Subj : Re: Food for Thoughts
To   : Dan Clough
From : Gerrit Kuehn
Date : Sat Sep 27 2025 10:42 pm

Hello Dan!

27 Sep 25 14:26, Dan Clough wrote to Gerrit Kuehn:


 GK>> Going purely ad hominem instead of talking about the actual content?
 GK>> Come on, that's too easy. You can do better than that.

 DC> Well, I actually *WAS* commenting on the actual content.  The other 
 DC> poster was extolling the opinion of the fake "physicist", and I was 
 DC> discounting his qualifications.  Completely referencing the actual 
 DC> content.  Pffffffffttttt.

Weill, the minor parts of the content in that case. Anyways, who decides who is a "fake" physicist and who is not? 


Regards,
Gerrit

.... 10:42PM  up 295 days,  4:49, 10 users, load averages: 1.04, 0.84, 0.76

--- msged/fbsd 6.3 2021-12-02
 * Origin: America asleep, since Mulberry's too long (2:240/12)

.