Subj : QSL, eQSL
To   : Daryl Stout
From : August Abolins
Date : Mon Nov 01 2021 11:18 pm

On 11/1/2021 2:54 PM, between "Daryl Stout": August,

> ...it's just easier and cheaper to 
> eQSL (QSL electronically). But, not every area has internet access, and
> in some countries, all content (internet and otherwise) is heavily
> regulated and "spied on" by goverment entities.

Too bad for the lack of internet access. eQSL wouldn't help in that situation.


> Usually, ham radio operators send their cards to a QSL Bureau, for
> processing, as it's much cheaper than doing it on their own. Yet, with
> the US Postal Service now taking a minimum of 5 days to deliver First
> Class Mail...along with several reports of losing mail (I've experienced
> that)...folks are doing eQSL's now.

Why even bother with a 3rd-party eQSL?  Why not just email contact/log info direct via email?
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
 * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)

.