Subj : Should EMulation.... To : Gamma Ray From : Gamma Ray Date : Tue Jul 04 2000 08:29 pm RE: Should EMulation.... BY: Gamma Ray to Hax0r on Wed Jul 05 2000 03:19 am > RE: Should EMulation.... > BY: Hax0r to Tinman on Thu Jun 08 2000 10:52 pm > > > RE: Should EMulation.... > > BY: Tinman to Hax0r on Thu Jun 08 2000 10:36 pm > > > > > It's funny, pearl jam is taking an interesting angle, thay are releas > > > new albums which thay are calling "official bootlegs", each album will > > > differant live proformance (PJ has always encouraged the tapeing of li > > > but thay say the fans always wind up with low quality music, so thay a > > > it easyer for them to get it, and get it good. > > > > Now, I am not a musician -- but I would tend to think that if I was, and > > fan either bought bootlegged concert shows or recorded them him/herself t > > would be flattered. I guess I just can't quite understand why sow many b > > are opposed to this concept. > > > > I guess it just proves to show that most musicians are not in it for the > > but rather for the $$$. > > > > > > I agree.. Completely. Even when, and IF all these musicians quit or dissap > because they feel their "art" is being stolen by trading, there will always > other who make the music to share with people, to influence, and associate > with peoples feelings, and dont do it for the money. I'm sure before Metall > was being paid HUGE bucks, they were doing it for the fun of making music, a > getting a rush out of others liking it. I really thik that the music indust > is one of the most bloated industries. That and sports. I dont think all t > money that flies around all of it is right at all. > -Gamma Ray Also.. in addition to what I wrote above... I understand that they would want to make money on their music, but instead of charging for the music, they should be charging for merchandise and ticket sales. theres PLENTY of money just on that. Charging for music is rediculous because its just so easily shared. -Gamma Ray .