Subj : Something new...
To   : Richard Webb
From : mark lewis
Date : Wed Oct 14 2009 07:08 pm


 RW> Much the same with binkley, the task number config parameter is
 RW> important here I"m sure.  ONly worked with one multinode
 RW> setup and that was many moons ago.  But, iirc. that's what
 RW> we did was a config for each node.  NOw mind you all three
 RW> were pots.

shouldn't really matter as long as each node can be config'd specially for the 
needs of that node...

 RW> AS for routing, squish or his mail processor would handle
 RW> that as Bink is a static mailer.  SAme inbound/outbound dirs though
 RW> pointed to by all versions.

hummm... therein lays the problem... can tossers handle multiple routings for 
static mail bundles?? FD can because it is dynamic in building its outbound 
stuffs but if a BSO style tosser cannot build multiple ?lo files indicating 
different "status'" for the same static outbound bundles for separate nodes, 
this may be a problem...

 RW> Back in the day there was lots of help in this echo for
 RW> getting multinode setups humming along nicely, especially
 RW> with os2, so anybody who's got this echo archived way back
 RW> could probably be quite a resource if you still have
 RW> trouble.

agreed... sadly, though, my archiving is more like a "live feed" in that my set 
up simply retains postings for a much longer time than others... currently 
that's only one year :?

)\/(ark

 
* Origin:  (1:3634/12)

.