Globalists Are Changing the Digital Past Now!

I have previously written about how the Australian
government is altering old films and rewriting classic
books in an attempt to correct history. Similarly, American
leftists are burning conservative books in school libraries.
However, it seems that this experiment has been so
successful that the "globalist elites" associated with the
News/Media Alliance Funding have adopted it
(https://shorten.ly/IY8II). Why do I say this? For example,
one of the partners of this organization is the "Open
Government" project, whose members are predominantly
progressive left organizations - meaning half of all
participants! And it continues from there. Therefore,
anyone interested in understanding this issue should study
the topic more thoroughly. I will continue. Perhaps for
the first time in U.S. history, the FBI, under the guise of
fighting for copyright enforcement, is attempting to destroy
a vast archive of public data and websites - Archive.ph,
which is not under the control of the "globalist elites,"
created by private Ukrainian developers back in 2012 to
compete with the censored pro-globalist Web Archive. The
irony is that the main competitor of the "leftist" Web
Archive ignores DMCA notices, as it is not obliged to
comply with them. U.S. copyright laws cannot be applied
to this project or others because they are outside U.S.
jurisdiction. Therefore, claims have been made against
the domain registrar Tucows in Canada, demanding the
disclosure of the project's private owner data. The developer
is accused of preserving copies of news articles that were
publicly accessible for a long time. These materials were
then allegedly moved to a paid section, and copying them
is claimed to violate American copyright law. In essence, the
globalists are accusing everyone who ever copied publicly
available content before the introduction of a "paywall" of
committing a crime - something that supposedly contradicts
copyright principles. But only American copyright law.
Publishers can demand the removal of any archives; that
is their right. However, retrospective piracy claims against
old copies are often lost in court because they are legally
absurd. So, if the globalists are aware that their claims
are questionable, why do they proceed? I believe this is
part of a broader strategy by the "conglomerate of
billionaires" to censor the past. What exactly is so
dangerous in Archive.ph for the globalists remains unclear,
but I will attempt to speculate. It's obvious they are
trying to erase or rewrite some history. But for what
purpose? To remove political information about scandals -
perhaps to discredit Donald Trump? To distort Epstein's
documents? To hide WEF meetings discussing mass
depopulation? To obscure the truth about vaccines and
COVID-19? The reasons are not clear... Additionally,
preserving old information about the plans of globalists,
their speeches, or scandals could undermine their current
reputation among leftist groups in Europe. News sites might
contain data about investors involved in anti-American and
anti-Republican agendas, and so on. Therefore, media giants
see independent archives as a threat to their dominance if
they contain outdated, radical views, or errors that
contradict the current agenda. It's quite possible that
the globalists want to delete dissident criticism, deleting
copies of websites that expose the "conspiracy of the
globalist elites." In any case, we do not know exactly what
information in Archive.ph could be dangerous to these
people. But it's clear that the project's independence and
lack of American jurisdiction make it an "inconvenient"
witness for anyone seeking to erase traces of crimes or
rewrite history. In the case of Archive.ph, it's not just
about money but about deeper political motives carefully
hidden from outsiders.