Subj : Re: Quid Pro Quo - Joe
To   : Dale Shipp
From : Gregory Deyss
Date : Thu Dec 26 2019 07:28 am

On 26 Dec 2019, Dale Shipp said the following...
 
 DS>  -=> On 12-25-19  08:20,  Gregory Deyss <=-
 DS>  -=> spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Quid Pro Quo - Joe <=-
 DS> 
 DS>  GD> It is obvious, the prosecutor that was fired was
 DS>  GD> investigating Hunter
 DS>  GD> and the gas and oil company that Hunter was
 DS>  GD> serving on the board on.
 DS> 
 DS>  DS> Nope -- the investigation of Burisa had been concluded and put on the
 DS>  DS> shelf.  Plus, Hunter Biden was not under investigation.  That prosecu
 DS>  DS> was fired because he was corupt.
 DS> 
 DS>  GD> Ukraine is the most corrupt place on the planet.
 DS>  GD> 
 DS>  GD> Follow the money and it will lead to the truth. 
 DS> 
 DS> Exactly.  The possible withholding of the billion dollar loan guarentee
 DS> was to get the corrupt procecutor fired.  That was the truth then and it
 DS> is still the truth, no matter how people try to spin it into something
 DS> else.
 DS> 
 DS>  GD> If the prosecutor was corrupt as you have suggested, then why was a
 DS>  GD> billion dollars used in typical Quid Pro Quo fashion.
 DS> 
 DS> To get him fired and to help clean up the Ukrainian corruption.
 DS> 
 DS>  GD> This is not open for debate when there is video-graphic evidence of
 DS>  GD> Joe Biden talking about what transpired. 
 DS> 
 DS> There is, but you are putting the exact opposite spin on what happened
 DS> and WHY.  It was done as an official policy of the US Government and our
 DS> allies.  It was not done for any individual's personal gain.

You left out the part that talks about the prosecutor who was fired was
investigating Hunter Biden and Burisa because the CEO of that company had
direct ties to leadership with the country of Ukraine. 

You sound very much like the Wizard of Oz, the guy pulling levers, behind the
curtain, proclaiming there is nothing to see here.

What is wrong with the President asking about what really happened there. 
Nothing, because it is written within the U.S. Constitution that he must.

That did not stop the Democrats, from impeaching the President based upon that
inquiry, w/ what was said within the phone call with that nations leader.

Normally at the back-end of an impeachment there are evident crimes that are
known but at the end of this impeachment there are no crimes that were
committed by the President that would indicate the reason why he was
impeached. No crimes what so ever. 

     . ______  ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿  ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿  ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿  ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿
   _[]_³³Äij³  ³ Fidonet ³  ³FSX  Net³  ³ Trump ³  ³ Another Message ³ 
  { NET 267 ³  ³1:267/150³  ³21:1/127³  ³ Train ³  ³   by Gregory    ³
 / 00ÄÄÄÄ00'-¨€ÀÄ00ÄÄÄ00ÄÙ¨€ÀÄ00ÄÄ00ÄÙ¨€ÀÄ00Ä00ÄÙ¨€ÀÄÄ00ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ00ÄÄÄÙ

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Windows/64)
 * Origin: Capital Station BBS * telnet://csbbs.dyndns.org * (1:267/150)

.