Language is a tool for communication - that is its purpose.* The
   fact that you understood what I said and then rejected it, tells
   me I successfully communicated. If you want to play a game of
   "let's be logical and consistent with the words we use,
   following a single particular System of game-play with
   language", then we can do that. But I'm trying to communicate a
   concept.* Not play a game.* Evidently, I succeeded.* I win :)
   [if It was a game I was playing :P ] I posted the same thing to
   my Facebook.* I got this response as one of them that I saw just
   now: "Me gustaria primero preguntarme que es lo normal??algo
   standar ,masivamente igualitario,yo me inclinaria por una
   sinonimia normal ser autentico al que le guste bien y al que
   no,no es mi problema" One of my friends is spanish and
   communicates ENTIRELY using Google Translate. My meaning was
   communicated successfully ACROSS languages and back again. I
   think that validates my point.* If you spent all your time
   looking at the parts, you never see the whole.* Gotta expand a
   little, otherwise you'll always be a provincial Internet
   debater, an Internet villager fighting over whether the local
   bridge should be painted or not.* You're way smarter than that.*
   That's not ad hominem; that's me trying to be helpful. You can
   tell me to fuck off, that's usually the appropriate response
   now, and I'll understand.* I deserve it. :P A helpful prick is
   still being a prick, and I know I was being a prick here.* Sorry
   :) I'll make my point even simpler.* Whether you agree or not
   doesn't matter; we just might be playing different games.* But I
   always win my game because my game is on the level of conceptual
   understanding, not agreement.* I'm playing a different game
   where everybody can win.* If the concept is successfully
   expressed and understood, which it was because you understood it
   then argued about it, here you can have the teddy bear.* Here.
   You win.* Have the Teddy bear.* I was being logically
   inconsistent and not playing fair by swapping the definitions of
   normal and weird that you use for normal and weird.* There.* You
   win your game, I win mine. :P