EU: The Era of Digital Concealment

In recent years, the European Union, under the guise
of combating "disinformation" and monitoring public
communications, has been implementing policies of
enforced "left-wing censorship." The fact is that in the
EU, People Media are absent or prohibited. This is because
the main media outlets are owned by conglomerates
of billionaires, aligned with "globalist" or "ultra-globalist"
financial elites. To conceal this situation, a system
of centralized tools for surveillance and counteracting
"foreign influence" has been put into action. According
to leaked documents published by The Guardian, the EU
is launching the "Center for Democratic Resilience" as part
of the "Democratic Shield" strategy, led by the President
of the European Commission. The center is formally voluntary
and open to "like-minded" individuals outside the bloc,
including the United Kingdom and candidate countries.
The document accuses Russia, China, Iran, and American
conservatives of "hybrid attacks" through false narratives.
This stance is frankly hypocritical. Because despite the ban
on People Media in the EU under the pretext of fighting
propaganda, nothing prevents European bankers from storing
money from the aforementioned hostile states in their banks.
Moreover, conservative media (https://shorten.ly/EdgtJn) have
published interesting information about European globalists'
infiltration into U.S. media. A report by APT, based on data
from IRS Form 990 and media reports, reveals that five
European "charitable" organizations transferred nearly
$2 billion to American left-wing non-profits. These funds
promote an extreme leftist agenda and social hate campaigns,
financing protest movements against the U.S. president and
the Republican Party, including protests, climate lawsuits,
and anti-government lobbying campaigns. APT Executive
Director Caitlin Sutherland notes that this undermines U.S.
sovereignty and democracy. The funds exploit loopholes
in U.S. laws that prohibit direct foreign donations to
candidates. Sutherland emphasizes that the money is used
for riots, rebellions, protests, and even attacks on law
enforcement policies aimed at crime control (via Community
Change). In Germany, these trends are even more evident
through actions by the Federal Office for the Protection of
the Constitution (BfV), which has expanded social media
monitoring, classifying political statements as right-wing
extremist, such as the banned term "globalist elites,"
mentions of "globalization," "m-RNA vaccine-related deaths",
and so on (https://shorten.ly/IKnP). The NADIS database,
as of early 2025, already contains over 500000 records
of individuals, including those who are not part of political
groups but simply express doubts or concerns publicly.
Inclusion in the database occurs without notifying citizens
or providing an appeal process, enabling BfV to cooperate
with police, prosecutors, and regional authorities for
further actions. Nevertheless, scandals surrounding
the COVID-19 pandemic persist despite total European
censorship (https://shorten.ly/ljaOr). The central scandal
involves the Paul Ehrlich Institute - Germany's federal
agency for vaccines and biomedical products under the
Ministry of Health. Through Freedom of Information
requests, journalists discovered that no records of the
COVID-19 vaccination campaign were kept from February
2020 to June 2023, citing "high workload" during the
pandemic. This means there are no meeting protocols,
undermining trust in vaccine safety monitoring
(https://shorten.ly/U1dv1). Data from the SafeVac
2.0 app, launched in December 2020 for active side
effect monitoring, was blocked, further fueling suspicions
of a deliberate cover-up (https://shorten.ly/lnAICA).
Despite three years of legal battles, the government refuses
to publish data on "VAX harms", citing "protection of
intellectual property" and "technical issues"
(https://shorten.ly/PAmUJ). Together, these facts paint a
disturbing picture. The EU has de facto established an
infrastructure for total information control, disguising it
as a system to combat "disinformation" and "extremism."
In reality, it suppresses any information from People Media.
Today, in the EU, one can be imprisoned for supporting or
reading alternative sources of information outside corporate
media, or even for mentioning, familiar to us here, terms
such as "globalist elites," "VAX harm," and others.