[1]10-and_26_the-link-between_body-parts_and_dimensionsI woke up
   with a hypothesis. I wondered if, being humans doing math, if
   our conceptualization of dimensions (in string theory,
   economics, etc) tended towards numbers related to the body parts
   that we learn for ourselves that show, "This is Human". In other
   words, do we ultimately map Reality upon our own bodies,
   especially with mathematics? (In higher math, certain dimensions
   like to pop up a lot like 10 dimensions and 26 dimensions) Well,
   it may be true or it may be a ridiculous notion, but a quick
   search for "translations for body parts different languages"
   came up with this image as the second result. Not proof of
   anything, but food for thought. We're still humans after all,
   doing this math, for even if we have computers to do the heavy
   lifting for us, we're still human beings coming up with with the
   questions and human beings interpreting the answers. Of course,
   different countings come up with different numbers. 10 fingers
   and toes, we have distinctions of left and right... etc. But the
   fact that these parts are considered important enough to learn
   separately, to 'know' - with distinct names for each common
   enough to teach small children... is it not possible that these
   'magic numbers' get buried as deep connecting points for how we
   analyze reality (even if we use numbers and computers to help
   us).
   [and the Law of Excluded Middle is simply a matter of "Left
   side, Right side" and excluding "the passions/emotions/animal
   side" that is inbetween - the genitals... objects of confusion,
   embarrassment, "genderness" and other things that are not nearly
   as neat and orderly as it would be if we just exclude the middle
   altogether?

   Did I... did I just become a feminist?] "We map the internal and
   external with the same mental tools that were evolved to map our
   simple environment hundreds of thousands of years ago."

     * Yeah that's what I was thinking. Functionally, humans
       haven't changed.

       For all the fancy tools we make and all the systems of
       thinking we come up with... we're still the same humans that
       we were 100,000 years ago, subject to the same amazing
       capabilities and the same limitations as well.
       [2]4 mins * [3]Like
     * [4][IMG]
       [5]Kenneth Udut I don't think the environment was simpler
       though. The detailed knowledge required to survive required
       intimate knowledge of hundreds of plants, animals, each
       other. We started making sharp objects to cut with VERY
       early on, carving out reality with differentiations right
       from the beginning.

       Recording for those that come after we die has made all the
       difference, and societies to pass on the methodology to
       interpret the various recordings.

       But still, each of us start off as babies, counting our
       fingers and toes.

References

   Visible links
   1. http://icopiedyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/10-and_26_the-link-between_body-parts_and_dimensions.jpg
   2. https://www.facebook.com/groups/neoacademiaannex/permalink/659039000884567/?comment_id=659040374217763&offset=0&total_comments=2
   3. Like this comment
	https://www.facebook.com/groups/neoacademiaannex/659039000884567/?comment_id=659040130884454&notif_t=group_comment#
   4. https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi
   5. https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi