Subj : Re: Proposal to Keep WinXP Support "Alive"
To   : All
From : keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net
Date : Thu Jan 31 2019 07:14 pm

Path:
eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.PO
STED!not-for-mail
From: knuttle <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.windows-xp,alt.os.windows-xp,microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment,mi
crosoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Subject: Re: Proposal to Keep WinXP Support "Alive"
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 13:52:05 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <kb4vgl$tpj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <m36sc8dpovqpibrtvmcd7pvdq2kpu3m5i6@4ax.com>
<XnsA12C3B284ED20jj@88.198.244.100>
<669769ce-c1a1-4f17-90f0-68768fc8dab6@f4g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<kb38pt$h2i$1@dont-email.me> <e$DniHbm8Y1QFwST@soft255.demon.co.uk>
<kb4e3h$kna$1@dont-email.me> <aljbd8t6ijnslrc7i9n44nihuc69abei12@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 18:52:05 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="941613918a673457b5b7dffa63b339ec";
 logging-data="30515"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/5EMommXwHj7N5f/Syu/vs"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
In-Reply-To: <aljbd8t6ijnslrc7i9n44nihuc69abei12@4ax.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4KWyocgNT0VvV7ps7FIg7itjq5A=
Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.windows-xp:3999 alt.os.windows-xp:5408
microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment:2458
microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support:30872
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:106073

On 12/22/2012 10:17 AM, Char Jackson wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:54:56 -0500, knuttle
> <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> I am not against new things in the operating system. In fact I was using
>> OS/2 when most people were extolling the virtue of the first version of
>> Windows. Why because it was far superior to Windows.
>>
>> I gladly upgraded to XP as it was based on part of the code that made
>> OS/2 far superior and stable.
>>
>> However, why should I get excited about upgrading to a system that
>> assumes I am using a touch screen on my computer?
>
> That explains a lot about your attitude. You seem to have completely
> ignored the multiple mentions of being able to avoid the modern UI and
> using a standard desktop.
>

Blinded by your opinion, you missed the hole point of what I wrote
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
 * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx  //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)

.