Date: 20 Nov 1998 04:00:11
Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology
From: pilot@soda.csua.berkeley.edu (The Pilot)
Subject: SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 39 - NOV 98 PILOT POSTS


POST39.txt 

SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 39 - NOV 98 PILOT POSTS

Posts to ARS/ACT are in Archive 39
Posts to ACT only are in Archive 40 and 41

==========================================

Contents:

   subj : Super Scio - THE JESSIE PRINCE TAPES
   subj : Super Scio - To Inducto & Roland on the Pederast Quote
   subj : Super Scio - ON THE RALPH DORIEN FANTASY
   subj : Super Scio - WGERT FOOTBULLETS AGAIN 
   subj : Super Scio - URLs for Web Summary (Attn Marina Chong)
   subj : Super Scio - PICKETS (Attn CiCiAychar)
   subj : Super Scio - TO ISMAEL
   subj : Super Scio - LEAVING STAFF (attn Tilman)
   subj : Super Scio - THE OLD TIMER'S NETWORK 
   subj : Super Scio Humor - MARCABBAGE, PRINCE OF SPACE

==========================================

   subj : Super Scio - THE JESSIE PRINCE TAPES


THE JESSIE PRINCE TAPES


These are well worth reading.  The transcripts are up at
<http://www.factnet.org/Scientology/jesse_tapes.html>.

First let me say that I have to assume that these are
not absolutely accurate since they were not done under oath 
and Jessie and Larry (who did the interview) have good reason 
to be pissed off at the CofS.  Therefore a bit of exaggeration 
or unfavorable speculation are only to be expected.

But I don't think that there are any outright lies.  Too
much of this data has been confirmed by other sources.

Take the story of Mary Sue for example.  I think that it
is pretty common knowledge that she was browbeaten by DM
and made to relinquish power and sign away things.  Jessie
gives a very detailed story that has not appeared before,
and I think that he really was there and that his account
of the events is quite important to the CofS membership.

But is his account right on or is it exaggerated?  Is the
pitifully small sum given to MSH correct or is he just
guessing?  I would like to see this particular story 
recounted under oath with a care to accuracy instead of
sensationalism.  I think that this tale, even if told in
a toned down bending over backwards manner, would be a
gross shock to the CofS membership.

Also note that whoever transcribed the tapes was not familiar
with the names and Scientology terms involved and made
quite a few bloopers such as writing "Golden Air" instead
of "Golden Era", but I think that this is only the transcriber,
I'm sure that Jessie was saying the names correctly.

Speaking of names, the dancer from Israel whose last name
Jessie couldn't remember is old time Scientologist
Teshura Tstav (I'm slightly uncertain of the spelling).

I'm going to pay special attention here to how these
revelations might affect the current membership.  After
all, I am very interested in seeing the CofS reform.

As to the big corporate manuvers, shell corporations,
legal irregularities, and so forth, I don't think that
any of the membership will be surprised or care.  I'm
very interested (and I'm sure the critics are interested)
because it is important to know your opponent, and I
thank Jessie for the data, but this kind of setup is
simply typical for big international corporations.

Of course is is not really kosher for a Church to be
setup along the same lines as the Rockafeller empire,
but the membership will accept this (and many are
halfway aware of it) as being necessary to survive in
a world where there are many big and unethical corporations.

What will be shocking to the membership is the way that
the money is being used and the hypocracy that is present
in the top ranks.

Here we have the picture of a tiny click of bad hats
indulging in the trappings of money and power and
living off of the sweat of thousands of staff who are
surviving at the poverty level.  It is not that they
live well, but that they live far too well at the
expense of others who live far too poorly.

And at the public level, we have the same misuse of
funds, where many millions of dollars leached off of
the upper level public by big league sales is used
not for good works in support of the tech but instead
goes towards funding corporate warfare and leagal
attacks and fair gameing.

In other words, I do not object to the fact that they
have money, I make good money myself at software
development.  No, its the way that the money is made 
and the uses to which it is put that is wrong.

Personally, I would say that this is an inherent flaw
of organizing as a single monolith which will, by 
definition, have a terrible weak spot at the top.

After reading Jessie's account, I am very sold on
the need to unbundle the CofS.  As long as there is
one single point of control, there is always the
possibility of it falling into the hands of somebody 
who is viscious or stupid, and even if the leader is
a paragon of virtue, it is a single target that can
be taken out with one blow and therefore will become
paranoid and take actions motivated by fear instead
of good sense.

And as I said earlier, the use of international corporate
defenses is ill becoming to something that seeks to
be a religion and therefor is a flawed solution to
survival.  They should be organized along the same
lines as the Protestants, where there is no central
point of attack or single point of failure rather
than building a corporate monster that is closer
kin to General Motors than it is to anything of a
spiritual nature.

-------

Jessie also gives an interesting account of the handling
of celebrities in Scientology.  

Older policy was that famous and influential people were 
not to be given special treatment or offered free service 
to win their favor.  In the mid 1960s, currying favors
from influential people is even listed as one of the potential 
sources of trouble.  But the Sea Org reign of terror that 
developed in the 1968-9 timeframe pissed off quite a few 
celebrities.  Most notable was Burroughs who turned into an 
outspoken critic, but they also lost such names as Lenny 
Cohen and Candice Bergman.  Even staunch supporter Stephen 
Boyd cooled off and stopped giving pro Scientology interviews.
They drove away Huntington-Hartford (the A&P millionaire -
at one point he was going to donate the Huntington-Hartford
Museum in NYC to Scientology and let the NY org occupy
the lower floors). And even Sue Tyrell, who had worked on
staff for years before achiving success as an actress in 
Hollywood, turned against them.

So eventually they cognited that they mustn't treat powerful
and influential people with the same crush ethics that they
were at that time using on ordinary staff and public (in
1969 even paying public were often doing amends projects -
that was when abusive ethics was at its peak, things toned
down considerably in the 1970s).

And so they flipped the other way, doing everything they
could to attract and hold onto celebrities.  And eventually,
of course, they get enough in a celebrity's pc folder 
that the person would not dare turn into a critic
and get declared and fair gamed.  Note that they never
use pc folder material for true blackmail.  The celebrity
could just walk off.  But there is always the threat
there that if he should become a critic, the org will
use his pc folder against him because they consider
that critics are not entitled to any protection from
policy, even the policy on keeping folders confidential.

Personally, I like John Travolta.  I think that he has
really matured as an actor.  And I think that he has
made gains from Scientology processing.  He could just
walk away if he was willing to abandon the tech.  But
he couldn't become a critic or openly support a freezone
organization, because his witholds would be all over
the net in a flash.

The same would apply to Tom Cruise or any other celebrity
who has gotten in deeply.  By the way, one of Tom Cruise's
personal assistants is OT 8 and old time auditor Wauter
Korringa.

-------

The insight into DM's character was quite valuable.  It
was good to hear that he does have his moments of doubt
in between his fits of crushing and contolling everything.
Doubt might be unpleasant and full of dispair, but it
is better to be doubfull than to walk backwards into
the jaws of a meat grinder with great confidence and
false certainty.  The chances are slim, but perhaps there 
is still a small window in which he might repent and 
save himself from lifetimes of motivators.  (OSA, 
please pass this on).

It was also interesting that Jessie identified Lyman
Spurlock as the other major power at the top.  Basically
Jessie identified the big 4 based on perks and power
and then regulated the other two (Starkey and Rathburn)
to the role of Miscavige's lackey's.  Which leaves
Lyman as the one person who might be pulling Davey's
strings, if there is such a person at all.

-------

On the whole I was not greatly surprised.  But it still
pissed me off to see how much waste there was (millions
for lawyers (ofensive ones rather tha defensive) and 
private investigators, for example) together with the 
creation of so much misery for the ordinary staff members.


Best,

The Pilot


==========================================


   subj : Super Scio - To Inducto & Roland on the Pederast Quote


TO INDUCTO & RONALD ON THE PEDERAST QUOTE

On 16 Oct 98, mcdonald@eieio.com (Ronald McDonald) continued the
discussion on subject "Jesse Prince on OT8 -- PILOT?"


>On 16 Oct 1998 16:06:35 GMT, inducto@aol.com (Inducto) wrote:
>
>>From: flying@edge.com (Timothy Prodick):
>>
>>>For instance, at the beginning of the "Instant Hat" tape, part 1
>>>he called Keynes (the economist) a "pederast." Calling Jesus another
>>>is just the kind of thing Hubbard would do.
>>
>>That's interesting.  "Pilot", who seems to be a real tape expert, said
>>something to the effect that he thought that calling someone a "pederast" was
>>out of character for Hubbard, which made him doubt the OT8.  It's interesting
>>if there's an example of this sort of accusation on an "official" tape, and I'd
>>be interested to hear what Pilot had to say about that.
>>
>>
>>I.
>
>A Mr. Zell posted the realaudio of Hubbard calling Keynes a "pederast"
>on alt.binaries.scientology. It looks like the circumstantial evidence
>is getting stronger for the "Jesus was a pedophile" "source".


I think that the Instant Hat tape is in the ESTO series, which
I haven't heard.  So I don't know if this pederast statement is
real or a troll.  Does anybody have the ra file up at a website?
Or even better, has anyone posted a transcript?  I'm better on
the older tapes rather than the small number done in the 1970s
of which I've only heard a few.

But it is a moot point.  As some others on ARS were quick to point
out, I was mistaken in thinking that the word "pederast" appears
in the bogus OT 8, it was just a lable put on it in ARS, it
describes it without actually using the word.

So I had to go back and reanalyze it in detail, which I posted
last month.

By the way, who is Keynes?


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

   subj : Super Scio - ON THE RALPH DORIEN FANTASY


ON THE RALPH DORIEN FANTASY


This was written by an expert at psychological manipulations.
It goes far beyond the average psychology texts and I
recommend it as a study in how to dork people around.

It is very Machiavellian in its analysis, by which I mean that
it has no considerations or bias either towards good or evil
but simply addresses the technical aspects of how to create
the effects envisioned.

It has a decent analysis of how to push buttons and herd 
the sheep.  

And the author has some aquaintance with Scientology tech and 
modern Scientology operating procedures.

However, it is a fairy tale.

The outpoints will be obvious to anyone who is familiar with 
the 1950s tech.

The Dorian vision of a secret crew of 5 backing a Hubbard front
man for the purposes of mind control just doesn't fit.  We
already know that Hubbard had help from ACC students such
as Farber, Horner, Gerbode, and Galusha despite the fact that 
the org tries to push this out of sight.  Their intentions and
their subsequent actions just don't line up with Dorian's
secret comittee, nor does Hubbard's behavor in the 50s.

I would say that the actual truth is that an expert psychologist
took a hard look at modern Scientology and said "how would
I create that effect if I wanted to".  And then he wrote
up how it could be accomplished.

The trouble is that he is right, not in his fantasy of how
it all started, but right in his vision of how it behaved
later.

Just for a moment put aside your knowledge of the basics,
the 1950s material, and the auditing tech, and just look
at post 1965 operating practices and HCO PLs.

If you do that, you will see that he is spot on.  It's
all designed to manipulate and control and push buttons.
In fact the truth is worse because the tech, used in a
reverse manner, goes far beyond what is envisioned in
psychology.

In fact, that is one of the biggest outpoints with his
analysis.  His psychological data just isn't good enough
to match the effectiveness of black Scientology in 
getting people to empty their bank accounts, abandon
their families, and willingly remain in the RPF to be
further abused.  Reverse Scientology is much better at
making slaves of people than behavioral modification.

But it still makes an important point.

It has been said before, but I'll say it again, if it looks
like a duck and walks like a duck and quacks like a duck,
then it is a duck.

The trouble is that this mockup of a manipulative cult is
layered on top of something which was quite the reverse.

-----

Let's take a hard and unbiased look at this thing and
try to see a bit more of the truth.

Take communication, for example.

We know that communication is the universal solvent.
We know that problems will develope in an area where
communciation is inhibited and we know that they will
dissolve in an area where free and open communication
is promoted.

So let us say that we want to manipulate somebody.  To
do this, we encourage communciation along some lines
and inhibit it on others.  The areas where it is inhibited
will become problem areas and the ones where it is open
and easy will be fun for the person.

The person will move away from the difficult areas and
gravitate towards the pleasant ones.

Do you want him working for the org and staying away
from his family?  Simply inhibit his comm with his
family.  Problems and difficulties will develope.  Soon
he will be happy to get away from them.

Simple, isn't it.

Disconnecting from somebody doesn't handle them, instead
it causes grade 1 to go out in that area.  The area
gets worse.

If you remain high toned and continue to communicate,
criticism will die down.  If you cut comm it gets worse.
This is why the problems and incomplete communications
process works.

Now in the 1950s, there was the idea that sometimes you
had to temporarily remove somebody from an environment
where they were getting continually chewed up and
invalidated.  That is a valid action, but note that it
is not the same as disconnection.  It is a temporary
breathing spell while the person gathers his forces and
builds up his strength so that he can handle the area.
He is only supposed to back off temporarily while he gets
an intenive of auditing.

We know this data on communication.  We know it well.
Ron knew it exceedingly well.

How could he issue the policy on disconnection?

Did he forget all the data on comm?

I just can't imagine that that was the case.

-----

So what other possibilities exist?


A) The policy was written by others without his knowledge
or agreement.

This is possible on minor things, we do know that others
were writing policy.  It is impossible on anything as
major as disconnection.


B) Could he have been bad intentioned to begin with?

I feel that this is also impossible.  There is too much 
that is right and positive in the early tech.  I can't 
believe that somebody with evil intentions could have 
developed it.


C) Could he have gone bad?

This would require a total GPM style flip flop, becoming
what you oppose.  It is just barely possible that this
might have happened during all the messed up GPM listing
of the early 1960s.  But it's hard to imagine that the
flip could be so extreme and persist for the rest of his
life, especially considering how much tech he knew.  So
I give this one a low probablility.


D) Could he be a comittee?

This is a new idea proposed by Dorian.  It is possible.
Whereas I don't believe that an evil manipulator and a
master tech finder could be one in the same person, I
do think that it is possible to have a group of which
one is the tech finder and another is the manipulator
and yet a third is the promoter who appears to be the
only source.

But this still doesn't fit the facts.  The promoter
would have to be there alone as he lectured and worked
with the ACC students.  Its possible later but not in
the early days.  He might have had more help than the
org likes to admit, but he never could have cut it if
he was only a front man.


E) Could he have been put under control and used?

This is a distinct possibility.  Maybe a CIA PDH operation
or a Marcabian implant or something.  I can hardly
guess.


F) Or is is it a mixture of factors?

Maybe research errors and a bit of decay.  And maybe
he had help earlier and drove those guys away.  And
possibly some of his later supporters were not of the
best intentions and made things worse.

But this one might not be good enough to really explain 
what seems to be intentional reverse use of the tech.
So although it is my favorite, I don't think that it
is leading by more than a nose in comparison with some
of the others above.


-----

Alternatives D and E above share one common factor which
is that there is a Hidden Influence, somebody behind
the scenes who is manipulating this, and that might be
true for F as well (with the manipulator showing up later
and hving less strength).  Note that this does not mean 
world conspiracy, there are pleanty of manipulators.

I notice that CofS has gotten worse rather than better
in these regards since Ron departed (late 1970s, he did
little after he went into hiding).  If alternative C
was correct, things should have improved because there
are many good people still on staff and they keep 
trying to fix the mess and getting beaten down.

This tends to indicate that there really is some other 
source which is still active.

It wouldn't be DM, the outpoints predate him by a considerable
margine.  He would only be the current puppet dictator.
There would be somebody pulling the strings behind him.

So the real question is who.

I don't have an answer for that one at this time.

-----

This is worth a lot of serious thought.

Read Dorian's writeup.  I'm pretty sure that its bogus,
but it does give you an idea of how these manipluations are 
done.  And think about what buttons might be used to manipulate 
you.

-----

At this point I think that there are two good possibilities -

1. There was a tremendous breakthough in the 1950s and
somebody has successfully subverted it.

OR

2. A tantalizing amount of advanced tech was used as
the bait for a trap.  It might even be that the space
alien ideas are correct and some of the tech came from 
off planet.


So either we are rescuing key knowlege or we are stealing
the bait off of a hook.

In either case it is well worth the effort.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

   subj : Super Scio - WGERT FOOTBULLETS AGAIN 


WGERT FOOTBULLETS AGAIN

On 22 Oct 98, wgert@loop.com (wgert) posted on subject
"More on OTVIII and "Ralph""

> On 21 Oct 1998 08:02:31 PDT,  Dennis Erlich wrote:
> 
> >Ron Pook's friend:
> >sense@tojo.net says...
> >>>More information from an old-timer who saw the "Jesus is a 
> >>>pedophile" version while on-lines.
> >
> >more hearsay 
> >
> >>Add me to the list of people who can verify that the HCOB
> >>exists.  David Butterworth of OSA kept a copy of it in his
> >>office filing cabinet.
> >
> >I'm quite sure he would.  The document was no doubt produced by OSA
> >as a trojan horse to entrap critics.  In any case it certainly was not
> >written by elrong.
> >
> >   Rev Dennis Erlich 
> 
> What a cheap shot by Erlich.
> 
> Because Erlich was once a member of the Church, he
> claims to be familiar with its "inner workings." First, he
> has not been in the Church for thirteen years and his
> postings show how completely out of touch he is.

<sniped endless dead agenting of Dennis>

> So the next time you read a posting from Dennis Erlich
> attacking Scientology and its people, realize that the demon
> he is fighting is in his own mind.
> 
> wgert
 

What a cheap shot by Wgert.

Can't you evaluate relative importances?

Dennis is actually supporting the org's position that the
pederast bulletin is not by Ron, and you use that as an
excuse to engage in dead agenting him?

Does this mean that you think the pederast quote really
was by Ron?  Are you doing a GPM flip flop or what?

Or is it just that you have such a craving to dead agent
that you can't refrain from it even when you know it is
the wrong action?

Try running "mock up a way to waste dead agenting".

And what have they done with the intelligent Wgert?
Is he in the RPF now along with the pig loving Wgert?

If I sound annoyed, its because I've been arguing this
one on ARS and its a relief to have Dennis agree that
its a bogus bulletin (and he knows a hell of a lot more
tech than you do even if he's turned his back on it).  
And then you shoot at him for it.  Talk about stupid 
footbullets.  Jeezz.


The Pilot

==========================================

   subj : Super Scio - URLs for Web Summary (Attn Marina Chong)

URLs for Web Summary (Attn Marina Chong)


On 22 OCT, marina@fakeaddress (Marina Chong) posted 
the latest revision of her excellent
"A.R.S. Web Page Summary  [22 Oct 1998]"


> Mirror sites:
> 
> http://www.best.com/~mchong/arsweb.shtml
> http://www.entheta.net/arsweb.shtml
> http://www.cl.ais.net/trc/mchong.htm
> http://www.mygale.org/01/tussier/arsweb.htm
> http://homepage.cistron.nl/~davel/mchong.htm
> http://www.whidbey.net/~skyhawk/arshtml.htm
> http://xenu.phys.uit.no/cos/arshtml.html
> http://www.thur.de/religio/server/webpag.html
> 
> Welcome to Marina's A.R.S. Web Page Summary!
> [last update: 22 Oct 1998]
> 
> If you've ever asked:
> 
> *  What is Scientology?
> *  Why is Scientology attacking the Internet, and how?
> *  Why are Scientologists called clams?
> *  What do all these strange abbreviations and terms mean?
> *  Who are all these people who post here?
> *  How does Scientology deal with criticism?
> *  How will I get any useful information with A.R.S. clogged with ClamSpam[tm]?
> *  [etc]
> 
> Take heart, for all is revealed in the following Web pages:



She has a good "FREE ZONE:" section near the end including links
to some of my pages, but we have been negligent in keeping her
up to date on important freezone links, especially the huge 
freezone america website and Ralph's Helpline.

So here are a few more freezone links that she might like to 
add -


Freezone America:         http://fza.org
Pilot:                    http://fza.org/pilot/index.html
Ralph Hilton:             http://ralph.hilton.org/



Other freezoner's might want to check if their links are
missing from her list or out of date.

And let me recommend her page as a good resource to link to.


>  Marina's Manor:  http://www.best.com/~mchong/


Thank you Marina.

The Pilot

==========================================

   subj : Super Scio - PICKETS (Attn CiCiAychar)


PICKETS (Attn CiCiAychar)

On 8 Nov 98, ciciaychar@aol.comDOWNBOY (CiCiAychar) posted
on subject "How Scn Staff View Pickets"


> A Scientologist that I had a conversation with made a very 
> interesting remark to me and I thought that I would share it 
> with everyone.  I have permission to do so.  The remark is this:
> 
> " Picketers make the Scientologists band together tighter as a 
> group and only closes their mind more, unfortunately."  
> 
>      <snip>
> 
> "I empathize with ignorant Scientologists. Most of the staff have 
> NO IDEA why the hell you guys are picketing them. It's so unreal 
> and picketers look like a bunch of crazies to them because service 
> org staff doesn't understand.  Really, the picketers should get on 
> Hollywood Blvd and picket right in front of of the L. Ron Hubbard 
> Exhibition in which International management are the floors right 
> above. THAT may be very powerful. You guys could scare all the 
> tourists away."  
> 
> It certainly made me stop and think.  This individual also stated 
> that the way to spread information and change was to start at the 
> very bottom of the Scn membership and go up from there.
> 
> Just wanted to share this point of view with everyone.
> 
> Regards,
> CiCi
> SP2, KoX
> ---------------
> Diagonally parked in                   Nothing is foolproof to a
> a parallel universe.                   sufficiently talented fool.
> --------------
> Drop DOWNBOY to email!
 

Exactly.  A staff member looking at a Scientology Kills sign
is simply going to think that the evil psychs or the world
conspiracy is behind it and fight all the harder.  They are
not going to think about this, they know that you are wrong
and that you are spreading lies about them.  You could roll
the body out on a cart infront of the org and they would
still be sure that you were lying.

On the other hand, a sign saying REFORM SCIENTOLOGY would make
at least some of the staff stop and think.  If they then say
"what business of it is yours", you can reply that Scientology
is abusing people and you want it to stop.

You could do a mixture.  If you have a big picket, why not have
some signs that will communicate to the staff as well as some
that are aimed at scaring away people.  That would be fair
and sensible and might get something to change in the organization.

When you go purely to destroy, you will get a pulling together
on the staff's part because they see no other choice than
defending to the last man.  When you give them an alternative,
they don't have to do that and you might create dissention
in the ranks.

Warrior and others as well as myself have all made good suggestions 
about signs that would hit staff's buttons.  If you have half
a dozen signs, why not have one or two aimed in that direction?

Even if you are on Hollywood Blvd. aiming at scaring off tourists,
a reform sign amidst the others gives you the moral high 
ground and dispels any charges of religious bigotry.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

   subj : Super Scio - TO ISMAEL


TO ISMAEL


First of all, let's not get into a pissing contest.

Obviously I believe deeply in the tech and think that it
is very important.

But I also understand that after a hell ride with captain
Ahab, one might well deny the existance of whales and the
sea and abandon the practice of sailing altogether.

So I don't bother proselytizing on ARS.

On the subject of money and vested interests, I would point
out that I am not affiliated with any specific freezone
organizations and I don't make any money off of this, I
am doing it out of faith and conviction rather than for
gain.

Furthermore, I am still officially in CofS and my big target 
is to get them to reform.  I am quite in agreement with the 
critics about the abuses practiced by the organization and I 
want to see them stopped.

I do think that it would be nice to collect royalites for my
books someday, but obviously that is not a motivating factor
since I put everything I write up on the net for free.
Furthermore, I think that all tech should be available at
normal book prices rather than the exorbanant monopoly
prices that the orgs like to use.

As far as freezone groups go, I think that the real solution
to avoiding scams and ripoffs and CofS like behavior is
to have normal business world style competition and
broad publication of all materials.

For CofS itself, I believe that the best thing would be
to have it unbundled like any big corporation that
practices monopoly style price gorging and smashing of
competition.  Let each org be set off on its own with
all the materials and freedom to deliver as it sees
fit.

With that, if ASHO RPFed somebody, he might just tell
them to go fuck off and get a job at AOLA without
having to choose between abandoning his religion or 
eating shit.

And if an org choose to practice price gorging or
abusive ethics, the public could simple go to a
different org that was behaving more sensibly.

But the biggest protection against abuse would be
to have do it yourself books so that the person can
practice the subject without having to depend on
anybody.  If you study a do it yourself book on
automechanics, you might still choose to take your
car to a mechanic, but you stop being a sucker
for rip-off type repair shops.

That is what the self-clearing book is all about.
People can go at it on their own without having to
kiss anybody's ass (not even mine) or drain their 
life savings.  And the book is not an exclusive.
It can be immitated.  I expect that eventually 
quite a few people will be writing these, slanted
different ways, because I don't think that one size 
fits all.

I am trying to set this thing free rather than sell
something.

Now as to Hubbard's tapes, my point was that back
in the 1950s he avoided lying to his advanced 
course students.  And so you find that they contradict 
bullshit that he might say or have others say to the 
outside world.  

The critics poke fun at his technical ideas (invader 
forces or whatever), but of course that doesn't
carry any weight with the membership that believes
in the tech.

But when Ron in his own words backs up and validates
an account in Bare Faced Messiah and invalidates
whatever PR stuff the org might publish in "Ron
the Devoted Husband", that carries a lot of weight
with the membership.

And as Inductio pointed out, it is very odd that
the first wife (Polly) is disliked but accepted 
whereas the second wife (Sarah) is errased from
the org's history.  Very strange.

But Nibs is already starting to disappear from the
tapes (the favorable mention of Nibs on the Role
of Earth tape has already been cut), so maybe they
are just being practical about waiting until there
are fewer people who remember him before errasing
the first marriage as well.

Enough for now.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

   subj : Super Scio - LEAVING STAFF (attn Tilman)


LEAVING STAFF (attn Tilman)

On 13 Oct 98, tilman@berlin.snafu.de (Tilman Hausherr) posted
on subject "You are not allowed to leave staff publicly"


> I am reading HCOPL 7.12.1976 LEAVING AND LEAVES. It explains that
> "informing fellow staff members and others that one is leaving is
> properly labeled a suppressive act".
> 
> But here is the correct way to do it: "to report it only to the HAS and
> Staff Chaplain and not to fellow staff members". If you don't do it so,
> you'll get an SP declare. Of course, everyone must also get a security
> check before departure (if not, you won't get your paycheck) and when
> coming back.
> 
> Funny is that Elron says "there is no intention of holding on to people
> who do not want to be where they are".
> 
> Found in OEC Vol0, p. 132.
> 
> Where I work, when someone leaves, she/he tells everyone (if it is a
> well-known person, it is even announced in the company usenet), and
> throws a big party.
> 
> Tilman
> 
> --
> (C) Tilman Hausherr        [KoX, SP4]
> tilman@berlin.snafu.de     http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/#cos
> 
>     Resistance is futile. You will be enturbulated. Xenu always prevails.
> 
> Find broken links on your web site:  http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/xenulink.html
> Annoy scientology by buying books:   http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/bookstore.html
 

Absolutely correct.

I have a friend who routed off staff and was stuck on post for
a year while doing the routing out and had to withhold from all
his fellow staff members that he was routing out.  Truely
rediculous.

And yet this will shock any old time ex-staff members who have
not kept up with modern policy, because this business didn't
start until 1976.

When I was on staff back in the 60s, routing out took:

a) You had to get a replacement for your post, but in lieu of
that you could give RAP (Dept of Routing, Appearances, and
Personel) one month's notice.

b) You had to do the off staff routing form, which might take
about a week.  This included a one page off staff sec check
(it was either form 7A or 7B, one of them is staff and one
is public - a real quick check).  Waiting for the session
was the main reason it took a week.  But you could start
writing ethics chits if they didn't get you in session in
that week.

c) If you had a freeloader bill, you had to make arrangements
to pay it.  Theoretically you had to pay 5% of your income
towards the debt until it was paid off to be considered in
good standing and eligiable for doing services while the
debt was still hanging there.  This meant that the org might
only be getting 5 bucks a week from somebody (there were
$100 a week normal jobs back in 1968) and yet they might
still be coming in and hanging out with their friends on
staff or even finishing a course that they had started while
on their staff contract or buying some new service.

And none of this was kept secret or withheld.

This was fine in the pleasant days of 1967 & early 68.

By 1969 (a dark crazy period of crush ethics, quickie
tech, and heavy force), there was massive and continual 
blows from post, so they didn't dare get tough about routing 
out because the staff member would just leave, knowing that 
he could get back in by doing a liability formula and a day 
of amends.  People did that in 1969 just to take a week or 
two vacation.  Policy says that they don't get declared if 
they can be coaxed back in, so they'd just turn off their 
phone or stay at their parents' for a few weeks so that 
nobody could try to coax them and fail.

Mid 1970 had a mild reform as expanded grades came in and
all ethics penalties were cancelled (reinstated in 1971).

When my contract was up in 1971, I simply blew.  Then I
waited a decent interval for them to replace me on post
and then came back in and did an amends project for
having blow and routed off officially.  It was fairly
easy and I remained in good standing and continued to
do services at the org.  That was the normal way that
people left staff in those days and nobody thought
much of it.

But things gradually got tighter and tougher again as 
the 1970s progressed, especially for Sea Org (who were
treated much rougher than the outer org staff that I was
discussing above).

And as you can see from the above policy, it got harder
and harder to route off of staff.

But I don't think that it generally took more than a few 
weeks to route out even in the late 70s.

According to the rumors I've heard, routing out in modern
times has become this horrible endlessly long cycle even if
your contract is up and you have no debt to the org.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

   subj : Super Scio - THE OLD TIMER'S NETWORK 


THE OLD TIMER'S NETWORK


I haven't talked much about OTN for fear of drawing OSA's
attention to it.

But I got their latest newsletter (vol 2 number 2) recently
and they appear to have been effectively stifled, so here
goes.

Although these old timers are much more party line than
ARS or freezone might like, they nonetheless are open talking,
free thinking Scientologists who do not fit the modern
regimented mold and their stories are quite interesting.

Those of you who were at the LA complex picket early this
year will remember a delightful old timer who came right
out and was having fun with arguing and discussing things
with the critics and was much respected by the picketers.
This is the kind of person I'm talking about.  Of course
with their usual stupidity, the SO fanatics came running 
out and dragged him away.

OTN used to have a bit of that flavor.  But it has
gradually disappered.

The new issue of the newsletter seems to have nothing but PR.

Looking back at Vol 2 issue 1 of their newletter (issued
at the begining of 1998), it has a few nice old timer's
stories (much better than the current issue) but nothing 
that would detract from Ron's glory.

Going back to the previous newsletters of 1997, there
are real stories about people who really did things, 
such as Don Breeding developing the modern E-meter in
1957-8.  Its still very pro Ron, but its a completely
different picture, a view of a man who had help rather
than a single divine source.

Their annual reunion (held each September in LA) also
seems to be going down the same path.

The last reunion (a few months ago) had this new feature -
you didn't have to be an old timer (25 years or more in
Scientology) to attend.  It has gradually been shifting
over into a PR event.

And then there is the story of the OTN website, which
was up all last year with no content but only a picture
from the Hubble telescope and a "coming soon" type
notice.  But they couldn't get issue authority, so its
gone by the boards.

The modern OTN was no more than a shadow of the free
thinking Old Timer's Club of the 1970s, but what little 
they had seems to have been taken away from them by OSA 
and issue authority.

As Walt Kelly said, "We have met the enemy and he is
us".  Scientologists should star rate check out on this
and do it in clay.  Walt's daughter Carolyn, by the way, 
is an old time Scientologist.

 
Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

   subj : Super Scio Humor - MARCABBAGE, PRINCE OF SPACE


MARCABBAGE, PRINCE OF SPACE

The loyalist officers in 4th dimensional hiding
seem to have intercepted a radio broadcast of
a popular soap opera called "Marcabbage, Prince
of Space".

Here is the episode that they recorded.

=============


In the constellation of Pegasus there lies a star
known as Marcabbage, often abbreviated to Marcab
by the sloppy and illiterate denzines of Earth.

Around that star orbits a planet of the same name
which is the capitol of an empire.

And on that planet there is a ruling family, who
also call themselves Marcabbage.

And it did come to pass that King Xemu Marcabbage
and his queen Scarf did have a son and named him
David.

And they looked forward to the glorious reign of
David Marcabbage when the time came for him to ascend 
to the throne.

But these royal lines are oft too deeply inbred and
the twisted gene did strike upon David.

"Why is that footman walking barefoot through the
throne room!" cried King Xemu.

"It is Davey." replied Queen Scarf. "He is collecting
shoes.  All the servants must give him their shoes
and he sits up all night standing guard over them."

"Yet more foolishness.  What of the harem we sent
to him so that he might learn the manly arts?
Do they not distract him from these moronic endeavors?"

"Indeed he plays with the harem.  But their true
use seems to be beyond his understanding.  Instead
he makes them stand in the dark and then runs around
wacking at them.  It is most undignified and a great
waste.  It is very upsetting to the girls for they
go unsatisfied."

"Furthermore," continued the queen, "he is making
trouble with the royal treasury.  He says that all
must pay double taxes and that no money may be
dispensed, it can go into the vaults but must never
come out again."

"This is outrageous," said the king.  "We will have
the merchants in revolt in no time.  What is to be
done?"

"You cannot punish him.  I will not stand for it",
the Queen cried.  "Even if he is a moron, he is still 
our child."

"But he will destroy the empire when he takes the
throne."

"Then you must find some way to teach him without
putting the realm at risk" replied Scarf.

And so they though long and hard upon how this
might be accomplished.  Finally, after two score
days, the king hit upon a solution.

"Call for the First Wanker" yelled the King.

And so El Hubbardo, First Wanker Of The Realm
was summoned to the throne room.

"I have a most important mission for you", declared
the King.  "Go forth and preparest ye a place for
my fine son David to learn to be a proper ruler,
and where he might make mistakes and wreak havok
in the process without endangering the realm."

"But where might such a place be?" asked Hubbardo.
"Where ever he goes the royal family will soon
be a laughing stock.  I may be a greater wanker
than anyone else, but I cannot work miracles."

"I have just the place.  It is a world called,
Dirt by its inhabitants.  A dismal place where 
we dumped some criminals once."

"The world is Earth your majesty.  But it lies
in the territory claimed by Espinich." responded
Hubbardo.

"All the better" said the king.  "If all goes well,
he can order the Dirtlings to stop eating Spinich
and appease Emporer Roland of Espinich.  And if
Davey proves too stupid to rule, they will manage
to snatch him up and hold him as a hostage.  Then
I will be rid of the moron and Scarf will not blame
me because giving him the Dirt world was her idea
in the first place.

"Now let the master technician fold time and space
to place you there ahead of my son so that you might
prepare a core of loyal worshippers to obey him.
You will both be beamed into newborn bodies there
while your real bodies are kept on ice.  Let Davey
either gain the experience he needs or be forever
more gone from my sight.  This is my decree.  Make
it so".  And with that the king waved Hubbardo
from his presence.

And so the great Hubbardo incarnated upon the
Earth (or Dirt if you prefer), and began to prepare
a fanatical religion to worship upon Davey.

But he resented being regulated to a backwater
while great doings might be afoot within the
empire.  And so he did tinker with the plan
for his own amusement.

Soon he had given the prospective worshippers
a secret scripture preaching against Xemu and
even went so far as to reveal Xemu's nasty
habbit of tossing people who displeased him
into the volcanos which abound upon Marcabbage.

But Xemu eventually found out and sent his chief
physician, Denke Wenke, to Dirt to stab Hubbardo
in the ass with Visatril and get him out of the
way.

Meanwhile, Davey Marcabbage ascended to the
leadership of the fanatical followers.  But
he still collected shoes and tried to lock all
the money up in the vaults.

 - TUNE IN FOR NEXT WEEKS EPISODE where Davey
accidentally locks himself in the vault and then
is rescued by the little grey guys from Espinich,
only to be held hostage.

Will Davey ever learn?

Will Scarf refuse to sleep with the king again?

Will Xemu toss more people into the volcano?

These questions and more will be answered next
week.

========================

End of the broadcast recored by the Loyal Officers
in 4th dimensional hiding.


Happy joking and degrading,

The Pilot


==========================================

These were all posted with the following trailer -

------------------
The free Self Clearing Book, The Super Scio book, and the
"SCIENTOLOGY REFORMER'S HOME PAGE" are all over the net.

See The Self Clearing Homepage for URLs to these sites
http://fza.org/pilot/selfclr.htm or
http://www.proweb.co.uk/~tech/clear.htm

Or see The Pilots Home Page at http://fza.org/pilot/index.htm

Some translations are available, see
In German  - www.sgmt.at/pilot.htm
In Hungarian - www.extra.hu/self/index.html
In Russian - http://www.user.cityline.ru/~cisergem/ and www.aha.ru/~espinol
  and http://www.tagil.ru/~sk/pilot/pilot.html.

The MASTER LIST OF LRH TAPES which I posted recently is available both at 
fza.org and at http://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/~krasel/CoS/tapes.html

All of this week's posts will be collected in Super Scio Archives
#39, 40, and 41 and posted to ACT.  See the Pilot Archives at FZA.ORG.

Note that some of my posts only go to ACT.  I cannot be reached by email.
I watch ARS and ACT for messages with Pilot in the subject line.

------------------





