1971
[DOCID: f:hc69ih.txt]
107th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 69
Expressing the sense of the Congress on the Hague Convention on the
Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and urging all
Contracting States to the Convention to recommend the production of
practice guides.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 20, 2001
Mr. Lampson (for himself, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Horn, Mr. Greenwood, Mrs.
Mink of Hawaii, Mr. Kolbe, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr.
Kirk, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Foley, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Shimkus,
Mrs. Tauscher, Mr. Borski, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. Sandlin, Mr. Pascrell,
Mrs. Maloney of New York, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Frank, Mr. Kind,
Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Farr of California, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr.
Reyes, Mr. Baca, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Ortiz, Mrs. Emerson,
Mr. Gutknecht, Mr. Green of Texas, and Mr. Bentsen) submitted the
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on
International Relations
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the Congress on the Hague Convention on the
Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and urging all
Contracting States to the Convention to recommend the production of
practice guides.
Whereas 20 years ago, the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International
Child Abduction was a bold step forward to provide a uniform process for
resolving international child abduction cases;
Whereas over the past 2 decades, the Convention has had increasingly important
and positive effects and has grown in terms of the number of Contracting
States and the level of interest of other nations;
Whereas there has been an increase of multinational marriages and a
corresponding increase of international abductions of children by
parents;
Whereas as travel becomes faster and easier, and as multinational marriages
become more common, the Convention is more significant than ever;
Whereas on 2 occasions, the International Centre for Missing and Exploited
Children and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children have
convened professionals and experts in international child abduction to
examine their experiences with the Convention;
Whereas on both occasions, the participants affirmed their overwhelming
commitment to the Convention, but were also unified in the conclusion
that there are serious shortcomings in its implementation;
Whereas the shortcomings include--
(1) a lack of awareness by policy makers and the general public of the
Convention and of the problem of international child abduction, making the
successful resolution of cases more difficult;
(2) the fact that, in too many instances, the process for resolving an
international child abduction is too slow;
(3) a lack of uniformity in the interpretation of the Convention from
nation to nation;
(4) the fact that key exceptions provided in the Convention to ensure
reason and common sense have in some cases ceased to be viewed as
exceptions, have instead become the rule, and are frequently used as
justifications for not returning abducted children;
(5) the increasing difficulty of enforcing access rights for parents
under Article 21 of the Convention;
(6) the need of parents for significant personal financial resources to
obtain legal representation and proceed under the Convention and, in many
places, the lack of assistance for parents who do not have such resources;
(7) a serious lack of training, knowledge, and experience for judges in
international child abduction cases, because there are too many courts
hearing these cases and in most instances few such cases for each court;
and
(8) in many instances, the lack of enforcement of court orders for the
return of children; and
Whereas the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children has promised
to support an effort to produce practice guides to provide a framework
for applying the Convention: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
That--
(1) it is the sense of the Congress that--
(A) the original intent of the Hague Convention on
the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction--to
provide a uniform process for resolving international
child abduction cases--is more important than ever;
(B) practice guides should be developed for the
Convention that build on recognized best practices
under the Convention and provide a framework for
applying the Convention;
(C) the Convention itself need not be modified;
(D) the practices identified and included in the
practice guides should not be legally binding on
Contracting States to the Convention and should be
based on research and the advice of experts to help
ensure the most effective process possible;
(E) the practice guides should be developed in 3
stages: comparative research and consultations,
meetings of expert committees to develop drafts, and
consideration of the drafts by a future Special
Commission; and
(F) the Permanent Bureau of The Hague should
organize the process of developing the practice guides;
and
(2) the Congress urges all Contracting States to the
Convention to adopt a resolution recommending that--
(A) the Permanent Bureau of The Hague produce and
promote practice guides to assist in the implementation
and operation of the Convention; and
(B) such a proposal to produce practice guides be
adopted by the Fourth Special Commission at The Hague
in March 2001.
<all>
0