Subj : Re: Quid Pro Quo - Joe
To   : GREGORY DEYSS
From : TIM RICHARDSON
Date : Fri Dec 27 2019 09:08 am

On 12-26-19, GREGORY DEYSS said to DALE SHIPP:

GD>On 26 Dec 2019, Dale Shipp said the following...


GD>You sound very much like the Wizard of Oz, the guy pulling levers, behind
GD>the curtain, proclaiming there is nothing to see here.


GD>What is wrong with the President asking about what really happened there.
GD>Nothing, because it is written within the U.S. Constitution that he must.


GD>That did not stop the Democrats, from impeaching the President based upon
GD>that inquiry, w/ what was said within the phone call with that nations
GD>leader. Normally at the back-end of an impeachment there are evident
GD>crimes that are known but at the end of this impeachment there are no
GD>crimes that were committed by the President that would indicate the reason
GD>why he was impeached. No crimes what so ever.


Pelosi is withholding the articles of impeachment from the Senate for a number
of good reasons of her own.


First of all I thnk she knows it isn't going far in the Senate.


Secondly, I think she has the notion she can stretch this out to the election
next year and make it an issue of 2020.


But something few people realize; Pelosi's own son made money in a Ukraine
company trading on his mother's position.


Also there was a democrat who pushed hard for impeachment, who's husband made
around $700,000 from a Ukrainian who was accused of ordering contract murders!


There is a lot that would come out that wouldn't reflect well on some
democrats if Pelosi hands this to the Senate and Trump insists on a trial to
bring witnesses.


There's more at stake for the democrats than Trump if it goes to the Senate
for trial.


Plus....getting to the Senate would be a much different situation than in
front of the democrat-controlled committees in the House; in the Senate it
would be much like a courtroom trial. presided over by the Chief Justice.


The democrat `house managers' would be the prosecutors, and Trump is entitled
to a legal team who can cross examine democrat witnesses; call witnesses of
their own; present their own evidence; etc.


I strongly suspect that, if it comes to that, the only thing the democrats
will be able to say is; they impeached Trump. But this is going to turn out to
be one of the worst days democrats ever saw!


They do not have one single fact witness. Only hear-say witnesses, and a pack
of academics who's best contribution was out-right Trump hate!


Their so-called `whistleblower' can't testify to anything. If they could Adam
Schitt would have been waving him like a victory flag!


---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)

.