152e
[DOCID: f:h3806ih.txt]
107th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 3806
To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect those who defend the
United States by exercising their duty as patriots to warn against the
existence of threats to weaknesses created by institutional failures
that should be identified and corrected in a timely manner, and for
other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 27, 2002
Mr. Israel (for himself, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Markey, and Mrs. Morella)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform,
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of
the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect those who defend the
United States by exercising their duty as patriots to warn against the
existence of threats to weaknesses created by institutional failures
that should be identified and corrected in a timely manner, and for
other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Paul Revere Freedom to Warn Act''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds that--
(1) terrorist attacks are a fundamental threat to America's
freedom;
(2) the Nation's capacity to be vigilant requires Congress
and law enforcement agencies to be aware of vulnerability to
terrorism from the existence of threats to weaknesses created
by institutional failures that should be identified and
corrected in a timely manner;
(3) the President has called on all Americans, as their
patriotic duty, to bear witness against ongoing threats to our
way of life;
(4) whistleblowers have risked retaliation and been
harassed for making significant contributions to prevent
avoidable tragedies by exercising First Amendment rights to
warn against threats to America's public safety infrastructure
for national defense, civil defense, law enforcement,
transportation, communications, energy, and food;
(5) whistleblowers often face severe harassment and
retaliation for exercising their duty to warn, and such
retaliation for responsibly exercising freedom of speech itself
is a threat to America's way of life;
(6) since 1912 Federal law has banned retaliation for
communicating with Congress because the free flow of
information is a prerequisite for effective exercise of
constitutional checks and balances, and the prohibition has
been extended to protect witnesses testifying to law
enforcement agencies;
(7) there are no remedies to enforce these rights for
victims of their violation; and
(8) Paul Revere, who risked his life to warn that America's
communities were being invaded, was America's first
whistleblower and personifies the way in which whistleblowers
can make a difference in our Nation's survival.
SEC. 3. PURPOSE.
The purpose of this Act is to protect people in either the public
or private sector who defend the United States by exercising their duty
as patriots to warn against the existence of threats to weaknesses
created by institutional failures that should be identified and
corrected in a timely manner.
SEC. 4. REMEDIES FOR RETALIATION AGAINST WHISTLEBLOWERS.
Section 7211 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``The right''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(b)(1) Any person aggrieved by a violation of subsection (a) of
this section or subsections (b) or (c) of section 1512 if title 18 may
bring a civil action (and is entitled to a jury trial) in the
appropriate United States District Court within three years from the
date of such violation, against any person, organization, or employer
responsible for the violation, for lost wages and benefits,
reinstatement, costs and attorney fees, compensatory or punitive
damages, and equitable, injunctive, or any other relief that the court
considers appropriate.
(2) A District Court shall retain jurisdiction over any claim filed
under this subsection unless all parties voluntarily elect after the
complaint is filed that the proceeding be resolved through mediation
and, if necessary, that a decision by an arbitrator selected by mutual
consent, with approval by the District Court, be binding. The District
Court shall retain jurisdiction as necessary to comply with an
arbitrator's decision.
``(c) The same legal burdens of proof in proceedings under
subsection (b) shall apply as under sections 1214 and 1221 of this
title.''.
<all>
0