Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology
From: pilot@hiddenplace.com (The Pilot)
Subject: SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 37 - EARLY OCT 98 PILOT POSTS TO ARS
Date: 9 Oct 1998  14:00:11


POST37.txt 

SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 37 - EARLY OCT 98 PILOT POSTS TO ARS

Posts to ACT only are in Archive 38

==========================================

Contents:

 subj : Super Scio - LRH on Martin Luther (was Apostates)
 subj : Super Scio - SARAH HUBBARD CONFIRMED ON LRH TAPE
 subj : Super Scio - To Tilman On anthrax.net
 subj : Super Scio - The Anonymous Attack
 subj : Super Scio - Answering Warrior on Fred Schwartz
 subj : Super Scio - FREEING SCIENTOLOGY
 subj : Super Scio - Greatest Good On All Dynamics
 subj : Super Scio - To Veritas On Ingo Swann
 subj : Super Scio - JESSE PRINCE'S NO CONSCIENCE, NO CHURCH
 subj : Super Scio - On Jenna Elfman and Rescues
 subj : Super Scio - Scientology Equals Bad PR
 subj : Super Scio Humor - OSINTOLOGY
 subj : Super Scio - Sci Fi Movie
 subj : Super Scio Tech - EXPANDED CC PLATEN

==========================================


 subj : Super Scio - LRH on Martin Luther (was Apostates)

LRH ON MARTIN LUTHER (was Apostates)

On 23 Sep 98, smokesig@ix.netcom.com (Neal Hamel) posted
on subject "Apostates"

> On Wed, 23 Sep 1998 03:05:12 GMT, publicrelations@scientology.org
> (Public Relations) wrote:
> 
> > RE:  APOSTATES 
> >
> >       Religious scholars have routinely found the testimony
> > and public statements of apostates to be unreliable.  In his
> > book "The Politics of Religious Apostasy: The Role of
> > Apostates in the Transformation of Religious Movement", 
> > professor David Bromley, Department of Sociology and
> > Anthropology of Virginia Commonwealth University, explained
> > how individuals who elect to leave a chosen faith must then
> > become critical of their religion in order to justify their
> > departure.  This then opens the door to being recruited and
> > used by organizations which seek to use their testimony as a
> > weapon against a minority religion:
> 
> How does scientology feel about Martin Luther and the whole
> reformation?  According to the statement above  you are opposed to
> protestants generally because they were appostates.   I do suppose you
> are opposed to Christianity also, seeing as they split off from the
> Jews.  Maybe there is a quote from Hubbard to reflect this attitude.
> Ah, here it is: 
> 
>     "The man on the cross, there was no Christ" 
> 
> Ahh, there is more consistency here than I thought!
> 
> Thanks for telling us again.
> 
> -Neal H.
 

Boy, that CofS Apostates remark is really dumb, and the org has
been using that line for awhile now.

And they are actually using a Sociologist as an authority.  Seems
like they have gone totally into the valence of the psychs which
they oppose.

The clams (by which I mean blind fanatics who keep their shells
closed) don't actually study LRH for fear of getting M/Us, or
else they would know what Ron really said about Martin Luther.

This is from lecture 18 of the 16th ACC (available on cassette
as "The Anatomy of Cause") given on 28 Jan 1957 and titled
"Auditing Techniques: Simulous-Response".

# What was an heretic? It was somebody who THOUGHT for himself.
# They said it was somebody who departed from the status quo.
# No, that's not true. It was an individual who thought for 
# himself."
# 
# If the tenets which were being taught had been true, then
# an original, independent thinker would have achieved the
# same tenets. They would have created these things, they
# would have looked them all over, and in this new creation
# there would have been room for the old creation."
# 
# So only the host of lies need fear individual adventure into
# the field of original thought."
# 
# The revolt which took place around Martin Luther, and so
# on, is quite interesting. You wouldn't think that one
# innocent little book penned out - not even very well
# penned out - would cause such a fantastic reaction within
# the citadels of the church itself. But there is where it
# caused its major reaction. It caused a reaction there long
# before it caused a reaction anywhere else. Wow! He
# energized all of the mechanisms and automaticities and
# engrams inside the church, and they kicked back. And
# it was the CHURCH which caused the debacle which followed,
# NOT Martin Luther, according to any casual view.  You
# see? The church went around and did all sorts of wild
# things ..."

I see a parallel here, and if I were CofS Int Management, I
would be quiverring in my boots right now.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - SARAH HUBBARD CONFIRMED ON LRH TAPE

SARAH HUBBARD CONFIRMED ON LRH TAPE


Did everybody miss this?  I would think that the critics would
be jumping all over it.

FZ Bible posted a transcript of the HPC lectures and they
noted what had been edited out in R&D Vol. 9.

This consisted of two tapes posted in a total of 4 parts.
The part of interested to critics is part 2 of 4.

The message header was -

FZ BIBLE 2/4 HPC TAPES 1952 (Fdn Business & HofM Incidents)

It was still on dejanews the last time I looked (but hurry,
their posts turn into "article unavailable" very quickly).

First let me repost the segment that knocked me on my ass.

------------

(begining of excerpt from FZ Bible transcript of tape
HPC-1 REVIEW OF PROGRESS OF DIANETICS AND DIANETIC BUSINESS
given on 25 FEB 1952 - they marked the part that was left
out of R&D 9 with ">")


My first effort at this was in Palm Springs. I went down to
Palm Springs, I got a modest little house down on the edge
of the desert and I sat down there and I figured out and
wrote down the chart notes on the Hubbard Chart of Human
Evaluation. I severed connections actually actively with
the Foundations and, using some royalty money and so forth,
worked out the chart you find in Science of Survival. Then
a great many sorrowful things happened to me in a rapid-fire 
order. I had neglected everything everywhere, practically - 
a lot of unfortunate incidents of one sort or another.

> The lady who was my wife went and got all tangled up with
> communists.  It was wonderful. My back was ... my back 
> was turned, I could do nothing to help her, I tried to
> help her, I couldn't. Bang. You've probably seen the
> results in the newspapers.

I finally - to get some peace and quiet, I went down to
Cuba. And I sat down in Cuba with a transcriber - I mean a,
pardon me, a recording Sound Scriber - and I dictated in a
space of three weeks the book Science of Survival, which
brought up the techniques and gave the evaluation of human
behavior and so on, and then came back up here to Wichita.

(end of excerpt)

----------------

I had heard this years ago, but it was well before getting 
on the net so I didn't pay much attention and probably 
assumed that he was talking about his first wife, who is 
known of by Scientologists (as Nib's mother and as some 
sort of a bad character who was hostile to Dianetics).

Since then I have read Barefaced Messiah and I know about
the controversy concerning his second wife, Sarah, who
he later claims he was not married to (and he denied fathering
Alexis).

Since fraudulent marriage and paternity suits are common
with famous people, I read the Barefaced Messiah account
with some doubt and I've avoided any discussion of Sarah
and her daughter Alexis.

But here we have it in Ron's own words.  "The lady who was
my wife went and got all tangled up with communists ..."

And the time period he is referring to on this 1952 tape
is indeed the well documented 1951 visit to Palm Springs 
when he was writing "Science of Survival".

There is no way that he could have been talking about his
first wife, Polly.  According to Chapter 8 of Barefaced 
Messiah (page 134 of the 1987 American hardcover edition),
Polly filed for divorce in 1947.  I would assume that
this is well documented.

That means that he must be referring to Sarah as his wife.
And his story fits with the events described in Barefaced
Messiah chapter 10 "Commies, Kidnaps and Chaos".

If the CofS hadn't edited this out of the transcript, it
would never have been noticed.  But thanks to FZB, it
has now come to light.  And let me confirm their transcript.
The first thing that I did was get out the old reel and
check it and they are correct, its on the reel and not
in the R&D, and the same goes for the other things about
Don Purcell and so forth that were edited out of this
lecture.

As I've said before, Hubbard might exaggerate or downplay
things in the 1950s lectures to his students but he doesn't
lie to them.  You wouldn't find a course tape where he
denies that Sarah was his wife just like you wouldn't
find one where he claims to be a nuclear physicist or
says that he got good grades in school.  Instead you
find just the opposite.  Even back in 1968 I always thought
that the stuff the org was putting out about Ron was
somekind of PR bullshit because it didn't match what I
was hearing on the old tapes.

Now it seems that CofS has to edit those tapes extensively
because he confesses much too much on them which is 
contrary to the PR and bullshit and so forth which CofS
is comitted to.

Note that FZBA did make a goof on the second tape ("Abberative
Incidents") that was in part 3 of their posting.  They marked
the beginning of that lecture as having been omitted in
the R&D and it was not omitted.  I suspect that they
simply missed the first page (a short one because of the
lecture heading) while they were scanning these in.  They
transcribed it accurately (apparently directly from the reel)
so the only thing that is wrong is that they mislabled it.
And the lecture does have other things (correctly labled
by FZBA) that were left out of the R&D.

And let me take this opportunity to encourage them to keep
posting these.  I think that getting all the tech out on
the net is very very important.


Best,

The Pilot


==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - To Tilman On anthrax.net

TO TILMAN ON ANTHRAX.NET

On 29 Sep 98, tilman@berlin.snafu.de (Tilman Hausherr) answered
on subject "www.anthrax.net ?"

> In <36100AF4.61A5@virgin.net>, Roland
> <roland.rashleigh-berry@virgin.net> wrote:
> 
> >http://www.anthrax.net no longer in operation?
> 
> No, it shut down because of threats from the 'ho. But all information
> from there is available elsewhere.

I hope that this is true, but as far as I know this was the only
website that was carrying the PDC transcripts and the FZ Bible
posts (and Zenon's LRH book postings too).

They were quite brave in keeping these online and I was surprised
that they managed to keep doing it for many months before the
org succeeded in taking them down.


Best,

The Pilot
 

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - The Anonymous Attack


THE ANONYMOUS ATTACK

Here is another example of Black or reverse Scientology being
used to do harm -

On 21 Sept 98 - Anonymous <nobody@replay.com> wrote: 

> He alters to
> unrecognizable the data of Scientology and attacks anyone who
> presents any serious opposition to the harm that altering the
> data of Scientology counseling produces.  That is anyone who
> opposes his efforts.  He alters - he lies.  The Pilot / Free Zone =
> ENEMY!


Notice the intentional vagueness to the accusations.  No specifics
about what is supposedly being lied about, just an entheta
generatlity.

There is an entire policy letter about these "entheta generalities"
being a suppressive characteristic and explaining how somebody
might go PTS to them.

So the OSA shill performs a known suppressive action on purpose
so as to drive me PTS (Ha! Not likely!).

If he could think for himself, he would realize that the overt
motivator sequence guarantees that this will become a footbullet.

So lets see what Ron says about the harm that I might be
producing.

This is from lecture 20 of the 16th ACC, "Auditing Techniques: 
Workable and Unworkable" given on 30 Jan 57, available as
part of the "Anatomy of Cause" cassettes.

# Bad auditing is better than no auditing.
# 
# Horribly enough, there is only one direction for the data
# of Dianetics and Scientology, in being fed to anybody with
# any kind of communication at all, and that's up. We've
# taken units and we've done nothing but instruct them,
# we've done nothing but feed them data, done nothing but
# give them lectures, and had them all improve. That's an
# oddity, isn't it? Because the data they were being given
# would make strong men blanch and strong women take to
# whiskey. Tell them all about thought control on the
# whole track, you know? ...


Best,

The Pilot


==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - Answering Warrior on Fred Schwartz


ANSWERING WARRIOR ON FRED SCHWARTZ

On 5 Oct 98, Warrior <warrior@entheta.net> asked on subject "APAC"


> Posted for a friend with no internet access:
> 
> Has anyone ever heard of a business named APAC? And if it's a Scientology-
> related business?  It was founded by a guy named Fred Schwartz and their
> logo is similiar to the green Dianetics triangle symbol. They handle incoming
> calls for companies that advertise their products on tv and have the consumer
> order over the phone.
> 
> Please email any info on this to warrior@entheta.net
> 
> Warrior
> See http://www.entheta.net/entheta/1stpersn/warrior/


It might only be a coincidence (the name is not uncommon), but
Fred and Gretchen Schwartz have been the Flag Liasons at AOLA
for decades.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - FREEING SCIENTOLOGY


FREEING SCIENTOLOGY


1. WHY WE, AS SCIENTOLOGISTS, NEED TO HANDLE THE COFS


I just searched Dejanews for recent FZ Bible posts and noticed
how many Lazarus Cancel reports came up in the search.  OSA's
Cancel Bunny is really going after these guys.

FZ Bible posts hardcore tech, LRH tape transcripts that any
Scientologist would be happy to see spread around.

At a minimum I would expect that even a loyalist would turn
a blind eye towards the copyright violation, maybe saying
that its not nice to do that but leaving it alone because
it is, after all, spreading real LRH tech.

But the CofS wouldn't do that.  Instead they attack and
work to crush tech out of existance.

It actually surprised me.  

Their other attacks make sense in a sick sort of way. After 
all, they can rationalize that I am a revolutionary or see 
me as a squirrel and they see the critics as enemies and 
they have policies about keeping the confidiential data hidden.

But Freezone Bible?

All they do is put LRH tech out where people can get it.

The org actually gets members to donate money to put 
Scientology books in the Libraries where people can borrow
them without having to pay for them.  That is supposedly done
to spread the tech.

Isn't FZBA doing the same thing, at no cost to the CofS?

Except of course for the possiblity of lost income.  Even
if the org puts a copy of a book in the library, they
con a member into paying for it first.

So maybe it does make sense in a sick sort of way.

But the viewpoint necessary to operate that way is abhorrent
to me.

The message that I get from this is that it doesn't matter
how good and honest an effort somebody makes, if it
has anything whatsoever to do with Scientology they will
go after it and work to destroy it.

They are sinking under the weight of their overts, but
their death throes are dangerous.

So we can't just ignore it.


2. TAKING POSITIVE ACTION


Well of course many of us have been doing that for quite
some time now.

But I wanted to suggest yet another action that might help
speed up the process of freeing the subject.

As I have said before, most of the Scientologists are sitting
on the sidelines, parked on the bridge, in that horrible
halfway state of not being able to either go in or leave.

This is especially true of Los Angeles.  There are probably
about half a million Scientologists there on the sidelines
(probably half of the worldwide population of Scientology
fence sitters).  You actually can't walk down the street
without falling over one.

If I go into a place that has a dozen programmers to do a 
computer contract, one of them will be a Scientologist.
If I go into a large resturant, there will be a Scientologist.
I moved into a new neighborhood, and a pair of old friends
(Scientologists) that I hadn't seen in a decade were living 
three blocks away.

In the professions that most often attract Scientologists
(sales, computers, and teaching), the percentage in LA may
be as high as five or ten percent.

Almost none of these, of course, are active Scientologists.
If you want to find those, you have to go to the complex or 
the Manor.

Most of them are not yet in the freezone.  They will talk
about how they are postulating that they will win the lottery
or something like that so that they can get back on lines.
And then they will tell you some heart rendering story of
their last actual attempt to do any services.

We need to reach these people.  They need to know that
there is an alternative.  They need to know that there is
a freezone and that materials are available on the net.

And the idea is theta and aligns with their purpose, so
that it will spread, and when enough people begin spreading
it, it will take off like a chain reaction and permeate
the orgs.

So I think that we should have some simple thing that
can be spread around where people will see it to the
point where they will open their eyes and really take
a look.

It has to be short and simple and attention getting without
at the same time being threatening and it has to lead to
more information.

So I thought of -

=================

FREE SCIENTOLOGY

WWW.FZA.ORG

=================


That is short and simple enough to make stickers and put
them everywhere.  

And Paul's website has links to everything else and it's
very easy to remember the URL.  I'm suggesting putting
the WWW prefix even though it isn't necessary (Paul has
smartly made it optional) because it clues people in
on it being an internet address without any explanation.

You can print these off on standard mailing lables with
normal mailing list software and then just stick the
things on lamposts in places where there are high 
concentrations of Scientologists.

It's easy if you already have a Laser printer.  And paper
with gummed lables for doing this is easy to get at
stationary stores.

And it's fun to stick lables on things.

Strike a blow for freedom today.


Affinity,

The Pilot



==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - Greatest Good On All Dynamics


GREATEST GOOD ON ALL DYNAMICS


I was thinking about the concept of greatest good for the
greatest number of dynamics.

The org uses this all the time to push errant members back
into line.  The idea is that you shouldn't be selfish but
should work towards the greater good and that the greatest
good for the planet is CofS expansion.

But there is a flaw in the logic even if you take the
concept as correct and believe that the spread of Scientology
is the ultimate solution to the ills of mankind.

The flaw is in equating the organization (CofS) with
the spread of the ideas.

It is a confusion of the 4th dynamic with a particular
occurance of a 3rd dynamic.

Ron has said that Buddah changed the face of Asia with
the spread of a single idea, and he is right.  That
effect was not dependent upon the survival or profit margin
of some particular Buddist Temple in India.

And Christ could be said to have changed the world with
his concepts of "Love thy neighbor" and "Do unto others".
And those concepts do not depend on the survival of the
Catholic Church.  In fact, if we look closely, the bad
things that came out of Christianity (Crusades, Persecution,
Witch Burning, Holy Wars) all came from organized bodies
and do not actually stem from Christ's teachings.

As Ron has said, the greatest good for the duck is not
the same as the greatest good for the duck hunter.

The greatest good for mankind is the free spread of truth
rather than the profit margins of some organization.

Now I personally believe that the tech is valuable
spritual truth.  I think that it is important for mankind
to have it. 

So the stat would be spreading the tech and making it
easily available.

Who has the highest stats?

No, its not me, although I would say that I'm one of the
runners up (as are many others).

The biggest all time dissemination of Scientology materials
was done by Zenon Parnarsus.  Over 25 Megabytes of LRH
material (in simple text format, not graphics).

For this the CofS sued him.

How much tech has the CofS put out on the net?

Almost none.  One LRH tape.  Lots of bullshit PR and
success stories, but no tech.  Their idea of "spreading"
the tech is to lock it away in vaults and crush anybody
who tries to use it.

So if you believe that the spread of LRH tech is important
to the 4th dynamic, then you should look at who is actually 
doing that and who is suppressing it.

Supporting the CofS is not good for the 4th dynamic
and it is not good for the 8th (Scientology as a religion)
either.  It is only good for supporting the current CofS 
managment in their backwards mishandling of the subject.

If you consider the average CofS staff member, their first
dynamic is continually sacrificed for the sake of the org.

If you look at how many families have been broken up by
disconnection and if you are familiar with the treatement
of Sea Org children, you will see that the org is hostile
to the 2nd dynamic.

Of course people on the sidelines don't feel these things
too much (non-staff do well in applying Scientology tech
by communicating better with their children, etc.), but if 
you move in close to the organization, these things hit
you right between the eyes.

Sea Org members don't tend to have very much MEST or pets
either.  And the arguments about the 4th dynamic that were
presented above apply equally well to the 7th and 8th.

So we have a group which, when somebody moves in close
to it, acts suppressivly towards all other dynamics.

Maybe its not that the 3rd is in opposition to all the
others.  Maybe its just that one particular 3rd dynamic
organization is on a reverse vector.

Maybe you could have a 3rd dynamic that is in harmony
with the other 7.

So what really is the greatest good for the greatest
number of dynamics?

Especially if you believe in the importance of the
tech as I do.

Think about it.


Yours in Freedom,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - To Veritas On Ingo Swann


TO VERITAS ON INGO SWANN

On 22 Sep 98, Veritas <writeveritas@iname.com> posted on
subject "CST and the CIA"


> Dear All,
> 
> We've just put a new page up on our site, and I thought I ought to write
> and let you know.
> 
> It's called "CST and the CIA." You can find it at:
> 
> http://www.clever.net/webwerks/veritas/cst/cst-cia.htm
> 
> I trust some of you will find it of interest.
> 
> And, for those conspiracy-haters out there in ARS-land, if you didn't
> like us before, you'll probably *really* despise us now. :-)
> 
> 
>                                   Sincerely,
>                                   Marie
>                                   Associate Editor, Veritas


Thank you for highlighting the CIA - Scientology - Remote Viewing
connection.  This is definitely worth exploring further.

But you are also jumping to conclusions.

Ingo Swann worked as a TRANSLATOR for the United Nations back
in the 1960s when he got involved with Scientology at the New
York Org.  As far as I can see, it was simply a good way for
someone with his broad but non-standard range of talents to make
some money.

As to having secret clearance, that is common.  I have friends who
have that simply because they needed it to do some areospace
programming contract.

I believe Ingo when he says that he didn't know the CIA was
behind the remote viewing project and that he wouldn't have
joined it if he'd known.

Although the appearance of "anchor points" and "dimension points"
in CIA remote viewing procedures is obviously from Hubbard,
there is nothing mysterious or surprising in this.  It was
obviously picked up from Ingo who uses these things, having
gotten them from Ron's "Creation of Human Ability" and old
OT 5 and 6.  I would consider that the entire CIA manual is
based on Ingo's extensions to LRH tech.

And of course now that CIA has let go of it and Ed Dannes
is trying to sell it as a course, he is going to hide any
Scientology connection both for fear of CofS lawsuits and
to avoid negative PR.

But there is something here, especially as to how avid
the CIA was to use Scientology tech.

Can you pry out anything earlier?  Let's say from the
1960s?  The CIA rumors in Scientology were running rampant
back then.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - JESSE PRINCE'S NO CONSCIENCE, NO CHURCH


JESSE PRINCE'S NO CONSCIENCE, NO CHURCH


Since I publicly criticised Jesse's first undignified rant,
let me go on record as saying that his subsequent postings
have been excellent.

The recent post entitled "No Conscience, No Church" is a
case in point, giving what I believe to be accurate insider
information on what was going on in CofS management in
the 1980s.

I hope that one of the critics is collecting these at a
web site since they are invaluable in helping us to understand
what happened during and after DM's coup.

We need more like this.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - On Jenna Elfman and Rescues


ON JENNA ELFMAN AND RESCUES

On 2 OCT 98, Xenubat@primenet.com (Bat Child (Sue M.)) posted
on subject "Jenna Elfman uses Tone 40 command to break up fight"


> From the "Globe" magazine, 10/13/98:
> 
> ===============================
> JENNA ELFMAN TO THE RESCUE IN REAL-LIFE ROAD RAGE HORROR
> 
> She plays a ditzy hippie on "Dharma & Greg".  But in real life, quick
> thinking Jenna Elfman stopped two brawling drivers from braining each
> other with their steering wheel clubs!
> 
> Jenna was pulling off an L.A. freeway recently when she spotted the
> potentially dangerous case of road rage.
> 
> "I'm at the red light and there's a convertible in front of me with
> two big dogs, but no driver," says Jenna, 27.
> 
> "In the next lane over, there was a Honda with no driver."
> 
> Then Jenna spotted the two men swinging their steering wheel club
> locks at each other.
> 
> "I dialed 911, but I knew it would take cops three million years to
> get here," she recalls.
> 
> "I rolled my window down and yelled:  'I'm calling the police.'
> 
> "The two guys looked up and I said:  'You, get in your car and take
> responsibility for your dogs.
> 
> "'You, get in your car.  Both of you take responsibility for your
> actions.'"
> 
> It worked!  The two guys drove away without a scratch, thanks to
> Jenna.
> 
> =============================================
> 
> Sue, SP4(:), listed on the Scieno Sitter list 5 times!
> --
> http://www.primenet.com/~xenubat
> 
> "It will take a *long* time to find another enemy
> with the combination of evil and incompetence
> you see in Scientology."--Keith Henson 


A nice story.

This is typical of new Scientologists.  Somebody does a TRs course
(communications course) and is more willing to face something that
is happening and do something about it, and in the first flush
of enthusiasm at making the world a better place, they are more
likely to be responsible and act in a slightly dangerous situation.

This is one of the most dramatic gains, you get a concerned and
active citizen instead of somebody who doesn't want to get
involved.  The stories of begining course graduates tackling purse 
snatchers or seeing a mugging from their window and throwing something 
at the mugger are endless.

But note that this doesn't involve any OT abilities or case
handling, just an increased social consciousness and ability
to face up to things.

Eventually what happens is that the person gets just as enthusiastic
and responsible about things that are wrong in the org.  And they
try and fix things.  And they come into conflict with policy.  And
the org doesn't like that.  So the new person gets handled.  And 
they loose this glow and will to act and begin to restrain themselves 
again.

Jenna is much too free and enthusiastic for the control freeks.  
Eventually she will end up at cross purposes with Command Intention.  
Then she will either be pushed out into the Freezone or put back in 
the box and become one of the robots.

It is still refreshing to see somebody who is still in that
first burst of enthusiasm and hasn't yet been handled.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - Scientology Equals Bad PR


SCIENTOLOGY EQUALS BAD PR

On 30 Sep 98, ralph@hilton.org (Ralph Hilton) responded to Sarah's
post on subject "(fwd) Re - Who goes there"


> On Thu, 17 Sep 98 20:06:57 PDT, "Sarah Hefver" <tech@proweb.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> >For my part,we have lost a number of public who were  fascinated by the
> >Self-clearing book...right up until they hit the word 'Scientology'.
> >
> >Some were recovered,others,despite a real initial interest,were not.
> 
> Good test for thetans who might be worth working with.
> 
> If people can't confront a word and some bad PR in their search for knowledge
> then I'm happy to let them go off and read "Teachings from the Pleiadians".
> 
> --
> 
> Ralph Hilton
> http://Ralph.Hilton.org


Although Ralph is correct, it is still sad that the CofS has
behaved so badly that the word "Scientology" actually has a
negative connotation.

I can't leave out all mention of Scientology in the self clearing
book because it would deny and obscure the research line that I'm
building on and be a betrayal.

But it is still a shame.  A real demonstration of reverse vectors.


Best,

The Pilot
 
==========================================

 subj : Super Scio Humor - OSINTOLOGY


HUMOR: OSINTOLOGY


It's time that OSA came out of the closet and stopped 
pretending to be Scientologists.

Obviously they do not believe that people should think for
themselves, they do not believe that any auditing is better
than no auditing, and they do not believe in spreading the
tech.

Ideas like total freedom and disagreeing with authority must
feel like heavy boat anchors to them, continually dragging
them back from their real goals of total control and
compulsive agreement.

So let us give them A RELIGION OF THEIR OWN.

Maybe then they'd leave the real Scientologists alone and
stop perverting the subject.

I hereby dub their religion as OSINTOLOGY, the science of knowing 
how to dead agent.

Some nifty slogans -

When all else fails, try making more money.

Any suing is better than no suing.

When in doubt, shoot.

The way out is through the RPF.

----

Some axioms of OSINTOLOGY -

Axiom 1: Life is basically static.  Like static on the radio,
it is an undesirable addative and interferes with OSA 
operations. So dispose of it quietly and without sorrow.

Axiom 2: Communication consists of talking people into giving
you money.

Axiom 3: The conditions of existance are four fold:

a) ASS-ISNESS: This is the condition of licking DM's ass.
This is the ultimate state.

b) NOTS-ISNESS: This is the condition of paying endlessly
for NOTS.  It is almost as desirable as ASS-ISNESS.

c) ALTER-ISNES: This is the condition of worshipping at
the Alter of LRH and shouting Hip Hip Horray.  It is not
as desirable as ASS-ISNESS or NOTS-ISNESS, but is acceptible
as a gradient that leads towards them.

d) WOG-ISNESS: This includes everything else and is handled
with the action of fair gameing.


-----

THE FACTORS of OSINTOLOGY

a) Before the beginning was the cause, and the total purpose
of the cause was TO MAKE MONEY.

b) In the beginning, now and forever, is the decision, and
THE DECISION IS TO MAKE MONEY.

c) And then there was a great dividing of the life units into
THETOSANS who make the money and PUBLICS who pay the money.

d) But the forces of darkness and evil brought forth the
SPs who lead the PUBLICS astray from paying their money
and drove the stats down.

e) Until the coming of the Holy Hubbard who showed the
THETOSANS how to dead agent the SPs and restore the universe
to its native state.

------

THE OSINTOLOGIST'S CODE

1. Always evaluate for a Public.

2. Always dead agent any public who invalidates you.

3. Never fail to get angry at a public who is not paying
in all its money.

4. Never let your staff and students get enought food and rest 
because it makes them harder to control.

5. Always record withholds revealed in session and publish
them as needed to protect the organization.

6. Always push buttons on people to control them.  Remember,
the reactive mind is your friend!


------

THE OSINTOLOGICAL DYNAMICS

There are 8 dynamic urges towards survival in the
osintological universe - they are:

1) Survival through making money
2) Survival through avoiding sex
3) Survival through getting the stats up
4) Survival through dead agenting
5) Survival through disconnection
6) Survival through suppressing tech
7) Survival through not thinking
8) Survival through lawsuits


------
 
NEW OSINTOLOGY TECHNICAL RELEASE

The Golden Age of Dead Agenting!

Learn how to achieve success and advancement in corporate
America by using the third party law to utterly ruin anybody
who is more able and might get the promotion that you want
for yourself.

-------

You guys at OSA might as well face up to it, OSINTOLOGY
is the road to total control and will eventually lead to
using the tech to implant others.  That's the real reason
for needing to keep the platens secret.

Oops, I guess that I just as-ised so much BS that I found 
myself staring at the hardcore truth.

So back to the humor.

-------

How many OSINTOLOGISTS does it take to change a lightbulb?

31 -

10 to investigate the lightbulb manufacturer
10 to third party the lightbulb manufacturer
10 to sue the lightbulb manufacturer
1 to explain to DM why there is no light in the bathroom.

-------

T-Rex considered everything fair game and look where it got
him.

Best,

The Pilot


==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - Sci Fi Movie


SCI FI MOVIE


This might be a bit off topic.

Or maybe not.  Because this movie is one of the all time best 
illistrations of the  concept that an idea alone can change 
civilization.

I'm refering to the recent sci fi movie titled "The Postman"
staring Kevin Costner and based on the classic novel by
David Brin.

It didn't do well at the box office, which only shows the
usual shallowness of the American public.

It might well be the best screen adaptation of a complex
novel since "Gone With The Wind".  Usually anything longer
than a short story is destroyed by Hollywood.

But it was mature sci fi and might have been a disappointment
to people who were expecting a simple pulp stlye plot such
as that used in "Waterworld".  And it was based on ideas
rather than special effects, so it was probably disappointing
to those who went to see it for the purpose of watching things
blow up real good.

Set in a post hollicost world like that of "Road Warrior", the
story is about a con man who foists himself off as a 
representative (a Postman) of a govemenment that no longer
exists.  The people want the idea so badly that they make
it real.

For those of us who believe in the tech, the potential parallel 
to Hubbard is really frightning.  Think about that one while 
you watch it.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio Tech - EXPANDED CC PLATEN


EXPANDED CC PLATEN

One of the biggest outpoints with the old clearing course
platen is that one does not get good ITSA on running it.

My personal experience was that I did get Itsa on the OT 2
platens, spotting occasional locks and seeing how I'd
dramatized them occasionally on the track.  But this was
not true when I ran the CC (which was on old OT 4, so it
was after doing OT 2).  A lot of it just FNed (as did much
of OT 2), but some items read spectacularly, the TA
action was quite good, and I felt a good bit of weight
lift.  So the CC platen ran well, except for the fact
that there wasn't any Itsa worth a damn.

I don't think that it was me.  The items just didn't seem
to relate properly to life.  And yet there were reads
and charge did come off.  In fact there was one spectacular
read, a gigantic theta bop between 1.5 and 3.5 on the TA
with tiny theta bops at each end which would repeate exactly
3 times and then FN at 2.5 each time the item or its opterm 
was called.  It ran like clockwork, so the items had to
be right.  But no Itsa.  What little I know about the
incident now is from running earlier track (see Cosmic History
in Super Scio) rather than from running the platen.

The most likely reason would be that the items were right
but the platen was incomplete.  My experience with researching
actual GPMs (Super Scio chapter 3) was that you can get
items reading well and rocket reading and going to big
FNs and then take another pass over the platen and find
that you had missing item pairs in between.  In other
words, skipped items do not create the same degree of
trouble as getting an item incorrect (mis-worded, half
right, etc.).

I previously did some work on trying to expand the first
section of the CC platen (part A - "The Sevens").  That
can be found in post26 in the pilot archives at fza.org.

This time I had a major cognition on the structure of
the confusion GPM which is part C of the clearing course
(note that part B - "The Basic Endwords" is simply a list
of the endwords used in the confusion GPM - I assume that
that was simply run to get charge off of the endwords
first before tackling the GPM itself).

The confusion GPM as given on the CC has 2 items per
endword, and when I revisited it, I found 6.  And with
that I also found more endwords (36 instead of 21 all
together) and it read nicely on the meter and my Itsa
line finally opened up on how these items are dramatized
in life.

It's still just a big old implant, but it produces good
TA and with the expanded platen (below), it runs easily.

--------------

Before I present the revised platen, I thought that it
might be helpful to explain how I came to it.

I was skimming through the 16th ACC transcripts looking
for quotes to use on a "Ron the Freezoner" web page that
I'm trying to put together and I came upon the following
nifty quote in lecture 20 "Auditing Techniques: Workable 
and Unworkable" of 30 JAN 57.

> "Horribly enough, there is only one direction for the data
> of Dianetics and Scientology, in being fed to anybody with
> any kind of communication at all, and that's up. We've
> taken units and we've done nothing but instruct them,
> we've done nothing but feed them data, done nothing but
> give them lectures, and had them all improve. That's an
> oddity, isn't it? Because the data they were being given
> would make strong men blanch and strong women take to
> whiskey. Tell them all about thought control on the
> whole track, you know? ..."

This, combined with all the quotes I already know about
how dangerous it would be to make the tech confidential
got me wondering yet again about why the CC was made
confidential.

In keeping the platen secret, there is the danger that
it will be used against people.  And in publishing it
broadly, the worst that would happen would probably
be that a few people got a little keyed in for a few
days and then felt a lot better.

In fact, I think that if you published a correct platen
in Reader's Digest, you would probably lighten the entire
planetary case even if you got a little bit of sarcasm and
riddicule in response.

So why not do just that to safeguard people from having
this used against them?

It must be that this platen does not indicate to people
as being correct.  And the very title ("the confusion
GPM") makes me think that even Ron found it confusing.

And it must be confusing because there are items missing
even though it is one of the best reading platens known.

So I tried to spot what was missing and why the platen
didn't make sense.

The entire confusion GPM just uses Create and Destroy.
That may be a heritage from looking at things as simple
opterms during the research of 1963-4.

And I remembered John Alexander's comment about how
Jack Horner was looking at a pattern of 3, and I remembered
that the cycle of action is Create - SURVIVE - Distroy.

And then I remembered an old tape (I think it was from the
HPCA series of 1956) where Ron had just cognited on the
real cycle of action being Create-Create-Create and
speculated that the Create-Survive-Destroy cycle was
not only an abberation but quite possibly had been
implanted.

So I thought of it being a cycle of all 3 rather than
just create and destroy.  And since the items are
in the form "creating to destroy" and "destroying
to create", I simply added "creating to survive",
"suviving to create", "destroying to survive", and
finally "suviving to destroy".

I wrote all six down with the first endword which is
"The Now" (or "the present") and immediately because
dizzy in a funny sort of way.

So I dug out my meter and found that all of them gave
nice small falls (despite having FNed the two old ones
when I did the CC platen long ago).

I then began meter assessing for the correct order
to place the 6 items in.  When I got the sequence
given below, it read as correct and the dizzyness
turned off instantly.

Next I took that first set of six (on the endword "NOW")
and began flattening the reads by repetative spotting
of the items (see Self Clearing chapter 34 for how
to flatten an implant platen).

With that I suddenly started cogniting on all these
locks in the form of "Creating an X to survive the now 
of a Y", such as "creating a good tooth to survive the
now of a bad tooth" (or to survive a bad tooth in the
present).

And I could see this compulsive creation coming about
out of an effort to survive some unpleasantness.  But
of course one then fails at creation (because it doesn't
really handle the unpleasantness one is non confronting)
and thereby slips into the next item, which is to
"surviving to create".

In other words, having become obsessed with creating,
one now has to survive in order to continue creating.
But when that fails, you begin destroying in order
to continue to survive, and so on.

And I could see this in the context of a being early
on the track getting suckered into compulsively mocking
things up in terms of survival and destruction.

This high level of Itsa validated the pattern for me.

The items as given by Ron, were - 

Pair One:

CREATING TO DESTROY THE NOW
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE NOW

And the expanded pattern I found is -

Set One:

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE NOW
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE NOW
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE NOW
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE NOW
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE NOW
CREATING TO DESTROY THE NOW


This is obviously an early implant that lays in the
Create - Survive - Destroy cycle.

My thought now is that the original platen was unpleasant
to read and a bit restimulative because it restimulated
the missing items.  In other words it wasn't the kick of
the items you were reading but the kick of the items that
were not there.  With careful solo, you could then flatten
the items anyway (if the 2 known ones were discharged, then
they would stop restimulating the missed ones), but you 
couldn't just casually skim over it because of the omissions.
Hence it would not have been optimum to publish the original
platen in Reader's Digest.

After this I started flattening the rest of the implant
and I found more endwords in between the ones given on
Ron's platen.

The expanded list of endwords is as follows.  I kept Ron's
numbering and identified the ones I found by adding letters
so that you can see which ones are from the original platen.
Note that in a couple of cases I tried to reword or alter
the sequence of the original ones and that doesn't work,
the originals really are correct, its just that there are
some inbetween that were missed.  However I did find that
a few of the endwords reacted better without including
the "THE".  I suspect that the use of "THE" is a matter of
translation and what communicates best.  Ron's version 
always has "THE" in the endword.

Also, the original CC has that business of spotting "The
Light" worked into it.  They have it worked in between 
endword 11 (Life) and 12 (existance), but when I added
endword 11A (Death) at that point, it seemed like there
was a "Light" associated with death and that seemed to make
sense.  But when I reworking it this way, I seemed to get a
sort of divine eturnal light (the Christian "lux aeterna")
rather than an impression of a point source atomic light
(which is what I seemed to get when I ran the old CC).

The basic endwords of the confusion GPM are:

 1.  THE NOW
 2.  THE PAST
 3.  THE FUTURE
 4.  TIME
 5.  THE SPACE
 6.  MOTION
 7.  ENERGY
 8.  THE MASSES
 9.  THE SELF
10.  THE OTHERS
10A. THE SOCIETY
11.  THE LIFE
11A. DEATH

     (LIGHT)

12.  EXISTENCE
13.  CONDITIONS
13A. THE CAUSES
14.  THE EFFECTS
14A. THE CONSEQUENCES
15.  THE PICTURES
16.  THE MIND
16A. THE BODY
16B. THE THOUGHTS
16C. THE MACHINERY
17.  THE HISTORIES
18.  THE REACTION
18A. THE TIME TRACK
18B. THE TRAP
19.  THE GOALS   (Ron has "THE GOAL")
19A. THE DESIRES
19B. THE SENSATIONS
19C. THE EMOTIONS
19D. THE CONFUSIONS
20.  CHAOS
20A. UNCONSIOUSNESS
20B. REALITY
21.  THE UNIVERSE

     (LIGHT)

----------------------------------

EXPANDED PLATEN FOR THE CONFUSION GPM

(CLEARING COURSE PART C)


LIGHT (front left)
   spot thetan

Set One

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE NOW
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE NOW
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE NOW
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE NOW
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE NOW
CREATING TO DESTROY THE NOW

Set Two

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE PAST
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE PAST
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE PAST
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE PAST
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE PAST
CREATING TO DESTROY THE PAST

Set Three

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE FUTURE
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE FUTURE
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE FUTURE
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE FUTURE
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE FUTURE
CREATING TO DESTROY THE FUTURE

Set Four

CREATING TO SURVIVE TIME
SURVIVING TO CREATE TIME
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE TIME
SURVIVING TO DESTROY TIME
DESTROYING TO CREATE TIME
CREATING TO DESTROY TIME

Set Five

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE SPACE
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE SPACE
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE SPACE
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE SPACE
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE SPACE
CREATING TO DESTROY THE SPACE

Set Six

CREATING TO SURVIVE MOTION
SURVIVING TO CREATE MOTION
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE MOTION
SURVIVING TO DESTROY MOTION
DESTROYING TO CREATE MOTION
CREATING TO DESTROY MOTION

Set Seven

CREATING TO SURVIVE ENERGY
SURVIVING TO CREATE ENERGY
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE ENERGY
SURVIVING TO DESTROY ENERGY
DESTROYING TO CREATE ENERGY
CREATING TO DESTROY ENERGY

Set Eight

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE MASSES
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE MASSES
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE MASSES
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE MASSES
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE MASSES
CREATING TO DESTROY THE MASSES

Set Nine

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE SELF
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE SELF
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE SELF
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE SELF
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE SELF
CREATING TO DESTROY THE SELF

Set Ten

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE OTHERS
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE OTHERS
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE OTHERS
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE OTHERS
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE OTHERS
CREATING TO DESTROY THE OTHERS

Set Ten A

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE SOCIETY
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE SOCIETY
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE SOCIETY
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE SOCIETY
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE SOCIETY
CREATING TO DESTROY THE SOCIETY

Set Eleven

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE LIFE
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE LIFE
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE LIFE
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE LIFE
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE LIFE
CREATING TO DESTROY THE LIFE

Set Eleven A

CREATING TO SURVIVE DEATH
SURVIVING TO CREATE DEATH
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE DEATH
SURVIVING TO DESTROY DEATH
DESTROYING TO CREATE DEATH
CREATING TO DESTROY DEATH

Set Twelve

CREATING TO SURVIVE EXISTENCE
SURVIVING TO CREATE EXISTENCE
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE EXISTENCE
SURVIVING TO DESTROY EXISTENCE
DESTROYING TO CREATE EXISTENCE
CREATING TO DESTROY EXISTENCE

Set Thirteen

CREATING TO SURVIVE CONDITIONS
SURVIVING TO CREATE CONDITIONS
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE CONDITIONS
SURVIVING TO DESTROY CONDITIONS
DESTROYING TO CREATE CONDITIONS
CREATING TO DESTROY CONDITIONS

Set Thirteen A

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE CAUSES
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE CAUSES
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE CAUSES
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE CAUSES
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE CAUSES
CREATING TO DESTROY THE CAUSES

Set Fourteen

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE EFFECTS
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE EFFECTS
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE EFFECTS
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE EFFECTS
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE EFFECTS
CREATING TO DESTROY THE EFFECTS

Set Fourteen A

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE CONSEQUENCES
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE CONSEQUENCES
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE CONSEQUENCES
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE CONSEQUENCES
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE CONSEQUENCES
CREATING TO DESTROY THE CONSEQUENCES

Set Fifteen

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE PICTURES
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE PICTURES
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE PICTURES
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE PICTURES
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE PICTURES
CREATING TO DESTROY THE PICTURES

Set Sixteen

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE MIND
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE MIND
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE MIND
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE MIND
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE MIND
CREATING TO DESTROY THE MIND

Set Sixteen A

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE BODY
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE BODY
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE BODY
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE BODY
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE BODY
CREATING TO DESTROY THE BODY

Set Sixteen B

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE THOUGHTS
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE THOUGHTS
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE THOUGHTS
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE THOUGHTS
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE THOUGHTS
CREATING TO DESTROY THE THOUGHTS

Set Sixteen C

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE MACHINERY
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE MACHINERY
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE MACHINERY
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE MACHINERY
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE MACHINERY
CREATING TO DESTROY THE MACHINERY

Set Seventeen

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE HISTORIES
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE HISTORIES
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE HISTORIES
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE HISTORIES
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE HISTORIES
CREATING TO DESTROY THE HISTORIES

Set Eighteen

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE REACTIONS
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE REACTIONS
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE REACTIONS
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE REACTIONS
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE REACTIONS
CREATING TO DESTROY THE REACTIONS

Set 18A

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE TIME TRACK
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE TIME TRACK
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE TIME TRACK
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE TIME TRACK
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE TIME TRACK
CREATING TO DESTROY THE TIME TRACK

Set 18B

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE TRAP
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE TRAP
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE TRAP
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE TRAP
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE TRAP
CREATING TO DESTROY THE TRAP

Set Nineteen

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE GOALS
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE GOALS
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE GOALS
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE GOALS
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE GOALS
CREATING TO DESTROY THE GOALS

Set Nineteen A

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE DESIRES
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE DESIRES
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE DESIRES
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE DESIRES
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE DESIRES
CREATING TO DESTROY THE DESIRES

Set Nineteen B

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE SENSATIONS
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE SENSATIONS
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE SENSATIONS
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE SENSATIONS
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE SENSATIONS
CREATING TO DESTROY THE SENSATIONS

Set Nineteen C

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE EMOTIONS
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE EMOTIONS
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE EMOTIONS
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE EMOTIONS
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE EMOTIONS
CREATING TO DESTROY THE EMOTIONS

Set Nineteen D

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE CONFUSION
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE CONFUSION
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE CONFUSION
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE CONFUSION
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE CONFUSION
CREATING TO DESTROY THE CONFUSION

Set Twenty

CREATING TO SURVIVE CHAOS
SURVIVING TO CREATE CHAOS
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE CHAOS
SURVIVING TO DESTROY CHAOS
DESTROYING TO CREATE CHAOS
CREATING TO DESTROY CHAOS

Set Twenty A

CREATING TO SURVIVE UNCONSCIOUSNESS
SURVIVING TO CREATE UNCONSCIOUSNESS
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE UNCONSCIOUSNESS
SURVIVING TO DESTROY UNCONSCIOUSNESS
DESTROYING TO CREATE UNCONSCIOUSNESS
CREATING TO DESTROY UNCONSCIOUSNESS

Set Twenty B

CREATING TO SURVIVE REALITY
SURVIVING TO CREATE REALITY
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE REALITY
SURVIVING TO DESTROY REALITY
DESTROYING TO CREATE REALITY
CREATING TO DESTROY REALITY

Set Twenty-One

CREATING TO SURVIVE THE UNIVERSE
SURVIVING TO CREATE THE UNIVERSE
DESTROYING TO SURVIVE THE UNIVERSE
SURVIVING TO DESTROY THE UNIVERSE
DESTROYING TO CREATE THE UNIVERSE
CREATING TO DESTROY THE UNIVERSE

(end) (total 36 sets of items)

--------------------

I would really like to know if people find this easier or
harder to run than the original platen.

I think that in this form its safe and easy to read, but
I don't have much charge on implant items anymore so its
hard for me to tell how this would affect a beginner.

I'm now pretty sure that that unpleasant kick of the old
CC platen is an indicator of missing items on a partially
correct platen.  One platen in Super Scio has that same
kick and that is the "Big Splitter" implant that I put
in chapter 9, and I know that one has problems and missing
items (thats why I put it in chapter 9 with warnings
instead of including it with all the other platens in
chapter 8).

I hope this helps.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

All the above were posted with the following trailer -

------------------
The free Self Clearing Book, The Super Scio book, and the
"SCIENTOLOGY REFORMER'S HOME PAGE" are all over the net.

See The Self Clearing Homepage for URLs to these sites
http://fza.org/pilot/selfclr.htm or
http://www.proweb.co.uk/~tech/clear.htm

Or see The Pilots Home Page at http://fza.org/pilot/index.htm

Some translations are available, see
In German  - www.sgmt.at/pilot.htm
In Hungarian - www.extra.hu/self/index.html
In Russian - http://www.user.cityline.ru/~cisergem/ and www.aha.ru/~espinol
  and http://www.tagil.ru/~sk/pilot/pilot.html.

The MASTER LIST OF LRH TAPES which I posted recently is available both at 
fza.org and at http://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/~krasel/CoS/tapes.html

All of this week's posts will be collected in Super Scio Archives
#37 and posted to ACT.  See the Pilot Archives at FZA.ORG.

Note that some of my posts only go to ACT.  I cannot be reached by email.
I watch ARS and ACT for messages with Pilot in the subject line.

------------------



