Problem R_X86_64_PC32
lazarus / 66-Unix

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-06 05:33

Good afternoon!
Fedora 21 64 Workstation
Memory: 8Gb

Not compiled fpc64.
Error build with the text: "relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32
against"

What should be done to solve the problem?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
marcov · 2015-03-06 06:03

What do you exactly do? Try to create a dynamic library?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-06 06:54

compiled FPC

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonas Maebe · 2015-03-06 07:09

How are you compiling FPC?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-06 09:06

Build script
Code: [Select]#
=============================================================
#                CodeTyphon Studio
#      Copyright (c) PilotLogic Software House.
#               All rights reserved.
# =============================================================

dothejob()
{

echo "   "
echo "=============================================================="
echo "            Build FreePascal $vBits for $vHostOSRealName"
echo "=============================================================="
echo "   "

if [ ! -f $vFpcSrcDir/Makefile.fpc ] ;
then   
    echo "[INFO]: FPC$vBits Source files not exists, extracting..."
    ./ln_FPC0_Extract_Source_From_ZipFile.sh
fi

if [ ! -f $vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile ] ;
then     
    echo "[INFO]: FPC$vBits Binary files not exists, extracting..."
    ./ln_FPC0_Install_Bin_Files.sh 64
fi

if [ -d $vFpcDir/newfpc ] ;
then    
    echo "[INFO]: Remove OLD FreePascal temporary build folder..."
    sudo rm -rf $vFpcDir/newfpc
fi

cd $vCTDir/fpcsrc

echo "------------------------------------------------"
echo "        Clean FreePascal $vBits"
echo "------------------------------------------------"
sudo $vMake clean PP=$vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile

echo "------------------------------------------------"
echo "            Build FreePascal $vBits"
echo "------------------------------------------------"

#sleep 100

echo 'пути '$vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile

case $vOSName in
solaris)
   sudo $vMake all OPT="-Xn" PP=$vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile
PPUMOVE=/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/compiler/utils/ppumove
 ;;
linux)
   sudo $vMake all PP=$vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile
PPUMOVE=/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/compiler/utils/ppumove
 ;;
freebsd)
   sudo $vMake all OPT="-Fl/usr/local/lib" PP=$vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile
PPUMOVE=/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/compiler/utils/ppumove
 ;;
openbsd)
   sudo $vMake all OPT="-Fl/usr/local/lib" PP=$vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile
PPUMOVE=/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/compiler/utils/ppumove
 ;;
netbsd)
   sudo $vMake all OPT="-Fl/usr/local/lib" PP=$vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile
PPUMOVE=/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/compiler/utils/ppumove
 ;;
dragonfly)
   sudo $vMake all OPT="-Fl/usr/local/lib" PP=$vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile
PPUMOVE=/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/compiler/utils/ppumove
 ;;
darwin) 
   sudo $vMake all PP=$vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile
PPUMOVE=/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/compiler/utils/ppumove   
 ;;
*)
   sudo $vMake all PP=$vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile
PPUMOVE=/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/compiler/utils/ppumove
 ;;
esac

# =======================================================
if [ -f $vCTDir/Settings/CT_FPC_Stop_Before_Install.ctsw ] ;
then
  echo "   "
  echo "[INFO]: Switch, FPC Stop Before Install Procedure, is ON."
  echo "        FPC Build procedure STOP.."
  echo "   "
  exit
fi
# =====================================================
echo "   "
echo "------------------------------------------------"
echo "        Install FreePascal $vBits"
echo "------------------------------------------------"

sudo $vMake install PP=$vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile
INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpc/newfpc

echo "   "
echo "------------------------------------------------"
echo "        Clean FreePascal $vBits"
echo "------------------------------------------------"
sudo $vMake clean PP=$vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile

# =====================================================
echo "   "
echo "------------------------------------------------"
echo "        Copy FreePascal $vBits"
echo "------------------------------------------------"

if [ ! -d $vFpcBitsDir/ ] ;
then  
  sudo mkdir $vFpcBitsDir
fi

sudo chmod -R 777 $vFpcDir/

sudo cp -f $vFpcDir/newfpc/bin/* $vFpcExeDir/
sudo cp -fr $vFpcDir/newfpc/share/* $vFpcBitsDir/

sudo cp -fr $vFpcDir/newfpc/lib/fpc/$vFpcVer/* $vFpcBitsDir/
sudo rm -fr $vFpcDir/newfpc/lib/fpc/$vFpcVer

sudo cp -fr $vFpcDir/newfpc/lib/fpc/* $vFpcBitsDir/

sudo rm -fr $vFpcDir/newfpc

sudo mv -f $vFpcBitsDir/$vFpcExeFile $vFpcExeDir/


sudo chmod -R 777 $vFpcBinDir
sudo chmod -R 777 $vFpcDir

#=========================================

sudo rm -f $vOSBinDir/$vFpcExeFile
sudo rm -f $vOSBinDir/fpc$vBits
sudo ln -f -s $vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile $vOSBinDir/$vFpcExeFile
sudo ln -f -s $vFpcExeDir/$vFpcExeFile $vOSBinDir/fpc$vBits

#=========================================

echo "   "
echo "[FINAL INFO]: FreePascal $vBits Building, finish..."
echo "================================================================
====="

}
# =================== MAIN =============================
. $PWD/ln_All_Functions.sh
getvalues

if [ $vBits = 64 ] ;
then
 dothejob
fi

Log
Code: [Select]/bin/mkdir -p x86_64/units/x86_64-linux
/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpc/fpc64/bin/x86_64-linux/ppcx64 -Ur -Xs -O2 -n
-Fux86_64 -Fusystems
-Fu/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/rtl/units/x86_64-linux -Fix86_64 -FE.
-FUx86_64/units/x86_64-linux -Cg -dRELEASE -fPIC   -dx86_64 -dGDB
-dBROWSERLOG -Fux86 -Sew pp.pas
/bin/ld: warning: ./link.res contains output sections; did you forget
-T?
/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/rtl/units/x86_64-linux/sysutils.o: In
function `SYSUTILS_$$_EXPANDFILENAMECASE$RAWBYTESTRING$TFILENAMECASEMA
TCH$$RAWBYTESTRING':
sysutils.pp:(.text.n_sysutils_$$_expandfilenamecase$rawbytestring$tfil
enamecasematch$$rawbytestring+0x22b): relocation truncated to fit:
R_X86_64_PLT32 against symbol `fpc_ansistr_assign' defined in
.text.n_fpc_ansistr_assign section in
/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/rtl/units/x86_64-linux/system.o
pp.pas(247,1) Error: Error while linking
pp.pas(247,1) Fatal: There were 1 errors compiling module, stopping
Fatal: Compilation aborted
Makefile:3925: ошибка выполнения рецепта для
цели «ppcx64»
make[5]: *** [ppcx64] Ошибка 1
make[5]: выход из каталога
«/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/compiler»
Makefile:3967: ошибка выполнения рецепта для
цели «next»
make[4]: *** [next] Ошибка 2
make[4]: выход из каталога
«/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/compiler»
Makefile:3972: ошибка выполнения рецепта для
цели «ppc1»
make[3]: *** [ppc1] Ошибка 2
make[3]: выход из каталога
«/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/compiler»
Makefile:3984: ошибка выполнения рецепта для
цели «cycle»
make[2]: *** [cycle] Ошибка 2
make[2]: выход из каталога
«/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc/compiler»
Makefile:2779: ошибка выполнения рецепта для
цели «compiler_cycle»
make[1]: *** [compiler_cycle] Ошибка 2
make[1]: выход из каталога
«/usr/lib/codetyphon/fpcsrc»
Makefile:2804: ошибка выполнения рецепта для
цели «build-stamp.x86_64-linux»
make: *** [build-stamp.x86_64-linux] Ошибка 2
  
[INFO]: Switch, FPC Stop Before Install Procedure, is ON.
        FPC Build procedure STOP..
  
_______________________________________________________________

Terminate Action at 6-3-15 12:09:07
Total time: 00:00:19.331
ExitCode : 0                                                         
                     

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonas Maebe · 2015-03-06 09:12

Which revision of the FPC source code (from which branch) are you
compiling? And what is the version number of your starting compiler?
Also, what is the version of your binutils?

Normally, the error you get should only occur if the total size of
your code (+ possibly static data) is over 4GB, but that's definitely
not the case for the compiler binary.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-06 09:36

(GNU Binutils) version 2.24
Version in the attached file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-09 05:57

In yet found https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/avoiding-
relocation-errors-when-building-applications-with-large-global-or-
static-data-on-intel64/
Only where this parameter (-mcmodel = medium) exhibit.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-10 02:46

Removed 4GB memory - everything compiled fine!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-10 08:38

The question is not removed!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonas Maebe · 2015-03-10 12:09

Quote from: krab22 on March 10, 2015, 09:38:06 amThe question is not
removed!
You're absolutely correct: I have absolutely no idea why that helped,
except if the memory that your removed is faulty.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-10 16:19

Memory tested by using memtest.
It's okay.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-10 16:20

What do you think about the message https://software.intel.com/en-
us/articles/avoiding-relocation-errors-when-building-applications-
with-large-global-or-static-data-on-intel64/?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonas Maebe · 2015-03-10 16:30

That says exactly the same as what I said before: "Normally, the error
you get should only occur if the total size of your code (+ possibly
static data) is over 4GB, but that's definitely not the case for the
compiler binary."

Whether you have 500MB or 128GB of ram in your computer should not,
and normally cannot, affect that error message you are getting from
the linker. The behaviour you are seeing simply does not make any
sense.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-11 02:56

Modules must be compiled for a specific memory model. If you do not,
an error occurs linker. How does this win when compiling FPC?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonas Maebe · 2015-03-11 09:24

FPC only supports the small memory model on x86-64. That is fine as
long as you don't have more 2GB of data, which is the case for the
compiler.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-12 03:10

Quote from: Jonas Maebe on March 11, 2015, 10:24:13 amFPC only
supports the small memory model on x86-64. That is fine as long as you
don't have more 2GB of data, which is the case for the compiler.
It's all good! But why is not going to the compiler?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonas Maebe · 2015-03-12 09:02

I don't know why it fails. As mentioned before, the only thing I can
think of that explains the symptoms you've described is a hardware
problem. It could also be a bug in the binutils version you are using,
but the fact that removing memory from your computer fixed the problem
makes this very unlikely.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
marcov · 2015-03-12 12:30

(Removed, problem seems to be code size, not datasize)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonas Maebe · 2015-03-12 12:34

The problem happens while compiling the compiler itself in his case.
The compiler does not have a combined code+data size of more than 2GB
(a reference to code from data can also be out of range if only the
data section is >= 2GB).

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-13 02:18

Quote from: Jonas Maebe on March 12, 2015, 01:34:37 pmThe problem
happens while compiling the compiler itself in his case. The compiler
does not have a combined code+data size of more than 2GB (a reference
to code from data can also be out of range if only the data section is
>= 2GB).
From your statements problem persists ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-13 02:20

Quote from: marcov on March 12, 2015, 01:30:14 pmRemoved, problem
seems to be code size, not datasize
I think so too

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cyrax · 2015-03-13 02:22

Please try to build FPC via standard way, not using CodeTyphon files
and their build scripts.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-13 10:52

Quote from: Cyrax on March 13, 2015, 03:22:56 amPlease try to build
FPC via standard way, not using CodeTyphon files and their build
scripts.
Tried to collect the resulting repository tag 2_6_4.
The same situation.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
engkin · 2015-03-13 16:19

What compiler/binutils did you use this time to compile 2.6.4?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-16 03:06

Quote from: engkin on March 13, 2015, 05:19:28 pmWhat
compiler/binutils did you use this time to compile 2.6.4?

http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,27615.msg170846.ht
ml#msg170846

----------------------------------------------------------------------
engkin · 2015-03-16 03:35

Quote from: krab22 on March 16, 2015, 04:06:42 amQuote from: engkin on
March 13, 2015, 05:19:28 pmWhat compiler/binutils did you use this
time to compile 2.6.4?

http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,27615.msg170846.ht
ml#msg170846

I suspected that you did use CodeTyphon, again, while Cyrax advised:
Quote from: Cyrax on March 13, 2015, 03:22:56 amPlease try to build
FPC via standard way, not using CodeTyphon files and their build
scripts.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
krab22 · 2015-03-18 10:39

"I suspected that you did use CodeTyphon, again, while Cyrax advised:"

The link is provided to clarify the compilers. When assembling
FPC_2.6.4 standard methods the same error occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonas Maebe · 2015-03-24 19:03

Could you try with an older or a newer version of binutils?