Save your Bugtracker/Mantis login => Reminder: Moving to GitLab
lazarus / 8-Other
----------------------------------------------------------------------
winni · 2021-07-17 20:04
Stonage IT
----------------------------------------------------------------------
wp · 2021-07-17 20:56
This is an arrogant attitude towards the people who do all the work
for the move to git.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-17 21:45
Maybe Stonage is exaggerated , Paleolithic is more realistic.
For example, I want to transfer a unassigned bug created by somebody
who left us, how to do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin_fr · 2021-07-17 21:51
Ok, I do not know for the original Post what exactly is supposed to be
stonage....
But for the "unassigned", there is no problem.
All issues are transferred. All issues will state who created them on
mantis.
Example: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/sandbox/lazarus-
test-4/-/issues/39200
If people are still active, and want to have their gitlab account
mentioned, then we offer that option. That is all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-17 22:00
Quote from: Martin_fr on July 17, 2021, 11:51:41 pmOk, I do not know
for the original Post what exactly is supposed to be stonage....
I think Winni was talking about this:
https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,55167.0.html
Quote from: Martin_fr on July 17, 2021, 11:51:41 pmBut for the
"unassigned", there is no problem.
All issues are transferred. All issues will state who created them on
mantis.
OK, then you confirm that this unassigned bug will be transferred too?
If yes, perfect (and dont forget to fast assign it, fix it and commit
it).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-17 22:20
Quote from: Martin_fr on July 17, 2021, 11:51:41 pmIf people are still
active, and want to have their gitlab account mentioned, then we offer
that option. That is all.
Ha, ok, understood now.
But, why not simply create a GitLab issue asking to gitlab members to
give their Mantis login?
For each answer, you will now the gitlab account.
Forget Mantis, do all via gitlab now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-17 22:27
Quote from: Fred vS on July 18, 2021, 12:20:36 amQuote from: Martin_fr
on July 17, 2021, 11:51:41 pmIf people are still active, and want to
have their gitlab account mentioned, then we offer that option. That
is all.
Ha, ok, understood now.
But, why not simply create a GitLab issue asking to gitlab members to
give their Mantis login?
For each answer, you will now the gitlab account.
Forget Mantis, do all via gitlab now.
OK, OK, you want to do it via Mantis to be sure that Gitlab users dot
usurp a Mantis account.
Yes, indeed, safer and more logical.
Sorry for the noise.
[EDIT] Hum, but Mantis users can also usrp Gilab account, so not so
evident.
[EDIT2] So you need to create 2 issues, one in Mantis that ask the
Gitlab account and one in GitLab that ask the Mantis account.
And after compare if both are the same.
Fre;D
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-17 22:39
@Winni
I agree with you that using issues (from Mantis or GitLab) is archaic.
And it will need lot of boring work for the maintainer to do manually
the transfer for each answer.
Are you thinking to a special program to do the job, via internet and
using database?
Fre;D
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin_fr · 2021-07-17 22:42
Quote from: Fred vS on July 18, 2021, 12:39:22 am@Winni
I agree with you that using issues (from Mantis or GitLab) is archaic.
And it will need lot of boring work for the maintainer to do manually
the transfer for each answer.
Are you thinking to a special program to do the job, via internet and
using database?
Mantis is a database frontend.
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/mantis_to_gitlab
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-17 22:48
Quote from: Martin_fr on July 18, 2021, 12:42:59 amMantis is a
database frontend.
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/mantis_to_gitlab
Ooops, ok, you are already deep inside.
So, if I understand ok, one of the last problem is to assign Mantis
user-name to their possible gitlab acount-name?
Indeed, not evident.
How will you do for the Mantis user-name that do not have a GitLab
account?
Will you create new one or centralize to only one?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
valdir.marcos · 2021-07-18 00:13
Quote from: Martin_fr on July 18, 2021, 12:42:59 amQuote from: Fred vS
on July 18, 2021, 12:39:22 am@Winni
I agree with you that using issues (from Mantis or GitLab) is archaic.
And it will need lot of boring work for the maintainer to do manually
the transfer for each answer.
Are you thinking to a special program to do the job, via internet and
using database?Mantis is a database frontend.
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/mantis_to_gitlabJust curiosity.
Let's suppose you want to move this data to any other solution in the
future.
Gitlab allows that as Mantis?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-18 01:54
Quote from: valdir.marcos on July 18, 2021, 02:13:47 amQuote from:
Martin_fr on July 18, 2021, 12:42:59 amQuote from: Fred vS on July 18,
2021, 12:39:22 am@Winni
I agree with you that using issues (from Mantis or GitLab) is archaic.
And it will need lot of boring work for the maintainer to do manually
the transfer for each answer.
Are you thinking to a special program to do the job, via internet and
using database?Mantis is a database frontend.
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/mantis_to_gitlabJust curiosity.
Let's suppose you want to move this data to any other solution in the
future.
Gitlab allows that as Mantis?
Of course!
For example I have one account in GitLab and one in GitHub.
All my GitHub repositories are mirrored and updated in (nearly) real
time in the GitLab repositories.
And vice-versa, you may do the same from GitLab to GitHub.
Also I may login in GitLab with a GitHub account!
[EDIT] In "Settings-General" you have even a option to easy export the
project (see picture):
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin_fr · 2021-07-18 08:04
To clarify:
We can't create an gitlab issue in someone else's name. All issues
will be reported by the same "fpc" account. All notes will be added by
that account.
But, we can add a bit of text that says "this ... was created by
mantis-user martin_f @martin_frb
Then if someone adds a new note, and want to refer to a previous, they
know who wrote it, and can do "@martin_frb" if they need.
If we do not have the gitlab name, then we just use the mantis name,
and there is no @martin_frb
As for assigning: the gitlab issues can be assigned to gitlab accounts
during conversion. But here we only need the accounts of those few who
have developer status in mantis.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin_fr · 2021-07-18 08:08
Quote from: valdir.marcos on July 18, 2021, 02:13:47 amLet's suppose
you want to move this data to any other solution in the future.
Gitlab allows that as Mantis?
gitlab has an API, so like we can import now, we can export.
The git data itself, is not gitlab dependent anyway. It's git.
Anyone can clone a git repro and push it elsewhere.
But gitlab has mirroring functions too.
And gitlab is open source. If they ever close, we could also self-host
again.
(so by not self hosting, we get access to some of the paid features
for free. Gitlab offers this to open source projects)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
avra · 2021-07-18 10:54
I followed the instructions today, but it seams that deadline was
yesterday. Did I really miss the chance?
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=39246
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PascalDragon · 2021-07-18 11:11
Quote from: avra on July 18, 2021, 12:54:14 pmI followed the
instructions today, but it seams that deadline was yesterday. Did I
really miss the chance?
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=39246
We've pushed the conversion back a week due to some further issues.
Quote from: winni on July 17, 2021, 10:04:55 pmStonage IT
If you're so genius then how would you map users of one system to
another without having any pre-existing mapping of the users between
the two?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin_fr · 2021-07-18 12:06
Quote from: avra on July 18, 2021, 12:54:14 pmI followed the
instructions today, but it seams that deadline was yesterday. Did I
really miss the chance?
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=39246
Deadline extended. We are running a bit behind.
Deadline is, when mantis no longer lets you log in / or no longer
exist.
Currently: ~23rd/24th/25th
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-18 12:58
Quote from: PascalDragon on July 18, 2021, 01:11:50 pmhow would you
map users of one system to another without having any pre-existing
mapping of the users between the two?
Mostly all people use the same user name for their Mantis-GitLab-
GitHub account.
What about to try to set user name of Mantis for GitLab?
Of course there will be "unknown" users but also "known" users.
My 0.0001 cent, of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kays · 2021-07-18 15:50
Quote from: wp on July 17, 2021, 10:56:55 pmThis is an arrogant
attitude towards the people who do all the work for the move to git.I
second that.
Quote from: PascalDragon on July 18, 2021, 01:11:50 pmIf you're so
genius then how would you map users of one system to another without
having any pre-existing mapping of the users between the two?I guess
this excludes email addresses. At least some people have the same
email address on GitLab as well as Mantis.
Quote from: Fred vS on July 18, 2021, 12:27:27 am[…] So you need to
create 2 issues, one in Mantis that ask the Gitlab account and one in
GitLab that ask the Mantis account.
And after compare if both are the same.You could probably eliminate
one issue (at least the Mantis issue) if you simply demand a
verifiable and trustworthy GPG-signed message using a key containing
the email address [as an uid] as stored in the Mantis bug tracking
system. However, trustworthy would imply a working (non-expired) web
of trust link to one of the core developer’s key: problem is, are
there any?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-18 16:28
Quote from: Kays on July 18, 2021, 05:50:41 pmAt least some people
have the same email address on GitLab as well as Mantis.
Yep, well seen (I forgot the email).
Then first and most important, sent, by courtesy, a email to every
Mantis user-account saying that fpc will go to git. (Dont do like
Nabble).
Also ask them if they have a gitlab account (I think that gitlab can
deal with github account too).
If they have, answer to the mail with the gitlab account.
Also, maybe try to do a compare with email of user in GitLab and
Mantis to get the respective user name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
winni · 2021-07-18 17:16
Quote from: wp on July 17, 2021, 10:56:55 pmThis is an arrogant
attitude towards the people who do all the work for the move to git.
I was not asked if I like it to move to git.
Now I am told - hop. hop - to move to git.
THAT is arrogant.
Winni
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin_fr · 2021-07-18 17:44
Quote from: winni on July 18, 2021, 07:16:15 pmI was not asked if I
like it to move to git.
Now I am told - hop. hop - to move to git.
THAT is arrogant.
No, arrogant would be the next line:
You don't need to, just download releases as before
SCNR
But seriously:
If you are a member of the core team, then yes: Everyone in the team
moves.
Otherwise:
Unless you want to (or do) contribute, you do not *need* to move to
git.
You can download any revision as zip or tar.gz directly for gitlab.
And even if you want to contribute, you can send patches.
If you want to report bugs, you need to register at gitlab, but not
move to git.
The same as in the old time you had to register on mantis.
You also do not need to provide your gitlab name for existing bugs.
They will be moved, and you can search for them by your mantis
username.
The ability to provide a gitlab account now, is merely a courtesy. If
you wish that name to be listed in the converted bug reports that you
made (or notes you added).
So really no "hop hop"... ?
Oh, and I have been told, but I have no idea if it true, or will
indeed work: Github allows svn access.
We may (eventually) have an github mirror (read only). So if what I
was told is true....
I still don't get how the above quoted statement of yours, relates to
"stonage it"?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PascalDragon · 2021-07-19 09:05
Quote from: Fred vS on July 18, 2021, 02:58:38 pmQuote from:
PascalDragon on July 18, 2021, 01:11:50 pmhow would you map users of
one system to another without having any pre-existing mapping of the
users between the two?
Mostly all people use the same user name for their Mantis-GitLab-
GitHub account.
What about to try to set user name of Mantis for GitLab?
Of course there will be "unknown" users but also "known" users.
That would still leave users that wouldn't be correctly mapped. There
are also users that have multiple accounts on Mantis (mainly due to
some hiccups with Mantis itself), among them also the one or other
core dev. Doing it this way we also essentially get an overview who is
still active.
Quote from: winni on July 18, 2021, 07:16:15 pmQuote from: wp on July
17, 2021, 10:56:55 pmThis is an arrogant attitude towards the people
who do all the work for the move to git.
I was not asked if I like it to move to git.
Of course not, you're not a member of the development teams. This is
about what the development teams want to use to further development of
FPC and Lazarus. For the users it's simple the following (to translate
a German saying): "eat it or die". This is just like it has always
been: When you came here for the first time you had to adhere to SVN
and Mantis. Now you simply have to adhere to GitLab. It's always the
project (and its devs) that makes the rules, not the users.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-19 10:05
Quote from: PascalDragon on July 19, 2021, 11:05:35 am It's always the
project (and its devs) that makes the rules, not the users.
Hum not sure to adhere with this but yes, it is (sadly) how lot of
things work.
But not always, sometimes it is the users that define the rules (it is
the idea of "marketing").
Imho, the users should be the kings.
Fre;D
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-19 10:17
Quote from: Fred vS on July 19, 2021, 12:05:52 pmQuote from:
PascalDragon on July 19, 2021, 11:05:35 am It's always the project
(and its devs) that makes the rules, not the users.
Hum not sure to adhere with this but yes, it is (sadly) how lot of
things work.
But not always, sometimes it is the users that define the rules (it is
the idea of "marketing").
Imho, the users should be the kings.
Fre;D
Please ban me after this post if you want.
Sven, I dont like how you treat Winni.
Winni, like other precious users, helps a lot for fpc, and maybe much
more than some pretentious "core" developers.
Fre;D
----------------------------------------------------------------------
howardpc · 2021-07-19 10:33
Quote from: Fred vS on July 19, 2021, 12:17:00 pmSven, I dont like how
you threat Winni.
Fred, I fail to see what you find objectionable. I presume by "threat"
you meant "treat" and not "threaten", but in either case I think you
are over-reacting.
To point out the difference between a user (however helpful he is) and
a member of the development team is merely to state a fact. It in no
way diminishes his helpfulness or represents a slight on winni. His
many numerous helpful contributions are valued, but not relevant to
decisions that are taken by those who are ultimately responsible for
the projects.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin_fr · 2021-07-19 12:15
Quote from: Fred vS on July 19, 2021, 12:05:52 pmHum not sure to
adhere with this but yes, it is (sadly) how lot of things work.
But not always, sometimes it is the users that define the rules (it is
the idea of "marketing").
Imho, the users should be the kings.
If the users pay the developers, then the developers need to (or must)
do whatever it takes to earn there money.
If the developers volunteer there free time, and give away there work
for free, then they can choose.
That said, from my observation its not black or white. All the
developers look at feedback, and look at were they can help others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin_fr · 2021-07-19 12:29
Quote from: Fred vS on July 19, 2021, 12:17:00 pmPlease ban me after
this post if you want.
Why?
We allow and invite critics.
Same for Winni. His post is fine (though it was not immediately clear
what it was about).
We may not be able to help him in this particular instance. Or at
least not by reverting our decision.
And maybe this individual complaint is not going to change things for
the future.
But that is not to say, that every complaint, critic or opinion is
pointless. They are read. And maybe some are considered.
Just for info, at the moment I guess that winni's post is only about
the way the account is transferred to gitlab?
Quote from: winni on July 18, 2021, 07:16:15 pmNow I am told - hop.
hop - to move to git.
That was in the context of this thread. The subject of it, he himself
has made the "Save your mantis login".
And the related request that we posted, is indeed the one that says
"please to so by deadline" (hence "hop hop"?)
But maybe he also means having to move from svn to git. Not 100% sure
at this point.
(But even on this, answers have been given, attempting to provide
help)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
devEric69 · 2021-07-19 12:56
Quote from: winni on July 18, 2021, 07:16:15 pmNow I am told - hop.
hop - to move to git.
That's for sure: a routing problem, amho.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
valdir.marcos · 2021-07-19 21:09
Quote from: Fred vS on July 18, 2021, 03:54:46 amQuote from:
valdir.marcos on July 18, 2021, 02:13:47 amQuote from: Martin_fr on
July 18, 2021, 12:42:59 amQuote from: Fred vS on July 18, 2021,
12:39:22 am@Winni
I agree with you that using issues (from Mantis or GitLab) is archaic.
And it will need lot of boring work for the maintainer to do manually
the transfer for each answer.
Are you thinking to a special program to do the job, via internet and
using database?Mantis is a database frontend.
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/mantis_to_gitlabJust curiosity.
Let's suppose you want to move this data to any other solution in the
future.
Gitlab allows that as Mantis?
Of course!
For example I have one account in GitLab and one in GitHub.
All my GitHub repositories are mirrored and updated in (nearly) real
time in the GitLab repositories.
And vice-versa, you may do the same from GitLab to GitHub.
Also I may login in GitLab with a GitHub account!
[EDIT] In "Settings-General" you have even a option to easy export the
project (see picture):What is "container registry images" that would
not be exported?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
valdir.marcos · 2021-07-20 00:49
Quote from: Martin_fr on July 18, 2021, 10:04:24 amTo clarify:
We can't create an gitlab issue in someone else's name. All issues
will be reported by the same "fpc" account. All notes will be added by
that account.
But, we can add a bit of text that says "this ... was created by
mantis-user martin_f @martin_frb
Then if someone adds a new note, and want to refer to a previous, they
know who wrote it, and can do "@martin_frb" if they need.
If we do not have the gitlab name, then we just use the mantis name,
and there is no @martin_frb
As for assigning: the gitlab issues can be assigned to gitlab accounts
during conversion. But here we only need the accounts of those few who
have developer status in mantis.I knew about the version control part
in GIT systems.
My doubt was about the bug tracker database (issues).
Thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PascalDragon · 2021-07-20 08:04
Quote from: Fred vS on July 19, 2021, 12:05:52 pmQuote from:
PascalDragon on July 19, 2021, 11:05:35 am It's always the project
(and its devs) that makes the rules, not the users.
Hum not sure to adhere with this but yes, it is (sadly) how lot of
things work.
But not always, sometimes it is the users that define the rules (it is
the idea of "marketing").
Imho, the users should be the kings.
We are not in a free market situation here. And even then I don't
agree that the "customer should be king" (or the user in this case),
cause that usually leads to problematic situations for the employees
(or the devs in this case).
Quote from: Fred vS on July 19, 2021, 12:17:00 pmSven, I dont like how
you treat Winni.
Winni, like other precious users, helps a lot for fpc, and maybe much
more than some pretentious "core" developers.
Well, and I don't like someone critizing the route the project takes
either with single word posts that explain absolutely nothing
("Stoneage IT") or expecting that the needs for the project and devs
will adhere to those of a user (however helpful that user might be).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-20 09:24
Thanks for the answer.
To cloture the thing, it seems to me that "Stoneage IT" was more
related about how the announce of conversion to git was done.
Did you remember the episode of fpc-Nabble that decides to stop to
update the mailing list without any warning to nobody, even not user-
maintainers?
And the effect that it did?
For such a big change, like moving to git, the minimum should have
been to prevent every fpc-Mantis members, via a personal email of the
change.
Note that personally, I am very happy that fpc moves to git, I never
liked SVN, to much things to install, not friendly, etc...
And, like proposed many years ago, the advice of precious helpers
should have more considerations.
fpc would never have survived until now without them.
They help giving their energy and time totally for free, without
waiting for any medals.
They are the true heroes in fact.
Peace.
Fre;D
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin_fr · 2021-07-20 10:18
Quote from: Fred vS on July 20, 2021, 11:24:44 amTo cloture the thing,
it seems to me that "Stoneage IT" was more related about how the
announce of conversion to git was done.
Did you remember the episode of fpc-Nabble that decides to stop to
update the mailing list without any warning to nobody, even not user-
maintainers?
And the effect that it did?
For such a big change, like moving to git, the minimum should have
been to prevent every fpc-Mantis members, via a personal email of the
change.
There are thousands (?) of mantis accounts. Most of them abandoned. We
can't mail them all. And many would not want that.
About the timing: The Announcement was first made on 27th June. (That
is the mantis part, the "moving to git" was done on 22nd June)
That is not a massive amount of time, but it wasn't "last minute".
(There should have been announcements on the mail lists, but I can't
find them. Maybe they got lost. They went out (again?) when the
"banner" was added.)
It also went on twitter.
And it is not a crucial/survival matter. It's a courtesy, for those
who whish to have means of contact on any issue they reported.
They issues themself will be there. And the reporter name too.
When we noticed that the reply-rate to the announcement was lower than
expected, we decided to get a bit more noticeable.
So anyone who now was surprised by the banner, really should consider
to read our announcements when we make them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
440bx · 2021-07-20 10:57
Quote from: Martin_fr on July 20, 2021, 12:18:20 pmThere are thousands
(?) of mantis accounts. Most of them abandoned. We can't mail them
all. And many would not want that.
That's a very good point. This move is the right time to do a little
"spring cleaning" (get rid of abandoned accounts.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-20 10:58
Quote from: Martin_fr on July 20, 2021, 12:18:20 pmThere are thousands
(?) of mantis accounts. Most of them abandoned. We can't mail them
all. And many would not want that.
Hum, I was thinking, of course, about Mantis accounts that have
submitted patch or participated in the bug tracker.
Really more than thousand, I have doubt.
But ok, let's close the subject, you are too perfect to accept advice.
Fre;D
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin_fr · 2021-07-20 11:39
Quote from: Fred vS on July 20, 2021, 12:58:45 pmQuote from: Martin_fr
on July 20, 2021, 12:18:20 pmThere are thousands (?) of mantis
accounts. Most of them abandoned. We can't mail them all. And many
would not want that.
Hum, I was thinking, of course, about Mantis accounts that have
submitted patch or participated in the bug tracker.
Really more than thousand, I have doubt.
But ok, let's close the subject, you are too perfect to accept advice.
That indeed could have been done.
I don't know if it hadn't been thought off, or if it had been thought
that those people will be on the forum/mail-list anyway.
Unfortunately the remaining few days are completely booked out.
Plenty of people from the teams had to coordinate to get a working
schedule, and they are all busy sticking to that time table now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred vS · 2021-07-20 13:19
Quote from: Martin_fr on July 20, 2021, 01:39:00 pmQuote from: Fred vS
on July 20, 2021, 12:58:45 pmQuote from: Martin_fr on July 20, 2021,
12:18:20 pmThere are thousands (?) of mantis accounts. Most of them
abandoned. We can't mail them all. And many would not want that.
Hum, I was thinking, of course, about Mantis accounts that have
submitted patch or participated in the bug tracker.
Really more than thousand, I have doubt.
But ok, let's close the subject, you are too perfect to accept advice.
That indeed could have been done.
I don't know if it hadn't been thought off, or if it had been thought
that those people will be on the forum/mail-list anyway.
Unfortunately the remaining few days are completely booked out.
Plenty of people from the teams had to coordinate to get a working
schedule, and they are all busy sticking to that time table now.
I am sure that somebody in team will find energy and time for this
very primordial thing: respect for contributors (even if they are not
part of the core).
Hop. hop - like Winni said.
Fre;D
----------------------------------------------------------------------
devEric69 · 2021-07-20 15:51
Quote from: Martin_fr on July 20, 2021, 12:18:20 pm[snip] mantis
accounts [snip] most of them abandoned. We can't mail them all. And
many would not want that.
Just for information, the mailbox bugs@freepascal.org does not answer
neither: "Mail Delivery System: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender":
Code: Text [Select][+][-]window.onload = function(){var x1 =
document.getElementById("main_content_section"); if (x1) { var x =
document.getElementsByClassName("geshi");for (var i = 0; i
: host mail.freepascal.org[178.33.235.90] said:
550 5.1.1 :Recipient address rejected: User
unknown in local recipient table Reporting-MTA: dns; mlpnf0119
Original-Recipient: rfc822;bugs@freepascal.org Final-Recipient:
rfc822;bugs@freepascal.org Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Diagnostic-
Code: smtp; : host mail.freepascal.org[178.33.235.90] said: 550 5.1.1
: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table;
Remote-MTA: dns; mail.freepascal.org X-mail-filterd: {"version":"1.2.
2","queueID":"4GPWgq5XhrznTV2","contextId":"05e13a38-bbea-4338-93f4-
0283b0dc1f61"} Received: from outgoing-mail.laposte.net
(localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpnf0113.laposte.net (SMTP
Server) with ESMTP id 4GPWgq5XhrznTV2 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:59:51
+0200 (CEST) X-mail-filterd: {"version":"1.2.2","queueID":"4GPWgq509Pz
nTTg","contextId":"df814b2b-5470-4f15-a922-4870777c435b"} X-lpn-
mailing: LEGIT X-lpn-spamrating: 40 X-lpn-spamlevel: not-spam X-lpn-
spamcause: OK, (0)(0000)gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudeigddtud
cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfntefrqffuvffgpdfqfgfvpdgg
tfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepff
fhrhfvkffugggtihesrgdtsggstddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvghrihgtrdhmohhuthhivges
lhgrphhoshhtvgdrnhgvthenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetueefhfehhfdvffehueeggf
egheffkefhveevgfekjedvfeefffevfeehjeegveenucfkphepledtrdeihedruddtledr
leejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghlohepfihlphhnfh
dtvddtjedrshihshdrmhgvshhhtghorhgvrdhnvghtpdhinhgvthepledtrdeihedruddt
ledrleejpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepvghrihgtrdhmohhuthhivgeslhgrphhoshhtvgdrnh
gvthdprhgtphhtthhopegsuhhgshesfhhrvggvphgrshgtrghlrdhorhhg Received:
from wlpnf0207.sys.meshcore.net (wlpnf0207.sys.meshcore.net
[90.65.109.97]) by mlpnf0113.laposte.net (SMTP Server) with ESMTPA id
4GPWgq509PznTTg for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:59:51 +0200 (CEST) Date:
Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:59:51 +0200 (CEST) From: bip.bip@laposte.net
Reply-To: bip.bip@laposte.net To: Mantis Bug Tracker Message-ID:
<740481868.697259.1626206391598@wlpnf0207> Subject: Re: Mentioned in
[Lazarus 0039200]: Add cosmetic information on address entry MIME-
Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_697258_1064273828.1626206391597" X-ORIGINATING-
IP: 90.65.109.97 X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-SAVECOPY: true X-WUM-
FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-
sha256; c=simple/simple; d=laposte.net; s=lpn-wlmd; t=1626213608;
bh=GFzo90R/2UR0/xIXO4ObcKumtNJN1A5p4lLcZGeC07k=; h=Date:From:Reply-
To:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nFLtiEEiWsFPiR5u
SFzSKJ/Cn0nA3zQzOwD0YkhSDI7A+4Wt7TFd0Yvqs3WUh1pHsMwWPCyb7QOilq8xNVPGei
8a9yLS9aMzx4NPGhGIZnmi5z76eqbCHHfoIeO/FmrUQDimitZE4dn3zvALDdxFChrL4+1S
JpitTh8huJ2nRrzaL5PMTkKCPTUefUoxnNb19aLJF8r6hSENQbFekAe64hd7/no26auav7
CqEqf1rm/vQqIWtBqDP4kuHDMrOwJ+5EubxKLlups9ZHRSVb1dzPRDaJGLK4oVfi/WjrHB
Uk6r+Xl6GSJ4qomtDmH5Y9mCCL6gBNYMY8hh/0zza7yXNw==;