TSizeUIntDynArray and TSizeIntDynArray
lazarus / 64-FPC development

----------------------------------------------------------------------
LemonParty · 2025-10-14 16:03

I think given types should be added to unit Types.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thausand · 2025-10-14 16:19

Quote from: LemonParty on October 14, 2025, 06:03:47 pmI think given
types should be added to unit Types.

QuoteTSizeUIntDynArray No !, Size is sign int (when use for index).

QuoteTSizeIntDynArrayCode: Pascal  [Select][+][-]window.onload =
function(){var x1 = document.getElementById("main_content_section");
if (x1) { var x = document.getElementsByClassName("geshi");for (var i
= 0; i  type TSizeIntDynArray   = specialize TArray<SizeInt>; Done

----------------------------------------------------------------------
LemonParty · 2025-10-14 17:00

QuoteNo !, Size is sign int (when use for index).What do you mean by
that?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thaddy · 2025-10-14 17:01

sizes can not be negative????? So are always unsigned.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
H₂SO₄ · 2025-10-15 05:32

These types are trivial to define and also assignment-compatible when
defined multiple times in different units, so I see no point in this.
I'd leave this to the programmer.

If anything, I'd like  TIntegerArray  to be removed from  objpas.  Why
pollute the namespace with a historical hack that only exists to
emulate raw pointers? Why is a fixed-size 960 MiB block of integers
considered important enough to be defined in  objpas  of all places?

(I know it's for historical reasons and should not be removed - it's
just funny to see archaic 16-bit era  ifdefs  fifteen lines above 
generic TArray<T> = array of T;   )

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thausand · 2025-10-16 06:58

Quote from: LemonParty on October 14, 2025, 07:00:10 pmQuoteNo !, Size
is sign int (when use for index).What do you mean by that?
I make sorry. As write Thaddy I make dumdum mistake when write that
and was confuse with index iterator (must signed with for loop).