Subj : Routing files To : Steve Quarrella From : Paul Quinn Date : Sat Dec 08 2001 02:59 pm Hi! Steve, On 07 Dec 01 09:32, Steve Quarrella wrote to Paul Quinn: PQ>> I used various forms of FroDo for about 4 years with FastEcho PQ>> (FE). All mail _routing_ was handled via a FE route file, SQ> Move your underscores a bit : _Mail_ routing. In my case, I SQ> have a similar situation. I've used (and continue to use) FD here on SQ> 1:393/9005 for years, but file routing is a function of my ROUTE.FD. Mmm... maybe I have been using Binkley-style outbound (BSO) for too long, already. ;-) In a BSO situation, your tosser is the mail & files router. A true Binkley system has no equivalent to a Route.Fd file... unfortunately. SQ> Now that I'm using a Binkley-style outbound with Radius, I continue SQ> to do the ROUTE.FE thing, similar to what you do, but files SQ> themselves just sit in my inbound and go nowhere. It's conceivable that FE could leave the files in the inbound and just reference them, there, in the .FLO file(s). It still doesn't work, huh? BTW, I gave up on FroDo at about the time when JoHo introduced the 2.2x version with static outbound (queues?). I just never investigated what that was all about. So, if you're trying to shoehorn a FroDo static outbound with a BSO with Radius, I can't assist. SQ> So what is ol' Steve doin' wrong here? Forget FroDo... utterly. Dump it & go BSO only. :) Are you using different FE config files between the two systems? I don't wanna tell you how to suck the eggs, but you have told FE to use a 'Binkley/Xenia' mailer in FeSetup, now that you're toss/pack-ing mail to Radius' outbound? Cheers, Paul. --- BT-W32 2.60XEg6/BinkD-W32 0.9.5 * Origin: He's got a magnet! Everybody stand back! (ZMH only) (3:640/384) .