Subj : Re: a small suggestion for future releases about mail size limit To : All From : HECTOR SANTOS Date : Thu Jan 31 2019 07:10 pm Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:44:19 -0400 From: HECTOR SANTOS To: CHRIS CRANFORD Subject: Re: a small suggestion for future releases about mail size limit Newsgroups: win.server.wish.list Message-ID: <1037807290.33.1037803538@winserver.com> References: <1037803538.33.1037801212@winserver.com> X-WcMsg-Attr: Rcvd X-Mailer: Wildcat! Interactive Net Server v7.0.454.5 Lines: 37 Well, he has a point. For a subscription based system, you can allow X size for one type of subscription/security profile versus another. It was always part of the futures list as part of the big change when we finally move the message databases to support long file names and possibly an alternative storage system that would better support "size options" on a per user basis. Right now, it would be a major server overhead to do the same thing. ---- wrote in message news:1037803538.33.1037801212@winserver.com... > Most mail servers that I'm familiar with have this as a global option. Just > out of curiousity, what would be the reasoning for having this available per > security profile instead of a common global mail server option? > > Chris > > wrote in message news:1037801212.33.0@winserver.com... > > Hello Hector & all, > > > > I would be nice if, in a future AUP, we could configure the maximum > > E-mail message size allowed pair access profile to be received or sent > > by an user. > > > > > > > > -------------------- > > Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS > http://www.netcava.net > > * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013) .