IDE In-Source Configuration
lazarus / 9-Editor

----------------------------------------------------------------------
ALLIGATOR · 2025-03-29 07:05

Hello, Lazarus has the ability to customize user-defined markup
settings

And these settings are for the whole IDE on a given installation, I
suggest to think about such a solution (necessity, format,
possibilities), that some IDE parameters can be set in the source code
of a file, i.e. the settings can be individual for each file, not for
the whole IDE. They can be defined in the header of the source code in
a comment of the form:
Code: Pascal  [Select][+][-]window.onload = function(){var x1 =
document.getElementById("main_content_section"); if (x1) { var x =
document.getElementsByClassName("geshi");for (var i = 0; i
{lazarus_config: “pattern”: bg:#AABBCC fg:#00FF00}
Or another possible, option to allow these settings to be stored in a
.lpr, .lps, .lpi file
To allow portability between different IDE installations

This is just a suggestion to think about what might be useful from
such individual parameter customization (via project files, or source
files), as opposed to centralized (via IDE)

Maybe someone has additional ideas, or ideas why this is not a good
way to do it
All options are welcome!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
TRon · 2025-03-29 13:43

I think it is a bad idea 

Reason, because it sounds like a programmer who is lazy not wanting to
build things at runtime but rather at design-time and then requires a
patch to be able to manipulate things as an afterthought.

At least, the message in your post sounded to me that way.

Would you be able to provide a practical example of what you have in
mind that is currently not possible or difficult to accomplish with
current available functionality, e.g. what would be the benefit of
such a feature.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
ALLIGATOR · 2025-03-29 15:01

Quote from: TRon on March 29, 2025, 02:43:37 pm
I'm not quite sure what the programmer's laziness has to do with it,
and also the runtime job 💁‍♂️

very simple example

customize a user-defined syntax highlighting, and then port it to
another Lazarus installation, e.g. via git

I don't really need it, I suggested it as a follow-up to this issue:
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/lazarus/-
/issues/40881#note_2421412634

but perhaps the collective mind will come up with some more useful
examples of application, I am not an advocate for either side in this
matter, I just brought it up for discussion

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin_fr · 2025-03-30 09:15

Putting those into the source code is not gonna happen.

Project settings wouldn't be completely impossible... though they
would need to be stripped of keyboard settings.
And they still pose the issue, that if someone opens a downloaded
source they don't want a color flood to happen.

And there would be a problem, if the file gets opened in an IDE with a
diff color scheme (dark vs light). Then any such "in source color"
would look terrible.

So basically this is only for a single person to sync between 2 IDE
setups.


IMHO a better way would be to have

1) Import/export of the global settings. So you can have them on all
your IDE synced

2) for words added via keyboard, store them in the session (optional)
Then you wouldn't edit the list in the global settings but instead add
via key combo (there are some other limits by that..)

However, unlikely to happen soon