Functional programming and fpjsonrtti
lazarus / 64-FPC development

----------------------------------------------------------------------
LeoBruno · 2022-07-23 17:15

Hi:

Is it possble to use FPJsonRtti to serialize OBjects written with
Functional Programming?

Code: Pascal  [Select][+][-]window.onload = function(){var x1 =
document.getElementById("main_content_section"); if (x1) { var x =
document.getElementsByClassName("geshi");for (var i = 0; i  type     
  { TClasse }   TClasse = class(TObject)  private    FNome: string; 
published    function Nome(aValue: string): TClasse; overload;   
function Nome: string; overload;        end; implementation { TClasse
} function TClasse.Nome(aValue: string): TClasse;begin  result :=
Self;  FNome := aValue;end; function TClasse.Nome: string;begin 
result := FNome;end; 
thank' s in advance!

--

Maybe the question should be:

How to generate rtti information with functional Object?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
PascalDragon · 2022-07-24 20:54

Quote from: LeoBruno on July 23, 2022, 07:15:39 pmHow to generate rtti
information with functional Object?

This is not possible with the existing RTTI, because it doesn't store
the method's signature which is required for correct overload
selection. This will only become possible once the extended RTTI is
integrated.

Also please use [ code=pascal ][ /code ] tags for source code which
increases readability and also avoids the forum software interpreting
certain character sequences.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
LeoBruno · 2022-08-07 13:41

I need to use functional programming in order to properly work with
interfaces, because is hard to implement interfaces with Properties.

Where can I find information about the completion status of the
"Extended RTTI"?

Thank you in advance!!



Quote from: PascalDragon on July 24, 2022, 10:54:32 pmQuote from:
LeoBruno on July 23, 2022, 07:15:39 pmHow to generate rtti information
with functional Object?

This is not possible with the existing RTTI, because it doesn't store
the method's signature which is required for correct overload
selection. This will only become possible once the extended RTTI is
integrated.

Also please use [ code=pascal ][ /code ] tags for source code which
increases readability and also avoids the forum software interpreting
certain character sequences.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
PascalDragon · 2022-08-08 21:37

Quote from: LeoBruno on August 07, 2022, 03:41:13 pmWhere can I find
information about the completion status of the "Extended RTTI"?
Keep an eye on this merge request (or any follow up should this one be
closed without merge).