Subj : Re: Bad behaviour not wanted.
To   : Dan Clough
From : Carol Shenkenberger
Date : Sat Feb 18 2023 03:05 pm

  Re: Re: Bad behaviour not wanted.
  By: Dan Clough to Carol Shenkenberger on Sun Dec 11 2022 06:28 pm

 > -=> Carol Shenkenberger wrote to Dan Clough <=-
 > 
 >  CS>   Re: Re: Bad behaviour not wanted.
 >  CS>   By: Dan Clough to August Abolins on Thu Nov 17 2022 07:54 am
 > 
 >  >  DC> complete and utter clusterf**k.  Effectively not readable
 >  >  DC> due to format mangling, lack of quoting, and general
 >  >  DC> stupidity.
 > 
 >  >  AA> You keep ignoring the fact that your first instance of a
 >  >  AA> complaint in LITRGP was based on a quoting issue due to
 >  >  AA> Aftershock, and not Tg. I agree with your latter point though;
 >  >  AA> since your participation, stupidity has emerged.
 > 
 >  > I don't know (or care) what Aftershock is, and either way, whether it's
 >  > that or TG, or both, the end result is:  The echo is trashed and
 >  > basically un-useable by those using "traditional" Fidonet software /
 >  > message reading tools.  Your claim that I'm stupid is just sour grapes
 >  > at being called out on it.  Anyone can see that I'm telling the truth by
 >  > simply trying to read messages in that group.  It's that simple,
 >  > simpleton.
 > 
 >  CS> Dan, can you tell me why my ASIAN_LINK never had that?  We were
 >  CS> in the first few, and we welcome Telegram users.  There have been
 >  CS> no issues otherthan a few *early* ones that caused odd tear
 >  CS> lines.  They did not affectoperations and were quickly patched by
 >  CS> Stas.
 > 
 > Have you considered checking/reading echomail more often than once a
 > month?  I've been all through this and don't feel like re-hashing it yet
 > again.  Read the complete thread.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > ... All the easy problems have been solved.
 > === MultiMail/Linux v0.52

Why should I Dan?  If you can't explain it, then it never happened.

  xxcarol
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
 * Origin: Shenk's Wandering Star (1:275/1000)

.