Currently released so far... 243 / 251,287

### Articles

Brazil

### Browse by release date

2010/11

### Browse by creation date

66 72 79 86 89 90 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02
1979/08
1986/05
1989/12
1990/01
2004/01 2004/12
2005/03 2005/05 2005/06 2005/12
2006/04 2006/08 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D H I J K L M P R S T U
Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bishkek Embassy Berlin Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad
Embassy Cairo Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Doha Embassy Damascus Consulate Dubai
Embassy Harare
Iran RPO Dubai Consulate Istanbul
Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kabul
Embassy London
Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Manama Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich
Embassy Prague Embassy Paris Embassy Panama
Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh
Secretary of State Embassy Sanaa Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa
USEU Brussels UNVIE

### Browse by tag

A B C E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U X Y Z
AE ASEC AM AF AR AU AORC AJ AG
BA BR BH BY BU
CVIS CH CASC CF COUNTERTERRORISM CD CV
ETRD ECON ELAB EFIN ENRG EG ETTC EPET EINV EFIS EXTERNAL EAID EUN EU ECUN EAIR EZ EAGR ELTN ECPS
FR
GM GG GR GOI GE GA
HO
IR IAEA IS IZ INRB IN IRAJ IQ IT
JO JA
KNNP KHLS KJUS KDEM KSPR KPKO KUNR KWBG KWMN KPAL KCRM KU KG KHIV KPRP KZ KN KTFN KGHG KSCA KMDR KPAO KCOR KACT KIRF KS KTIA KISL
LE LY LG
MNUC MPOS MARR MU MASS MOPS MCAP MOPPS MK MAR MTCRE MY ML MR
NATO NG
OPDC OEXC OIIP OVIP OPRC OTR OTRA
PGOV PREL PARM PTER PINR PHUM PINS PREF PM PEPR PROP PK PBIO PA PBTS PECON POLITICAL PARTIES
QA
RU RS RW
SA SYR SY SO SU SF SCUL SM SNAR SOCI SENV SP SG
TRGY TU TI TX TC TSPA
US UZ UE UK UNESCO UP UNSC UV
XF XA
YM
ZP ZR ZF ZI

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page

### Viewing cable 10MUSCAT71, OMANI GOVERNMENT REACTS STRONGLY TO SUGGESTION OF PATRIOT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10MUSCAT71.
Help us extend and defend this work

Reference ID | Date | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | ---
10MUSCAT71 | 2010-02-02 14:02 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Muscat

`

    VZCZCXYZ0000
    OO RUEHWEB

    DE RUEHMS #0071/01 0331443
    ZNY CCCCC ZZH
    O 021443Z FEB 10
    FM AMEMBASSY MUSCAT
    TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1190
    INFO RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL IMMEDIATE
    RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
    GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL COLLECTIVE
    RHBVAKS/COMUSNAVCENT
    RHMFISS/COMUSAFCENT SHAW AFB SC

` `

    C O N F I D E N T I A L MUSCAT 000071

    SIPDIS

    E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/02/02
    TAGS: PREL MARR MOPS IR MU
    SUBJECT: OMANI GOVERNMENT REACTS STRONGLY TO SUGGESTION OF PATRIOT
    OFFER

    CLASSIFIED BY: Richard Schmierer, Ambassador, Department of State,
    Embassy Muscat; REASON: 1.4(A), (B), (D)

    ¶1. (C) Summary:  A recent New York Time's (NYT) article describing
    Patriot missile deployment to countries in the Gulf in order to
    counter Iran, assuage Israel, and reassure our Gulf partners has
    been disquieting to the Omani Government.  There has never been an
    official USG offer of Patriots to Oman, due in large part to the
    GoO's rejection of any undertaking that might include or would
    imply the presence of Patriot missiles here.  Oman's close
    partnership with the USG, particularly through the Base Access
    Agreement (BAA), is contingent on maintaining an extremely low
    profile and continuing the Sultanate's foreign policy objective of
    carefully balancing public perception of its relationships with the
    U.S. and Iran.  Press of this sort, however unintended, makes it
    extremely difficult for Oman to maintain that balance.  End
    Summary.

    Press Articles on Missile Defense in the Gulf

    --------------------------------------------- ----------

    ¶2. (U) A NYT article appeared on January 30 titled "U.S. Speeding
    Up Missile Defenses in Persian Gulf," which quoted General Petraeus
    as saying that Patriot missile batteries would be located in four
    gulf countries, and noted that Saudi Arabia already has Patriots.
    An unnamed military official named the countries as Qatar, the UAE,
    Bahrain and Kuwait.   The version of this article syndicated by the
    NYT news service includes the sentence "Oman, which has always been
    sensitive about perceptions that it is doing U.S. bidding, has also
    been approached, but there is no deployment of Patriots there,
    according to U.S. officials."  (Note:  That sentence does not/not
    appear in the version currently available via the NYT website, and
    it is unclear to post if it appeared in the print edition on
    January 31; the syndicated version of the article is otherwise not
    substantially different from the NYT original.  End Note).   The
    item was picked up by regional press on January 31, quoting the NYT
    article and specifically noting that "Oman has declined the offer."
    On February 2, the private English daily "Times of Oman" carried a
    front page article titled "Missile Shield: Oman denies receiving
    any offer from US."  In it, Sayyid Badr al Busaidi, Secretary
    General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), is quoted as
    saying, "the Sultanate's position on such matters is firm and that
    it does not ... enter into alliances or axis (sic) against any
    state."  He stressed that Oman "does not allow its territory to be
    used to carry out any military operations against any country in
    the region."

    Oman is not Interested

    ------------------------------

    ¶3. (C) The Embassy has no record of a formal offer of Patriot
    missiles made to Oman by the USG.  However, a number of discussions
    have occurred in which USG intent was to gauge Omani interest in
    collective missile defense capability.  Oman has consistently shown
    a lack of interest and has politely declined to engage in
    substantive discussions on "shared early warning" systems,
    "integrated air defense,"  or "collective defense."  (Note:  This
    is likely due to its assessment that Iran does not pose an imminent
    threat, its desire to not needlessly antagonize Iran, and its
    distrust of fellow GCC members, making it unwilling to share data
    within that group.  End Note.)  Further, in official
    correspondence, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) rejected an offer for
    a "Missile and Air Defence Working Group" on February 6, 2009;
    rejected further offers for an "Air and Missile Defense Shared
    Early Warning (SEW) System" on March 30, 2009, citing Oman's
    "unwillingness to commit itself to a SEW"; and on July 22, 2009
    again rejected any participation in the "Air Defense Missiles
    Advanced Warning System" project.

    Direct Omani Reaction

    -----------------------------

    ¶4. (C) The Omani Royal Office made contact with the Embassy on
    February 2 to express strong concern about the article and its
    repercussions, as that office had just received a pointed inquiry
    from the Sultan on this matter.  In a follow-up discussion embassy
    officer provided the history of discussions on the issue, of which
    the Royal Office was previously unaware, due to what was described

    as a "lack of lateral coordination within the GoO."

    ¶5. (C) Comment:  The strength of Oman's immediate reaction, and the
    level at which it transpired, is reflective of the tremendous
    seriousness with which this matter is viewed by the GoO.  It is
    likely that one of the goals of Badr's media statement was to
    protect the U.S./Omani relationship, as any belief that the U.S.
    would attempt to utilize Omani territory in this way could
    potentially cause a public backlash that would jeopardize other
    aspects of our relationship.  The deployment of Patriots to Oman,
    especially with the goal of countering the Iran threat, would run
    completely counter to Oman's publicly-stated foreign-policy
    objectives.  Although they do not find the threat imminent, Iran is
    Oman's number one strategic threat; however, the GoO fundamentally
    believes the threat can be mitigated through careful management of
    the relationship.  Therefore, the GoO works very deliberately to
    create a  public perception of balance in its relationships with
    the U.S. and Iran.  Oman's security strategy of keeping a low
    public profile in general has been threatened by the attention
    brought by the NYT article, and the GoO is working to manage the
    message for the public.  End Comment.
    Schmierer

`