Subj : Re: JAM versus Squish?
To   : Kurt Weiske
From : James Coyle
Date : Fri Nov 13 2015 08:31 pm

 KW> I'm running Synchronet now with its proprietary message base. I'm
 KW> playing with Mystic and debating whether JAM or SQUISH (and their
 KW> respective tossers) are a better choice. Does anyone have experience
 KW> with both you'd like to share?

If you are going to use Mystic then you should use JAM because the author may
be removing Squish in the next version.  No one really uses Squish with Mystic.

 KW> I used Squish for years with Maximus, and miss the variety of third
 KW> party apps for stats, logging, netmail routing, etc. I know both have
 KW> third-party apps, any experience with those would be helpful, too.

I think JAM is considered to have better 3rd party support these days.  In the
case of Mystic, you don't need any 3rd party software as it has a tosser and
mailer built it, but you can still use 3rd party stuff if you want to.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A1 (Windows)
 * Origin: Sector 7 [Mystic BBS WHQ] (1:129/215)

.