Subject: SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 61 - JULY 7, 99 PILOT POSTS TO ARS/ACT
Date: 7 Jul 1999 04:00:19
From: pilot@echelon.alias.net (The Pilot)
Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology

POST61.txt

SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 61 - JULY 7, 99 PILOT POSTS TO ARS/ACT

A short set of posts to let everybody know that I am alive
and well and to stay on top of things.  The last 4 only
went to ACT, the remainder went to both newsgroups.

==========================================

Contents:

 subj : Super Scio - A Big Thank You
 subj : Super Scio - On Targets (Attn Kim Baker)
 subj : Super Scio - Call Me Pilot
 subj : Super Scio - To Nile On Golden Disks
 subj : Super Scio - URL For The BofA Story
 subj : Super Scio - IF THEY HAD ANY SENSE
 subj : Super Scio - On Name Dropping (Attn Warrior, JimDBB)
 subj : Super Scio - About Book Copyrights & Net Publishing (Attn Croesus)
 subj : Super Scio - To Tilman On Spam Pages
 subj : Super Scio - An OT Outing (Attn Rogers etc.)
 subj : Super Scio Tech - Worth Saying Again (Attn Alan)
 subj : Super Scio Tech - Locational OT (Attn Oleg, Homer, etc.)
 subj : Super Scio Tech - TECH BREAKTHROUGH

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - A Big Thank You

A BIG THANK YOU

This is to say thank you to all of you who offered help and
support on ARS, ACT, and other lines.

There are just too many to acknowledge individually, but I
wanted you all to know that each one helped immensly.

It lets me go forward with confidence and good feelings.

It is greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - On Targets (Attn Kim Baker)

ON TARGETS (Attn Kim Baker)

On 3 Jul 99, Antony Phillips <ivy@post8.tele.dk> posted
"Fwd: To Pilot from Kim Baker"

# Kim Baker has asked me to post this to a.c.t,  Ant

<snipped for brevity>

>-----------------------------------------
>To Pilot from Kim Baker (for a.c.t)
>
>Dear Pilot,
>
>I came to hear about what happened with regard to your
>wife "outing" you to the CoS, in a roundabout way. This
>event, as Ralph Hilton pointed out, is not a minor deal,
>it is a graphic example of the kinds of betrayals that
>take place, between friends and family, inside the CoS,
>a lot of the time (or at least did in my experience
>of being in the CoS from 1990 - 1994). This is why I
>have always drawn the parallel to Nazism, with respect to *this*
>aspect, in that children, spouses, friend, family all report
>on each other to the SS, I mean, SO.

The parallel is there, and it is a complete violation of
Scientology as it was in the 1950s.  It is asking for
continuous violations of the Code of Honor among other
things.

>You fall into their "category A" type targets - highly
>visible, high public profile, and widely respected,
>on all sides of the fence.

Exactly.  When I first started posting, I was not
category A and was quite in danger.  Now I think I
will be fine.  If they make an example of me the backlash
would be fantastic.

>There's only one way they can reduce the power of your
>impact (an "impingement" DM is surely green with
>envy over). In my opinion, it is to get you to
>dead agent yourself. Now you're obviously a LOT more
>savvy, wiser, and experienced than those of us who have
>smashed themselves on the rocks on this particular one,
>in the past (you're talking to an expert at that here, ;-) )
>but I just want to bring it to your attention, to keep
>in mind while you "hold your position in space".

Yes, the key to this one is holding position without
flinching or running around like a chicken without a
head.  That is why all the offers of support were so
important to me.  Because they were made, I know that
I have backup and the org knows as well, so the likelyhood
of actually needing to call on it is very low.  If the
offers hadn't been made, I would be worried and I might
actually need the help.

>They will use your wife to bring pressure on you, they
>will even resort to hurting her (even though she's
>on "their" side

I have ample justification for ignoring the matter.  And
that makes such an action on their part into a valueless
activity which could backlash badly.

>I am however fully confident that you will not land in that
>type of position, though. I just wanted to say it,
>as I tried to warn Bob Minton in the past. In
>my opinion, they use that mental strain of "the perceived
>threat is as effective as the actual threat" - approach,
>based on Clausewitz, Sun Tsu, etc., to unhinge one.
>Sometimes, they deliberately wait, letting you sweat,
>before coming for you. My advise would be to refresh-read Sun Tzu, or
>even Clausewitz, in order to "know your enemy", which "as-is's" it
>very well. (grin) Advice from a squirt.

Excellent advice.

Speaking of perceived threats, I wonder if they have started
the mass sec checking yet to see who is under my influence.

>Anyway. It's said. Back into retirement for me.
>Oh, just one more thing - you have my utmost respect
>and admiration for the remarkable undertaking you
>have achieved. I'm somewhat permanently allergic
>to the "tech", myself, preferring to use just good
>old Life as my "process", but I respect what you
>have done, and the integrity with which you have done
>it. Stay true to yourself.
>
>With love,
>
>Kim Baker

Thank you,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - Call Me Pilot

CALL ME PILOT (Attn Heidrun)

On 1 Jul 99, Heidrun Beer <concern@atnet.at> responded to my
post on "Super Scio - PILOT IDENTITY REVEALED"

> On Thu, 1 Jul 1999 13:42:16 -0400 (EDT), The Pilot wrote in
> <X519990701T37470X12.3BR@somewhere.com>:
>
> >The person who turned me in is my wife Ann Tordai.
> >
> >Ann remains a loyalist and has been unwilling to hear about
> >or look at what I've been writing on the net, but she was
> >keeping quiet about me up until now.
> >
> >We have been estranged and planning to separate for quite
> >awhile now, but practicalities have prevented that and we
> >have been sharing the house in a sort of truce.
> >
> >Unfortunately I yelled at her Tuesday night about something
> >her cats had done and she called the org on Wednesday while
> >I was at work.
>
>
> Wow. WOW!!!!!
>
> Do we bet that they come down on her for waiting so long?

If they're smart they will handle her with kid gloves.  She is
another old timer and ex-staff member.  If they push too hard
she may open her eyes and realize that I was right all along.


> Please count on our support. Do we call you Ken now? We have
> a Ken already.

Better to keep calling me Pilot.  It has charisma and PR
value and is easy to remember.


> Do you have a photo for us?

No.  I've rarely been photographed.  I'm such an out PR
character.  Maybe I'll do one eventually and ask fza to
put it up.

> I guess the changed e-mail address
> will work for all the fan-mail you will have to expect?

It's still not valid.  I change it occasionally.  It says
very clearly at the end of my posts that I can't be reached
by email.

I do not use a mail server at my end and I don't want to
start.  As it is now I can post from any IP link without
using any other resources besides what is on my own system,
that way I avoid involving any innocent ISPs.

And I would hate to go to the trouble of all the annoying
cutting and pasting and clicking that is involved in using
a GUI interface.  As it is now, I will post this entire
batch with a single command from the command line once I
have finished typing them all up and reviewing them.

It is not really a forged address (no attempt to pretend
to be anybody else), simply a mythical one as is the case
with anon addresses.


> God, what a story!
>
> Much love,
>
> Heidrun Beer
>
> Workgroup for Fundamental Spiritual Research and Mental Training
> http://www.sgmt.at

Affinity,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - To Nile On Golden Disks

TO NILE ON GOLDEN DISKS

On 6 Jul 99, nile-eb@iname.com (Nile Evil Bastard) posted
on subject "Golden disks"

> Today I received physical proof that golden disks are what give us
> visual images.
>
> --
> http://www.netizen.com.au/    http://www.caube.org.au/
>
> ALERT! Australian government attempts to censor Australian internet out of
> existence! - See http://www.efa.org.au/ for the gory details ...

Ho Ho, yes indeed.

I put the golden disk with its JPEGs and GIFs into my CD Rom
reader and the visual images do indeed appear on my screen.

Thank you for validating the LRH tech.  Finally we have scientific
proof.

Just lightening things up a bit since I don't really have time
to write one of my humor posts this time.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - URL For The BofA Story

URL FOR THE BOFA STORY

In article <3793295c.4557131@enews.newsguy.com>, Bern -
http://welcome.to/ars <welcome@bernie.us-inc.com> writes
>On 1 Jul 1999 04:00:16 pilot@echelon.alias.net (The Pilot) wrote:
>
>>LIFE SAVING PREMONITION
>
>>After the gun battle was over I went around to take a look and
>>that's when the Times reporter talked to me.  Of course he
>>misquoted everything I said and won a Pultzer prize for doing so.
>
>So what's the exact reference? And can it be found on the net?
>
>Good thing you thought about taking the dog with you. One should
>always listen to one's intuition

Last time I looked it was on

http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/REPORTS/PULITZER_98/N_HOLLYWOOD/violent_script.htm

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - IF THEY HAD ANY SENSE

IF THEY HAD ANY SENSE

On 5 Jul 99, welcome@bernie.us-inc.com (Bern - http://welcome.to/ars)
responsed to my post on "Super Scio - CAN THEY DEAD AGENT ME"

> On 1 Jul 1999 04:00:12 pilot@echelon.alias.net (The Pilot) wrote:
>
> >CAN THEY DEAD AGENT ME
> >
> >Not likely.
>
> Instead of dead agenting, and if they are anywhere clever, they
> should give you some prominent official posts to lead up the reform -

Exactly.

> but I doubt you would even want to take on the job.

I want very much to see them reform.

I would primarily be concerned about false offers and hidden
traps and it should be obvious that I would not put myself
under anybody's control after what we have seen happening in
CofS.

But I would gladly lend my services as, shall we say, a
consultant on reform.  And actually I am doing that already
here on the newsgroup, except that they don't like it and I have
no official recognition.


> Bernie
> http://welcome.to/ars

CofS cannot survive unless they confront the Xemu story being
public knowledge.

It is just one incident.  The critics have no trouble using it
to push CofS's buttons.  Nobody gets sick.  It is not a big
deal unless they hide from it and make it into a big deal.

CofS cannot expand unless they retain the well wishes and
support of older members who have moved beyond the limitations
of the modern standard bridge.  To attack tech lovers who have
learned to think for themselves as squirrels and enemies is to
cut off their own roots so that they can grow no further.

And to shoot at every critical remark is just asking for
trouble.

Nothing to say of making "Scientolgist" a trademark so that
they can stop people from calling themselves Scientologists
and sueing people for spreading around the tech.  Do these
guys want to expand or do they want to bury the whole subject
in a hole in the ground?

If the guy from Xenu TV had been faced with smiling faces
waving for the camera and enjoying the publicity he would
have left.  And if he didn't, they would have gotten some
free publicity on the web about their nice event.  Instead
they turned it into a pissing contest.

If they had any damn sense at all they'd be listening to
me.

You can't survive by shooting at everything that moves and
resisting all change.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - On Name Dropping (Attn Warrior, JimDBB)

ON NAME DROPPING (Attn Warrior, JimDBB)

On 2 Jul 99, Warrior <warrior@entheta.net> responded to my
post on "Super Scio - NAME DROPPING"

> >And then in 1970 Bob Harvey showed up on a Sea Org mission,
>
> Bob married Ruthie Weissberg (another New Yorker). Ruthie has
> been married at least 4 times now. Her husbands have been Weissberg -
> father of David (who was put on the RPF as a child), Bob Harvey
> (one of the men whom, along with Arte Maren, alledgedly raped
> Lavenda), and Mike Silverman (former AOLA Registrar; now she
> goes by Ruthie Silverman Discher (according to Auditor Mag #278).

At that time in NY, he was married to Connie.

> >At one point Sue Tyrell (later a movie star) was receptionist,
> >David Gale (founder of MCBA and Real World Software) was
> >treasury, Glennis Duggan (Julie Lewis's mother), Wendal Dayton
>
> Do you mean Juliette Lewis, daughter of Geoff ("Every Which Way
> But Loose") Lewis?

Yes.

> >The Miraculous String Band gave a concert in the academy
>
> Incredible String Band - Mike Heron, Robin Williamson,
> Licorice McKechnie and Rose Simpson.

Correct.


> >I was introduced to Captain Bill once at an event.
>
> Met him at an attempted SO Mission into ASHO in 1976
> when Irene Dunleavy/Howey/Dirmann refused to turn over
> the org to him and Joan Robertson.

Without knowing anything about this, my immediate reaction
is to think that CBR was right and Irene was wrong, just
from what I've heard of both of them.

I think extremely well of Tony Dunleavy.  Very much a tech
person.

But not so well of Irene.  If I remember right, she was CS-1
(Commodore Staff in charge of HCO) at some point.  Wasn't
Dirmann an ethics officer under her?  A match made in heaven
(or in hellatrobus?).  Maybe I've been third partied, but my
impression is of crush ethics type people.

> >There were also a lot of people who later rose high in
> >the Sea Org.  My first senior was John Mustard (who later
>
> Also was Mfg Sec at Pubs US / Bridge Pubs for a long time.
> He was also one of the original SO Missionnaires (along with
> Irene Howey and others) to LA to establish ASHO over 30 years ago.

John was one of these warm and very capable people, a pleasure
to work for.

That makes me think of Al Yaeger who replaced John as Dissem
Sec at NY when John left for WW.  Anybody know if Marc Yaeger
(RTC last I heard unless he is blown) is related (a son
perhaps?)

Al was yet another warm and able character.  In fact, now
that I think about it, almost everybody was until the
crazyness hit New York in 68.

Although the nasty policies started coming out in 1965, the
average Scientologist used judgement, considered tech basics
to be senior to policy, remembered that "policy is a guiding
thing" rather than an absolute, and also considered it their
duty to be responsible rather than robotically obeying orders.

Therefore, policies that didn't seem right were simply
ignored.  Very non standard and very very workable.

And so the organization was full of warm and able people until
the Sea Org missions began to hit in 1968 and enforce policy
in a literal minded fashion.

The org had boomed incredibly during late 67 and early 68.
It was never that large again, nothing to say of achieving
that impossible rate of growth.  And it was done by making
everybody on staff study and apply tech and by ignoring policy.

I'm getting carried away here, sorry.

> >PPS. Last year somebody was politely asking about Robin
> >Alkins in a friendly manner.  She is alive and well and
> >working for CCHR (my wife is a big CCHR supporter).
>
> I think you meant Carrie Alkins.

I am deeply embarrassed.  And I had not forgotten or confused
their names.  It was just that after typing so much about
old New York, I just automatically wrote Robin's name since
I knew him so well when we were on staff together.  I didn't
meet Carrie until I came to LA, and of course that is who
I meant in the above.


> >PPPS. When I first came to LA I moved into apartment 107
> >at 1570 N. Edgemont (I haven't been there for years).
> >Mail for the Crivellos was still comming to my address.
> >I asked the landlady about a forwarding address.  That
> >is when I was told that Al had shot himself in my apartment
>
> This is so sad. I hadn't known what happened to Al after her
> was ordered to the RPF. The last time I saw him he was about
> 65 years old and running around the Cedars Complex in his
> RPF rags. Perhaps I'll post a picture of Al to a.b.s.

I hope that I didn't get the wrong first name.  I never
knew any of them.  But a detailed story was posted to ARS
a year or two ago.

===============

Also in response to my post, jimdbb@aol.com (JimDBB) asked

> >Subject: Super Scio - NAME DROPPING
> >From: pilot@echelon.alias.net (The Pilot)
>
> >At one point Sue Tyrell (later a movie star) was receptionist,
> >David Gale (founder of MCBA and Real World Software) was
> >treasury, Glennis Duggan (Julie Lewis's mother), Wendal Dayton
> >(Sky Dayton's father), and all sorts of other interesting
> >names were on board.
>
> Would this David Gale  be Philip Gale's father?

Certainly.

> This was a very interesting post.  Yes, scientology was fun and
> somewhat sane at onetime with  good and interesting people on lines.
>
> Thanks, Pilot   JimDBB

Yes.  As I was mentioning above, it was a great crowd until
the policies started getting enforced in a literal minded
manner and sick ideas like hunting for SPs every time somebody
sneezed ("All sickness equals PTS") became the order of the day.

================

In case anybody hasn't guessed yet, I did this name dropping
to help out OSA with the problem of investigating who might
be connected to me.

In truth, the New York boom resulted in hundreds of very able
people who then rose very high in the command structure as
the Scientology network collapsed in 1969 and then recovered
in the reforms of 1970.

And I have been around the AO and Flag as well.

If they begin tracing all my old friends and then begin worrying
who those people are connected to, they will soon have
Miscavige and Spurtlock sec checking each other to see if
they are connected to me.

I am looking forward to that.

So I thought that I should give them a push to help them along.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - About Book Copyrights & Net Publishing (Attn Croesus)

ABOUT BOOK COPYRIGHTS & NET PUBLISHING (Attn Croesus etc.)

On 2 Jul 99, croesus123@aol.com (Croesus123) posted on topic
"The PILOTS and the freezone's problem"

Dear pilot,

> Thank you for your contributions and for your integrity. You are what I
> consider a true Scientologist and a seeker of the truth. I know
> Hubbard would agree with this assessment. What he said as the leader
> of the movement and whathe thought as an individual were two different
> things.
>
> By the way I also have a history that goes back to when you started.

Which org were you around.  I'm curious if I know you.

> For those of you who weren't around in the sixties or seventies the
> pilot's observations and conclusions of what happened in the church
> both tech and admin wise is spot on. The problems and conditions the
> pilot mentions about those times is a lucid and correct description
> of what really happened.
>
> The problem you (we) face might be the following. The tactic the
> church will probably use is to make your life both miserable and
> costly through harassment and suits and then tell you that this will
> end if you sign over the copyrights of Super Scio and Self Clearing
> to the church and cease writing about it. They may even offer you
> money for your works- you know, the old pain pleasure routine. If
> they get your works they will put them in a vault and sue anyone
> who uses them. They have then solved a big problem. They have removed
> from consideration the only well written, clear and effective text
> on Scientology that was not authored (and copywritten) by Hubbard.
> At that point we are back to square one.
>
> Remember they want two things. They want what you to stop speaking
> and/or they want your written works. If they get either of these two
> points, in a sense, you have been neutralized.

I thought of this right at the start.  Here is how I have been
publishing the books online - This is from the original posting
of the Super Scio book to ARS.

# SUPER SCIO #0: INTRODUCTION AND CONTENTS
#
# ---------------------------------------------
#
# Copyright 1996
#
# All commercial rights are reserved to the author, who currently
# wishes to remain anonymous and therefore is writing under the
# pen name of "The Pilot".  Individuals may freely copy these files
# on the internet for their own use and they may be made available
# on any web server who does not charge for them and who does not
# alter their contents.
#
# ---------------------------------------------

Even if they were to gain the copyrights by some nefarious scheme,
spreading the book around online would still remain legal.

I intentionally did it this way so that I or my estate (if I
were to be bumped off) would have no power to block the online
distribution.

As Homer said once, the book is like shareware, not really in
the public domain but allowed to be copied around on the net.


> They will try to acomplish either or both these points with the pain
> pleasure routine. (Isn't it amazing that the church has 'become' their
> enemy, the psychiatrist, using the pain pleasure technique to
> enforce their will).
>
> All this must be defended against. They will try to cause
> you as much pain as is necessary to secure these objectives.
> The freezone must defend you against that pain so that you can
> stay true.
>
> Part of the solution will be money. With enough money the church
> can be fought. I think that if needed sufficient funds could be
> raised to offset the pain and burden of continuing legal costs.
> The remaining pressure would be the dead agent shit and other
> stupid (but sometimes effective) tricks. Some of this
> could also be neutralized with some help.
>
> I hope you, the freezoners, realize the importance of this situation

==============

From some of the responses to my earlier question about
publishishing, I realized that a few of the ARSers don't
realize that these books (super scio and self clearing) are
already available online for free downloading.

In fact it was Cornelius who acted quickly to get the Super
Scio book online as soon as I posted it to ARS (he has my extreme
thanks).  It is still up on his site.  The url is
ftp://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/pub/ss/index.html

And then Homer heard about what I was doing on ARS and put it in
his online clearing archives at lightlink.

And of course fza.org and eventually www.fzint.org came into existance
and began carrying the books too.  Nothing to say of the various
foriegn language editions that are available online.

So they are up on so many websites that it would not even be
worthwile for the org to attack the sites.  I used to list the
urls in my trailing signature, but eventually it became so
large that I had to cut back to just a few urls that will lead
to others.

What I would like to find is a real publisher who would put
the Self Clearing book into bookstores.

And maybe I will write a thrid book eventually, but I'm a
bit too busy right now.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - To Tilman On Spam Pages

TO TILMAN ON SPAM PAGES

On 2 Jul 99, tilman@berlin.snafu.de (Tilman Hausherr) responded to
my post on "Super Scio - PILOT IDENTITY REVEALED"

> On 1 Jul 1999 04:00:11, pilot@echelon.alias.net (The Pilot) wrote in
> <X519990701T41772X12.3BR@somewhere.com>:
>
> >As of this writing, I am still a Scientologist in good standing,
>
> Why did you never have a spam page?
>
> >The person who turned me in is my wife Ann Tordai.
>
> She did also not have a spam page.
>
> I am asking to get an idea how many clams without spam page there are...
>
> --
> Tilman Hausherr  [KoX, SP4]  Entheta * Enturbulation * Entertainment
> tilman@berlin.snafu.de       http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/#cos
>
>     Resistance is futile. You will be enturbulated. Xenu always prevails.
>
> Find broken links on your web site:
http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/xenulink.html
> The Xenu bookstore:
http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/bookstore.html

The bulk of them do not have spam pages.  For people who are not
up on ARS slang, these are the look alike "I am a Scientologist"
web pages.

It is a very pushy PR action, where you stick your foot in and
then you find out that you have to get issue authority and
install the net nanny and go through all sorts of nonsense.

Anyone who is active on the net would be embarrassed to have
such a page because it is not personalized and they are not
allowed to talk freely.

Anyone who is not on the net, is not on the net and generally
doesn't want to be dragged into something like this.

They could have done this in a much smarter way that encouraged
personalized pages and free communication without censorship.

Even so, many did do this (obviously), but it is a low percentage
of what they could have had.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - An OT Outing (Attn Rogers etc.)

AN OT OUTING (Attn Rogers etc.)

On 2 Jul 99, "Rogers" <here-i-yam@erols.com> continued the discussion
on the topic "To Pilot"

> Anti-Cult wrote in message
>
> >Interesting questions, but the answers stay the same: If there were any
> >OT's, or if the tech really did what it promised, nothing like that would
> >happen :-)
> >
> >The Pilot have posted a lot of tech, but the tech couldn't help even
> >himself when it became serious.
> >
> >Says it all I believe.
>
>
> It may say a lot, and it may be a sobering thought, but it doesn't quite
say
> it all.
>
> Of course, you are undoubtedly right insomuch as, if the Pilot were in one
> of his super keyed-out phases, he probably wouldn't have been touchable.
(I
> say that based on my own experiences, but, it's been about 20 years since
I
> have been THAT keyed-out myself.)  But it should never be overlooked (even
> though it IS overlooked by the CofS consistently) that, amnesiac gods
> (thetans) or not, ALL the inhabitants of this planet (except for two) ARE
> thetans.

In a super keyed out phase, they might simply have surrendered and
asked me to help them reform.  Since it really would be for their
own good, such a postulate could stick.

I did not plan this, and yet it does seem to be turning out well.
See the message I just posted to Kim Baker.  If Ann had not been
the one to out me, I would have felt moraly obligated to protect
her even though we disagreed.  And if I had simply said, "Hi, here
I am", I might not have gotten as many offers of support, and I
think that the very existance of those offers  will make OSA act
with great restraint.

I did want a price for OSA learning my identity, but it seems like
they have always avoided paying that price.  There has always
been enough data in the Super Scio book to identify me if they
had handed it to the senior CS at flag and ask him which Flag
PC had written the various stories.

I expected that I would eventually be exposed that way, but that
it would cost them considerable technical staff, many of whom
would blow if they studied Super Scio in detail.

But they never seemed to risk doing that.

In truth I have felt for a month or two that it was time for
me to take a forward step, but I was undecided as to exactly
what step, and that march of a hundred felt like a bad idea.
So I was being lazy and complacent, enjoying my safe position.

It might be that some friendly spirit gave me a kick in the
ass to get me moving, or perhaps some postulate I made to
bring about reform has manifested in this fashion.

I don't feel bad about the matter.  I always expected that it
would happen sooner or later and I've been prepared to face
up to it all along.

There are many worse ways in which it could have happened.

Also note that I might have done Ann a bit of a disservice
in emphasising the cats and the argument.  Her concerns have
been growing over the last year or so and something was bound
to happen eventually.  But I wanted to make it very clear to
OSA that they would be attacking her and not me if they
launched a cat attack as they did against Stacy.

======================

And from another post by "Rogers" <here-i-yam@erols.com> on
topic "Super Scio - PILOT IDENTITY REVEALED"

> Hi Ken, (aka Anjin-san)
>
> I just  a-l-m-o-s-t  made a post yesterday to inquire if anyone else was
> feeling a bit wierd the past few days. (For one thing, it was like time
was
> going backwards a couple of mornings.  doo-doo doo-doo.)

Now that is funny.  As mentioned above, this whole business could
have gone much worse.  It could be the best of a series of possible
alternatives that might have occured last week.  Certainly there were
a couple of times when it felt like the bottom of my stomach had
fallen out and there was wierd charge kicking around even before
I got outed.

Probably just dub-in.  Or maybe somebody was helping me.  I do not
want to claim powers at that level.  But it does occur to me that
some mild but important adjustments might have been made in the
flow of events.


> Sometimes, when there's a pressure in the air for me personally, I suspect
> it MAY be in the air for everyone.
>
> I'm not trying to validate "outside sources" or anything, just, oh,
> environmental stress or something like that.  Of course, in California
they
> blame the Santa Ana winds, but I am thousands of miles away.
>
> Perhaps the same edginess that made you shout at your wife contributed to
> her actions too.  Oh well, one less withhold, eh?
>
> Anyway, if you want you can come and stay with me for a few weeks - until
> July 22nd.  My wife and son have taken off for a european vacation.  I'd
be
> happy to accommodate you for this period, perhaps give the dust a chance
to
> clear.  (I'm not suggesting this is a GOOD idea, but it is a sincere
> invitation, an option for you.)
>
> Best,  Les.

Thank you for the offer of support.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio Tech - Worth Saying Again (Attn Alan)

WORTH SAYING AGAIN (Attn Alan)

On 2 Jul 99, "Alan C. Walter" <wisdom@cyberstation.net> posted
on topic "Love, Power, Loyalty, Trust, Betrayal" in response
to my being outed

<snipped for brevity>

> Common sense plays a vital role in rehabilitating anyone. You cannot
> legislate common sense. And it takes a long time to obtain common sense in
> an area you are not familiar with.
>
> At best all the Tech and all the Policy are guide lines. To be used or not
> used as common sense dictates.
>
> It is hard to betray someone if there are no rules or codes to violate.

In mocking up the rule, we mockup the violation.  Adam and Eve are
not ashamed until they concieve of nakedness as a sin.

> The Tech works best in a safe environment. It does not work well in a
> restrictive environment. It does not work at all when your case is used
> against you.

Very much worth repeating, loudly.


> I wish Scio, Ken and his wife the best, but there is a lot of processing
to
> do in the area. May they all get the products of TRUTH and FREEDOM and be
> able to have immense amounts of Love, Power, Loyalty, Trust and wonderful
> futures.
>
> Alan

Thank you,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio Tech - Locational OT (Attn Oleg, Homer, etc.)

LOCATIONAL OT (Attn Oleg, Homer, etc.)

On 28 Jun 99, "Dopertchouk, Oleg" <olegd@ea.com> continued a discussion
of my post on "Super Scio Tech - Answering Homer on Clear OT"

> > It pains me, but Jabba is right.  Only location works. Time
> > doesn't work at
> > all.
>
> This makes me wonder: so we take the time coordinate out of the equation
and
> achieve the Clear OT state, is there a state where the "location track"
> blows as well? Probably when one handles alter-isness of location? The
> alleged "why thetans mock up" bulletin comes to mind...
>
> Usually time and location play the roles of comparable magnitude:
> dating/locating, differentiation processes, Einstein's space-time
continuum,
> LRH's bulletin about the possibility of exteriorisation in time as well as
> in space and so on.
>
> Just being curious.
>
> Oleg

I hit a state on "location" similar to the Clear OT state on "time".
I mentioned it in Super Scio.

It happened about a week after the solo Nots EP (cause over life,
or better stated as "no longer at the effect of BT think").

It may have been because I was blowing everything by inspection,
super fast, and reaching in all concievable directions and times
and places to find anything I could which might be stuck.

I was running consistantly at sensativity 1 at that time, and
the sensativity was too high based on a gentle can squeeze.
(it tightened up to a more normal level during the later overruns).

Something happened at the end of that week which blew all
considerations of location and I realized that nobody had
every been located anywhere in the first place and was only
fooling themselves and playing games.

I described it later as feeling like I was three feet back of
the Mest universe.

It would seem to me that some alter-is of location blew, but
I'm not sure what.  When I first went clear OT, I did not quite
see how it happened either, but just that it had happened.  In
retrospect, I can see the blowing of the time alter-is, but if
you had asked me years ago, I would simply have said that I had
confronted a terrible overt and everything had changed as a result.

And so I think that I must have undone some terrible distortion
of location with all of that reaching for BTs, but it is hard
to say exactly what it was.  Hopefully it will come to me
eventually as this falls into better context.

Since then concepts of being bigger or smaller as a being
seem almost silly to me and have little effect.  Right now
I consider that perception of detail is far more important
than the amount of space one is occupying.  Each of us is
everywhere, it is only a matter of consideration.  But how
much of that can one percieve, that is the practical limitation.

But, just as with time, after the solidity of location blows,
there is still location, it is just a bit different and there
is a compulsion of locating things which is gone.

As to running incidents, after clear OT the dating seems to
be less significant, and after this locational OT state,
the location doesn't seem very important either.  Who cares,
you just mock it up to get your TRs in on it so as to undo
postulates and decisions which are still present even after
the time, place, and force are unimportant.

More and more it seems like incident running is simply a
gradient of removing suppress and not-know so that you can
remember what happened and regain choice over postulates
that were made under bad circumstances and which you foolishly
cast in concrete to handle an unpleasant situation.

Hope this helps,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio Tech - TECH BREAKTHROUGH

TECH BREAKTHROUGH

In spite of all the distractions, I haven't totaly abandoned
the research.  I've been doing a bit more handling on how all
of us push mental machinery and control lines into each other
which was inspired by cross correlating CBR's and my own work.
And I've been thinking more about the present time continuous
creation of relality, and the recent Avatar postings have
helped with that one.  And I was talking to a lot of freezoners
over the weekend, getting reminded of various technical areas.
I even talked to one guy who was on the R6 course in 1964 and
that helped me get some of Ron's final work in that area
into persepective.

And so I was connecting to a lot of different technologies,
all valid, all lying there as pieces of the puzzel, and
experiencing a great deal of cross fertilization.

And then I was sitting there talking to a friend and we were
discussing the need to keep moving forward on any line as
long as it was a move in the direction of freedom and
understanding, so as to avoid being stopped and having stops
go into restimulation.  And he was drawing an analogy to
studying computers in a situation where all data was not
available but some was, and so you study what is available
with the confidence that the different lines, which might
seem disrelated, will come together eventually.

And I thought of the entity oriented approach and the
R6 oriented approach and all the other almost contradictory
but sporatically workable approaches and suddenly everything
fell together into a cohesive whole.

There are 4 broad areas of tech:

1. The objective present time oriented tech including OT
drills, Avatar, objectives, etc.

2. The grades style tech, including many freezone things which
the CofS would not call grades but which are working the same
kind of thing from different angles.

3. The theta line, entity, plugs, machines, and what have
you type handlings.

4. The item or pattern oriented stuff that relates to R6
and GPMs and implants etc.

I'm talking here about 4 classes of things rather than
specific approaches or processes or theories about individual
types of things within the broad areas.

And the areas seemed slightly in conflict as to theory.  But
the exact same difficulty might well resolve on handling
from any of the 4 areas, indicating that all formed a part
of what might be holding a particular abberation in place.

And so there had to be a broader viewpoint from which
all of these were part of the same cohesive whole.

And it had to be happening now, in present time, because
of objective PT processes being part of the puzzel.

And it had to involve grades style whys because they run
well, and that especially brings to mind overts and
motivators, which would say that we are doing it to each
other now in PT.

And the whole entity business, especially this bit about
pushing control entities on each other, would have to be
the delivery mechanism.

And that leaves R6 like patterns, items, implants, gpms,
or whatever, as what is being delivered, which is not to
say that we have the PT pattern, but we may be close what
with all the research into these things.

So here it is, the unified theory:

WE ARE NOW IN PT IMPLANTING EACH OTHER ON A COMPULSIVE
BASIS BELOW OUR CONSCIOUS LEVEL OF AWARENESS.

The entity mechanisms are how we do it.

The R6 type stuff is what we are implanting into each other.

And the grades type stuff is the reason WHY we do it.

And it is all going on in PT, which is why objectives and
OT drills work.

We are holding each other in the trap of a singular solidified
reality and compulsive agreement.

But as we work any of the above lines we begin to shake
things loose.

And as each of us begins to come up in awareness and loosen
our hold on others, it becomes easier for the remainder to
go free.

And of course, if you weren't doing it to others, they couldn't
do it to you successfully.

I've hardly scratched the surface of this.  There is much
more work needed here, and as you all know, I'm quite
distracted right now.

But I wanted to get the basic idea out immediately.

My gut feeling is that this is the key that we needed to
make it to real OT.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

This weeks messages were all posted with the following trailer.

------------------
The free Self Clearing Book, The Super Scio book, and the
"SCIENTOLOGY REFORMER'S HOME PAGE" are all over the net.

See The Self Clearing Homepage for URLs to these sites
http://fza.org/pilot/selfclr.htm

Or see The Pilots Home Page at http://fza.org/pilot/index.htm

Some translations are available, see links at fza.org

Also see the new www.fzint.org website.

All of the current posts will be collected in Super Scio Archives
#61 and posted to ACT.  See the Pilot Archives at FZA.ORG.

Individual posts to ARS are being double posted to ACT rather than
cross posted to foil the spambot attack which takes good headers
and attaches garbage messages to them.

Note that some of my posts only go to ACT.  I cannot be reached by email.
I watch ARS and ACT for messages with Pilot in the subject line.

------------------
