Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology
From: pilot@hiddenplace.com (The Pilot)
Subject: SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 21 - MID JAN 98 PILOT POSTS TO ARS
Date: 20 Jan 1998  14:00:29


POST21.txt 

SUPER SCIO ARCHIVE 21 - MID JAN 98 PILOT POSTS TO ARS

see also post22.txt containing the posts to ACT


==========================================

Contents:

 subj : Super Scio - SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TECH AND COPYRIGHTS
 subj : Super Scio - To Alec About Freezone Action
 subj : Super Scio - About The ASMC Lectures
 subj : Super Scio - More Solo Nots Stats
 subj : Super Scio - To Cornelius On Free Zone
 subj : Super Scio - Scientology Mental Abuse
 subj : Super Scio - End Of CofS Pool
 subj : Super Scio Humor - Penalties for Failure to Footbullet
 subj : Super Scio - To Michael About ARS Bigots
 subj : Super Scio - TO WGERT - PROTECTING THE TECH
 subj : Super Scio - THE PERSECUTION OF THE FREEZONE (ANSWERING BEV)
 subj : Super Scio - FREEZONE BATTLE PLANS 

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TECH AND COPYRIGHTS


SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TECH AND COPYRIGHTS


Since Scientology is a religion, it is obviously religious
persecution to hold any of the Scientology materials back
from those who are dissafected with the mother church (the
CofS) and yet still choose to practice the religion.

Note that Scientology is not a religion of rites and worship.
The practice of the religion consists of the running of
processes to increase the awareness of one's spiritual nature
and one's relationship to other beings.  This is known as
"The Tech" (technology).

From the standpoint of many of the Freezone Scientologists, the 
orthodox Church of Scientology is indulging in money grubbing
behavior, denying materials even to its own members, and 
requiring inordinately high tiths for almost anything related 
to The Tech.  Furthermore, they apply coercive "Ethics" and
other control methods that many Freezoners object to.

As such, their behavior is akin to that of the Catholic Church
in the old days of selling Holy Offices and selling the right
to commit sins for a price.

This is sacrelidge in the eyes of many who consider that the
earlier scriptures, such as L. Ron Hubbard's statement that 
"The work was free, keep it so", are the senior guiding data.

To this we must add a cry of foul at the endless persecution
of splinter groups and dissafected members as well as an 
internal policy of "security checking" and punishing its members
("lower conditions penalties" etc.)  in a manner akin
to that of the Spanish Inquisition.

Note that the Freezone, like the Protestants, is not a single
organization with a singular liturgy but is a proliferation
of rebellious believers, each interpreting the scriptures
in his own way.  And just as Martin Luther allowed for the
individual to pray directly to God without the intersession
of any church, so to does the freezone include individuals
who are not part of any organization but who do profess a
belief in the workability of the tech or some portion 
thereof.

-----

Considering the importance of "The Tech" in the practice
of Scientology, the iron handed control of the materials
and copyrights by the CofS is a serious issue for the freezone
Scientologists.

In the current hate filled atmosphere encouraged by the
CofS, where they label any freezoner's as "squirrels" and
subject to any form of mistreatment, it is not even possible
for a known freezoner to walk into a CofS organization and
purchase materials since they are officially barred from the
organization.

Furthermore, the CofS does not even make all of the materials
available for sale to its own members, labling some things
as confidential.  This practice is contrary to the beliefs
of at least some of the freezoners (this is one of the many
variables between different freezone interpretations of
correct tech).

Of course many freezoners would also consider it morally
repugnant to be contributing to the coffers of an organization
which considers it its duty to stamp out freezoners by
whatever means possible.

-----

The appropirate stance, on religious and moral grounds,
it that the materials cannot be copyrighted because they
are religious works and that any attempt to exercise
such a copyright would be in violation of the Bill of Rights.

As such it becomes subject to Conscientious Disobedience.

-----

In the long term, the freezone should develope its own
editions of the works of L. Ron Hubbard.

For example, in my opinion (remember that different freezoners
have varying opinions), a proper freezone set of technical 
volumes  would be a complete merger of the 1975 and moderns 
sets plus the additon of all confidential materials in 
the appropriate date order and other missing or edited materials
all appropriately annotated as to sources and the alterations 
that were progressively applied.

Were such things to exist, then we could see the rights
of the CofS in regards to their particular editions and 
editing.

However, in the current situation, the CofS behaves as
a copyright terrorist and sues any other Scientology sects
or practictioners and furthermore believes in bringing
suit for purposes of harrasment even if the case is
invalid.

This makes it extremely dangerous to attempt to produce
freezone tech volumes, and furthermore, some of the
materials which would be needed for an edition such as
the one described above are kept under lock and key by
the CosS and are unavailable without their co-operation.

This leaves the freezone in the position of having to
reluctantly indulge in copyright violations as being
a necessity in maintaining their faith and belief under
the current reign of terror propogated by the CofS.


Restpectfully,

The Pilot

----

Since I must remain anonymous to avoid attacks from the
CofS, it would help if those of you who believe in religious 
freedom were to do me the favor of posting or emailing this 
message to any places on the internet where discussion of 
religious freedom is appropriate.

Thank You,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - To Alec About Freezone Action


TO ALEC ABOUT FREEZONE ACTION


On 12 Jan 98, "Alec" <alec@flash.net> responded to my
post "Super Scio - FREEZONE MUST ACT NOW" as follows -

>The Pilot wrote in message ...
> >
> >FREEZONE MUST ACT NOW
> >
> >These are the final days of the CofS, at least in the
> >form that we have known it.
> >
> >It might still reform, although that time window is closing.
> >It might just shatter.  In either case, something will
> >remain, but it will not be what has existed before.
> >
> >But the Freezone story has not yet hit the big news.
> >And it is very important that it do so NOW while every
> >newsroom is hot for material and unafraid of CofS
> >retaliation.
> 
> >WHAT YOU SHOULD DO NOW, TODAY, IS TO START EMAILING
> >EVERY NEWSROOM IN THE US AND OTHER COUNTRIES ABOUT THE
> >FREEZONE STORY.
> 
> 
> This is all fine Scio, but who's willing to stand up and represent to some
> newspaper the story of Cap'n Bob's space pirates, space travel, and other
> eerie crap?  It's all going to sound like Cap'n Bob's Howdy Doody Time.
> 
> When Hubbard invented Scientology "to make a million bucks", he defeated 
> COS and Freezone alike.
> 
> ---Alec

I was using freezone in the generic sense rather than refering
to Capt. Bill's organization.

If one of the people in his organization wants to talk to the
newspapers about Bill's theories, I'm not going to object.  But
it is not what I was talking about.

The freezone story is one of religious persecution.  It includes
lawsuits forbidding people to practice their religion and it
also includes secret agents sent into these places to sabotoge
them, nothing to say of the usual dead agenting and fair game
attacks.

Some freezone groups may believe the Xenu story and some might
not.  Some have what you would call Howdy Doody Time stuff
and some don't.  But that is all besides the point.

The common underlying thread of freezone is the use of
processes to increase spiritual awareness.

Some follow Hubbard closely and some pick and choose and
some try to break their own new ground, but all stem
from this same basis.

Consider the Tora (the books of Moses) for example.  Would it 
be proper for the Jews to force the Christians to remove the first
five books from the Bible because they were copyrighted
by Moses?

It is besides the point whether or not the material in
Genisis is plausable or whether or not the Christians
follow the dietary laws set forth in the Old Testament.
It is part of the foundations of their faith and they
should have access to it.

Go ahead and make fun of the space opera stuff if you
feel like it.  I really enjoy some of the Xenu jokes and
it helps to relieve the tension.

But don't make fun of the victims of the Spanish Inquisition,
at least not while the inquisition is still in business.


Regards,

The Pilot

==========================================


 subj : Super Scio - About The ASMC Lectures


ABOUT THE ASMC LECTURES

On 15 Jan 98, afrobert@neca.com (Anthony Roberts) posted
on subject "Take the Flag Quiz Now!"


> I've tried to restrain myself from reporting some of the stranger things
> CofS sends us in the mail, but the following item was way too good to pass
> up.  When are they going to stop acting like snake oil salesmen?
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> -- begin quiz --
> 
> Exercise your knowledge of spiritual beings and their abilities.  See if
> you can answer these questions from the "Anatomy of the Spirit of Man
> Congress Lectures."  This lecture series was a culmination of eight months
> of intensive research and heralded the development of Scientology(R)
> technology to the point of bringing about a new state of being in man as
> announced by LRH in the first lecture of this congress.  Put a check mark
> next to the answer you think is correct.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Anthony
> 
> P.S.: The ASMC Lectures cost $500, or $400 is you're a member of IAS.
 
The ASMC lectures are unfortunately very overpriced, but it is
one of the better lecture sets.

There are 15 main lectures plus #7A which is an after lecture
question and answer session.  I hope that they did all of them
without editing (does anybody have the new set? I only have the 
old reels), but I have my doubts.

The first lecture is "The Hope Of Man" and the final one (#15)
is "What Scientology Is Doing".

That last lecture is one of the most Anti-Sea Org lectures ever
given and is the rabble rousing one where Ron predicts that
someday we will have to rebel against the orthodox organization.

That is where my "AUDITORS ARISE" quote comes from that is
on the Scientology Reformer's Home Page.

In October of 1969, all the orgs world wide gave something called
THE OCTOBER CONGRESS.  It was actually a repackaging of 
the ASMC lectures.

This was done as an emergency measure to try and handle the
collapse of Scientology which was actually occuring due to
quickie grades, suppressive ethics, crush sell, overboard style
standard tech, and rabid Sea Org missions.

Somebody researched the old congresses and found that the
Anatomy of the Spirit of Man Congress (ASMC) given over a
period of 4 days in 1955 was one of the most successful congresses
ever done and caused a boom in the subject.

A congress was a Scientology event where Ron would speak (or
his tapes would be played) given full time over a weekend or
a bit longer.  It was open to the general public but usually
contained a good bit of advanced tech watered down a bit for
ordinary public instead of professional auditors.  Usually
there was an admission charge.  Generally these were about
25 dollars in the 1960s.  I think that was the fee for attending
the October congress.

The October Congress (1969) was promoted a great deal and the 
impression everyone had was that it would be a new set of lectures 
from Ron and that it would save the subject.

The tapes only arrived a few days before the event and I was
surprised to see that it was really a repackaging of an old
congress.  But we were to play them as if it was a new release
and so the few of us who knew kept our mouths shut.

If I remember right, it was Thursday evening, and Friday
evening, and then full time Saturday and Sunday.

The very last lecture (the rable rousing one) was OMITTED
and a modern lecture about the grade chart was substituted.

The lectures included 3 hours of group processing (Ron giving
auditing commands to the audience).  Some of the standard
tech fanatics and the C/Ses almost shit their pants.  Some
of the wildest squirrely auditing that the public had ever
had in a decade.

Remember, these were the toughest of the standard tech days.
People would get declared suppressive for running processes
like the ones on the tapes.

The standard tech fanatics were sure that the people in the 
audience would get sick, cave in, have nightmares, or whatever.

Instead the audience loved it, and a number of people even had
the clear cog from one of the tapes.

It actually did create a boom at the org for about two weeks.
That was about how long it took for the public to cognite that
the tech they heard on those tapes had nothing whatsoever to
do with modern standard tech.

After that the collapse continued on its downward slide.
But somebody must have noticed that it worked despite violating
all the rules of standard tech, so eventually Yvonne Gillam
(later Yvonne Jentz) started going around to the various
orgs on tour running 1950s style group processing.

Too bad they didn't play the last tape in the set.  We
might have had our revolution right then and there.

Best,

The Pilot


==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - More Solo Nots Stats


MORE SOLO NOTS STATS


I was looking over the latest Solo Nots Newsletter and
comparing the current stats to the one that I posted a month
or two ago (which was already a bit old).  I wouldn't repeat the 
whole thing here, but I noticed some interesting numbers.
		  	   
Solo Nots Newsletter Vol 1 issue 10
titled "Merry Christmas and an OT New Year".
Recieved sometime in December

This gives a detailed statistical breakdown of the effort
to get Solo Nots people to do the Solo Nots Certainty
course.

"Target: To have every person in every country finished 
by Mar 13, 1998".

The old target was to start everyone by Nov 1.

These newsletters are undated.  The difference in target
dates is 4 1/2 months, so that is probably the time
difference between the issues.

AREA        TOTAL  COMPS    STARTS    LEFT    % LEFT  

OLD TOTAL   3280     768     1527     1753     (53%)
	     -32    +157     +102     -134     (49%)
	   =====     ===     ====     ====
NEW TOTAL   3248     925     1629     1619	  
	
The TOTAL represents the total number of people who 
started Solo Nots prior to the release of the SNOTS certainty
course (new people get the Golden Era version to begin
with).  This includes everyone who completed and all the
new OT 8s and so forth.

The stat is showing how many of the TOTAL who needed
to do the Solo Nots Certainty course have actually
started or completed it.

Of course the TOTAL should not go down unless people
traved back in time and fix it so that they never got
on Solo Nots in the first place.  Or it could go down
if they became declared SPs and stopped being counted
as OT 7s and 8s.

So in the last 1/3 year, they managed to get another
102 to start the certainty course (6% of those who
hadn't yet started) and managed to declare or otherwise
lose 32 SNOTS completions.

Note that the Starts column includes the people who
have already completed (TOTAL = STARTS + LEFT).

Of course they do let people complete sometimes,
so the number of Comps is going up.

The newsletter included a detailed breakdown by
country (similar to the previous one I posted).

In general, the few who were talked into starting
were pretty much spread out in the various geographical
areas, with a few interesting exceptions.

Germany did not suffer any decrease, and 3 of SNOTS
completions seem to have started the certainty course
(and 13 completed it) so the troubles with the 
government doesn't seem to have hurt the orthodox
enthusiasm.

But some places such as Italy (4 started and 4 gone)
and San Franciso (9 started and 9 gone) may have used
a heavy ethics push to get people to start and lost
half of the people they pushed hard at.

One of the little articles in the newsletter is called 
"Italian Ambassadors in Action".

"The Italian OT Ambassadors are rolling, not only
getting OT Project #1 done (see where Italy is in
the latest standings) but also they have now activated
OT Project #2, getting Clears moving as well.  Ably
lead by Franco Beschi they are holding events and
doing mailings and from this, the CLO noticed that
their field is becoming activated!  Anna Mazza,
FSC Italy I/C, recently commented 'I have never had
anything like this before.  I can ask ANY Solo
NOTs Certainty completion at ANY time for help and
they assist me on whatever is needed - IT'S INCREDIBLE.'"


AREA            TOTAL COMPS STARTS LEFT  PERCENT LEFT
			   
Italy (old #s)    214   90   126    88     (41%)

Italy (new #s)    210  100   130    80     (38%)

difference        -4   +10    +4    -8

In other words, of the 88 people who hadn't started
last time, they managed to force 4 of them to get on
the course while losing another 4, probably to the 
freezone.  I have no data but I would guess that they
put heavy ethics style pressure on 8 guys and 4 of
them blew and 4 succumbed.  The Italian OT Ambassadors 
really are rolling!

Well, at least they let another 10 people complete
what seems to be an endlessly long course (apparantly
26 of the 30 people in Italy who have started it and not 
completed have been on it since the last newsletter came 
out - I assume that most of these people just did the first
part and are at home rather than being at Flag the
entire time, probably under the "must come back every 6
months" rule).

Sounds like overrun city, with Flag trying to go to
the trough again and again on the same people.


Best,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - To Cornelius On Free Zone


TO CORNELIUS ON FREE ZONE


On 12 Jan 98, Cornelius Krasel <krasel@wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de>
asked on subject "Analysis of CoS attack on ARS"

> D.A. Hacker <dhacker@SLAM.SPAM.pacbell.net> wrote:
> > I urge you to restore your focus and promote FreeZone. This is the way to
> > the end of CoS.
> 
> In my opinion, the Free Zone has never satisfactorily addressed the question
> of which part of the "tech" it promotes and which part it despises.
> 
> Just two examples:
> 
> * Do "Suppressive Persons" or "Potential Trouble Sources" exist in the
>   Free Zone?
> * Is the aim of the Free Zone to "Clear The Planet"?
> 
> --Cornelius.
> 
> /* Cornelius Krasel, U Wuerzburg, Dept. of Pharmacology, Versbacher Str. 9 */
> /* D-97078 Wuerzburg, Germany   email: phak004@rzbox.uni-wuerzburg.de  SP4 */
> /* "Science is the game we play with God to find out what His rules are."  */

This is like asking how Protestants are supposed to pray.  Do they
cover their faces, clasp their hands, or fold them in the Catholic
style.

The answer is that it varies by denomination.  The Baptists for
example will cover their faces.

Since they are welcome at each other's churchs, a big service
will see a mixture of methods even though the specific church
will have its particular way.  At least that is how it is here
in the US.

In my particular flavor, one would have PTS as a case condition
where somebody is being abused or manipulated by another and
would handle it as a case matter by auditing them until they could
confront and handle the person who is suppressing them.  The concept 
of an abstract suppressive person who is the root of evil does not exist 
in my world view.  Therefore using ethics to label people as suppressive
is a false idea which is to be despised.

This is how I would reform orthodox Scientology as well if the
opportunity presents itself.  It is a reasonable position that
retains the use of auditing rundowns which help the situation
while eliminating the witch hunting and kangaroo court style
ethics.

But various freezone groups would have differing postions on
this.  It is one of the areas that is obvious to all of them
as needing revision because all of them have been wrongfully
attacked on the basis of their being suppressives.

Some might reject the entirety of the PTS/SP concepts.  Some might
retain more than I do, but none would keep everything because
they have been harmed by it.

As to Clearing the Planet, again this is a subject of much
varience.

There are many differences of opinion on the meaning of
Clear.  I have my own based on Ron's much saner definitions
of 1957-8 (ability to confront pain and force in mental pictures) 
rather than the fanatical definitions of the late 1960s.

And some definitions of "Clearing the Planet" do not require
that everyone on Earth become "Clear" but simply expect the
planet to become a safer and saner environment.  I would suggest
this as being a good thing which does not require that everyone
convert to Scientology or accept it but simply expects rational
behavior from governments and society.

Many freezone groups would want to spread the tech around
the planet and make it easily available to all.

I don't think that anybody in the freezone would want to
see everyone on the planet recruited into a single tough minded
organization that marshalled everyone up and "cleared" them.

One of the underlying concepts that is a common denomenator
of the free zone is that people should be free to practice
the tech in their own way and not have to bow to some singular
central authority.

Asking the free zone questions such as the above is liable to
trigger a theological debate.  Both questions are points of
contention and most freezoners will know that they can't answer
for the others on points like these.

No single person can speak for all of the freezone just as
no single person can speak for all the Protestants.  At best
one can study the matter and give a good analysis which will
be mostly correct.


I hope this helps,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - Scientology Mental Abuse


SCIENTOLOGY MENTAL ABUSE

On 15 Jan 98, "Homer W. Smith" <homer@lightlink.com> forwarded
a message on subject "Your emotional health (fwd)" without
identifying the author.

The article discussed emotional abuse of children and ended
with the following very interesting section -


> If you are a victim of emotional abuse, there can be no self-help until
> you learn to SELF-REFERENCE. That means developing your own standards,
> deciding for yourself what "goodness" really is. Adopting the abuser's
> calculated labels--"You're crazy. You're ungrateful. It didn't happen the
> way you say"--only continues the cycle.
> 
> Adult survivors of emotional child abuse have only two life-choices: learn
> to self-reference or remain a victim. When your self-concept has been
> shredded, when you have been deeply injured and made to feel the injury
> was all your fault, when you look for approval to those who can not or
> will not provide it--you play the role assigned to you by your abusers.
> 
> It's time to stop playing that role, time to write your own script.
> Victims of emotional abuse carry the cure in their own hearts and souls.
> Salvation means learning self-respect, earning the respect of others and
> making that respect the absolutely irreducible minimum requirement for all
> intimate relationships. For the emotionally abused child, healing does
> come down to "forgiveness"--forgiving yourself.
> 
> How you forgive yourself is as individual as you are. But knowing you
> deserve to be loved and respected and empowering yourself with a
> commitment to try is half the battle. Much more. 
> 
> And it is never too soon--or too late--to start. 


This in turn made me think of the new Scientology slogan about
THINKING FOR YOURSELF.

That one must have been originated by a reformer and snuck
through lines because it sounds good and seems like what Scientology
should be about.

It seems to me like its really a message from some Scientologists
to other Scientologists in the church and was placed on outside
lines because there is no way to send such a message internally.

It seems to me that the real tech on thinking for yourself would
be to learn to "SELF-REFERENCE" and develop your own standards as
mentioned in the above article.

And that reminded me of the really really good feeling I got
from doing my writeup on "What is and isn't true" in the first
chapter of the Super Scio book.

So here is THE PROCESS for people coming out of the CofS (and
for those within it who really want total freedom):

DO YOUR OWN EVALUATION OF WHAT IS AND ISN'T TRUE IN SCIENTOLOGY.

EVALUATE IT BY YOUR OWN STANDARDS.  NOT BY MY STANDARDS OR 
HUBBARD'S STANDARDS OR THE REGISTRAR'S STANDARDS OR THE CRITIC'S
STANDARADS, BUT BY YOUR OWN PERSONAL STANDARDS.

Do this for your own satisfaction and for your own freedom
of thought.

This does not guarantee that you will be correct in your
evaluations.  But at least it will be your own thoughts in
your head instead of somebody else's.

Good Luck,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - End Of CofS Pool


END OF COFS POOL


I seem to have started this with my postulate that 21 Mar 98 would be
the date when it happened in my post "Super Scio - Plugging Away At 
All Fronts (Attn Hartley)".

Then David Gerard picked up on it and renamed the thread
"Death of CoS Pool!" which I though was a neat idea, but Death
is too strong a word so I'll call it the "End of CofS Pool".

And there has been some wondering about the rules.  I mentioned
the kind of things that I had in mind in the original post, but
I was discussing the subject rather than listing things clearly.

So here is a suggested list for use as a starting point.

These are things that I think are significant enough to mean
the end.  Of course there are possible loopholes (DM gets
hit by a truck and an equally fanatical person replaces him),
and some ending situations lead to them lingering on for years
in a slow crumbling, but in general any one of these would
at least signal that we have entered the end game and be worth
having a party.

The condition for winning the pool is for any of the following
to occur:

1. The copyrights becoming public domain or are otherwise lost

2. David Miscaviage blows, is removed, goes to jail, or resigns 
and is replaced by a leader dedicated to reform.

3. Major Policies such as KSW, High Crimes, and so forth are
actually revised significantly or cancelled and the changes
are broadly promoted and circulated among the membership.

4. The corporate structure is shattered or unbundled so that
the outer organizations and missions are totally independent,
can do what they like including publishing confidential materials,
and are not subject to RTC or Sea Org mandates.

(This is almost as good as losing the copyrights, any disgruntled
mission could authorize operation clambake for example).

5. The corporation declares bankruptcy and either Flag or
Cedars is auctioned off.

6. A high CofS offical such as Heber publicly acknowledges and 
discusses the story of Xemu without ranting about the evil
psychs.

7. Hubbard reappears as a reincarnated teenager with enough
proof to convince the orgs and gain control of the fortune
and then says "It was all a big mistake, everybody go home".
(joke, but anything like this would qualify if the members
believed it).

-----

The pool tickets that I have seen so far are:

The Pilot
    21 Mar 1998

D.A. Hacker
    5 July 1998

David Gerard
    May 1999

Tommy_spoogespam@Xs.net
    Feb 2000

William Barwell
    Jan 2008  (based on his saying "another DECADE")

Austin George Loomis
    December 22, 2012

Martin Hunt
    the high number, whatever it is

-----

I'm not planning to maintain the above list.  I'm just laying
it out here to make it easy for the next man.

-----

Note that I wouldn't be disappointed or get discouraged
if I miss my date.  I believe in going for the best case
senario rather than holding back.  If it takes longer, then
it takes longer.

-----

As to prizes, I would suggest a tin foil hat.  Maybe the
ARSCC would even go so far as to offer an autographed tin
foil hat, but that's up to them.

Here's Hopeing for a Really Good Year,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio Humor - Penalties for Failure to Footbullet


PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO FOOTBULLET


They loyalist officers hiding in the 4th dimension have
intercepted the following new policy letter which is
about to be released at the next event.

I am mearly passing it on as a public service and take
no responsibility for its contents.

Enjoy,

The Pilot

----------

   HCO POLICY LETTER OF xxxxx
   (date garbled in transmission) 

   PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO FOOTBULLET


It has come to my attention that some Scientologists have
failed to footbullet adequately.

The magnitude of this error is so great as to threaten
the future of all of western civilization.

On this basis, the lower ethics conditions are inadequate
and must be beefed up.


1. FOOTBULLET LIABILITY

Sometimes the organization has failed to spam and sue
adequately to keep creating more critics in adequate numbers.
This is downstat and cannot be tolerated.

As long as there is a single neutral ISP on the internet,
our job has not been done adequately.   Remember that two
thirds of an ISP is an SP or a Suppressive Person.  Therefore
they must be sued.  If they haven't put up any confidential
materials yet, they will soon, so get the jump on them and
attack first.  

Make them into critics FAST.  We need adequate critics to
show the membership how bad it is out there.

Anyone failing to implement this or being namby pamby about
launching lawsuits is to be put on a diet of dog food in
place of the customary rice and beans in addition to applying
all normal formulas and penalties for a condition of liability.


2. FOOTBULLET DOUBT

Some members have lacked adequate certainty that there is an
evil world conspiracy out there run by the 12 evil bankers
and their chairman Rockecenter.

We must prove to the world that this evil conspiracy is
real.

Do whatever is necessary to get the governments pissed off
at us so that we can be persecuted.  Break laws, commit credit 
card frauds, infiltrate government agencies, or do whatever
else it takes to accomplish this, but be sure and get those
attacks moving.

There is no better thing that you could do for your country
than to get it to persecute Scientology because that will
ensure that the membership will rally to our support and
guarantee that we will clear the planet.

Anyone failing to support this or agree with it is in a 
condition of FOOTBULLET DOUBT.  They are to not only apply
the doubt formula and all penalties but must also shit in 
their pants instead of using a restroom until they are 
upgraded to FOOTBULLET LIABILITY.


3. FOOTBULLET ENEMY

Some members actually disagree with the wisdom of footbulleting.
They object to the televised rantings of our loyal leaders.
They would actually talk to the critics or try to improve
conditions.

This is an invalidation of the organization and must be
stopped at all costs.

Anyone who disagrees with the practice of footbulleting is 
hereby immediately assigned a condition of FOOTBULLET ENEMY.

In addition to the normal formula, which is to "find out
who you really are", they are also to apply an additional
step which is to "find out who your god really is" and the
only acceptible answer is "L. Ron Hubbard".  Until this
answer is cognited on (without prompting), they must remain
in this lower condition.

To encourage quick congnitions, anyone in FOOTBULLET ENEMY
is also to be subject to daily anal reamings by upper management
in addition to all other penalties.


4. FOOTBULLET TREASON

A very few bad hats who have somehow remained hidden in our
ranks not only object to footbulleting but wish to see
a complete reform.

They would have the membership actually confront critics and
find out what is being criticised instead of suppressing
the existance of critics.

This is intolerable and would doom the organization in the
form in which it now exists.

Anyone condoning such practices or failing to stomp them
out with a vengance is hereby declared in a condition of
FOOTBULLET TREASON.

The additional penalties include ritual surgery so as to
ensure an adequate supply of replacement body parts for
our glorious leadership so that they may continue to guide
us through the troubled times ahead.


5. SUMMARY

We cannot adequately dramatize our Goals Problem Masses
(GPMs) unless we actively create opponents.  If we fail
to do this, then there is less reason to mortage homes
and scrape up bucks to pay to audit this all out.

And that would lead to less income, and that is the worst
crime of all.

Remember -

THE ONLY CRIME IN THIS UNIVERSE IS TO BE THERE AND NOT
MAKE MORE MONEY.

MONEY IS THE UNIVERSAL SOLVENT.

WHEN IN DOUBT, MAKE MORE MONEY.


Issued by the RTC (the Rearend Technology Crowd) from
the unpublished (and previously unwritten) works left
behind by L. Ron Hubbard upon his elevation into a bodiless
condition.

---

end of transmission


Blessed be the Jokers and Degraders,

The Loyalist Officers in 4th Dimensional Hiding

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - To Michael About ARS Bigots


TO MICHAEL ABOUT ARS BIGOTS

On 15 Jan 98, "Michael Voytinsky" <SPAMBLOCK.michaelv@igs.net>
posted on subject "I am not an ARS bigot!?"

> In response to a very reasonable request to Russell Shaw to add me to the
> list of ARS Bigots at http://www.dancris.com/~rshaw I received the
> following:
> 
> ** start quote **
> 
> To: "Michael Voytinsky" <michaelv@igs.net>
> X-UIDL: 884789376.000
> From: Russell Shaw <rshaw@dancris.com>
> Subject: Re: an ARS bigot
> Status: RO
> 
> At 10:43 PM 1/9/98 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >When are you going to add me to the list of ARS bigots? 
> 
> I'm not going to add you.  Sorry.
> 
> > Why don't you read
> >a story of my visit to the Ottawa Church of Scientology - its at
> >http://www.igs.net/~michaelv/amongthe.htm. 
> 
> Because I'm not interested.
> 
> >I think it warrants me being
> >included.
> >
> 
> It doesn't matter what you think.  Really.
> 
> >Thank you
> >
> >Michael Voytinsky
> 
> You are welcome.
> 
> Russell
> 
> ** end quote **
> 
> So, what do I have to do to get added to the ARS Bigots list?   
> 
> Cheers
> Michael
> 
> -- 
> Michael Voytinsky
> michaelv@igs.net
> Ottawa Ontario Canada
> http://www.igs.net/~michaelv/
> 
> ----- In Prozac We Trust!
 
This was the sacrifice that you unknowingly made when you
hosted my Scientology Reformer's Webpage.

They don't dare put you on the Bigots page.

It might suck them into a discussion of reform and then they
would be in the RPF the next day.

Notice that he wouldn't even discuss why, because it is 
forbidden for him to mention reform.  He certainly isn't
doing it out of niceness because he is insulting with his
"It doesn't matter what you think".

He did not even take the opportunity to rant about the
other "evil bigots" that he is attacking (saying perhaps
that he was waiting for proof of your having sex with
parrots before including you or some such nonsence).

He simply clammed up totally, as if he were praying for
the conversation to go away quickly and not be discussed 
any further.


Thank You for your help,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - TO WGERT - PROTECTING THE TECH


TO WGERT - PROTECTING THE TECH


I remember when operation Snow White went down.  All of a sudden
there it was all over the newspapers about the GO being caught
red handed infiltrating the government.

I'm not going to argue the morality of this, the government is
not lilly white either.

My overwhelming reaction at the time was that those idiots in
the GO had put MY Religion At Risk.

They were playing games, you see.  Big league spy games.  In a
misguided effort to protect the subject, they actually did
it great damage.

These were not bad guys.  I knew a lot of them in the old
days.  They were willing to put their lives on the line for
the sake of the subject.  They believed in the tech.  They
wanted to help people.  They wanted to make the world a
better place.

And somehow or other, they got this stupid idea that the
tech and the society were opterms (opposition terminals).

Instead of using their skill as auditors to help people, they
took on a dubbed-in wrong target, played James Bond, and FAILED.

They actually brought about a worst case senario.  Not only
did they fail to handle the government, but they got caught
engaging in something that could well have been labled "high
treason" and used to destroy the subject.  This is ten times
worse than doing nothing.

We were lucky.  There was no world conspiracy carefully 
orchestrating everything.  The courts and the government
did not extract every ounce of blood possible.

The subject survived.  Not thanks to obeying policy, but thanks 
to haveing NOT applied even more policy and gotten caught at
even more criminal acts.

----

Despite anything you or others might think of me or my actions,
I love the tech and I want to ensure its survival.

Put aside the fact that I also write my own materials (the
self clearing book) and have friendly chats with freezoners
(what you might want to call squirrels).

These things are not in conflict.  I want to spread my own
stuff, but I also want to see Ron's stuff remain available
and intact without alter-is (alteration).

----

Things are going badly for the CofS.

Let's not argue about the rightness and wrongess.  Maybe you
will stay in there and fight to the death to protect the
organization no matter what and maybe I will keep crying for
reform and eventually end up completely in the freezone.

But you have to face the possiblity that the organization
might go under.  Even if you're sure it wouldn't and even
if you are prepared to put everything on the line to defend
it, you still need to get your TRs in on the chance that
the worst will happen.

Remember that what you resist you become.  It applies to
organizations too.

So you need a fallback just in case.  What the business
world calls covering your ass or hedging your bets.

----

What I'm most concerned about here is the survival of the
tech and the availability of Ron's materials.

Not just those tiny pieces of OT materials that are floating
around on the internet.  That is really trivial.  No more
than a few percent of the research line.  Those will never
be lost because even the critics are propogating them.

But what about the vast quantities of tapes and bulletins?

That is what might be lost.  The tech might disappear from
the society.  Maybe one of the vaults might survive, but
that does nobody any good within this civilization.

----

If the CofS goes down, somebody might buy up the copyrights
at a bankruptcy sale.  And it might be somebody hostile
to the tech who will want to bury it and sue anybody who
tries to publish it.

If Int Magagement gets smashed, everybody in the orgs might
suddenly find themselves in the position of standard tech
proponents within the freezone.  These exist, but they hide
because of the copyright suits.  The visible freezone groups
generally diverge further.  Many of the hidden ones are
what you would call standard (standard tech, not policy).

If the head is cut off, many of the CofS pieces would still 
survive as independent organizations.  But if somebody nasty 
gets the copyrights, the remnants could be destroyed by lawsuits.

And you and I both know that you wouldn't have advanced
warning.  Unless you are high in OSA's councils (which
I'm pretty sure you are not), there will be no briefings
about really bad things coming because it would be bad PR 
and spreading entheta.

Things like Snow White, Ron's Death, and the Lisa business
all show up in the newspapers first.  Then you might get
a little damage control from management.

----

The only safe place for the copyrights is Public Domain.

This is the only way to guarantee that you wouldn't be on
the receiving end of the same kind of leagal attacks that
the CofS is currently launching against others.

Remember the overt motivator sequence.  The tendency will
be for the CofS to "pull in" the same stuff that it has
done to others.

This has to be prevented for the sake of the tech.

We both know that it wouldn't hurt CofS booksales.  The
membership would still buy the authorized copies or risk
ending up in Ethics.

If the freezone reproduces some of the stuff for their
own use, why should you mind.  Either they will make it
out of the trap on their own or they wouldn't, but why
should you stop them.  And it ensures that there will be
more copies around if the worst should happen.

----

How about spreading the word around?

How about suggesting to your friends at OSA that it might 
be a good idea to get the tech into the public domain so
that it can't be suppressed?

How about spreading the word among the other big league
FSMs?

It can be done.  You don't have to take the enemy line
or put yourself at risk with ethics.

Just cover the org's ass against the possiblity of the
fight going against them.


Regards,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - THE PERSECUTION OF THE FREEZONE (ANSWERING BEV)


THE PERSECUTION OF THE FREEZONE (ANSWERING BEV)

On 9 Jan 98, Bev <dbj1120@iag.net> replied to my post
on subject "Super Scio - To Justin About Religion"

> Pilot wrote:
> 
> > The only group that would not leave me alone if I were
> > to come out in the open and really start spreading
> > the tech is the CofS itself.
> > 
> > Think about it.
> > Where does the real suppression lie?
> > ARC,
> > The Pilot
> 
> Pilot, I am really curious.  Have you talked to any current Co$
> adherants about this and have any of them really answered you?  If
> so, what do they say?  
> 
> Do they realize that their own organization is guilty of that same 
> denial of rights to practice spiritual beliefs by labeling and attacking 
> "SP's and Squirrel's" that they are currently making a major issue of 
> regarding their own selves?
> 
> Beverly

There are three areas where it is almost impossible to talk to
the current membership.  These are the evil psychs, the "squirrels",
and confidentiality.  And of these areas, the "squirrels" are possibly 
the worst.

The "squirrels" can't even be mentioned in most cases without
a knee jerk reaction.  And simply calling them freezone or 
independents instead of squirrels is asking for trouble because
you are being theedie weedie and showing some agreement with
their right to practice.

On the other hand, CofS management stupidity, the abuse of staff 
members, the high prices, misuse of ethics, and many reformist
ideas are very popular and easy to bring up in most cases as long
as you start with an old quote of Rons (like the ones on the
Reformer's Home Page).

Or rather, it is easy for one Scientologist to bring up while
talking to another.  A direct critic who puts them under attack
will cause them to clam up.  But these are what Scientologists
talk about amongst themselves.  

For example, I can be scathingly critical of Flag's handling of 
Lisa as long as I mention the C/S series reference on "Not Going 
on Hopeing" first.  If I don't do that, then I'm supporting the 
enemy line.  If I do do it, then I'm Keeping Scientology Working.

The only statement in the area of "right to practice" that I
have found to be acceptible to loyalists is that we may have
been shooting ourselves in the foot with some of the court
cases because the precedents established might be used against
us later.

Of course there are Scientologists right on the edge who do
talk to freezoners and can discuss this sanely.  But they are
generally prepared to walk out the door already and are simply
hanging on because of friends and family in CofS.

Note that the Reformer's Home Page concentrates on things that
are wrong internally and only mentions the freezone near the end.
This goes over very well any time that I have felt safe in
directing a loyalist to look at it.  And even there, they are
usually a bit hesitant about the freezone for a short while.
The internal hate mongering against squirrels has been so 
strong that it takes time for them to re-evaluate it.

----

On 9 Jan 98, Bev <dbj1120@iag.net> also wrote in response
to my earlier post on subject "Super Scio - FREEZONE MUST ACT NOW"

> The Pilot wrote:
> > 
> > FREEZONE MUST ACT NOW
> 
> > But the Freezone story has not yet hit the big news.
> > And it is very important that it do so NOW while every
> > newsroom is hot for material and unafraid of CofS
> > retaliation.
> 
> > And there is an important reason for telling the Freezone
> > story.
> > It is a matter of religious persecution and the freedom
> > to have the religious scriptures necessary to one's faith.
> 
> I have wondered for a really long time why those who wish to 
> practice the tech according to their own beliefs, hearts and
> minds have not spoken up and written to the leaders of their
> respective countries regarding their suppression of spiritual
> beliefs and practices and also sent more data to the media.

There have been some efforts in these areas by big names
such as Mayo, but the CofS counter attacks are so terrible that
they scared off many of the lesser players.

Often they have perferred to keep their heads down and practice
the tech instead of calling attention to themselves and ending
up practicing law and self defense instead.

And even that doesn't protect them.  One example is Jim Bostrom.
He used to pass around xeroxs of LRH materials as a public service
to independent Scientologists.  Eventually the CofS got a court
order and launched a surprise police raid, confiscating all
his materials.  There was a picture of him being hauled off
in handcuffs in some CofS publication (I forget which one).
I ran into him a few months afterwards and he was very dishartened.
I think that this was back around 1990 or so.  I haven't seen him 
since.  

 
> I hope that your suggestion will be listened to.  I think that
> those in the Freezone need to be kept alert to the next meeting
> of Congress for the Committee on Religious Persecution and see
> if some brave souls would be willing to be present in whatever
> places possible to talk with the media and hopefully get to also
> be heard by the Committee itself.
> 
> Also, there need to be some that are willing to make the trip 
> to see the State Department reps for the Human Rights commission
> as well.

Up until now, any freezoner who stood up would be putting themselves
at great risk.  The copyrights make anyone who is practicing
a potential target, and if it is a freezone group that charges
for services, they don't even have fair use to aid them.

If I understand correctly (I am not an expert in this area),
Enid Vien tried to argue religious freedom in the courts many
years ago and didn't have a deep enough war chest and ended up
settling.

The lawsuits against freezoners would be much stronger than
anything the CofS can launch against people who simply make
confidential materials available freely on the net.

And at the same time, CofS also uses dead agenting and sends
in secret agents to sabotoge the freezone groups.  If they keep
a low profile, the CofS may ignore them, but if they speak up,
they become the high priority target.

Things have changed and the freezone has a real chance right
now.  It has all been happening very fast and the trouble is
that many of them may hold back because of old bad experiences.

First, the IRS ruling of the CofS as a religion makes a religious
freedom case much stronger.  They need to act while this is
strong (the CofS is stupid enough to screw it up and loose the
religious status).

Second, the critics are blowing the whistle and the press attacks
against CofS are working up to a fever pitch.  So OSA is very
distracted and doesn't have the usual resources available.

Third, at this moment the critics would mostly welcome the
freezone as allies (my opinion).

Fourth, the CofS is at its weakest right now, driving off members
with the Golden Era stuff, suffering from crashed stats, and
looking like idiots on TV.  Too much persecution will 
strenghten the ranks, so this is the time to act.

Fifth, the critics have been broadly spreading confidential
materials on the net and these things are coming to court.
A freedom of religion argument fits right in with these things
and could be of great help to both the critics and the
freezone.  This is an opportunity for an assault on two fronts
which is much more powerful than either group could do alone.

Sixth, I feel that right now a lot of members are on the
edge and ready to leave and the publicity of an open battle
for religious freedom might show them that the freezone is
really a realm of free tech rather than evil traitors.  This
would weaken the CofS and strengthen the freezone greatly.
It is a time when the mass media might help the freezone to
get their story across to the loyalists and offset the endless
internal anti-squirrel promotion.
 

> Co$ has worked overtime to make their points heard (having 'clebs
> also works as it opens a door to a rep about as fast as a New York
> second) but I honestly don't believe that the government officials
> they have spoken with have even the remotest idea that the Co$ is
> guilty of doing the same thing to "rougue" members who wish to
> practice outside of the strangling control of the Co$.

Exactly.  This is why it is time to speak up and become visibile.
 
> Would this even be an action that anybody out there would be willing
> to take on?
> 
> Also, one thing that I have to be honest that is in the back of my
> mind is . . . if the Freezoners and other "squirrels" were free to
> start their own organizations free from the inimidation of the Co$,
> would there be the possibility of the same abusive polices coming
> into effect?

Not likely because there is no single freezone group or point
of control.  It is like the protestants.  The only protestant
exceptions were tiny colonies in the new world where a single
sect had enough isolation and control to push people around.
As soon as a community has multiple protestant sects, they must
bend over backwards to keep from driving off their members
because the members can join the church across the street.

It should be obvious from the conversations on A.C.T. that
there is much arguing of "theology" between the various posters
and actually many of them could be considered individual sects 
unto themselves although a number of different organizations
are also represented.
 
> Again, I have stated before I could care less what people choose
> to believe, but the ACTIONS taken, when abusive or fraudulent, are 
> what I would never want to see happen again.  Those are the things
> that I have severe objections and criticisms of with the Co$.
> 
> Beverly

I am definitely in agreement on this.

---

I do not expect freezone practictioners to head straight for the
courtrooms.  Their organizations are too vulnerable.

They need publicity first.  Very much publicity about the abuses
and lawsuits and discrimination that has already been practiced
against them.

Somebody should be collecting their stories into a Scientology
Persecution webpage.  It shouldn't be me because I am, at least
theoretically, still a member of CofS and I couldn't do the
continual adding of links and documents from an annonymous
position.

I know that there are already things in FactNets archives and
at various critics sites, but it needs to be beefed up and
highlighted and added to.  There should be a high quality
page acting as a focus so that reporters can be given a
specific URL as a starting point for their research.

Somebody running a freezone group shouldn't be waving their
hands and calling the CofS over to kick them around.  They
need to keep their groups operating.  But their members could
be encouraged, as individuals, to write congressmen, newspapers,
etc. and get some national coverage onto this situation.

A good title might be "The Persecuted Scientologist's Page".
It sounds loyalist and may attract them to read it, but it 
would show how CofS is persecuting Scientologists.


Regards,

The Pilot

==========================================

 subj : Super Scio - FREEZONE BATTLE PLANS 


FREEZONE BATTLE PLANS 


On 11 Jan 98, Heidrun Beer wrote on subject "PILOT - WE NEED YOU!"

> Pilot, we need you now to synchronize our efforts and get
> something done. I suggest you contact the individuals you
> trust most, and arrange for regular meetings on an invitation-
> only IRC-channel.

This is the wrong tactic.

The CofS is totally geared to handling things that have a single 
source.

This was one of Ron's biggest blind spots.  It might be because
he himself wanted to be a single source.

Things often come from multiple sources.  Not just multiple
relay points, but multiple origination points.

We have a common target.  We each mock something up.  If you
are only a relay point for my mockups, then it all traces back
to a single source.  But if you are doing your own mockups, 
then there are multiple sources and the CofS will be incapable
of handling it.

I would not have thought up the things you are doing.  I might
not even agree with everything you say.  But that is all to
the good.  It makes the whole battle plan totally unpredictable.

They will never know where the next blow is landing or what
the specific source points are.

This is gureilla warfare rather than an army marching in
ranks.  It is like the American Revolution with the rebels
hiding in the trees and shooting at the British who are
foolishly marching in straight lines with but a single thetan 
mocking up their entire operation.

We have, for example, Joe the Eternal coming up with his own
plan for getting the tech on the net and it is an excellent
idea and they can't stop him by stopping you or me.  And they
can't predict his actions by predicting you or me.  And they
can't even find out his plans by bugging our communications
(or even by reading our minds) because we don't even know
exactly what his plans are in detail.  And so it becomes 
hopeless for them.

Because every tool in their arsenel is aimed at finding the
one and only unique source point and handling it.  The
critics are already showing that the CofS starts going PTS
and even stops sueing eventually when the attacks are coming
from too many source points at once.

The CofS still thinks that there must be one super SP behind
all of the attacks.  It makes for endless errors in judgement
and footbulleting.

We do need enthusiasm and for each of us to know that we are
not alone in this.  And we need some identification of targets.
And we even need some synchonization.

But I'm putting everything I've got on these points out in
the open where everybody on the net can see them.

Because its not just you and me or the other guys who are
visible on the net.  For everyone posting, there are ten
or a hundred who are also planning their attacks but staying
out of sight while they do it.

They need the encouragement.  They need to know what is
going on.  We are the more visibe targets.  The lurkers are 
the camaflogued army that the CofS can't even guess at.

Did you notice that somebody started posting the tech vols
anonymously (Red Volumes 1/? and 2/? so far)?  I don't think 
that it was Joe, he was still trying to find a set when the 
posts appeared.  I assume that somebody simply heard it and
decided to contribute to the motion.

If the discussion had been secret, that wouldn't have happened.

As it is, I assume that people will continue posting them
and that even if somebody were stopped, someone else would
simply keep the posts coming.  The CofS would never be able
to handle it because they would look for the one source
point.

Furthermore, I think that Ron was wrong in trying to be
a single source.  Past a certain stage of development, it
will stunt the growth of the other beings involved.

You have already grown beyond the orthodox restraints.
You don't need another guru to chain you up again.  I will
happliy offer suggestions and hopefully helpful constructive
criticism, but you are already at the stage where you must
chart your own course.

Consider yourself a player in your own right rather than
a piece in my game.

As for being in direct comm personally, I think that that
would be very nice and look forward to it later, but my gut
feeling is that it would be a really wrong action right
at this moment.  It would be that much less comm going out
to the lurkers.


> This might constitute the CRITICAL MASS in the freezone
> scene which is still just glowing (growing?), but not really
> manifesting its full potential.

Whether or not I was co-ordinating things, there are physical
universe comm lags and it takes time for ideas to spread.

The freezone sceen is far from full potential.  My feeling
is that we ain't seen nothin yet compared to what is going
to surface over the next few months.

Some of the freezone groups are very well hidden, especially
near the larger CofS organizations.

My prediction for critical mass is that March 21 date, but
I should warn you that I tend to postulate and predict
the best case scenario.  As Machiavelli says, aim high
and you might actually hit the target.


------

On Jan 11, "Steve n' Sarah" <tech@proweb.co.uk> picked up
Hiedrun's post and added the following -

> Over the last few days,we have been copying the 'self-clearing' book 
> onto floppy and ensuring that non-.netizens who are interested,receive a 
> copy.One person had never even HEARD of Scientology before and likes 
> the book.
> 
> One of the most important activities we can undertake is to ensure this 
> book get's off the net and into the real world.

Excellent.  You have my thanks and support.

This again makes my point about individual thetans each contributing
their efforts against the same targets.  Totally unpredictable.
Totally unstoppable.  I didn't plan or suggest this.  The CofS
could not have prepared against this by analyzing me as an
opponent.

Even if I were to vanish in this instant, what has been started
would carry forward.
 
> Start or expand our groups.Preach not to the converted but to the OTHERS!.
> Those who simply do not know.
> 
> Pilot knows more about computers than we do,but a combination of the 
> anonymizer and a free e-mail account at 'unforgettable.com' may be 
> untraceable.
> 
> We already have enough to set the world alight.
> Shit,if Pilot ever open's an Org........we'll both join staff.

You're already on board.  Like the Kingdom of God, the Org of the
Pilot is within you, spreading tech where ever you go so long as
you choose to do so.  Keep up the good work.
 
> Steve/Sarah

-----

I notice many voices supporting reform.

I see many postings encouraging the freezone.  

There have been excellent articles posted recently showing the 
parallels with the Protestant Reformation.

Many who lurk may be doing things even as we speak.  They do
not have to be visible to be effective.

-----

Important targets right now include

a) media exposure of the existance of freezone Scientologists
and their persecution by the CofS, especially as to copyrights.

b) spread of self clearing materials, not only within the
freezone but also to CofS members in good standing.

c) spread of basic reform ideas, especially copies of the
Scientology Reformer's Homepage, to CofS members and especially
to CofS staff members.

Much of this can be done in a fabian manner or with low
personal risk.

It is not quite the time for lurkers to stand out in the
open yet.  

Things can be mailed.  Messages can be sent to the press.
Printouts of things like "The Org's Grades Are Out" could
even be pasted to lampposts around CofS facilities.  They
don't even have to be infront of the org's doorway, they
can be where you know that the public goes to have lunch
and so forth.

For those of you who are still officialy in the CofS,
all the quotes on the Scientology Reformer's Homepage are
valid LRH quotes.  They can be used to start conversations
with loyalists to sound them out.  If you come on strong
in favor of Ron and early tech, you can get away with
tons of criticism of management and even of foolish
policies without having knowlege reports written on you.

If you talk from a basis of theta rather than from bypassed
charge, you'll be surprised at how much agreement you get
even from the literal minded robots.

And for those of you who are already freezone, spread the
word openly.  And get it to your friends who are still
"in" if at all possible.  There is free self clearing.
There is a reform movement.  There is an expanding freezone.
And most of all, there is hope.  There is no need for 
anybody to sell their souls into slavery to buy freedom.

Sow the seeds now so that we may reap the harvest later.

Errode the foundations and the tiniest breeze will blow
down the walls.

All the silent lurkers who are in agreement with this 
should get busy each in their own way.


Much Affinity,

The Pilot

==========================================

This set of posts used the following trailer.

------------------
The free Self Clearing Book, The Super Scio book, and the
"SCIENTOLOGY REFORMER'S HOME PAGE" are all over the net.

See The Self Clearing Homepage for URLs to these sites
http://fza.org/pilot/selfclr.htm or
http://www.proweb.co.uk/~tech/clear.htm

Or see The Pilots Home Page at http://fza.org/pilot/index.htm

All of this week's posts will be collected in Super Scio Archive 
#21 and #22 and posted to ACT.  See the Pilot Archives at FZA.ORG.

Note that some of my posts only go to ACT.  I cannot be reached by email.

------------------




