Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology
From: pilot@hiddenplace.com (The Pilot)
Subject: SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 28 - APR 3,1998 PILOT POSTS TO ARS/ACT
Date: 3 Apr 1998  14:00:21


POST28.txt 

SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 28 - APR 3, 1998 PILOT POSTS TO ARS/ACT

Note that the posts which only went to ACT are being posted
separately in Archive 29.

Note that I have also posted "Super Scio FAQ - GUIDE TO 
CONFIDENTIAL DATA V1.1" but not included it in the archives
because I expect that this will continue to be revised in
the future and I do not want to fill the archives with
minor revisions of the same document.  Hopefully somebody
will keep the latest version up at a websight as I continue
to maintain this document.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

Contents:

 Subj : Super Scio - THE PICKETS OF DOOM
 Subj : Super Scio - SAVE THE TECH BEFORE ITS TOO LATE
 Subj : Super Scio - Auditor 257 Clear Count
 Subj : Super Scio - S/Nots Stats (Attn Martin Ottmann)
 Subj : Super Scio Humor - A Scientology Easter
 Subj : Super Scio - Answering The Magician on Getting Started
 Subj : Super Scio - Light-Year Kilotons (attn Podkayne1 & ex-CMO)
 Subj : Super Scio - Answering Eldon
 Subj : Super Scio - A Note on Gale and Dayton
 Subj : Super Scio - Answering Lakis on PGP
 Subj : Super Scio - Answering Gregg About 1967
 Subj : Super Scio Tech - Self Clearing After Clear (ans to Anonymous)
 Subj : Super Scio Tech - Stage Fright (Attn Lakis)


==========================================

 Subj : Super Scio - THE PICKETS OF DOOM


THE PICKETS OF DOOM


It was unbelievable.

Four pickets with a Xenu sign and the LA complex was locked up
tighter than a drum.  Of course many more pickets showed up
later, but the first 4 were enough to close down the entire
operation.

It truely pissed me off.  Not at the pickets, but at management.

LRH Way was dead and deserted (except for a few pickets).  Those
big doors at ASHO shut and black in the sunlight.  In case you
don't know the complex, it never looks like that in daylight.  
There are always lots of public and staff wandering the streets.

What I truely expected was that the pickets would show up and 
the org would respond by hustling all the lower level public into
the inner courtyard at ASHO.  It's silly, but the org does have
this fear of exposing people to Xenu, even though Ron once wanted
to make a popular movie about the guy.

But I expected them to fill LRH Way with every OT 3 or above that
they could lay their hands on.  They would have been able to
field hundreds of them immediately, and they could have gotten
on the phones and called up every OT in Central Files (lower
level people could have done the phoning from inside) and urged
them to rush down and defend their church.

They could easily have mustered a thousand OTs and filled LRH
Way with them, not to fight the pickets but simply to put on
a big show of "Hip Hip Hurrays" and florishing and prospering
like it says in policy.

And some old timers could have gone over to the pickets and 
at least won some respect, as did happen briefly (until the SO
dragged the one brave old Dianeticist away) and as was demonstrated
by the DC org in handling its pickets.  Even today, with the
CofS a shadow of its former self and most of the old timers driven
away, there are still enough loyal old timers in LA to have put
about fifty of them on the street to talk to these pickets.  That's
about how many showed up at ASHO last fall for the last old
timer's reunion there.  Just ask Artie Maren, he is head of the
Old Timer's Network.

Instead management choose to hide their head in the sand, like
an ostrich.

This is a sign of death.

In fact it is below death per the expanded tone scale.  They
have finally dropped below punishing bodies and gone into
Hiding.

What The Hell Was Going On In Management's Head?

This was the stupidist possible action.  It is contrary to all
tech and policy.  You either attack (which I usually disagree
with, it is low toned and rebounds) or you florish and prospher 
(and use high toned Akido and Gandi style techniques, which is
what I like) but the one thing you never ever do is to back off 
and HIDE.

THEY HAVE GIVEN THE CRITICS THE KEYS TO THE COMPLEX.

Up until now, the critics were a bit leary of picketing the
complex directly.  After all, it is the heart of Scientology
strength, with more public in the surrounding area than anywhere
else in the world.  There are tens of thousands of public who
might not be on lines but who are only a phone call and a few
minutes drive away in times of dire necessity.

Now the critics know that any 4 of them with a Xenu sign can
shut the whole place down any time that they feel like it.  
And there are lots of resident critics in LA.  How long before
there is a regular picket around lunchtime every Saturday
(which is one of the complex's busiest days) that crashes
stats and disrupts everything?

So I was very pissed at management.  And I'll bet that others
in the ranks are pissed at management.  In fact, I'll even
bet that many in management are pissed at the people who
issued these orders.

Of course I think that they have to get their confront up on
Xenu and laugh it off as a minor incident (which is it according
to the Hubbard College Lectures of 1952), but even a fanatical
loyalist would feel that at least the OTs should be out there
confronting this Xenu business and handling it.

I previously mentioned March 21 as my guess at when the CofS
would fall or reform.  Obviously I was wrong and I don't mind
passing my ticket in the pool on to the next man who predicted
a later date.  But I still have my gut feeling about that
weekend (the weekend after the picket) even though nothing
is visible on the outside.

I think that their response to the picket was the handwriting
on the wall.  I think that the following weekend was the
turning point within the high command itself (the council of
12 under Miscavige).  Somebody's head will have to go on 
a pike.  It could even be Davey's if a majority of the council
vote to remove him for incompetance before he can invoke their
pre-signed resignations.

The guys at the top can't trust each other anymore.  Who is
going to be RPFed?  Who is going to bail out with a pocket
full of money?  Who is conspiring to reform the church?
Who is simply conspiring to take power?

Its better than a soap opera and we should all stay tuned for
the next episode.

Indeed we live in interesting times.


Best,

The Pilot


==========================================


 Subj : Super Scio - SAVE THE TECH BEFORE ITS TOO LATE


SAVE THE TECH BEFORE ITS TOO LATE


This is for all Scientologists, whether orthodox or reformers
or freezone.

CofS Management is SINKING, as evidenced by their response to
the recent LA Picket.

The handling of this picket was down at HIDING, which is way
below death.

I don't know whether these are good guys who have simply gotten
overwhelmed or bad hats who are secretly delighted, or (most
likely), some mixture of the two.

But one thing is certain, and that is that the observable operating
basis is at Minus 8 on the Expanded Tone Scale.

That means that they are not only dead and in the grave but also
begging for the dirt to be thrown down upon them so as to help
them hide better.

THEY MUST NOT DRAG THE TECH INTO THE GRAVE WITH THEM.

One of my nightmares is of a sue happy organization that does
not audit but does sue and successfully erradicates the tech
from any locations outside of their secret vaults.

---

Now some of you might think that I am a squirrel (I am not by
the older definitions), but I am certainly unorthodox and seek
to extend the tech as well as bringing the 1950s tech back into
use.

But these things are in addition to my support of the original
LRH materials and my desire to see them made easily available
to everyone forever.  Just because I write a book doesn't mean
that the LRH books should be burned.  I want everything on my
reference shelf, all of LRH as well as any useful freezone
writings.

Just imagine what would happen to Christianity if the entire
old testament were burried under a flurry of copyright suits
and locked up out of sight forever.

So it is important for everyone, on every side of the fence,
to ensure that the original LRH materials are broadly available
to everyone.

---

The only safe course is to make it all public domain.

I do not mean here to invalidate the good efforts of Gold or 
Bridge in publishing the tech.  I still buy from them and
will continue to do so (as long as they let me), and it is,
in fact, the only money that I am willing to give to the
CofS at this time.  This would be true even if the copyrights
were public domain.

A sane and honest CofS could function well with copyrights
in the public domain because their official printings of
the materials would be supported by all their members who
would certainly prefer to have good quality authorized editions.

On the other hand, a messed up CofS which had either been
infiltrated or simply gotten stupid would be incapable of
destroying the tech by means of copyright terrorism.

---

The tech must be gotten outside of the walls.

It must be broadly published outside of the control of
the CofS.

Not just the upper levels or Nots, not just the tech volumes,
but all of it.

I do not usually condone copyright violations, but in this
case it must be done for the sake of RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.

Get it out on the net.  Get it all out on the net.  There
are hundreds of megabytes of stuff.  Get busy with your
scanners.  Post it to ARS and ACT annonymously through 
remailer chains.

It will take a lot of work, but it must be done before too
much dirt gets shoveled into that grave.

There is no telling what will happen during Int Mangagement's
death throes.  And you can't count on the critics to preserve
the tech for you.

If you are an orthodox standard tech adherent, realize that
you may someday have no choice but to be part of a standard
tech splinter group that is separated from a caved in and
psychotic CofS which no longer practices tech but does
attack anyone who does.  In that case, you will only have
whatever tech that can successfully be exported into the
public domain.

I am not asking this for myself.  I have one of the most
comprehensive Scientology technical libraries on the planet.  
Just read my recent post giving a history of the GPM research
line and check out some of the LRH quotes, or check the ones
on the Scientology Reformer's Homepage.

I am asking this for your sake, and for the sake of future
generations who should have their chance to walk the road
to truth.


Affinity,

The Pilot


==========================================


 Subj : Super Scio - Auditor 257 Clear Count


AUDITOR 257 CLEAR COUNT

I haven't been paying attention, so this might have been
reported before.

I just stumbled on a copy of The Auditor while moving some 
books around.

It is number 257 and appears to be from around December 1995
(copyright 1995 and it has ads for the 1996 calendar).

The clear count is 49,656.


==========================================

 Subj : Super Scio - S/Nots Stats (Attn Martin Ottmann)


SOLO NOTS STATS (Attn Martin Ottmann)

On 24 Mar 98, "Martin Ottmann" <rashidahmed1@hotmail.com> posted
on subject "More Internal Co$-Statistics! Today: Solo NOTs"

> This is a statistic from the Solo NOTs Newsletter, published by the 
> FSO in Clearwater (February 1998). It shows the progress of the Solo 
> NOTs-Certainty Course.
> 
> Explanation: Since the start of Miscavige's "Golden Age of Tech" in 
> May 1996 every Scientologist, who is New OT VII, Mid-New OT VII or OT 
> VIII has to do the Solo NOTs Certainty Course. The following shows how 
> they are gone so far. You also can see how many New OT VIIs and New OT 
> VIIIs are in each country.
> 
> Abbreviations: NS = Not Started, S = Started, C = Completed,
> T = Total.
> 
> Africa: NS: 23, S:25, C:19, T:67
> ANZO: NS:65, S:53, C:26, T:144
> Austria: NS:15, S:17, C:7, T:39
> Belgium: NS:4, S:2, C:2, T:8
> Canada: NS:30, S:26, C:13, T:69
> Denmark: NS:14, S:28, C:16, T:58
> Finland: NS:2, S:1, C:0, T:3
> France: NS:38, S:26, C:11, T:75
> Germany: NS:116, S:98, C:48, T:262
> Holland: NS:3, S:9, C:3, T:15
> Israel: NS:6, S: 9, C:8, T:23
> Italy: NS:75, S:135, C:105, T:315
> LATAM: NS:50, S:51, C:33, T:134
> Spain: NS:14, S:13, C:9, T:36
> Sweden: NS:15, S:9, C:6, T:30
> Switzerland: NS:107, S:84, C:39, T:230
> UK: NS:31, S:68, C:42, T:141
> East US: NS:127, S:178, C:103, T:408
> West US: NS:604, S:637, C:361, T:1,602
> 
> The total number of Scientologists in the range between New OT VI and 
> New OT VIII is therefore 3,659.
> 
> Martin Ottmann, Scharnhauser Str. 19,
> 73760 Ostfildern/Ruit, Germany
> 
> Scientology hates free speech, but loves to spam.
> 
> "I can try a pornography case without a note
> because I have done it so often."
> Elliot Abelson, OSA-Lawyer (1979)
> 
> "Ottman, you are a sick individual...I spit on you...
> May you rot in hell." wgert, OSA-operative (1998)
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Good to see somebody else collecting these numbers.  But
you misinterpreted them and they are lower.

I've posted these from Solo Nots newsletters twice.  See -

In post14.txt in the pilot archives

# SOLO NOTS CERTAINTY COURSE STATS
# 
# You might be interested in the numbers.  This is from Solo
# Nots newsletter volume 1 issue 5.
#
# .... (see the archives for the full post)

And post21.txt in the pilot archives

# MORE SOLO NOTS STATS
# 
# I was looking over the latest Solo Nots Newsletter and
# comparing the current stats to the one that I posted a month
# or two ago (which was already a bit old).  I wouldn't repeat the 
# whole thing here, but I noticed some interesting numbers.
# 		  	   
# Solo Nots Newsletter Vol 1 issue 10
# titled "Merry Christmas and an OT New Year".
# Recieved sometime in December
# 
# This gives a detailed statistical breakdown of the effort
# to get Solo Nots people to do the Solo Nots Certainty
# course.
# 
# "Target: To have every person in every country finished 
# by Mar 13, 1998".
# 
# The old target was to start everyone by Nov 1.
# 
# These newsletters are undated.  The difference in target
# dates is 4 1/2 months, so that is probably the time
# difference between the issues.
# 
# AREA        TOTAL  COMPS    STARTS    LEFT    % LEFT  
# 
# OLD TOTAL   3280     768     1527     1753     (53%)
#              -32    +157     +102     -134     (49%)
# 	     =====     ===     ====     ====
# NEW TOTAL   3248     925     1629     1619	  
# 	
# The TOTAL represents the total number of people who 
# started Solo Nots prior to the release of the SNOTS certainty
# course (new people get the Golden Era version to begin
# with).  This includes everyone who completed and all the
# new OT 8s and so forth.
# 
# The stat is showing how many of the TOTAL who needed
# to do the Solo Nots Certainty course have actually
# started or completed it.
# 
# Of course the TOTAL should not go down unless people
# traved back in time and fix it so that they never got
# on Solo Nots in the first place.  Or it could go down
# if they became declared SPs and stopped being counted
# as OT 7s and 8s.
# 
# So in the last 1/3 year, they managed to get another
# 102 to start the certainty course (6% of those who
# hadn't yet started) and managed to declare or otherwise
# lose 32 SNOTS completions.
# 
# Note that the Starts column includes the people who
# have already completed (TOTAL = STARTS + LEFT).
#
# .... (see the archives for the full post)


When they total these up, the total who have started
includes the ones that completed.

So your number for Africa, for example, is totalled
incorrectly.  Instead of -

> Africa: NS: 23, S:25, C:19, T:67

It should be -

> Africa: NS: 23, S:25, C:19, T:48

This is obvious if you have the actual newsletter in front
of you and start checking the addition.  Note that the most 
recent issue that I just recieved does specifically list 
the grand total for Africa as 48, and it still shows 23 as 
not having started.

The other odd thing that they did in the calculations was
to omit Sea Org members from the entries, so that if you
add up all the detail entries, the total for the column
is greater (because they don't list an entry for sea org
members but do add them into the final total at the bottom).

So you would first have to subtract all the completions
out of your total of about 3600, which would take you
down to about 2700, and then you would have to add in
the missing sea org members to get to the actual grand
total reported in the newsletter, which is a bit under 3300.

The latest one that I have lists East US as having 122 not
started instead of the 127 that you list, so I assume that
the numbers you posted are from one of the issues that
are in between the latest one I've got and the previous
ones that I posted.  This is reasonable because I don't
save all of these and you said that your stats are from
February.  So it fits in between the numbers I gave
previously and the numbers I'm going to put here.

My newest copy is Volume 2 issue 3.  It came in the mail after
the LRH birthday event, but it still has the Mar 13, 98
(LRH birthday) target date for starting everybody, so it
must have been written and not sent out fast enough.

This time they left out the column listing how many have
started, and only listed "Left to Start", "Comps", and
"Total", but you can calculate the "starts" by subtracting
the not started from the total.

I will repete the old and December totals from the above
along with the March 98 total and calculate the difference.


AREA        TOTAL  COMPS    STARTS    LEFT    % LEFT  

OLD TOTAL   3280     768     1527     1753     (53%)
             -32    +157     +102     -134     
           =====     ===     ====     ====
DEC TOTAL   3248     925     1629     1619     (49%)	  
	     +28     +80     +213     -185
           =====     ===     ====     ====
MAR TOTAL   3276    1005     1842     1434     (43%)


Now this is odd.  The total went up.  This used to be
a constant (those who had to do the certainty course, in
other words, all those who started or completed Solo Nots
before the Golden Age Solo Nots Certainty improvement was
released) which would only decrease by blowing off and 
declaring people or by somebody dying and had no way of
increasing.

Maybe they are now counting new OT 7 starts in this
number as well.

I suspect that this is because I started tracking and
posting the fact that the total number of Solo Nots
certainty people was gradually decreasing, which indicates
that they are losing about a dozen OT 7s a month.

If the loss of OT 7s has continued at the same pace
as before, they lost another 32 but showed a gain of
28 so that they must have added about 60 people into
the total.  Since there have been very few new starts
on OT 7 since the Golden Age business came out, that
number sounds very reasonable to me for the total new
starts that have now been added into the certainty totals.

Of course I am only guessing at how they managed to
make the stats look good.

And my thanks to Martin for posting the details by
country.  I did this once but I don't have the patience
to do it every time.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 Subj : Super Scio Humor - A Scientology Easter


HUMOR: A SCIENTOLOGY EASTER


To ensure proper success, a new religion must absorb the holidays
of the old and develop its own versions of them.  Otherwise the
membership will be tempted to backslide and join their old friends
in the festive celebrations of the old religion.

Hence there is Christmas with it's pagan tree worship celebrated 
in December so that the early Christians would not join their friends
in the Saturnalia or other celebrations of the winter solstice.

And then there is Easter, heir to both the rites of spring and
the Jewish Passover.

And it should be obvious from the Easter eggs and the fertility
of rabbits that the anchient rites do indeed have their impact
on what is in theory a very solumn Christian holiday.

Scientology has successfully embraced Christmas thanks to Ron's
delight at receiving Christmas presents.

But Easter is a different story.  There is little recognition
of the holiday except for a slightly beefed up Sunday Service.

This just can't compete with bunnies and chocolates and crucifixion
stories.

So a plan is needed to put the Scientology Easter celebration on a 
par with the Christian one.

First there is the matter of the resurrection.  Unfortunately,
Ron neglected to resurrect.  So the best that we can do is
to let the holiday symbolize the rebirth of civilization.

This can be done by wearing conical party hats painted to look
like the DMSMH volcano.  For lower level public, this would be
the day on which Ron cognited on Dianetics.  For upper level
people, they could be told that it is really the day upon
which Xenu was captured and locked away in his mountain trap.

Next, we must have Easter chocolates.  These could be cast in
the shape of ethics officers and consumed as a symbol of one's
comittment to Ethics.  The bookstore can sell these blessed
ethics chocolates at a high markup and thereby ensure that the
gross income will not go down due to the holiday.

And then comes the matter of the Easter eggs.  Coloring them
is lots of fun for the kids.  It is best to color raw eggs
rather than hard boiling them and that has the additional
benifit of teaching the kids not to be clumsey.

So the holiday begins on Saturday night with the egg coloring.

In the morning, the conical volcano hats are donned and the
ethical chocolates are consumed.

Then the public proceeds to the org with their baskets of raw
and colorful eggs.

There is an Easter parade in front of the org and the wearer
of the most colorful volcano hat is judged and declared as
an ethics upstat.  The winner also gets to lead the crowd in the 
remaining festivities.

Next the crowd goes to the chapel to sing hymns such as 
"A mighty fortress is our org" and "Rock of ages, cleft for
me, let me hide from pickets in thee".  Sometimes
they might even sing the secular but immensely popular
"Guradian Thetans around my Ass".

But the high point of the activites comes when the crowd leaves
the formal service and returns to the street.

This is when the RPFers are lead out and finally get to see
the light of day.

The crowd, dressed up in their colorful hats and carrying their
egg baskets, gathers around the RPFers and shouts "Hip Hip Hooray".

Then the eggs are thrown.


Happy Easter and Good Joking And Degrading to all!

The Pilot


==========================================

 Subj : Super Scio - Answering The Magician on Getting Started


ANSWERING THE MAGICIAN ON GETTING STARTED

On 20 Mar 98, The Magician <magician@anon.efga.org> asked
on subject "attn: Pilot, where do I start studying?"


> Dear Pilot,
> 
> I read Dianetics about twenty-five years ago.  I was in jail, 
> and got involved in a Narconon group.  When I got released, 
> I visited the Church of Scientology, but got turned off when 
> all they kept asking me was how much money I had, and could I 
> get more?  I never followed up with Dianetics or Scientology.
> 
> I just discovered the Free Zone, and independent Scientology.  
> My questions is, where do I start studying?  I downloaded SuperScio 
> and Self Clearing, and hope to start reading them this weekend.  
> Should I pick up a copy of Dianetics and read that again?  In your 
> opinion, which books of L. Ron Hubbard a
> 
> TIA for your input.
> 
> The Magician
 

Start with self clearing.  It doesn't assume any knowledge of
Scientology but it works in a balanced approach of both
grades and OT level processes right from the beginning.  It
eventually gets around to a modern Dianetic style incident
running technique as well as more advanced actions.

I would recomment "Self Analysis", "Fundamentals of Thought",
and "Creation of Human Ability" as some of the best of Ron's
works.  The Dianetics book is slow going and only half accurate.
He was much smarter in 1952 after going through the hard
knocks of the first Dianetics organization.

Best,

The Pilot

==========================================


 Subj : Super Scio - Light-Year Kilotons (attn Podkayne1 & ex-CMO)


LIGHT-YEAR KILOTONS 

Podkayne1 asked on subject "OT Maxims"

> ...here's one from the tech bulletin called "OT Maxims".
>
> "The power (defined as light-year kilotons per microsecond) of a thetan is
> measured by nothing else than the distance (defined as spherical spatial
> length) around him in his envioronment that he can control."
> -----
> Does this make *sense* to anybody?

To which future808@aol.com (Future808) replied on 4 Mar 98

# Gawd was I glad after getting out of the Sea Borg and taking some college
# classes in Physics and Chemistry that I could finally understand that some
# Hubbardian things just don't make any sense.
# 
# I find this particularly funny since Elron talkes about Einstein's infamous
# E=MC2 being all wrong, as well as some of the other physics arriving out of
# that time frame.
# 
# WTF is a light year kiloton anyway?
# 
# 
# EX-CMO
# 
# P.S. to OSA: The Truth Is A Virus.
 

This is obvious.  A Light-year is a measure of distance, as is
a foot.  And a kiloton is a measure of weight as is a pound.
And of course a microsecond is a measure of time.

Therefore this is the old foot pounds per second formula beefed up
to sound electrifying to the yokels.

All formulas of this character are equivallent and can be 
transformed from one scale to another by using a conversion factor.

In this case, since a light-year is very very long, and the others
are biggies too, the conversion factor probably has about
twenty digits in the number.  In other words, there would be
about 1 times 10 to the 20th power foot-pounds per second in
one of these big Hubbardian thingamajigs.

Now we can calculate Hubbard's power on his own scale.

Take an average 200 pound man and assume that he can walk about
one foot per second.  That's 200 foot pounds per second.  I'm just 
ballparking for convienience rather than describing Hubbard specifically.

Divide by our 20 digit conversion factor.  Just doing this in
a ballpark manner, we get 0.000000000000000002 of these big
watchamacallits for anyone who can walk around in a body.

Since Hubbard could walk (at least until the last days), we can
grant him this power level.

Of course that is while using the body for an amplifier.

If we want to get picky and calculate this in terms of how many 
ashtrays he could levitate per second, the number gets much much 
smaller.  If he could only levitate one ashtray per week, we
need to add about ten more zeros to the above fraction.  And that
is being very generous because he himself was never observed
to have done this.

But lets be generous and grant it to him.  That gives us 
his power level as 0.0000000000000000000000000002 TPUs (Theta
Power Units).

(sardonic wry smile)

In truth this is a very late bulletin and I tend to doubt that
he wrote it.  It sounds more like the kind of thing that he would
have tossed out in a half joking manner in one of the old tape
lectures.  Probably some idiot heard it on a tape (with the
audience laughing) and took it seriously and issued it as a
bulletin to try and get some people to sign up for Nots.
Of course I'm just guessing here.

As far as the current CofS goes, I think that right now they
are measuring their power in terms of foot bullets per second.


Not really joking and degrading.  This is humorous truth and 
calling em as I seez em.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================


 Subj : Super Scio - Answering Eldon


ANSWERING ELDON


I almost ignored this as being a Troll, but I checked and you
do seem to have written some intelligent posts and you do seem
to be a critic, so I don't think you have any hidden intentions
to out me for OSA's benifit.

So I'll do you the curtesy of replying, even though I think
that you have neglected to check into the kind of things I
have been posting.

On 19 Mar, 98, eldonb123@aol.com (EldonB123) asked on
subject "To the pilot"

> What makes you the expert you pretend to be? What expertise do 
> you really have with the technologies of Dianetics and Scientology? 

Years on staff.  Years of training.  Years of auditing.  Many decades 
in the subject.  See the introduction to the Super Scio book or 
other things I've written that talk a bit more about my experiences.

For proof, find somebody who really knows the tech and can look
up LRH references and have them check out some of the LRH quotes
I put up on the Scientology Reformer's Homepage, or have them
check tech volume page numbers I listed in the Guide To 
Confidential Data that I posted, or have them check the LRH
references I gave in my recent writeup on the GPM Research
Line.

Or just ask on alt.clearing.technology.

It's not just that I quote LRH, but that I quote stuff which
is not on the net but can be checked out by a trained
Scientologist.  Nobody has ever called any of my direct LRH
quotes as being inacurrate.  They might argue about my
interpretations, but not my sources.


> E-mail me.

I don't use E-mail, at least from the Pilot identity.


> And while you're at it, Pilot, post it on the board so 
> everyone can see. You are doing a great job on honesty 
> as far as I am concerned. 

Indeed yes, I am quite honest.  I am not lying about who I
am.  That I choose not to tell you, especially as I make the 
fact that I am using an anonymous pseudonym well known, is 
quite different from giving you false data.


> Respectfully, Eldon
> 
> EldonB123@aol.com


It does occur to me that you are posting from aol.com and
you did mention "post it on the board", so maybe there
is a bit of confusion here.

I'm not on aol and I don't post to the board, nor do I
know what is going on there, but sometimes people repost
some of my stuff to the aol board (I have said that my
posts can be copied around and reposted freely, and I
stand behind that decision).  So maybe you got a piece
of something out of context.

I'm also curious as to your own level of expertise in
Scientology and whether you've had any auditor training.


Restpectfully,

The Pilot

==========================================

 Subj : Super Scio - A Note on Gale and Dayton


A NOTE ON GALE AND DAYTON


This is not of great significance, but just for the record,
David Gale and Wendel Dayton were on New York Org staff together
back in the 1960s, working, I believe, in the Treasury division
and gaining experience in accounting and so forth.

Wendel's son Sky had a real knack for computers and ended up
founding Earthlink.  

David founded MCBA (accounting software) back in the 1970s and 
later he founded New World Software.

David's son Philip grew up into yet another computer wiz and
did some major work for Earthlink.

I don't think that there is any hidden significance to any of
the above.  I doubt that Scientology retains any strong 
influence over Earthlink anymore, and Scientologists in business
who are not WISE fanatics are not necessarily loyalists who
quote policy or follow orders from OSA.

I really doubt that his family would have disconnected from
Philip or treated him harshly.  There are many disaffected
or disillusioned Scientologists who do not get declared or
attacked.  They are ignored as long as they don't make trouble
or join a squirrel group.

But disillusionment with one's parent's beliefs can leave a
teenager feeling estranged and out of communication.

He should have been able to talk to his parents.  But maybe
they were pushing too many buttons trying to handle him.  That
is true of a lot of parents, not just Scientologists and not
just religious fanatics.

He should have been able to talk to somebody at his church.
But he was disaffected and most of them would have fanatically
quoted policy instead of listening to a troubled kid.  So as
an alternative he should have been able to talk to a freezoner
who would understand what was bothering him but who wouldn't
push the party line down his throat.  But of course he 
would have been afraid to do that for fear of getting declared
and losing all contact with his family.

He should have been able to talk to his friends.  But somebody
who hasn't been there is rarely capable of understanding the
doubts and qualms of a disillusioned Scientologist.  So he
probably felt a gulf separating them.

He should have been able to talk with somebody at the school,
whether a psychologist or a teacher or somebody with 
understanding and insight.  Although most of these people
are useless for any real problem, a large school will usually
have somebody who really does listen and really does help,
and the students usually know who it is even if the Dean
doesn't.  But he was told that all psychs are bad and third
partied against all "wog" authority figures.  So of course 
they were also ruled out.

I'm not sure that we'll ever know what it was he was
trying to communicate.  But it probably had something
to do with Scientology or else he wouldn't have choosen
LRH's birthday to jump out of that window.

I'm quite sorry about this event.

Maybe if he'd been given a copy of the self clearing book
to play around with he would have had some hope for the
future and taken the time to have second thoughts before
jumping.


Regretfully,

The Pilot


==========================================

 Subj : Super Scio - Answering Lakis on PGP


ANSWERING LAKIS ON PGP

On 26 Mar 98, lakis agrogiannis <agrogiannis@swipnet.se>
asked on subject "To Pilot"

> Hi Pilot!
> I would like to use PGP for email , but I noticed that you use 
> the (old) version 2.6! A version 5.0 something, is available on 
> the net, which has an up-to-date interface, very nice. What's your 
> opinion, to me it seems like unecessary hard work, to use any 
> older than 5.0, and actually a 5.5 is on its way. What would
> take for you to switch over to 5.0? You can let me know, either 
> way. If you wont go over to 5.0, can you guide me in using 
> the old MS-Dos version?
>             Have a nice day
>             lakis

Hi Lakis.

I would think that newer packages can handle the old keys.

When I went looking, my rule was that it has to be available
internationally and can run on different platforms (which
eliminates any GUI only versions).  The 2.6 I use is an
international version that met those criteria.  I got it
from the same set of links as Private Idaho, and PI will
shell out to DOS to execute it automatically (PI runs under 
Win 3.1).

Of course I don't post with PI, but I did want to try it.

For simple DOS use, it is very easy.  There are command line
agruments for generating or adding a key to the key ring.
Once those are setup, you simply give it an input file
(with command line arguments) and get an output file,
either encrypted or signed or decrypted.  All very easy.

As far as mailing or posting goes, I would never use an
actual E-mail package to write anything very long.  The
editing is just too poor and annoying.  So I would recommend
writing your files with whatever editor is comfortable
whether or not you are going to use a DOS PGP package.  
Once you have a text file, you can optionally point PGP 
at it and get a signed or encrypted copy.

When it is time to mail or post, cut/paste or insert the
file into the email message.  Do not "ATTACH" the file, because
that gives you one of those horrible MailMerge attachment
messes instead of giving you a true single message to
transmit.

I have so many other things to look into and keep up with,
both for work and for my "hobby" here on the net, that I
doubt that I will get around to looking into PGP again
for awhile.  But if you have a site with an easy to download
version that meets my requirements as far as being easily
available internationally and working under at least
PC DOS and Unix (so that everybody can work with it), I'll
take the time to download it if you post the URL.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================


 Subj : Super Scio - Answering Gregg About 1967


ANSWERING GREGG ABOUT 1967

On 30 Mar 98, elrond@cgo.wave.ca (Gregg Hagglund) asked on
subject "A WINDOW IN TIME: State of Co$ Beliefs 1967?"

>    Okay Ex members and Scholars:
> 
>    Let us pretend it is 1967 for a moment. 

A very good year.  I was on staff and training as an auditor.
This was before crush Ethics and crush sell and the academy
was a pleasant place where you could chat with the supervisor
or the other students about the tech.  There was a lot of fun
and a lighthearted atmosphere.  Of course I was at an outer
org rather than in the thick of it, and things might already
have gone very bad up at the top.

 
>    Please fill me in (with references if possible) as 
> to the state of the Co$ beliefs at this time.
> Was OT3 written yet? 

Initially, only trained auditors could do the advanced levels.
The modern clearing course had started in 1965, but only
a Class 6 auditor (Saint Hill Special Briefing Course - SHSBC)
could do it.  The only way to get grade 6 initially (a pre-requisite
for clear) was to do the SHSBC.

John MacMasters (1st modern clear) finished the CC (clearing course) 
in 1966.

Then a solo bridge was created to allow people to do clear without
all the intensive training.  It consisted of doing the 1966 style
Dianetics course (a light, easy version of Dianetics, neither
the old heavy DMSMH style nor the professional R3R style that
is used in modern Dianetics).  This was so that the amature
could learn a bit about auditing and how the mind worked.
After this and getting lower grade auditing (about 25 hours usually),
the person could go to Saint Hill and get audited on grades 5 and
5A (power and power plus), and then do the solo course and grade 6,
and then he could do the clearing course.

Prices were not too bad.  Grades 0 to 4 auditing were $125 each
or $500 for the 0 to 4 package.  The DAC was either $250 or $500
(I forget).  Grades 5 and 5A were about $500 each.  The Solo+R6 
course was, I think, $500 and so was the Clearing Course.  
Maybe 3 thousand for the entire lot.  The basic price of
auditing in general was $25 per hour (and half price for anyone
trained through class 2 or above).

During 1966, there were only a handful of clears around, and
all of them were exceptionally highly trained auditors and either
on staff or running franchises etc.  There were small numbers
of Class 7 auditors around (the highest level) who were trained
to run power processing.  Power was only delivered to public
at St. Hill, but outer orgs were allowed to run it on their 
contracted staff members if they had a class 7 on staff.

In 1967, ordinary public finally started completing the solo
route to clear and coming back as clears.  Note that it took
time for them to do the new solo bridge (Dianetics course etc.).

This generated lots of excitement.  The expectation was that 
these new public clears would be like the highly trained old
timers who had gone clear, but of course there was no way
that fooling around with the CC platens was going to turn
a beginner into the same breed of cat as somebody who had
spent a decade studying the tech and trying to audit and help
people.

I suspect that trying to make these public "clears" look and
act like the old timers (most of whom really were very able) 
was the real beginning of the bullshit PR and false claims.

OT 1 and OT 2 had come out.  OT 2 was a long run, so staff
members were allowed to take the platens home with them and
solo audit it on themselves while getting back to work at
their org.

There was no Case Supervision (C/Sing).  Eventually, when I 
was auditing in the HGC (Hubbard Guidance Center - where 
professional auditing is done), I would write the next
thing to audit in the 'Suggest' section of the session report
and the DofP (Director of Processing) would either initial
it or suggest something else to run, but it was all very
informal.

Solo auditors were trained in what they were going to do
and then given their materials, and then just ran it on
their own without a C/S looking over their shoulders.

The "Only accounts talks money" policy was still in, so
the registrars were not even allowed to bring the subject
up, and certainly couldn't hound people about paying for
things.  Accounts would simply advise the person of the
price of things because they were not trained in any
kind of sales techniques.  So the reg would explain
about a course and how great it was and accounts would
say it costs so and so much and that was about the end
of the matter.  This made them fairly comfortable to
deal with.  It was very much like registering at a
college and not at all like going to a used car dealer.

Although high crimes and fair game existed in theory,
there was almost no practical use of these things at
this time.  This was before the witch hunts.  So these
things were like sleeping time bombs rather than in
heavy use.  But that was probably only true in these
outer orgs, where people were interested in studying
the subject rather than in hunting for squirrels and
SPs.  But that would change fairly rapidly.

By late 1967, the HCOB "All sickness equals PTS" had
come out.  Now this idea of finding SPs and disconnecting
from them became the "why" for things going wrong etc.
Sometime late in 1967, a staff member was put in liability
for the first time (by 1968 it was a common occurance).
Also somewhere in this time period, one of our staff
going out to St. Hill for advanced levels was declared
suppressive (another first).  But by 1968 we all kept
stacks of disconnection forms in our desks for disconnecting
from the weekly list of newly declared suppressives.

It was at the end of 1967 that the RJ67 Tape (Ron's Journal
1967) came out and was played for all staff, and subsequently
for all public.  The transcript for this tape is available
from Clambake and other internet sites.

This tape was a real shocker and it is basically when OT 3
was officially released.  Throughout the year, Ron had
been completely out of sight, and there were only vague
rumors of the Enchanter (his yacht) and so on.  Suddenly
he's on "an island in the sea" (Valencia) and people can
fly off to the secret location and do this super level that
handles the event that made this galactic sector a wasteland.

At this point the fanaticsim begins to escallate.  There was
just enough that did work in the tech that we were using
(doing things like finding that solutions to old problems
would themselves become new problems) that we had trememdous
confidence in Ron.  And the real data about OT 3 was 
confidential, so we just had to trust that he was being
as smart about that as about the older stuff which we 
could discuss and try out.  Note that there was a much more
liberal atmosphere about discussing and experimenting with
tech in those days.

So we swallowed it all, hook, line, and sinker.  And public
people would go out and do these OT levels and come back with
no more OT ablilites than a Lamppost.

But we trusted and we believed.  And there was just enough
of the sporatic OT phenomena (the critics will say bullshit,
but these things did happen) still around to make it all
seem true.  But the sporatic OT phenomena only occured for
trained auditors and old timers and not for these untrained
OTs who only put on airs of importance.  

And a Sea Org member who is not an auditor but has learned 
to be afraid of misunderstood words and squirreling the tech 
is about the furthest from real OT that one can get.  And
they will go after anyone who is thinking and able to do
things and pound them into the dirt until any of these
rare OT manifestations disappear completely.

But I'm slipping over into 1968 and 1969 here.  The really
heavy force didn't hit until fall of 68.

					 
> Had Hubbard taught there		 
> was no God or Christ? If so at what level?

You're thinking of the Class 8 lecture called "Assists" that
is available on various websites.

This was given as part of the first Class 8 course in mid
1968 and it was confidential.

> Were Body Thetans part of the teachings? Etc.

This was confidential material on OT 3.

The earlier tech on "entities" dates back to 1952 and is
mentioned in "History of Man" and discussed extensively
in the Hubbard College Lectures (HCL), but was always
considered to be a minor case factor rather than a thing
of great significance.  There (the HCL tapes) he mentions
that the most recent "joiner" incident (as things like
the Xenu incident were then called) took place on Earth,
but he says that there are many earlier ones.

Nobody paid much attention to these things in 1967.  The
History of Man book was around but considered to be old
and out of date, so people read it but didn't get all
worked up about it.

> Orgs were held as Franchises were they not?

No.

There were a small number of central orgs, maybe twenty or
thirty all together.  They were basically part of CofS and
final management authority was the World Wide (WW) organization
which was also at Saint Hill (in addition to the SH organization
itself).

The central orgs could deliver training and processing up
through Class 4 and Grade 4 to their public.

The francises were franchised operations, with the franchise
holder providing the initial financing and taking profits.

A franchise was only allowed to deliver the Dianetic Auditors
Course (the DAC, the public route to solo) and the grades
up to 4, but it could not train classed auditors.

Saint Hill delivered Class 6 (the Briefing course or SHSBC)
and Grade 5/5A, and the solo training and levels (Grade 6,
Clear, OT 1 - 2).

When OT 3 was released, and when the Class 8 course first
came out, these were done only on the ship with Ron.  Then
they were exported to SH (1968).

Sometime in 1968, HAPI was established in Scotland to
provide an alternate location for doing OT levels.

And then the general ban on Scientology staff (not public
or tourists) emegrating to England was passed there.  In
other words, Scientologists could travel there to take
courses, but Scientology employees could not emigrate or
get work permits, so transfering new Sea Org recruits
to England was blocked.

A "flight to freedom" had been organized in the US at this
time (mid-1968).  It was a chartered jet full of hundreds 
of people going out either for their OT levels or to join
the Sea Org.  When it landed in England, it was stopped
at customs and the new ban was enforced for the first
time, denying all the new sea org recruits their entry visas.
They apparantly had gotten a list of who was a recruit 
vs who was paying public and denied entry on this basis.

There was a mad scampering of waking various staff members
up at Saint Hill that night, and a crowd of trained sea
org people replaced some of the public (who went to
St. Hill) on the plane and the flight was re-chartered
for Los Angeles, where it landed and they setup the Los Angeles
advanced org (AOLA) and ASHO (American Saint Hill organization)
on the spot.

But I digress.  So back to 1967.  The franchises were
fairly loose and autonomous.  Then comes the heavy ethics
and worries about squirreling, and the various mutinies
and leaking of OT levels in 1968 and 1969, and franchises
like Bernie Green's breaking loose and delivering OT levels
without authorization.  So the court battles and fair
game go into full force.


> What level of Scn'tist was permitted to be a 
> Franchise or Missionholder?

I'm not sure of the specific requirements.  After the Class 8
course came out, they had to have a class 8 to ensure that
standard tech was delivered (late 1968), but the franchise
holder himself did not have to be a class 8 (some were), but
only had to employ one.

The class 7 course was limited to contracted staff, so
the highest training a franchise would have prior to late 68
would be to have one or more class 6 auditors (SHSBC granduates).

I think that by the 1968 timeframe, the ethics record and
loyalty of a potential franchise holder was of more interest
than their training level as far as getting approval to open
up for business.  Later there were big price tags on starting
a new franchise, but I don't think that this was the case at
this time.
 
>    I have a reason for this but want to hold back for
> a bit. Ok?

Yup.  But I'm looking forward to you posting whatever data
or story got you to raise these questions.

 
>    Email is fine, but please post too as this will encourage more
> discussion of Scientology and less 'Not Scientology'.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Gregg
> 
> <<<oo{ At Constant Cause Over the toronto org.}oo>>>
> oo>>>{ And sentenced to Death for this SP Act. }<<<oo
> 
> ["You know, people die if they criticize scientology - 
>       I should take care if I were you." 
> -Marcus Nyman, OSA (former GO), $cio-org, Stockholm, Sweden.]
> 
>  Gregg Hagglund SP5 
> http://www.cgocable.net/~elrond
> --
> " I'm sure it's obvious to all who read my stuff, that I have 
> serious problems when it comes to being able to communicate."
> 
> Download the latest Xemu Flyer:
> http://www.cgocable.net/~elrond/2-1ZipArch.html


Throughout this timeperiod, there were things happening at the
top that only hit the orgs on a delayed basis and which in turn
hit the franchises even later.

Following policy or adhereing to standard tech was not done
with the later fanaticism.  The very term "standard tech" did
not come out until the first class 8 course in mid-68.  And
there is a policy which says that policy is a guiding thing
rather than an absolute, so it was usually used to settle
disputes between arguing staff members rather than enforced
as law.

So a policy or bulletin might be issued, and an org might be
careful and tentative about trying it out to see what happened
before going hog wild on it.  There was still room for good
sense and judgement.  And sometimes old timers would still
try to write things up and correct mistakes and pass these
up the line to World Wide.  But it seemed like nobody there
was listening anymore.

The heavy handed attitude and literal minded interpretations
must have started at the top in the 1967 timeframe, but
it only worked its way down to the outer orgs and franchises
slowly.

Gradually the Sea Org was hitting the orgs with more and more
force.  And the "standard tech" release in 68 caused auditors
to be trained by force.  And Ethics kept getting tougher,
and things kept getting worse, until there was a complete
collapse in 1969.

Then there was a major turn around in 1970.  Many of the
LRH Eds from that time have disappeared (they are no longer
by LRH or something like that) and most of the crap came
back in within a year or two, but it shows that a reform
is possible if their backs are to the wall.

The 1970 "reform" included things like cancelling all penalties
for lower conditions.  The fair game cancellation, which was
in name only in policy was re-interpreted to mean not engaging
in the action of fair gameing (obviously that interpretation
only lasted for about a year).  Most declarations of SPs were
considered to be incorrect and an effort was made to recover
people who had been wrongly declared (thousands came back in).
Disconnection from SPs was pretty much abandoned briefly.
Sea Org missions announced things like the SO was in liability
to the orgs for having ruined them and was making amends.
Expanded grades came out and grades were run on clears
instead of insisting that what was wrong with a clear was
due to OT 3.  The "overboarding" was stopped, and the C/Ses
became helpful instead of invalidating.

The whole atmosphere changed briefly, at least in the outer
orgs, and then all the vile stuff began sneaking back in.

Basic problems like the confidientiality and the Xenu
business were not handled at this time.  So they did
the right thing at lower levels, but the top was still
under this pall of idiocy.  I think that is why the
reform couldn't work in the long run.  The sickness
began filtering down from the top again and the bad 
behavior gradually came back.

Sorry for getting so carried away here.

Best, 

The Pilot

==========================================


 Subj : Super Scio Tech - Self Clearing After Clear (ans to Anonymous)


SELF CLEARING AFTER CLEAR (answering Anonymous)

On 21 Mar 98, fza@fza.org (FreeZone America) forwarded an
anonymous message to ACT that they had recieved with the
subject "[Fwd]: ATTN: PILOT - questions from an anonymous source"

> I went clear on Book I Dianetics. I never did any grades Is there a
> "Self OT" Technology in the Self Clearing Manual to continue past
> clear? I was thinking of running myself through Route I of COHA.
> Would this be a good idea? What else would be reccomended?
> 
> - Anonymous


Maybe I should have called the book "self OT drilling".  It 
really is both.  The various Route I drills are pretty much
worked into various places in the book.

Of course you can just do Route I, and you should make good
gains on it, it works excellently on a solo basis, but it isn't 
enough by itself.  I still recommend COHA as one of Ron's best 
books.

Going clear does not eliminate the need for grades.  And
even after they are done, the grades can run again on a much
deeper basis once you have advanced a lot further.  Ultimate
errasure of the grades on the early track (first problem
that ever got stuck, etc.) are somewhere up at the very
top of the OT levels (around OT 40 or 50 on the current
bridge).

I prefer mixing OT drills in right from the beginning because
it builds horsepower faster.  So the second process of
chapter 1 of self clearing is a strong OT drill rather 
than a low level process.  The difference is that for a
beginner it will run on a shallow basis.  Somebody who is
already way up scale can get major effects with the same
process.  Since it is an unlimited process, you can use
it again and again.  So one might as well learn it right
away instead of waiting.

The real difference for a clear is not in what processes will
run but in how fast they run (much faster) and how deep
one can reach (one reaches much deeper).  Above clear, one
gets big cognitions and overruns easily because it all happens
so fast.  And some things will feel like overrun right away
and should be skipped in that case.

A clear is not likely to flinch from force or non-confront.
Therefore their judgement as to what they should run can
generally be trusted because they don't try to get out
of running a process that will be helpful to them.

So don't try to force yourself on things that don't seem
to have any charge right now, and don't grind away at 
things.  Some barriers will already be gone.

But learn all the theory and run any process that seems
like it has something on it.

Since you've done Dianetics, skip the chapter on incident
running on the first pass through the book, or just read
it for theory.  That's about the only chapter that might
get a clear into trouble.  And it might be useful again
later after you've done some of the more advanced chapters.

At this point I feel that all overrun is due to trying to
push too deep in one area while other areas remain unhandled.
You get some huge breakthrough and reach super deep in some
area, and then when you try to push deeper you start 
dragging things in from the side instead of actually getting
lower, like digging a hole in the sand to the point where
the sand to the sides keeps sliding in.  So you clean off
some other areas of the beach.  But eventually you can take
any area to a new level of depth.


Good Luck,

The Pilot

  
==========================================


 Subj : Super Scio Tech - Stage Fright (Attn Lakis)


STAGE FRIGHT (Attn Lakis)

On 10 Mar 98, lakis agrogiannis <agrogiannis@swipnet.se>
asked on subject "To Pilot and other tech-minded"


> hi,
>  I was watching my kid perform on stage one day, first shyly but then
> with more and more certainty, I looked at him for a while and I realized
> that that's what I'm doing, too. When invited to talk in front of many
> people, my first reaction is 'oh my god', but I force myself through the
> 'stage fright', and after a while it gets a lot better.
>    My question is, what are the steps or rundown that effectively puts
> stage fright out of the way.
> 
> with arc, lakis


I had terrific stage fright when I was little.

When I was young, a relative had suggested that I try the trick
of imagining that everybody in the crowd was naked.  But that
didn't do me much good because I felt just as shy and foolish
in front of naked people as with normal ones.  From my viewpoint,
whoever was in the audience could be as foolish as they liked
but the one up on stage could not.

So I still suffered from stage fright when I joined staff.

TRs and auditor training helped me get my confront up.  And I
remembered Ron's comment about talking to a specific individual
in the crowd rather than considering the crowd as a whole.

Rubinstein, the famous old concert pianist, said a similar thing
on one of his TV specials.  Namely, that he would imagine that
there was a specific person in the crowd who would really understand
everything that Rubinstein was trying to do on the piano, and
then he would play for that person.

Eventually it happened that I was Director of Training and I 
had to host the academy graduation.  Some of the crowd were my
own students, but the graduations also had large numbers from
the beginners courses and casual drop ins and so forth, so there
were a hundred or more people, many of whom I didn't know.

I had some confidence from the auditor's training, but I also
knew that I had always felt stage fright in front of a large
audience and was apt to do foolish things, and I had further 
worries of embarassing the org by coming across poorly.

Remembering the business about talking to one individual in
the crowd, I decided to take it a bit further just to be safe.
So as the crowd began to accumulate, I started spotting
people in the crowd who I would be willing to communicate
with and deciding that I could indeed talk to them.  I had
spotted a few dozen and was seeing the crowd as individuals
and feeling very very good about all of them by the time I
had to walk out in front of the group.

Not only was there no stage fright, but I felt truely safe
and comfortable and had a good time.

Since then I've enjoyed talking to groups and never have a
hint of stage fright, and I don't bother to run any processes
on it or prepare myself either.  So it was a total handling.

This or some variation of it would be the thing to do.

Affinity,

The Pilot

==========================================

The following trailer was used on all of these posts.

------------------
The free Self Clearing Book, The Super Scio book, and the
"SCIENTOLOGY REFORMER'S HOME PAGE" are all over the net.

See The Self Clearing Homepage for URLs to these sites
http://fza.org/pilot/selfclr.htm or
http://www.proweb.co.uk/~tech/clear.htm

Or see The Pilots Home Page at http://fza.org/pilot/index.htm

Some translations are available, see
In German  - http://www.cso.net/mt/pilot.htm
In Russian - http://www.user.cityline.ru/~cisergem/ or www.aha.ru/~espinol

All of this week's posts will be collected in Super Scio Archives
#28 and #29 and posted to ACT.  See the Pilot Archives at FZA.ORG.

Note that some of my posts only go to ACT.  I cannot be reached by email.
I watch ARS and ACT for messages with Pilot in the subject line.

------------------



