Subj : Feature request
To   : Tommi Koivula
From : Michael Dukelsky
Date : Wed Jan 27 2016 07:04 pm

Hello Tommi,

Wednesday January 27 2016, Tommi Koivula wrote to Michael Dukelsky:

 BF>>>    Absolutely! Current as in the directory where your EXE-file
 BF>>> is located.

 MD>> Sorry, but I cannot agree. It is not good to have configuration
 MD>> files and executables in one directory. Microsoft used that bad
 MD>> practise in Windows 9x, but later they abandoned it.

 TK> In OS/2 I still prefer the directory where the executable is located.
 TK> Also the husky way would be ok, use environment variable for pointing
 TK> the config file.

Using an environment variable would be much better than any directory hardwired 
in the executable.

 TK> I have no problem with the current way; no default.

Neither do I.

Michael

.... node (at) f1042 (dot) ru
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20151128
 * Origin: Moscow, Russia (2:5020/1042)

.