2025-10-27
(TXT) Encheiridion 27
nothing bad by nature happens in the world.
Today is a short passage, although I find it challenging. Again,
the problem is the required belief in a providential and
benevolent will that orders and permeates the natural world.
How does one go about deciding whether this is true or not? I
cannot imagine what test one could conduct to verify whether this
was true or not. And the truth is that my intuition on the
matter is that things do happen that are bad with regard to
sentient life. There is often much suffering that simply does
not appear to be necessary, and that does not even include the
suffering caused by moral agents.
I wonder what Stoicism would look like if the project were
undertaken with scientific naturalism as it's foundation rather
than the pre-scientific naturalism of the Hellenistic Period.
How would this have changed things, or would it. I do think it
would be an interesting experiment to undertake the spirit of the
Stoic experiment, the development of a holistic and naturalistic
philosophy that seeks to integrate our best knowledge of science
and logic and from this foundation to derive an ethics to answer
the question of how one ought to live in such a universe. This
ideal is very much my own desire and consitutes my main attraction
to Stoicism.
I believe another passage from the Christian bible(1) appropriately
expresses this desire:
Seeing then these things, what manner of person ought ye
to be?
~ 2 Peter 3:11
It is a question I seek to answer, albeit inconsistently, in my
own life.
(1) I should note that while I am not Christian, I do have a deep
cultural affinity and debt to Christianity and recognize this
influence in my thinking and heritage, even when I disagree
with it and/or it's modern day adherents.
(DIR) Daily Reading and Thoughts
(DIR) Home