2000
[DOCID: f:h3005rfs.txt]
107th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3005
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
December 6, 2001
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance
_______________________________________________________________________
AN ACT
To extend trade authorities procedures with respect to reciprocal trade
agreements.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND FINDINGS.
(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Bipartisan Trade
Promotion Authority Act of 2001''.
(b) Findings.--The Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The expansion of international trade is vital to the
national security of the United States. Trade is critical to
the economic growth and strength of the United States and to
its leadership in the world. Stable trading relationships
promote security and prosperity. Trade agreements today serve
the same purposes that security pacts played during the Cold
War, binding nations together through a series of mutual rights
and obligations. Leadership by the United States in
international trade fosters open markets, democracy, and peace
throughout the world.
(2) The national security of the United States depends on
its economic security, which in turn is founded upon a vibrant
and growing industrial base. Trade expansion has been the
engine of economic growth. Trade agreements maximize
opportunities for the critical sectors and building blocks of
the economy of the United States, such as information
technology, telecommunications and other leading technologies,
basic industries, capital equipment, medical equipment,
services, agriculture, environmental technology, and
intellectual property. Trade will create new opportunities for
the United States and preserve the unparalleled strength of the
United States in economic, political, and military affairs. The
United States, secured by expanding trade and economic
opportunities, will meet the challenges of the twenty-first
century.
SEC. 2. TRADE NEGOTIATING OBJECTIVES.
(a) Overall Trade Negotiating Objectives.--The overall trade
negotiating objectives of the United States for agreements subject to
the provisions of section 3 are--
(1) to obtain more open, equitable, and reciprocal market
access;
(2) to obtain the reduction or elimination of barriers and
distortions that are directly related to trade and that
decrease market opportunities for United States exports or
otherwise distort United States trade;
(3) to further strengthen the system of international
trading disciplines and procedures, including dispute
settlement;
(4) to foster economic growth, raise living standards, and
promote full employment in the United States and to enhance the
global economy;
(5) to ensure that trade and environmental policies are
mutually supportive and to seek to protect and preserve the
environment and enhance the international means of doing so,
while optimizing the use of the world's resources;
(6) to promote respect for worker rights and the rights of
children consistent with core labor standards of the
International Labor Organization (as defined in section 11(2))
and an understanding of the relationship between trade and
worker rights; and
(7) to seek provisions in trade agreements under which
parties to those agreements strive to ensure that they do not
weaken or reduce the protections afforded in domestic
environmental and labor laws as an encouragement for trade.
(b) Principal Trade Negotiating Objectives.--
(1) Trade barriers and distortions.--The principal
negotiating objectives of the United States regarding trade
barriers and other trade distortions are--
(A) to expand competitive market opportunities for
United States exports and to obtain fairer and more
open conditions of trade by reducing or eliminating
tariff and nontariff barriers and policies and
practices of foreign governments directly related to
trade that decrease market opportunities for United
States exports or otherwise distort United States
trade; and
(B) to obtain reciprocal tariff and nontariff
barrier elimination agreements, with particular
attention to those tariff categories covered in section
111(b) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C.
3521(b)).
(2) Trade in services.--The principal negotiating objective
of the United States regarding trade in services is to reduce
or eliminate barriers to international trade in services,
including regulatory and other barriers that deny national
treatment and market access or unreasonably restrict the
establishment or operations of service suppliers.
(3) Foreign investment.--The principal negotiating
objective of the United States regarding foreign investment is
to reduce or eliminate artificial or trade-distorting barriers
to trade-related foreign investment and, recognizing that
United States law on the whole provides a high level of
protection for investment, consistent with or greater than the
level required by international law, to secure for investors
important rights comparable to those that would be available
under United States legal principles and practice, by--
(A) reducing or eliminating exceptions to the
principle of national treatment;
(B) freeing the transfer of funds relating to
investments;
(C) reducing or eliminating performance
requirements, forced technology transfers, and other
unreasonable barriers to the establishment and
operation of investments;
(D) seeking to establish standards for
expropriation and compensation for expropriation,
consistent with United States legal principles and
practice;
(E) providing meaningful procedures for resolving
investment disputes;
(F) seeking to improve mechanisms used to resolve
disputes between an investor and a government through--
(i) mechanisms to eliminate frivolous
claims; and
(ii) procedures to ensure the efficient
selection of arbitrators and the expeditious
disposition of claims;
(G) providing an appellate or similar review
mechanism to correct manifestly erroneous
interpretations of law; and
(H) ensuring the fullest measure of transparency in
the dispute settlement mechanism, to the extent
consistent with the need to protect information that is
classified or business confidential, by--
(i) ensuring that all requests for dispute
settlement are promptly made public;
(ii) ensuring that--
(I) all proceedings, submis
2000
sions,
findings, and decisions are promptly
made public;
(II) all hearings are open to the
public; and
(iii) establishing a mechanism for
acceptance of amicus curiae submissions from
businesses, unions, and nongovernmental
organizations.
(4) Intellectual property.--The principal negotiating
objectives of the United States regarding trade-related
intellectual property are--
(A) to further promote adequate and effective
protection of intellectual property rights, including
through--
(i)(I) ensuring accelerated and full
implementation of the Agreement on Trade-
Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
referred to in section 101(d)(15) of the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C.
3511(d)(15)), particularly with respect to
meeting enforcement obligations under that
agreement; and
(II) ensuring that the provisions of any
multilateral or bilateral trade agreement
governing intellectual property rights that is
entered into by the United States reflect a
standard of protection similar to that found in
United States law;
(ii) providing strong protection for new
and emerging technologies and new methods of
transmitting and distributing products
embodying intellectual property;
(iii) preventing or eliminating
discrimination with respect to matters
affecting the availability, acquisition, scope,
maintenance, use, and enforcement of
intellectual property rights;
(iv) ensuring that standards of protection
and enforcement keep pace with technological
developments, and in particular ensuring that
rightholders have the legal and technological
means to control the use of their works through
the Internet and other global communication
media, and to prevent the unauthorized use of
their works; and
(v) providing strong enforcement of
intellectual property rights, including through
accessible, expeditious, and effective civil,
administrative, and criminal enforcement
mechanisms; and
(B) to secure fair, equitable, and
nondiscriminatory market access opportunities for
United States persons that rely upon intellectual
property protection.
(5) Transparency.--The principal negotiating objective of
the United States with respect to transparency is to obtain
wider and broader application of the principle of transparency
through--
(A) increased and more timely public access to
information regarding trade issues and the activities
of international trade institutions;
(B) increased openness at the WTO and other
international trade fora by increasing public access to
appropriate meetings, proceedings, and submissions,
including with regard to dispute settlement and
investment; and
(C) increased and more timely public access to all
notifications and supporting documentation submitted by
parties to the WTO.
(6) Anti-corruption.--The principal negotiating objectives
of the United States with respect to the use of money or other
things of value to influence acts, decisions, or omissions of
foreign governments or officials or to secure any improper
advantage in a manner affecting trade are--
(A) to obtain high standards and appropriate
domestic enforcement mechanisms applicable to persons
from all countries participating in the applicable
trade agreement that prohibit such attempts to
influence acts, decisions, or omissions of foreign
governments; and
(B) to ensure that such standards do not place
United States persons at a competitive disadvantage in
international trade.
(7) Improvement of the wto and multilateral trade
agreements.--The principal negotiating objectives of the United
States regarding the improvement of the World Trade
Organization, the Uruguay Round Agreements, and other
multilateral and bilateral trade agreements are--
(A) to achieve full implementation and extend the
coverage of the World Trade Organization and such
agreements to products, sectors, and conditions of
trade not adequately covered; and
(B) to expand country participation in and
enhancement of the Information Technology Agreement and
other trade agreements.
(8) Regulatory practices.--The principal negotiating
objectives of the United States regarding the use of government
regulation or other practices by foreign governments to provide
a competitive advantage to their domestic producers, service
providers, or investors and thereby reduce market access for
United States goods, services, and investments are--
(A) to achieve increased transparency and
opportunity for the participation of affected parties
in the development of regulations;
(B) to require that proposed regulations be based
on sound science, cost-benefit analysis, risk
assessment, or other objective evidence;
(C) to establish consultative mechanisms among
parties to trade agreements to promote increased
transparency in developing guidelines, rules,
regulations, and laws for government procurement and other regulatory
regimes; and
(D) to achieve the elimination of government
measures such as price controls and reference pricing
which deny full market access for United States
products.
(9) Electronic commerce.--The principal negotiating
objectives of the United States with respect to electronic
commerce are--
(A) to ensure that current obligations, rules,
disciplines, and commitments under the World Trade
Organization apply to electronic commerce;
(B) to ensure that--
(i) electronically delivered goods and
services receive no less favorable treatment
under trade rules and commitments than like
products delivered in physical form; and
(ii) the classification of such goods and
services ensures the most liberal trade
treatment possible;
(C) to ensure that governments refrain from
implementing trade-related measures that impede
2000
electronic commerce;
(D) where legitimate policy objectives require
domestic regulations that affect electronic commerce,
to obtain commitments that any such regulations are the
least restrictive on trade, nondiscriminatory, and
transparent, and promote an open market environment;
and
(E) to extend the moratorium of the World Trade
Organization on duties on electronic transmissions.
(10) Reciprocal trade in agriculture.--(A) The principal
negotiating objective of the United States with respect to
agriculture is to obtain competitive opportunities for United
States exports of agricultural commodities in foreign markets
substantially equivalent to the competitive opportunities
afforded foreign exports in United States markets and to
achieve fairer and more open conditions of trade in bulk,
specialty crop, and value-added commodities by--
(i) reducing or eliminating, by a date certain,
tariffs or other charges that decrease market
opportunities for United States exports--
(I) giving priority to those products that
are subject to significantly higher tariffs or
subsidy regimes of major producing countries;
and
(II) providing reasonable adjustment
periods for United States import-sensitive
products, in close consultation with the
Congress on such products before initiating
tariff reduction negotiations;
(ii) reducing tariffs to levels that are the same
as or lower than those in the United States;
(iii) reducing or eliminating subsidies that
decrease market opportunities for United States exports
or unfairly distort agriculture markets to the
detriment of the United States;
(iv) allowing the preservation of programs that
support family farms and rural communities but do not
distort trade;
(v) developing disciplines for domestic support
programs, so that production that is in excess of
domestic food security needs is sold at world prices;
(vi) eliminating Government policies that create
price-depressing surpluses;
(vii) eliminating state trading enterprises
whenever possible;
(viii) developing, strengthening, and clarifying
rules and effective dispute settlement mechanisms to
eliminate practices that unfairly decrease United
States market access opportunities or distort
agricultural markets to the detriment of the United
States, particularly with respect to import-sensitive
products, including--
(I) unfair or trade-distorting activities
of state trading enterprises and other
administrative mechanisms, with emphasis on
requiring price transparency in the operation
of state trading enterprises and such other
mechanisms in order to end cross subsidization,
price discrimination, and price undercutting;
(II) unjustified trade restrictions or
commercial requirements, such as labeling, that
affect new technologies, including
biotechnology;
(III) unjustified sanitary or phytosanitary
restrictions, including those not based on
scientific principles in contravention of the
Uruguay Round Agreements;
(IV) other unjustified technical barriers
to trade; and
(V) restrictive rules in the administration
of tariff rate quotas;
(ix) eliminating practices that adversely affect
trade in perishable or cyclical products, while
improving import relief mechanisms to recognize the
unique characteristics of perishable and cyclical
agriculture;
(x) ensuring that the use of import relief
mechanisms for perishable and cyclical agriculture are
as accessible and timely to growers in the United
States as those mechanisms that are used by other
countries;
(xi) taking into account whether a party to the
negotiations has failed to adhere to the provisions of
already existing trade agreements with the United
States or has circumvented obligations under those
agreements;
(xii) taking into account whether a product is
subject to market distortions by reason of a failure of
a major producing country to adhere to the provisions
of already existing trade agreements with the United
States or by the circumvention by that country of its
obligations under those agreements;
(xiii) otherwise ensuring that countries that
accede to the World Trade Organization have made
meaningful market liberalization commitments in
agriculture;
(xiv) taking into account the impact that
agreements covering agriculture to which the United
States is a party, including the North American Free
Trade Agreement, have on the United States agricultural
industry; and
(xv) maintaining bona fide food assistance programs
and preserving United States market development and
export credit programs.
(B)(i) Before commencing negotiations with respect to
agriculture, the United States Trade Representative, in
consultation with the Congress, shall seek to develop a
position on the treatment of seasonal and perishable
agricultural products to be employed in the negotiations in
order to develop an international consensus on the treatment of
seasonal or perishable agricultural products in investigations
relating to dumping and safeguards and in any other relevant
area.
(ii) During any negotiations on agricultural subsidies, the
United States Trade Representative shall seek to establish the
common base year for calculating the Aggregated Measurement of
Support (as defined in the Agreement on Agriculture) as the end
of each country's Uruguay Round implementation period, as
reported in each country's Uruguay Round market access
schedule.
(iii) The negotiating objective provided in subparagraph
(A) applies with respect to agricultural matters to be
addressed in any trade agreement entered into under section
3(a) or (b), including any trade agreement entered into under
section 3(a) or (b) that provides for accession to a trade
agreement to which the United States is already a party, such
as the North American Free Trade Agreement and the United
States-Canada Free Trade Agreement.
(11) Labor and the environment.--The principal negotiating
objectives of the United States with respect to labor and the
environment are--
2000
(A) to ensure that a party to a trade agreement
with the United States does not fail to effectively
enforce its environmental or labor laws, through a
sustained or recurring course of action or inaction, in
a manner affecting trade between the United States and
that party after entry into force of a trade agreement
between those countries;
(B) to recognize that parties to a trade agreement
retain the right to exercise discretion with respect to
investigatory, prosecutorial, regulatory, and
compliance matters and to make decisions regarding the
allocation of resources to enforcement with respect to
other labor or environmental matters determined to have
higher priorities, and to recognize that a country is
effectively enforcing its laws if a course of action or
inaction reflects a reasonable exercise of such
discretion, or results from a bona fide decision
regarding the allocation of resources and no
retaliation may be authorized based on the exercise of
these rights or the right to establish domestic labor
standards and levels of environmental protection;
(C) to strengthen the capacity of United States
trading partners to promote respect for core labor
standards (as defined in section 11(2));
(D) to strengthen the capacity of United States
trading partners to protect the environment through the
promotion of sustainable development;
(E) to reduce or eliminate government practices or
policies that unduly threaten sustainable development;
(F) to seek market access, through the elimination
of tariffs and nontariff barriers, for United States
environmental technologies, goods, and services; and
(G) to ensure that labor, environmental, health, or
safety policies and practices of the parties to trade
agreements with the United States do not arbitrarily or
unjustifiably discriminate against United States
exports or serve as disguised barriers to trade.
(12) Dispute settlement and enforcement.--The principal
negotiating objectives of the United States with respect to
dispute settlement and enforcement of trade agreements are--
(A) to seek provisions in trade agreements
providing for resolution of disputes between
governments under those trade agreements in an
effective, timely, transparent, equitable, and reasoned
manner, requiring determinations based on facts and the
principles of the agreements, with the goal of
increasing compliance with the agreements;
(B) to seek to strengthen the capacity of the Trade
Policy Review Mechanism of the World Trade Organization
to review compliance with commitments;
(C) to seek provisions encouraging the early
identification and settlement of disputes through
consultation;
(D) to seek provisions to encourage the provision
of trade-expanding compensation if a party to a dispute
under the agreement does not come into compliance with
its obligations under the agreement;
(E) to seek provisions to impose a penalty upon a
party to a dispute under the agreement that--
(i) encourages compliance with the
obligations of the agreement;
(ii) is appropriate to the parties, nature,
subject matter, and scope of the violation; and
(iii) has the aim of not adversely
affecting parties or interests not party to the
dispute while maintaining the effectiveness of
the enforcement mechanism; and
(F) to seek provisions that treat United States
principal negotiating objectives equally with respect
to--
(i) the ability to resort to dispute
settlement under the applicable agreement;
(ii) the availability of equivalent dispute
settlement procedures; and
(iii) the availability of equivalent
remedies.
(13) WTO extended negotiations.--The principal negotiating
objectives of the United States regarding trade in civil
aircraft are those set forth in section 135(c) of the Uruguay
Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3355(c)) and regarding rules of
origin are the conclusion of an agreement described in section
132 of that Act (19 U.S.C. 3552).
(c) Promotion of Certain Priorities.--In order to address and
maintain United States competitiveness in the global economy, the
President shall--
(1) seek greater cooperation between the WTO and the ILO;
(2) seek to establish consultative mechanisms among parties
to trade agreements to strengthen the capacity of United States
trading partners to promote respect for core labor standards
(as defined in section 11(2)), and report to the Committee on
Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the
Committee on Finance of the Senate on the content and operation
of such mechanisms;
(3) seek to establish consultative mechanisms among parties
to trade agreements to strengthen the capacity of United States
trading partners to develop and implement standards for the
protection of the environment and human health based on sound
science, and report to the Committee on Ways and Means of the
House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the
Senate on the content and operation of such mechanisms;
(4) conduct environmental reviews of future trade and
investment agreements, consistent with Executive Order 13141 of
November 16, 1999 and its relevant guidelines, and report to
the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives
and the Committee on Finance of the Senate on such reviews;
(5) review the impact of future trade agreements on United
States employment, modeled after Executive Order 13141, and
report to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate on
such review;
(6) take into account other legitimate United States
domestic objectives including, but not limited to, the
protection of legitimate health or safety, essential security,
and consumer interests and the law and regulations related
thereto;
(7) have the Secretary of Labor consult with any country
seeking a trade agreement with the United States concerning
that country's labor laws and provide technical assistance to
that country if needed;
(8) with respect to any trade agreement which the President
seeks to implement under trade authorities procedures, submit
to the Congress a report describing the extent to which the
country or countries that are parties to the agreement have in
effect laws governing exploitative child labor;
(9) preserve the ability of the United States to enforce
rigorously its trade laws, including the ant
2000
idumping and
countervailing duty laws, and avoid agreements which lessen the
effectiveness of domestic and international disciplines on
unfair trade, especially dumping and subsidies, in order to
ensure that United States workers, agricultural producers, and
firms can compete fully on fair terms and enjoy the benefits of
reciprocal trade concessions;
(10) continue to promote consideration of multilateral
environmental agreements and consult with parties to such
agreements regarding the consistency of any such agreement that
includes trade measures with existing environmental exceptions
under Article XX of the GATT 1994;
(11) report to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House
of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate,
not later than 12 months after the imposition of a penalty or
remedy by the United States permitted by a trade agreement to
which this Act applies, on the effectiveness of the penalty or
remedy applied under United States law in enforcing United
States rights under the trade agreement; and
(12) seek to establish consultative mechanisms among
parties to trade agreements to examine the trade consequences
of significant and unanticipated currency movements and to
scrutinize whether a foreign government engaged in a pattern of
manipulating its currency to promote a competitive advantage in
international trade.
The report under paragraph (11) shall address whether the penalty or
remedy was effective in changing the behavior of the targeted party and
whether the penalty or remedy had any adverse impact on parties or
interests not party to the dispute.
(d) Consultations.--
(1) Consultations with congressional advisers.--In the
course of negotiations conducted under this Act, the United
States Trade Representative shall consult closely and on a timely basis
with, and keep fully apprised of the negotiations, the Congressional
Oversight Group convened under section 7 and all committees of the
House of Representatives and the Senate with jurisdiction over laws
that would be affected by a trade agreement resulting from the
negotiations.
(2) Consultation before agreement initialed.--In the course
of negotiations conducted under this Act, the United States
Trade Representative shall--
(A) consult closely and on a timely basis
(including immediately before initialing an agreement)
with, and keep fully apprised of the negotiations, the
congressional advisers for trade policy and
negotiations appointed under section 161 of the Trade
Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2211), the Committee on Ways and
Means of the House of Representatives, the Committee on
Finance of the Senate, and the Congressional Oversight
Group convened under section 7; and
(B) with regard to any negotiations and agreement
relating to agricultural trade, also consult closely
and on a timely basis (including immediately before
initialing an agreement) with, and keep fully apprised
of the negotiations, the Committee on Agriculture of
the House of Representatives and the Committee on
Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate.
(e) Adherence to Obligations Under Uruguay Round Agreements.--In
determining whether to enter into negotiations with a particular
country, the President shall take into account the extent to which that
country has implemented, or has accelerated the implementation of, its
obligations under the Uruguay Round Agreements.
SEC. 3. TRADE AGREEMENTS AUTHORITY.
(a) Agreements Regarding Tariff Barriers.--
(1) In general.--Whenever the President determines that one
or more existing duties or other import restrictions of any
foreign country or the United States are unduly burdening and
restricting the foreign trade of the United States and that the
purposes, policies, priorities, and objectives of this Act will
be promoted thereby, the President--
(A) may enter into trade agreements with foreign
countries before--
(i) June 1, 2005; or
(ii) June 1, 2007, if trade authorities
procedures are extended under subsection (c);
and
(B) may, subject to paragraphs (2) and (3),
proclaim--
(i) such modification or continuance of any
existing duty,
(ii) such continuance of existing duty-free
or excise treatment, or
(iii) such additional duties,
as the President determines to be required or
appropriate to carry out any such trade agreement.
The President shall notify the Congress of the President's
intention to enter into an agreement under this subsection.
(2) Limitations.--No proclamation may be made under
paragraph (1) that--
(A) reduces any rate of duty (other than a rate of
duty that does not exceed 5 percent ad valorem on the
date of the enactment of this Act) to a rate of duty
which is less than 50 percent of the rate of such duty
that applies on such date of enactment;
(B) notwithstanding paragraph (6), reduces the rate
of duty below that applicable under the Uruguay Round
Agreements, on any agricultural product which was the
subject of tariff reductions by the United States as a
result of the Uruguay Round Agreements, for which the
rate of duty, pursuant to such Agreements, was reduced
on January 1, 1995, to a rate which was not less than
97.5 percent of the rate of duty that applied to such
article on December 31, 1994; or
(C) increases any rate of duty above the rate that
applied on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(3) Aggregate reduction; exemption from staging.--
(A) Aggregate reduction.--Except as provided in
subparagraph (B), the aggregate reduction in the rate
of duty on any article which is in effect on any day
pursuant to a trade agreement entered into under
paragraph (1) shall not exceed the aggregate reduction
which would have been in effect on such day if--
(i) a reduction of 3 percent ad valorem or
a reduction of one-tenth of the total
reduction, whichever is greater, had taken
effect on the effective date of the first
reduction proclaimed under paragraph (1) to
carry out such agreement with respect to such
article; and
(ii) a reduction equal to the amount
applicable under clause (i) had taken effect at
1-year intervals after the effective date of
such first reduction.
(B) Exemption from staging.--No staging is required
under subparagraph (A) with respect to a duty reduction
that is proclaimed under paragraph (1) for an article
of a kind that is not produced in the United States.
The United States International Trade Commission shall
advise the President o
2000
f the identity of articles that
may be exempted from staging under this subparagraph.
(4) Rounding.--If the President determines that such action
will simplify the computation of reductions under paragraph
(3), the President may round an annual reduction by an amount
equal to the lesser of--
(A) the difference between the reduction without
regard to this paragraph and the next lower whole
number; or
(B) one-half of 1 percent ad valorem.
(5) Other limitations.--A rate of duty reduction that may
not be proclaimed by reason of paragraph (2) may take effect
only if a provision authorizing such reduction is included
within an implementing bill provided for under section 5 and
that bill is enacted into law.
(6) Other tariff modifications.--Notwithstanding paragraphs
(1)(B), (2)(A), (2)(C), and (3) through (5), and subject to the
consultation and layover requirements of section 115 of the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act, the President may proclaim the
modification of any duty or staged rate reduction of any duty set forth
in Schedule XX, as defined in section 2(5) of that Act, if the United
States agrees to such modification or staged rate reduction in a
negotiation for the reciprocal elimination or harmonization of duties
under the auspices of the World Trade Organization.
(7) Authority under uruguay round agreements act not
affected.--Nothing in this subsection shall limit the authority
provided to the President under section 111(b) of the Uruguay
Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3521(b)).
(b) Agreements Regarding Tariff and Nontariff Barriers.--
(1) In general.--(A) Whenever the President determines
that--
(i) one or more existing duties or any other import
restriction of any foreign country or the United States
or any other barrier to, or other distortion of,
international trade unduly burdens or restricts the
foreign trade of the United States or adversely affects
the United States economy; or
(ii) the imposition of any such barrier or
distortion is likely to result in such a burden,
restriction, or effect;
and that the purposes, policies, priorities, and objectives of
this Act will be promoted thereby, the President may enter into
a trade agreement described in subparagraph (B) during the
period described in subparagraph (C).
(B) The President may enter into a trade agreement under
subparagraph (A) with foreign countries providing for--
(i) the reduction or elimination of a duty,
restriction, barrier, or other distortion described in
subparagraph (A), or
(ii) the prohibition of, or limitation on the
imposition of, such barrier or other distortion.
(C) The President may enter into a trade agreement under
this paragraph before--
(i) June 1, 2005; or
(ii) June 1, 2007, if trade authorities procedures
are extended under subsection (c).
(2) Conditions.--A trade agreement may be entered into
under this subsection only if such agreement makes progress in
meeting the applicable objectives described in section 2(a) and
(b) and the President satisfies the conditions set forth in
section 4.
(3) Bills qualifying for trade authorities procedures.--(A)
The provisions of section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974 (in this
Act referred to as ``trade authorities procedures'') apply to a
bill of either House of Congress which contains provisions
described in subparagraph (B) to the same extent as such
section 151 applies to implementing bills under that section. A
bill to which this paragraph applies shall hereafter in this
Act be referred to as an ``implementing bill''.
(B) The provisions referred to in subparagraph (A) are--
(i) a provision approving a trade agreement entered
into under this subsection and approving the statement
of administrative action, if any, proposed to implement
such trade agreement; and
(ii) if changes in existing laws or new statutory
authority are required to implement such trade
agreement or agreements, provisions, necessary or
appropriate to implement such trade agreement or
agreements, either repealing or amending existing laws
or providing new statutory authority.
(c) Extension Disapproval Process for Congressional Trade
Authorities Procedures.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided in section 5(b)--
(A) the trade authorities procedures apply to
implementing bills submitted with respect to trade
agreements entered into under subsection (b) before
July 1, 2005; and
(B) the trade authorities procedures shall be
extended to implementing bills submitted with respect
to trade agreements entered into under subsection (b)
after June 30, 2005, and before July 1, 2007, if (and
only if)--
(i) the President requests such extension
under paragraph (2); and
(ii) neither House of the Congress adopts
an extension disapproval resolution under
paragraph (5) before June 1, 2005.
(2) Report to congress by the president.--If the President
is of the opinion that the trade authorities procedures should
be extended to implementing bills described in paragraph
(1)(B), the President shall submit to the Congress, not later
than March 1, 2005, a written report that contains a request
for such extension, together with--
(A) a description of all trade agreements that have
been negotiated under subsection (b) and the
anticipated schedule for submitting such agreements to
the Congress for approval;
(B) a description of the progress that has been
made in negotiations to achieve the purposes, policies,
priorities, and objectives of this Act, and a statement
that such progress justifies the continuation of
negotiations; and
(C) a statement of the reasons why the extension is
needed to complete the negotiations.
(3) Report to congress by the advisory committee.--The
President shall promptly inform the Advisory Committee for
Trade Policy and Negotiations established under section 135 of
the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155) of the President's
decision to submit a report to the Congress under paragraph
(2). The Advisory Committee shall submit to the Congress as
soon as practicable, but not later than May 1, 2005, a written
report that contains--
(A) its views regarding the progress that has been
made in negotiations to achieve the purposes,
policies, priorities, and objectives of this Act; and
(B) a statement of its views, and the reasons
therefor, regarding whether the extension requested
under paragraph (2) should be approved or disapproved.
(4) Status of reports.--The reports submitted to the
Congress under paragraphs (2) and (3), or any portion of such
reports, may be
2000
classified to the extent the President
determines appropriate.
(5) Extension disapproval resolutions.--(A) For purposes of
paragraph (1), the term ``extension disapproval resolution''
means a resolution of either House of the Congress, the sole
matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows:
``That the ____ disapproves the request of the President for
the extension, under section 3(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Bipartisan
Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2001, of the trade authorities
procedures under that Act to any implementing bill submitted
with respect to any trade agreement entered into under section
3(b) of that Act after June 30, 2005.'', with the blank space
being filled with the name of the resolving House of the
Congress.
(B) Extension disapproval resolutions--
(i) may be introduced in either House of the
Congress by any member of such House; and
(ii) shall be referred, in the House of
Representatives, to the Committee on Ways and Means
and, in addition, to the Committee on Rules.
(C) The provisions of section 152(d) and (e) of the Trade
Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2192(d) and (e)) (relating to the floor
consideration of certain resolutions in the House and Senate)
apply to extension disapproval resolutions.
(D) It is not in order for--
(i) the Senate to consider any extension
disapproval resolution not reported by the Committee on
Finance;
(ii) the House of Representatives to consider any
extension disapproval resolution not reported by the
Committee on Ways and Means and, in addition, by the
Committee on Rules; or
(iii) either House of the Congress to consider an
extension disapproval resolution after June 30, 2005.
(d) Commencement of Negotiations.--In order to contribute to the
continued economic expansion of the United States, the President shall
commence negotiations covering tariff and nontariff barriers affecting
any industry, product, or service sector, and expand existing sectoral
agreements to countries that are not parties to those agreements, in
cases where the President determines that such negotiations are
feasible and timely and would benefit the United States. Such sectors
include agriculture, commercial services, intellectual property rights,
industrial and capital goods, government procurement, information
technology products, environmental technology and services, medical
equipment and services, civil aircraft, and infrastructure products. In
so doing, the President shall take into account all of the principal
negotiating objectives set forth in section 2(b).
SEC. 4. CONSULTATIONS AND ASSESSMENT.
(a) Notice and Consultation Before Negotiation.--The President,
with respect to any agreement that is subject to the provisions of
section 3(b), shall--
(1) provide, at least 90 calendar days before initiating
negotiations, written notice to the Congress of the President's
intention to enter into the negotiations and set forth therein
the date the President intends to initiate such negotiations,
the specific United States objectives for the negotiations, and
whether the President intends to seek an agreement, or changes
to an existing agreement;
(2) before and after submission of the notice, consult
regarding the negotiations with the Committee on Finance of the
Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of
Representatives, such other committees of the House and Senate
as the President deems appropriate, and the Congressional
Oversight group convened under section 7; and
(3) upon the request of a majority of the members of the
Congressional Oversight Group under section 7(c), meet with the
Congressional Oversight Group before initiating the
negotiations or at any other time concerning the negotiations.
(b) Negotiations Regarding Agriculture.--
(1) In general.--Before initiating or continuing
negotiations the subject matter of which is directly related to
the subject matter under section 2(b)(10)(A)(i) with any
country, the President shall assess whether United States
tariffs on agricultural products that were bound under the
Uruguay Round Agreements are lower than the tariffs bound by
that country. In addition, the President shall consider whether
the tariff levels bound and applied throughout the world with
respect to imports from the United States are higher than
United States tariffs and whether the negotiation provides an
opportunity to address any such disparity. The President shall
consult with the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee
on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the
Committee on Finance and the Committee on Agriculture,
Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate concerning the results of
the assessment, whether it is appropriate for the United States
to agree to further tariff reductions based on the conclusions
reached in the assessment, and how all applicable negotiating
objectives will be met.
(2) Special consultations on import sensitive products.--
(A) Before initiating negotiations with regard to agriculture,
and, with respect to the Free Trade Area for the Americas and
negotiations with regard to agriculture under the auspices of
the World Trade Organization, as soon as practicable after the
enactment of this Act, the United States Trade Representative
shall--
(i) identify those agricultural products subject to
tariff reductions by the United States as a result of
the Uruguay Round Agreements, for which the rate of
duty was reduced on January 1, 1995, to a rate which
was not less than 97.5 percent of the rate of duty that
applied to such article on December 31, 1994;
(ii) consult with the Committee on Ways and Means
and the Committee on Agriculture of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Finance and the
Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of
the Senate concerning--
(I) whether any further tariff reductions
on the products identified under clause (i)
should be appropriate, taking into account the
impact of any such tariff reduction on the
United States industry producing the product
concerned; and
(II) whether the products so identified
face unjustified sanitary or phytosanitary
restrictions, including those not based on
scientific principles in contravention of the
Uruguay Round Agreements;
(iii) request that the International Trade
Commission prepare an assessment of the probable
economic effects of any such tariff reduction on the
United States industry producing the product concerned
and on the United States economy as a whole; and
(iv) upon complying with clauses (i), (ii), and
(iii), notify the Committee on Ways and Means and the
Committee on Agriculture of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Finance and the
Committee on Agriculture, Nut
2000
rition, and Forestry of
the Senate of those products identified under clause
(i) for which the Trade Representative intends to seek
tariff liberalization in the negotiations and the
reasons for seeking such tariff liberalization.
(B) If, after negotiations described in subparagraph (A)
are commenced--
(i) the United States Trade Representative
identifies any additional agricultural product
described in subparagraph (A)(i) for tariff reductions
which were not the subject of a notification under
subparagraph (A)(iv), or
(ii) any additional agricultural product described
in subparagraph (A)(i) is the subject of a request for
tariff reductions by a party to the negotiations,
the Trade Representative shall, as soon as practicable, notify
the committees referred to in subparagraph (A)(iv) of those
products and the reasons for seeking such tariff reductions.
(c) Negotiations Regarding Textiles.--Before initiating or
continuing negotiations the subject matter of which is directly related
to textiles and apparel products with any country, the President shall
assess whether United States tariffs on textile and apparel products
that were bound under the Uruguay Round Agreements are lower than the
tariffs bound by that country and whether the negotiation provides an
opportunity to address any such disparity. The President shall consult
with the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives
and the Committee on Finance of the Senate concerning the results of
the assessment, whether it is appropriate for the United States to
agree to further tariff reductions based on the conclusions reached in
the assessment, and how all applicable negotiating objectives will be
met.
(d) Consultation With Congress Before Agreements Entered Into.--
(1) Consultation.--Before entering into any trade agreement
under section 3(b), the President shall consult with--
(A) the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the
Senate;
(B) each other committee of the House and the
Senate, and each joint committee of the Congress, which
has jurisdiction over legislation involving subject
matters which would be affected by the trade agreement;
and
(C) the Congressional Oversight Group convened
under section 7.
(2) Scope.--The consultation described in paragraph (1)
shall include consultation with respect to--
(A) the nature of the agreement;
(B) how and to what extent the agreement will
achieve the applicable purposes, policies, priorities,
and objectives of this Act; and
(C) the implementation of the agreement under
section 5, including the general effect of the
agreement on existing laws.
(e) Advisory Committee Reports.--The report required under section
135(e)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 regarding any trade agreement
entered into under section 3(a) or (b) of this Act shall be provided to
the President, the Congress, and the United States Trade Representative
not later than 30 days after the date on which the President notifies
the Congress under section 3(a)(1) or 5(a)(1)(A) of the President's
intention to enter into the agreement.
(f) ITC Assessment.--
(1) In general.--The President, at least 90 calendar days
before the day on which the President enters into a trade
agreement under section 3(b), shall provide the International
Trade Commission (referred to in this subsection as ``the
Commission'') with the details of the agreement as it exists at
that time and request the Commission to prepare and submit an
assessment of the agreement as described in paragraph (2).
Between the time the President makes the request under this
paragraph and the time the Commission submits the assessment,
the President shall keep the Commission current with respect to
the details of the agreement.
(2) ITC assessment.--Not later than 90 calendar days after
the President enters into the agreement, the Commission shall
submit to the President and the Congress a report assessing the
likely impact of the agreement on the United States economy as
a whole and on specific industry sectors, including the impact
the agreement will have on the gross domestic product, exports
and imports, aggregate employment and employment opportunities,
the production, employment, and competitive position of
industries likely to be significantly affected by the
agreement, and the interests of United States consumers.
(3) Review of empirical literature.--In preparing the
assessment, the Commission shall review available economic
assessments regarding the agreement, including literature
regarding any substantially equivalent proposed agreement, and
shall provide in its assessment a description of the analyses
used and conclusions drawn in such literature, and a discussion
of areas of consensus and divergence between the various
analyses and conclusions, including those of the Commission
regarding the agreement.
SEC. 5. IMPLEMENTATION OF TRADE AGREEMENTS.
(a) In General.--
(1) Notification and submission.--Any agreement entered
into under section 3(b) shall enter into force with respect to
the United States if (and only if)--
(A) the President, at least 90 calendar days before
the day on which the President enters into the trade
agreement, notifies the House of Representatives and
the Senate of the President's intention to enter into
the agreement, and promptly thereafter publishes notice
of such intention in the Federal Register;
(B) within 60 days after entering into the
agreement, the President submits to the Congress a
description of those changes to existing laws that the
President considers would be required in order to bring
the United States into compliance with the agreement;
(C) after entering into the agreement, the
President submits to the Congress, on a day on which
both Houses of Congress are in session, a copy of the
final legal text of the agreement, together with--
(i) a draft of an implementing bill
described in section 3(b)(3);
(ii) a statement of any administrative
action proposed to implement the trade
agreement; and
(iii) the supporting information described
in paragraph (2); and
(D) the implementing bill is enacted into law.
(2) Supporting information.--The supporting information
required under paragraph (1)(C)(iii) consists of--
(A) an explanation as to how the implementing bill
and proposed administrative action will change or
affect existing law; and
(B) a statement--
(i) asserting that the agreement makes
progress in achieving the applicable purposes,
policies, priorities, and objectives of this
Act; and
(ii) setting forth
2000
the reasons of the
President regarding--
(I) how and to what extent the
agreement makes progress in achieving
the applicable purposes, policies, and
objectives referred to in clause (i);
(II) whether and how the agreement
changes provisions of an agreement
previously negotiated;
(III) how the agreement serves the
interests of United States commerce;
(IV) how the implementing bill
meets the standards set forth in
section 3(b)(3); and
(V) how and to what extent the
agreement makes progress in achieving
the applicable purposes, policies, and
objectives referred to in section 2(c)
regarding the promotion of certain
priorities.
(3) Reciprocal benefits.--In order to ensure that a foreign
country that is not a party to a trade agreement entered into
under section 3(b) does not receive benefits under the
agreement unless the country is also subject to the obligations
under the agreement, the implementing bill submitted with
respect to the agreement shall provide that the benefits and
obligations under the agreement apply only to the parties to
the agreement, if such application is consistent with the terms
of the agreement. The implementing bill may also provide that
the benefits and obligations under the agreement do not apply
uniformly to all parties to the agreement, if such application
is consistent with the terms of the agreement.
(b) Limitations on Trade Authorities Procedures.--
(1) For lack of notice or consultations.--
(A) In general.--The trade authorities procedures
shall not apply to any implementing bill submitted with
respect to a trade agreement or trade agreements
entered into under section 3(b) if during the 60-day
period beginning on the date that one House of Congress
agrees to a procedural disapproval resolution for lack
of notice or consultations with respect to such trade
agreement or agreements, the other House separately
agrees to a procedural disapproval resolution with
respect to such trade agreement or agreements.
(B) Procedural disapproval resolution.--(i) For
purposes of this paragraph, the term ``procedural
disapproval resolution'' means a resolution of either
House of Congress, the sole matter after the resolving
clause of which is as follows: ``That the President has
failed or refused to notify or consult in accordance
with the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of
2001 on negotiations with respect to ____________ and,
therefore, the trade authorities procedures under that
Act shall not apply to any implementing bill submitted
with respect to such trade agreement or agreements.'',
with the blank space being filled with a description of
the trade agreement or agreements with respect to which
the President is considered to have failed or refused
to notify or consult.
(ii) For purposes of clause (i), the President has
``failed or refused to notify or consult in accordance
with the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of
2001'' on negotiations with respect to a trade
agreement or trade agreements if--
(I) the President has failed or refused to
consult (as the case may be) in accordance with
section 4 or 5 with respect to the
negotiations, agreement, or agreements;
(II) guidelines under section 7(b) have not
been developed or met with respect to the
negotiations, agreement, or agreements;
(III) the President has not met with the
Congressional Oversight Group pursuant to a
request made under section 7(c) with respect to
the negotiations, agreement, or agreements; or
(IV) the agreement or agreements fail to
make progress in achieving the purposes,
policies, priorities, and objectives of this
Act.
(2) Procedures for considering resolutions.--(A) Procedural
disapproval resolutions--
(i) in the House of Representatives--
(I) may be introduced by any Member of the
House;
(II) shall be referred to the Committee on
Ways and Means and, in addition, to the
Committee on Rules; and
(III) may not be amended by either
Committee; and
(ii) in the Senate may be introduced by any Member
of the Senate.
(B) The provisions of section 152(d) and (e) of the Trade
Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2192(d) and (e)) (relating to the floor
consideration of certain resolutions in the House and Senate)
apply to a procedural disapproval resolution introduced with
respect to a trade agreement if no other procedural disapproval
resolution with respect to that trade agreement has previously
been considered under such provisions of section 152 of the
Trade Act of 1974 in that House of Congress during that
Congress.
(C) It is not in order for the House of Representatives to
consider any procedural disapproval resolution not reported by
the Committee on Ways and Means and, in addition, by the
Committee on Rules.
(c) Rules of House of Representatives and Senate.--Subsection (b)
of this section and section 3(c) are enacted by the Congress--
(1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the House of
Representatives and the Senate, respectively, and as such are
deemed a part of the rules of each House, respectively, and
such procedures supersede other rules only to the extent that
they are inconsistent with such other rules; and
(2) with the full recognition of the constitutional right
of either House to change the rules (so far as relating to the
procedures of that House) at any time, in the same manner, and
to the same extent as any other rule of that House.
SEC. 6. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TRADE AGREEMENTS FOR WHICH NEGOTIATIONS
HAVE ALREADY BEGUN.
(a) Certain Agreements.--Notwithstanding section 3(b)(2), if an
agreement to which section 3(b) applies--
(1) is entered into under the auspices of the World Trade
Organization,
(2) is entered into with Chile,
(3) is entered into with Singapore, or
(4) establishes a Free Trade Area for the Americas,
and results from negotiations that were commenced before the date of
the enactment of this Act, subsection (b) shall apply.
(b) Treatment of Agreements.--In the case of any agreement to which
subsection (a) applies--
(1)
2000
the applicability of the trade authorities procedures
to implementing bills shall be determined without regard to the
requirements of section 4(a) (relating only to 90 days notice
prior to initiating negotiations), and any procedural
disapproval resolution under section 5(b)(1)(B) shall not be in
order on the basis of a failure or refusal to comply with the
provisions of section 4(a); and
(2) the President shall, as soon as feasible after the
enactment of this Act--
(A) notify the Congress of the negotiations
described in subsection (a), the specific United States
objectives in the negotiations, and whether the
President is seeking a new agreement or changes to an
existing agreement; and
(B) before and after submission of the notice,
consult regarding the negotiations with the committees
referred to in section 4(a)(2) and the Congressional
Oversight Group.
SEC. 7. CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT GROUP.
(a) Members and Functions.--
(1) In general.--By not later than 60 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, and not later than 30 days after
the convening of each Congress, the chairman of the Committee
on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the
chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate shall
convene the Congressional Oversight Group.
(2) Membership from the house.--In each Congress, the
Congressional Oversight Group shall be comprised of the
following Members of the House of Representatives:
(A) The chairman and ranking member of the
Committee on Ways and Means, and 3 additional members
of such Committee (not more than 2 of whom are members
of the same political party).
(B) The chairman and ranking member, or their
designees, of the committees of the House of
Representatives which would have, under the Rules of
the House of Representatives, jurisdiction over
provisions of law affected by a trade agreement
negotiations for which are conducted at any time during
that Congress and to which this Act would apply.
(3) Membership from the senate.--In each Congress, the
Congressional Oversight Group shall also be comprised of the
following members of the Senate:
(A) The chairman and ranking Member of the
Committee on Finance and 3 additional members of such
Committee (not more than 2 of whom are members of the
same political party).
(B) The chairman and ranking member, or their
designees, of the committees of the Senate which would
have, under the Rules of the Senate, jurisdiction over
provisions of law affected by a trade agreement
negotiations for which are conducted at any time during
that Congress and to which this Act would apply.
(4) Accreditation.--Each member of the Congressional
Oversight Group described in paragraph (2)(A) and (3)(A) shall
be accredited by the United States Trade Representative on
behalf of the President as official advisers to the United
States delegation in negotiations for any trade agreement to
which this Act applies. Each member of the Congressional
Oversight Group described in paragraph (2)(B) and (3)(B) shall
be accredited by the United States Trade Representative on
behalf of the President as official advisers to the United
States delegation in the negotiations by reason of which the
member is in the Congressional Oversight Group. The
Congressional Oversight Group shall consult with and provide
advice to the Trade Representative regarding the formulation of
specific objectives, negotiating strategies and positions, the
development of the applicable trade agreement, and compliance
and enforcement of the negotiated commitments under the trade
agreement.
(5) Chair.--The Congressional Oversight Group shall be
chaired by the Chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of
the House of Representatives and the Chairman of the Committee
on Finance of the Senate.
(b) Guidelines.--
(1) Purpose and revision.--The United States Trade
Representative, in consultation with the chairmen and ranking
minority members of the Committee on Ways and Means of the
House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the
Senate--
(A) shall, within 120 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, develop written guidelines to
facilitate the useful and timely exchange of
information between the Trade Representative and the
Congressional Oversight Group established under this
section; and
(B) may make such revisions to the guidelines as
may be necessary from time to time.
(2) Content.--The guidelines developed under paragraph (1)
shall provide for, among other things--
(A) regular, detailed briefings of the
Congressional Oversight Group regarding negotiating
objectives, including the promotion of certain
priorities referred to in section 2(c), and positions
and the status of the applicable negotiations,
beginning as soon as practicable after the
Congressional Oversight Group is convened, with more
frequent briefings as trade negotiations enter the
final stage;
(B) access by members of the Congressional
Oversight Group, and staff with proper security
clearances, to pertinent documents relating to the
negotiations, including classified materials;
(C) the closest practicable coordination between
the Trade Representative and the Congressional
Oversight Group at all critical periods during the
negotiations, including at negotiation sites; and
(D) after the applicable trade agreement is
concluded, consultation regarding ongoing compliance
and enforcement of negotiated commitments under the
trade agreement.
(c) Request for Meeting.--Upon the request of a majority of the
Congressional Oversight Group, the President shall meet with the
Congressional Oversight Group before initiating negotiations with
respect to a trade agreement, or at any other time concerning the
negotiations.
SEC. 8. ADDITIONAL IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT REQUIREMENTS.
(a) In General.--At the time the President submits to the Congress
the final text of an agreement pursuant to section 5(a)(1)(C), the
President shall also submit a plan for implementing and enforcing the
agreement. The implementation and enforcement plan shall include the
following:
(1) Border personnel requirements.--A description of
additional personnel required at border entry points, including
a list of additional customs and agricultural inspectors.
(2) Agency staffing requirements.--A description of
additional personnel required by Federal agencies responsible
for monitoring and implementing the trade agreement, including
personnel required by the Office of the United States Trade
Representative, the Department of Commerce, the Department of
Agriculture (including additional personnel required
2000
to
implement sanitary and phytosanitary measures in order to
obtain market access for United States exports), the Department
of the Treasury, and such other agencies as may be necessary.
(3) Customs infrastructure requirements.--A description of
the additional equipment and facilities needed by the United
States Customs Service.
(4) Impact on state and local governments.--A description
of the impact the trade agreement will have on State and local
governments as a result of increases in trade.
(5) Cost analysis.--An analysis of the costs associated
with each of the items listed in paragraphs (1) through (4).
(b) Budget Submission.--The President shall include a request for
the resources necessary to support the plan described in subsection (a)
in the first budget that the President submits to the Congress after
the submission of the plan.
SEC. 9. COMMITTEE STAFF.
The grant of trade promotion authority under this Act is likely to
increase the activities of the primary committees of jurisdiction in
the area of international trade. In addition, the creation of the
Congressional Oversight Group under section 7 will increase the
participation of a broader number of Members of Congress in the
formulation of United States trade policy and oversight of the
international trade agenda for the United States. The primary
committees of jurisdiction should have adequate staff to accommodate
these increases in activities.
SEC. 10. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.
(a) In General.--Title I of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2111
et seq.) is amended as follows:
(1) Implementing bill.--
(A) Section 151(b)(1) (19 U.S.C. 2191(b)(1)) is
amended by striking ``section 1103(a)(1) of the Omnibus
Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, or section 282
of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act'' and inserting
``section 282 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, or
section 5(a)(1) of the Bipartisan Trade Promotion
Authority Act of 2001''.
(B) Section 151(c)(1) (19 U.S.C. 2191(c)(1)) is
amended by striking ``or section 282 of the Uruguay
Round Agreements Act'' and inserting ``, section 282 of
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, or section 5(a)(1) of
the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2001''.
(2) Advice from international trade commission.--Section
131 (19 U.S.C. 2151) is amended--
(A) in subsection (a)--
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ``section
123 of this Act or section 1102 (a) or (c) of
the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of
1988,'' and inserting ``section 123 of this Act
or section 3(a) or (b) of the Bipartisan Trade
Promotion Authority Act of 2001,''; and
(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking
``section 1102 (b) or (c) of the Omnibus Trade
and Competitiveness Act of 1988'' and inserting
``section 3(b) of the Bipartisan Trade
Promotion Authority Act of 2001'';
(B) in subsection (b), by striking ``section
1102(a)(3)(A)'' and inserting ``section 3(a)(3)(A) of
the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2001'';
and
(C) in subsection (c), by striking ``section 1102
of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988,''
and inserting ``section 3 of the Bipartisan Trade
Promotion Authority Act of 2001,''.
(3) Hearings and advice.--Sections 132, 133(a), and 134(a)
(19 U.S.C. 2152, 2153(a), and 2154(a)) are each amended by
striking ``section 1102 of the Omnibus Trade and
Competitiveness Act of 1988,'' each place it appears and
inserting ``section 3 of the Bipartisan Trade Promotion
Authority Act of 2001,''.
(4) Prerequisites for offers.--Section 134(b) (19 U.S.C.
2154(b)) is amended by striking ``section 1102 of the Omnibus
Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988'' and inserting ``section
3 of the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2001''.
(5) Advice from private and public sectors.--Section 135
(19 U.S.C. 2155) is amended--
(A) in subsection (a)(1)(A), by striking ``section
1102 of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of
1988'' and inserting ``section 3 of the Bipartisan
Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2001'';
(B) in subsection (e)(1)--
(i) by striking ``section 1102 of the
Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988''
each place it appears and inserting ``section 3
of the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act
of 2001''; and
(ii) by striking ``section 1103(a)(1)(A) of
such Act of 1988'' and inserting ``section
5(a)(1)(A) of the Bipartisan Trade Promotion
Authority Act of 2001''; and
(C) in subsection (e)(2), by striking ``section
1101 of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of
1988'' and inserting ``section 2 of the Bipartisan
Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2001''.
(6) Transmission of agreements to congress.--Section 162(a)
(19 U.S.C. 2212(a)) is amended by striking ``or under section
1102 of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988'' and
inserting ``or under section 3 of the Bipartisan Trade
Promotion Authority Act of 2001''.
(b) Application of Certain Provisions.--For purposes of applying
sections 125, 126, and 127 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2135,
2136(a), and 2137)--
(1) any trade agreement entered into under section 3 shall
be treated as an agreement entered into under section 101 or
102, as appropriate, of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2111
or 2112); and
(2) any proclamation or Executive order issued pursuant to
a trade agreement entered into under section 3 shall be treated
as a proclamation or Executive order issued pursuant to a trade
agreement entered into under section 102 of the Trade Act of
1974.
SEC. 11. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) Agreement on agriculture.--The term ``Agreement on
Agriculture'' means the agreement referred to in section
101(d)(2) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C.
3511(d)(2)).
(2) Core labor standards.--The term ``core labor
standards'' means--
(A) the right of association;
(B) the right to organize and bargain collectively;
(C) a prohibition on the use of any form of forced
or compulsory labor;
(D) a minimum age for the employment of children;
and
(E) acceptable conditions of work with respect to
minimum wages, hours of work, and occupational safety
and health.
(3) GATT 1994.--The term ``GATT 1994'' has the meaning
given that term in section 2 of the Uruguay Round Agreements
Act (19 U.S.C. 3501).
(4) ILO.--The term ``ILO'' means the International Labor
Organization.
(5) United states person.--The term ``United States
person'' means--
(A) a United States citizen;
(B) a partnership, corporation
48f
, or other legal
entity organized under the laws of the United States;
and
(C) a partnership, corporation, or other legal
entity that is organized under the laws of a foreign
country and is controlled by entities described in
subparagraph (B) or United States citizens, or both.
(6) Uruguay round agreements.--The term ``Uruguay Round
Agreements'' has the meaning given that term in section 2(7) of
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3501(7)).
(7) World trade organization; wto.--The terms ``World Trade
Organization'' and ``WTO'' mean the organization established
pursuant to the WTO Agreement.
(8) WTO agreement.--The term ``WTO Agreement'' means the
Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization entered
into on April 15, 1994.
Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 2001.
Attest:
JEFF TRANDAHL,
Clerk.
0