2000
[DOCID: f:h1660ih.txt]
107th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1660
To develop a demonstration program through the National Science
Foundation to encourage interest in the fields of mathematics, science,
and information technology.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 1, 2001
Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (for herself, Mr. Frost, Mr.
McGovern, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. Sandlin, Mr. Hastings of Florida,
Mr. Boucher, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Meeks of New York, Mrs. Christensen,
Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Ms. Carson of Indiana, Ms. Lee, Mr. Rangel, Mr.
Baca, Mr. Etheridge, Mr. Owens, Mr. Cummings, Ms. Woolsey, and Ms.
Kilpatrick) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committee on Education and
the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To develop a demonstration program through the National Science
Foundation to encourage interest in the fields of mathematics, science,
and information technology.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Mathematics and Science Proficiency
Partnership Act of 2001''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds the following:
(1) Mathematics and science education is a vital link to
connect today's students with the information age and to the
workplace of the 21st century.
(2) Today's United States economy depends more than ever on
the talents of skilled, high-tech workers.
(3) To sustain America's preeminence, we must take drastic
steps to change the way we develop our workforce.
(4) It is estimated that more than half of the economic
growth of the United States today results directly from
research and development in science and technology.
(5) We must acknowledge that the effectiveness of the
United States in maintaining this economic growth will be
largely determined by the intellectual capital of the United
States.
(6) The education of America's students is critical to
developing this resource.
(7) American students consistently demonstrate average and
below average performance compared to their international peers
in their skills in mathematics and science.
(8) According to the 1999 edition of the National
Assessment of Educational Progress, also known as the Nation's
Report Card, the trends in mathematics and science are
characterized by declines in the 1970's, followed by increases
during the 1980's and early 1990's. However, performance has
remained unchanged since the early 1990's. Several findings of
the Report Card deserve mention, including the following:
(A) In 1999, the average science score for 17-year-
olds was lower than the average score in 1969 for the
same age group.
(B) In 1999, the average science score for 13-year-
olds was similar to the average score in 1970 for the
same age group.
(C) In 1999, white students had higher average
mathematics scores than their black and Hispanic peers.
Although the gap between white and black students
narrowed since 1973, there is evidence that the gap may
be widening since 1990.
(D) In 1999, males outperformed females in science
at ages 13 and 17.
(E) A greater percentage of 13-year-olds in 1999
than in 1986 reported that the content of their science
class was general rather than focused on earth,
physical, or life science.
(9) The National Commission on Mathematics and Science
Teaching for the 21st century also finds that recent reports of
the performance of our country's students from both the Third
International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and the
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) echo a
dismal message of lackluster performance, now 3 decades old. It
is time the Nation heeded it--before it is too late.
(10) In an age now driven by the relentless necessity of
scientific and technological advancement, the current
preparation that students in the United States receive in
mathematics and science is, in a word, unacceptable.
(11) Proficiency in mathematics, science, and information
technology is necessary to prepare American students for
participation in the 21st century and to guarantee that the
United States economy remains vibrant and competitive.
(12) Now is the time to set the stage for advancement in
mathematics and science proficiency.
(13) The United States must expect more from our educators
and students.
(14) In order to achieve this, it is important that we show
interest in economically disadvantaged students who have not
been provided with opportunities that will improve their
knowledge of mathematics, science, and information technology.
(15) Many economically disadvantaged students in urban and
rural America share a common need to receive a quality
education, but often their schools lack the needed resources to
prepare them for the 21st century global community.
(16) The schools and businesses serving these communities
are strategically positioned to form a unique partnership with
urban and rural students that will increase their mathematics,
science, and information technology proficiency for the benefit
of the Nation.
(17) If our Nation continues failing to prepare citizens
from all population groups for participation in the new,
technology-driven economy, our Nation will risk losing its
economic and intellectual preeminence.
(18) America's students must improve their performance in
mathematics and science if they are to succeed in today's world
and if the United States is to stay competitive in an
integrated global economy.
(19) It is clear that the most direct route to improving
mathematics and science achievement for all students is better
mathematics and science teaching.
SEC. 3. DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.
(a) General Authority.--
(1) In general.--
(A) Grant program.--The Director shall establish a
demonstration program under which the Director awards
grants in accordance with this Act to eligible local
educational agencies.
(B) Uses of funds.--A local educational agency that
receives a grant under this Act may use such grant
funds to develop a program that builds or expands
mathematics, science, and information technology
curricula, to purchase equipment necessary to establish
such program, and to provide professional development
to enhance teacher quality in those subject areas.
(2) Program requirements.--The program described in
paragraph (1) shall--
(A) train teachers specifically in information
1989
technology, mathematics, and science; and
(B) provide students with a rich standards-based
course of study in mathematics, science, and
information technology.
(b) Eligible Local Educational Agency.--A local educational agency
is eligible to receive a grant under this Act if the agency--
(1) provides assurances that it has executed conditional
agreements with representatives of the private sector to
provide services and funds described in subsection (c); and
(2) agrees to enter into an agreement with the Director to
comply with the requirements of this Act.
(c) Private Sector Participation.--The conditional agreements
referred to in subsection (b)(1) shall describe participation by the
private sector, including--
(1) the donation of technology tools;
(2) the establishment of internship and mentoring
opportunities for students who participate in the mathematics,
science, and information technology program; and
(3) the donation of scholarship funds for selected students
to continue their study of mathematics, science, and
information technology.
(d) Application.--
(1) In general.--To apply for a grant under this section,
each eligible local educational agency shall submit an
application to the Director in accordance with guidelines
established by the Director pursuant to paragraph (2).
(2) Guidelines.--
(A) Requirements.--The guidelines referred to in
paragraph (1) shall require, at a minimum, that the
application include--
(i) a description of proposed activities
consistent with the uses of funds and program
requirements under subsection (a)(1)(B) and
(2);
(ii) a description of the higher education
scholarship program, including criteria for
selection, duration of scholarship, number of
scholarships to be awarded each year, and
funding levels for scholarships; and
(iii) evidence of private sector
participation and financial support described
in subsection (c).
(B) Guideline publication.--The Director shall
issue and publish such guidelines not later than 6
months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(3) Selection.--The Director shall select a local
educational agency to receive an award under this section in
accordance with subsection (e) and on the basis of merit to be
determined after conducting a comprehensive review.
(e) Priority.--The Director shall give special priority in awarding
grants under this Act to eligible local educational agencies that--
(1) demonstrate the greatest ability to obtain commitments
from representatives of the private sector to provide services
and funds described under subsection (c); and
(2) demonstrate the greatest economic need.
(f) Maximum Grant Award.--An award made to an eligible local
educational agency under this Act may not exceed $300,000.
SEC. 4. STUDY AND REPORT.
(a) Study.--The Director shall initiate an evaluative study of the
effectiveness of the activities carried out under this Act in improving
student performance in mathematics, science, and information technology
at the precollege level and in stimulating student interest in pursuing
undergraduate studies in these fields.
(b) Report.--The Director shall report the findings of the study to
Congress not later than 4 years after the award of the first
scholarship. Such report shall include the number of students receiving
assistance under this Act who graduate from an institution of higher
education with a major in mathematics, science, or information
technology, and the number of students receiving assistance under this
Act who find employment in such fields.
SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of this Act--
(1) the term ``conditional agreement'' means an arrangement
between representatives of the private sector and local
educational agencies to provide certain services and funds,
such as, but not limited to, the donation of computer hardware
and software, the establishment of internship and mentoring
opportunities for students who participate in mathematics,
science, and information technology programs, and the donation
of scholarship funds for use at institutions of higher
education by eligible students who have participated in the
mathematics, science, and information technology programs;
(2) the term ``Director'' means the Director of the
National Science Foundation;
(3) the term ``eligible student'' means a student enrolled
in the 12th grade who--
(A) has participated in a mathematics, science, and
information technology program established pursuant to
this Act;
(B) has demonstrated a commitment to pursue a
career in information technology, mathematics, science,
or engineering; and
(C) has attained high academic standing and
maintains a grade point average of not less than 2.7 on
a 4.0 scale for the period from the beginning of the
10th grade through the time of application for a
scholarship;
(4) the term ``institution of higher education'' has the
same meaning given such term in section 101 of the Higher
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001); and
(5) the term ``local educational agency'' has the same
meaning given such term in section 14101 of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 8801).
SEC. 6. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
There are authorized to be appropriated to the National Science
Foundation to carry out this Act $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal
years 2002 through 2006.
<all>
0