Subj : Re: Synchronet vs. Mystic
To   : James Coyle
From : Jas Hud
Date : Mon May 09 2022 06:58 am

|03Quoting message from |11James Coyle |03to |11Dumas Walker
|03on |1105 May 22  17:14:50|03.

JC>  DW> > Menu Editor :)  ANSI files .... the rest is just there for bells an
JC>  DW> > to do what you want.  I highly doubt anyone would think of themselv
JC>  DW> > programmer to use Mystic.
JC>  DW> 
JC>  DW> It would not matter if they were or not because it is not open source
JC> 
JC> You can change everything Mystic displays easily within the editors withou
JC> any programming.


that's nothing special. everyone has that.

JC> No one is running custom hacked versions of Synchronet for the same reason
JC> because like Mystic, they both provide the capability to be extended throu
JC> configuration and scripting.
JC> 


that is incorrect.  their are people that run their own versions with their
own specific changes to synchronet. it's not 'hacked', it's just their own 
personal preferences that they run on their own system.

JC> The idea that you need to modify source code to customize your BBS is a le
JC> over concept from the 1980 WWIV sysops.
JC> 


it's called having options.

--- Renegade v1.30/DOS
 * Origin: The Titantic BBS Telnet - ttb.rgbbs.info (1:129/305)

.