Subj : Re: The US election
To   : Rob Swindell
From : jimmylogan
Date : Sun Nov 10 2024 12:33 pm

-=> Rob Swindell wrote to jimmylogan <=-

 >  RS> No. The fact that different moral authorities among the human
 >  RS> population claim different, incompatible sets of moralities and that
 >  RS> these moralities have evolved and changed over the years, proves that.
 >  RS> There is not "one set of laws" (or morals) that rules all of mankind
 >  RS> now and forever. --

 > So does that mean that yours are not absolute either? And other can
 > have a differing opinion?

 RS> I think that's obvious.

 > So to me the life should be saved - that is no less a valid moral
 > claim that yours, right?

 RS> Sure. But I'm not wanting to force anyone to have an abortion, while
 RS> you're wanting to force others to have unwanted births. I don't think
 RS> morals have validity. A religion, socity, individual can believe that
 RS> the genitals of young women should be mutilated to prevent sexual
 RS> gratification. It's a moral belief that someone holds. Is it valid or
 RS> invalid? Who's to say. I know I don't want that for my family though,
 RS> so I vote against crap like that. --
 RS>                                             digital man (rob)

Okay. Since you don't see the unborn as valid life, then we'll never come
to an agreement. At least I know where you stand.




.... Please no deja vu; I don't want to go through that again.
--- MultiMail/Mac v0.52
 * Origin: Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com (1:105/7)

.