Subj : binkley multinode, was something new
To   : mark lewis
From : Richard Webb
Date : Thu Oct 15 2009 04:19 am

HI Mark,

following up a message from Richard Webb to mark lewis:

 RW> AS for routing, squish or his mail processor would handle
 RW> that as Bink is a static mailer.  SAme inbound/outbound dirs though
 RW> pointed to by all versions.

ml> hummm... therein lays the problem... can tossers handle multiple
ml> routings for static mail bundles?? FD can because it is dynamic in
ml> building its outbound stuffs but if a BSO style tosser cannot build
ml> multiple ?lo files indicating different "status'" for the same
ml> static outbound bundles for separate nodes, this may be a problem...

Also tough because most multinode setups I've seen they
shared inbound and outbound directories.  I.e. tosser builds one lot file, or 
the pkt if a raw pkt with the .out/cut/hut
extension, changed to pkt on the fly.

BUt then how do you keep different versions of fd from
clashing over who's manipulating the netmail area in this
situationn?

Another thing i just remembered which SEan may already
remember is that when running his telnet binkley that task
might want to use the noemsi config verb because iirc one
can't do zmodem and its variants over a telnet connection,
hence no zedzap.


Regards,
           Richard
--- timEd 1.10.y2k+
 * Origin: Radio REscue net operations BBS       (1:116/901)

.