about #0034416: EPoll_Event struct size lazarus / 66-Unix ---------------------------------------------------------------------- baldzhang · 2020-02-01 22:56 Hi, I met this issue yesterday, search the bug tracker and found #0034416 already add a note there. could any one have a look of it please? I'm not familiar with mailing list and do not know how to post/reply... sorry about that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- baldzhang · 2020-02-12 00:15 Is it possible to merge r43880 and r44093 to 3.2 ? r43880 (fix #0036528) and r44093 (fix #0034416) hope it is not too late to merge them. ** I try to post this to mailing list, sent success but not shown in list archive, may be my email address is banned** although my register email received ok.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thaddy · 2020-02-12 07:57 Marcov does most of the merges and he reads this, so: Marco, can you merge them? They are both non-intrusive. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- marcov · 2020-02-12 09:02 Quote from: Thaddy on February 12, 2020, 08:57:07 amMarcov does most of the merges and he reads this, so: Marco, can you merge them? They are both non-intrusive. During the week, depending on time, I only merge easy stuff. I had already looked at the revs, but they didn't seem easy. First, syscall changes are never nonintrusive. 43880: It has to be checked if 3.2 already contains that newfsstatat call. And finally, a build has to be done to test for issues, since lstat is used in things like findfirst, which are critical to the compiler. 44093 I already test merged, but had a conflict on the test. Looking into it costs too much time now So both -> weekend, unless I get feedback from Florian. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- baldzhang · 2020-02-12 15:33 thanks marcov now I know this is complex than I think. and the mailing list has my posts, is it update daily? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thaddy · 2020-02-12 16:47 Quote from: baldzhang on February 12, 2020, 04:33:01 pmand the mailing list has my posts, is it update daily? It is updated every time somebody posts ...It is near real time. (except if you are unknown, then it might take some moderation or even refused to post) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- baldzhang · 2020-02-24 02:59 manually patched branches/fixes_3_2 r44232, compiled and run unit tests, on Raspberry Pi 4, Debian 10 arm64 the digest outputs is same as original codes hopefully is useful to merge this two revisions Code: [Select]make -C utils utils make[1]: Entering directory '/srv/build/fpc-fixes-3.2/tests/utils' make[1]: Leaving directory '/srv/build/fpc-fixes-3.2/tests/utils' utils/digest output/aarch64-linux/log No run found for "Skipping test because for other target webtbs/tw36544b.pp 2020/02/19 05:39:54" Total = 7574 (38:7536) Total number of compilations = 4658 (11:4647) Successfully compiled = 3522 Successfully failed = 1125 Compilation failures = 8 Compilation that did not fail while they should = 3 Total number of runs = 2916 (27:2889) Successful runs = 2889 Failed runs = 27 Number units compiled = 152 Number program that should not be run = 450 Number of skipped tests = 627 Number of skipped graph tests = 10 Number of skipped interactive tests = 31 Number of skipped known bug tests = 7 Number of skipped tests for other versions = 4 Number of skipped tests for other cpus = 402 Number of skipped tests for other targets = 173 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- baldzhang · 2020-04-22 16:16 @marcov emmmm.... any news? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Bi0T1N · 2020-04-23 13:40 Better add it to the wiki page. Maybe with a reference to your post. According to the log view it seems not merged yet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- baldzhang · 2020-05-12 14:30 I saw 3.2 was tagged without this, hope they can be merged next release ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- baldzhang · 2020-06-01 14:44 saw the merge. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- marcov · 2020-06-01 15:54 Quote from: Bi0T1N on April 23, 2020, 03:40:08 pmBetter add it to the wiki page. Maybe with a reference to your post. According to the log view it seems not merged yet. Note that that is the fixes, not the release branch. The release branch is tags/release_3_2_0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- baldzhang · 2020-06-02 00:37 compile fail on Raspberry Pi OS 64 error: AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW not defined. trunk has it defined at rtl/linux/ostypes.inc