Subj : Feature request
To   : Michael Dukelsky
From : Tommi Koivula
Date : Wed Jan 27 2016 05:09 pm

27 Jan 16 17:29, Michael Dukelsky wrote to Bjorn Felten:

 BF>>    Absolutely! Current as in the directory where your EXE-file is
 BF>> located.

 MD> Sorry, but I cannot agree. It is not good to have configuration files
 MD> and executables in one directory. Microsoft used that bad practise in
 MD> Windows 9x, but later they abandoned it.

In OS/2 I still prefer the directory where the executable is located. Also the 
husky way would be ok, use environment variable for pointing the config file.

I have no problem with the current way; no default.

'Tommi

--- GoldED+/EMX 1.1.5-b20151130
 * Origin: =========================================== (2:221/0)

.