Subj : Re: Genuine History? To : paul lee From : Bbsing Bbs Date : Mon Dec 28 2020 01:22 am Re: Re: Genuine History? By: paul lee to Bbsing Bbs on Sun Dec 27 2020 10:51 am > BB> > His intelligence is not derived from actual knowledge, rather it's a > BB> > reflection of his character and poise that has always been > BB> > When you dig in, I think any human would agree that that character i > BB> > positive attribute. It could be called narcissistic, > BB> > He should have never been a President of the United States of Americ > BB> > because of the lack of moral, character and empathy that > BB> > BB> I think itelligence is normally an assesment by an intelligence test. I > BB> hasbeen proven that individuals with higher intelligence > BB> usually have a more sucess. The sucess is often measured in wealth. I > BB> can'ttell you our President's intelligence, I haven't seen > BB> any test results, but I can make fair assumptions based on his success > BB> by whatmost measure in many countries, and that is wealth. > > I can even go further and agree with you that President Trump is intelligent > > BB> I for one can't agree that his character is specifically one of > BB> narcissist anymore than our past president, or many other > BB> presidents of countries, or corperations. > > I cannot agree with this, however. :P The man isn't a narcissist?! The only > uld come to the conclusion that its all about him. Let alone if you watch hi > > BB> I can say the major media corperations are running a psyops information > BB> war onthe american people. > > I agree with you 100%. I don't know what it more disgusting, the actions of > ot to read between their lines, either... while they absolutely lean to the > > BB> I've never witnessed so many people eager to trash their country's > BB> president.Its interesting to see the main stream media sending > BB> the message and the people parating the message. Even making claims of > BB> psycological assements, and intelligence assements that I > BB> can't see how they obtained data normally obtained by long test. > > You know... I've heard this from the right over the course of the Presidency > he right will do when Biden takes office. Again, I think the onus here is on > merica. They are disgusting... the left, the right, politicians and those in > > > > |07p|15AULIE|1142|07o > |08......... > > --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2020/11/23 (Raspberry Pi/32) > * Origin: 2o fOr beeRS bbS>>20ForBeers.com:1337 (1:105/420) Hi Paul, Sorry I have to bottom post the entire message. I do agree with you on many aspects. I do struggle with what I watch and see and try to determine the bias of myself and others. I've heard from friends of things about our president and parties, that I've never heard growing up. I've been told I'm niave as well, by indivuduals far younger than I. I think how interesting those who know less in life have more knowledge about things they have less experience with. So as I struggle with my bias and other bias, and the disinformation I am a general sceptic. Sometimes the question is one of what to do, and then the belief what an individual can do. Of course our discussion here (you and I) and anyone else in a civil way (not a facebook, old school flame-war way), is always a start and always healthy. Thanks for not flaming! :) It will really be interesting if Biden and when Biden takes office what will happen, how the main stream media will change, and what new miss direction will be usshered in. Things like the re-definition and over clasification of racism, or sexism, for almost anything anyone wants to use in a zero-sum outcome, has been devistating on the psychology of many individuals. During the Obamma era, I was very un-aware of the general politics. I was so wrapped up in my life, and technology, and after 911, I really stayed away. But then I had a bit of stake in the game, where new things impacted my ability to prepare for my long term future, and I also saw the world directly by setting foot in other countries than my country of origin. People's opinions of Trump, and Biden, and Hillary Clinton are very interesting to me. How they determine their party/candidate choice. What they say about who they like and don't like and what to do in the event they don't like someone, and how they derive at statements like paraphrased: if you don't vote, you just gave a vote to the opposing party. (which is impossible in that case, but worked will in brexit, and then other initatives campeign companies working with datascience companies put together to manipulate masive groups of people). I like hearing about your thoughts Paul. --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux * Origin: Electronic Warfare BBS | telnet:\\bbs.ewbbs.net (1:227/201) .