2000
[DOCID: f:h1310ih.txt]
107th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1310
To reform the Army Corps of Engineers.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 29, 2001
Mr. Kind (for himself, Mr. Andrews, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Barrett, Mr.
Blumenauer, Mr. Gilchrest, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Lewis of
Georgia, Mrs. Maloney of New York, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Tancredo, Mrs.
Tauscher, Mr. Udall of Colorado, and Mr. Udall of New Mexico)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To reform the Army Corps of Engineers.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Corps of Engineers
Reform Act of 2001''.
(b) Table of Contents.--
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Findings and purposes.
Sec. 3. Secretary defined.
TITLE I--PROJECT PLANNING REFORM
Sec. 101. Principles and guidelines.
Sec. 102. Stakeholder advisory committees.
Sec. 103. Independent review.
Sec. 104. Public access to information.
Sec. 105. Benefit-cost analysis.
Sec. 106. Project criteria.
TITLE II--MITIGATION
Sec. 201. Full mitigation.
Sec. 202. Concurrent mitigation.
Sec. 203. Mitigation tracking system.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The Army Corps of Engineers is the primary Federal
agency responsible for developing and managing the Nation's
harbors, waterways, shorelines, and water resources.
(2) Scarce Federal resources require more efficient use of
Corps of Engineers funding and greater oversight of Corps of
Engineers analyses.
(3) Demand for recreation, clean water, and healthy
wildlife habitat must be reflected in the Corps of Engineers
project planning process.
(4) The social and environmental impacts of dams, levees,
shoreline stabilization structures, and other projects must be
adequately considered and fully mitigated.
(5) Affected interests must play a larger role in the
oversight of Corps of Engineers project development.
(b) Purposes.--The purposes of this Act are as follows:
(1) To ensure that the Nation's water resources investments
are economically justified and enhance the environment.
(2) To provide independent review of Corps of Engineers
feasibility studies, general reevaluation studies, and
environmental impact statements.
(3) To ensure that mitigation for Corps of Engineers
projects is successful and cost-effective.
(4) To enhance the involvement of affected interests in
Corps of Engineers feasibility studies, general reevaluation
studies, and environmental impact statements.
(5) To revise Corps of Engineers planning principles to
meet the economic and environmental needs of riverside and
coastal communities.
(6) To ensure that environmental analyses be considered as
co-equal to economic analyses in the assessment of Corps of
Engineers projects, recognizing the need for sound science in
the evaluation of the impacts on the health of aquatic
ecosystems.
(7) To ensure that the Corps of Engineers is making
appropriate, up-to-date calculations in conducting cost-benefit
analyses of Corps of Engineers projects.
SEC. 3. SECRETARY DEFINED.
In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the
Army.
TITLE I--PROJECT PLANNING REFORM
SEC. 101. PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES.
Section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2) is
amended to read as follows:
``SEC. 209. CONGRESSIONAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES.
``(a) In General.--It is the intent of Congress that economic
development and environmental protection and restoration be co-equal
goals of water resources planning and development.
``(b) Revision of Principles and Guidelines.--Not later than 1 year
after the date of enactment of the Corps of Engineers Reform Act of
2001, the Secretary shall revise the principles and guidelines of the
Corps of Engineers for water resources projects--
``(1) to provide for the consideration of ecological
restoration costs under Corps of Engineers economic models;
``(2) to incorporate new techniques in risk and uncertainty
analysis;
``(3) to eliminate biases and disincentives for
nonstructural flood damage reduction projects;
``(4) to incorporate new analytical techniques;
``(5) to encourage, to the maximum extent practicable, the
restoration of aquatic ecosystems; and
``(6) to ensure that water resources projects are justified
by benefits that accrue to the public at large and not to a
limited number of private businesses.
``(c) Update of Guidance.--The Secretary shall update the Guidance
for Conducting Civil Works Planning Studies (ER 1105-2-100) to comply
with this section.''.
SEC. 102. STAKEHOLDER ADVISORY COMMITTEES.
(a) In General.--Upon receipt of a written request by any person or
governmental entity, the Secretary shall establish for a water
resources project that is authorized or substantially modified after
the date of enactment of this Act a stakeholder advisory committee to
assist the Secretary with the development of feasibility studies,
general reevaluation studies, and environmental impact statements for
the project.
(b) Duration of Reviews.--A stakeholder advisory committee
established for a project under this section may provide advice to the
Secretary during planning and design of the project, beginning with the
initiation of the project's draft feasibility study and ending with the
issuance of the project's draft environmental impact statement.
(c) Membership.--A stakeholder advisory committee established for a
project under this section shall be composed of representatives of
State and local agencies, tribal organizations, public interest groups,
industry, scientific, and academic organizations, Federal agencies, and
other interested citizens. The membership shall represent a balance of
the social, economic, and environmental interests in the project.
(d) Role.--A stakeholder advisory committee established for a
project under this section shall advise the Secretary but shall not be
required to make a formal recommendation.
(e) Costs.--The costs of a stakeholder advisory committee
established for a project under this section--
(1) shall be a Federal expense;
(2) shall not exceed $250,000; and
(3) shall be considered as part of the total cost of the
project.
(f) Applicability of Federal Advisory Committee Act.--The Federal
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall apply to a stakeholder
advisory committee established under this section.
SEC. 103. INDEPENDENT REVIEW.
(a) Projects Subject to Independent Review.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall ensure that
feasibility studies, general reevaluation studies, and
environmental impact statements for each water resources
project described in paragraph (2) are subject to review by an
independent panel of experts established under this section.
(2) Projects subject to review.--A project shall be subject
to review under paragraph (1) if--
(A) the project has an estimated total cost of more
than $25,000
2000
,000, including mitigation costs;
(B) the Governor of an affected State requests the
establishment of an independent panel of experts for
the project;
(C) the Director of the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service determines that the project is likely
to have a significant adverse impact on fish or
wildlife after implementation of proposed mitigation
plans;
(D) the head of a Federal agency charged with
reviewing the project determines that the project is
likely to have a signficant adverse impact on
environmental, cultural, or other resources under the
jurisdiction of the agency after implementation of
proposed mitigation plans; or
(E) the Secretary determines that the project is
controversial under paragraph (3).
(3) Controversial projects.--Upon receipt of a written
request by an interested party or on the initiative of the
Secretary, the Secretary shall determine whether or not a
project is controversial under paragraph (2)(E). The Secretary
shall determine that a project is controversial if the
Secretary finds that--
(A) there is a significant public dispute as to the
size, nature, or effects of the project; or
(B) there is a significant public dispute as to the
economic or environmental costs or benefits of the
project.
(4) Affected state defined.--In paragraph (2)(B), the term
``affected State'' means a State that is at least partially
within the drainage basin in which the project is located and
would be economically or environmentally affected as a
consequence of the project.
(b) Office of Independent Review.--
(1) Establishment.--There is established in the Office of
the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works an Office
of Independent Review (in this section referred to as the
``Office'').
(2) Director.--
(A) Appointment.--The head of the Office shall be
the Director of the Office of Independent Review (in
this section referred to as the ``Director''), who
shall be appointed by the Secretary for a term of 3
years.
(B) Qualifications.--The Secretary shall select the
Director from among individuals who are distinguished
scholars. In making the selection, the Secretary shall
consider any recommendations made by the Inspector
General of the Army.
(C) Limitation on appointments.--The Secretary
shall not appoint an individual to serve as the
Director if the individual has a financial or close
professional association with any organization or group
with a strong financial or organizational interest in
an ongoing water resources project.
(D) Terms.--An individual may not serve for more
than 1 term as the Director.
(3) Duties.--The Director shall establish a panel of
experts to review each project subject to review under
subsection (a).
(c) Establishment of Panels.--
(1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the Secretary
selects a preferred alternative for a project subject to review
under subsection (a), the Director shall establish a panel of
experts to review the project.
(2) Membership.--A panel of experts established by the
Director for a project shall be composed of not less than 5 and
not more than 9 independent experts who represent a balance of
areas of expertise, including biologists, engineers, and
economists.
(3) Limitation on appointments.--The Director shall not
appoint an individual to serve on a panel of experts for a
project if the individual has a financial or close professional
association with any organization or group with a strong
financial or organizational interest in the project.
(4) Consultation.--The Director shall consult with the
National Academy of Sciences in developing lists of individuals
to serve on panels of experts under this section.
(5) Compensation.--An individual serving on a panel of
experts under this section shall be compensated at a rate of
pay to be determined by the Secretary.
(6) Travel expenses.--An individual serving on a panel of
experts under this section shall receive travel expenses,
including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in accordance with
sections 5702 and 5703 of title 5, United States Code.
(d) Duties of Panels.--A panel of experts established for a project
under this section shall--
(1) review each feasibility study, general reevaluation
study, and environmental impact statement prepared for the
project;
(2) assess the adequacy of the economic models used by the
Secretary in reviewing the project to ensure that--
(A) multiple methods of economic analysis have been
used; and
(B) any regional effects on navigation systems have
been examined;
(3) assess the adequacy of the environmental models and
analyses used by the Secretary in reviewing the project;
(4) receive and review written and oral comments of a
technical nature concerning the project from the public; and
(5) submit to the Secretary a report containing the panel's
economic, engineering, and environmental analysis of the
project, including the panel's conclusions on the project's
feasibility studies, general reevaluation studies, and
environmental impact statements, with particular emphasis on
areas of public controversy.
(e) Duration of Project Reviews.--A panel of experts shall complete
its review of a project under this section not later than 180 days
after the date of establishment of the panel and shall terminate upon
submission of a final report to the Secretary under subsection (d)(5).
(f) Recommendations of Panel.--
(1) Consideration by secretary.--After receiving a report
on a project from a panel of experts under this section and
before entering a final record of decision for the project, the
Secretary shall consider any recommendations contained in the
report and prepare a written explanation for any
recommendations not adopted.
(2) Public review; transmittal to congress.--After
receiving a report on a project from a panel of experts under
this section, the Secretary shall--
(A) make a copy of the report and any written
explanation of the Secretary on recommendations
contained in the report available for public review
under section 104; and
(B) transmit to Congress a copy of the report,
together with any such written explanation.
(g) Costs.--
(1) In general.--The costs of a panel of experts
established for a project under this section--
(A) shall be a Federal expense;
(B) shall not exceed $500,000; and
(C) shall be considered as part of the total cost
of the project.
(2) Waiver.--The Secretary may waive the $500,000
limitation contained in paragraph (1)(B) in cases that the
Secretary determines appropriate.
(h) Applicability of Federal
1cd4
Advisory Committee Act.--The Federal
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall apply to a panel of
experts established under this section.
SEC. 104. PUBLIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION.
(a) In General.--The Secretary shall ensure that information
related to the analysis of a water resources project by the Corps of
Engineers, including all supporting data, analytical documents, and
information that the Corps of Engineers has considered in its analysis,
is made available to any individual upon request and to the public on
the Internet.
(b) Types of Information.--Information about a water resources
project to be made available under subsection (a) shall include any
information that had been made available to the project sponsor and all
data used by the Corps of Engineers in its justification and analysis
of the project.
(c) Exception for Trade Secrets.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall not make information
available under subsection (a) that the Secretary determines to
be a trade secret of the person who supplied the information to
the Corps of Engineers.
(2) Criteria for trade secrets.--The Secretary shall
consider information to be a trade secret only if--
(A) the person who supplied the information to the
Corps of Engineers--
(i) has not disclosed the information to
any person other than (I) an officer or
employee of the United States or a State or
local government, (II) an employee of such
person, or (III) a person who is bound by a
confidentiality agreement; and
(ii) has taken reasonable measures to
protect the confidentiality of the information
and intends to continue to take such measures;
(B) the information is not required to be
disclosed, or otherwise made available, to the public
under any other Federal or State law; and
(C) disclosure of the information is likely to
cause substantial harm to the competitive position of
such person.
SEC. 105. BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS.
Section 308(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33
U.S.C. 2318(a)) is amended--
(1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (1)(B);
(2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (2) and
inserting ``; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(3) any projected benefit arising from the draining,
reduction, or elimination of wetlands attributable to increases
in the value of privately owned property, increases in the
quantity of privately owned property, or increases in the value
of privately owned services.''.
SEC. 106. PROJECT CRITERIA.
After the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall not
submit to Congress any proposal to authorize or substantially modify a
water resources project unless the proposal contains a certification by
the Secretary that the project minimizes to the greatest extent
practicable adverse impacts on--
(1) the natural hydrologic patterns of aquatic ecosystems;
and
(2) the value or native diversity of aquatic ecosystems.
TITLE II--MITIGATION
SEC. 201. FULL MITIGATION.
Section 906(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
U.S.C. 2283(d)) is amended--
(1) in the first sentence of paragraph (1) by inserting
``fully'' before ``mitigate''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(3) Standards for mitigation.--To mitigate losses to fish
and wildlife resulting from a water resources project, the
Secretary, at a minimum, shall acquire and restore an acre of
habitat to replace each acre of habitat negatively impacted by
the project. The mitigation plan shall include a detailed and
specific plan to monitor mitigation implementation and success.
``(4) Design of mitigation projects.--The Secretary shall
design mitigation projects to reflect contemporary
understanding of the importance of spatial distribution of
habitat and the natural hydrology of aquatic ecosystems, and
shall fully mitigate the adverse hydrologic impacts of
projects.
``(5) Recommendation of projects.--The Secretary shall not
recommend a water resources project alternative or choose a
project alternative in any final record of decision,
environmental impact statement, or environmental assessment
completed after the date of enactment of this paragraph unless
the Secretary determines that the mitigation plan for the
alternative has the greatest probability of cost-effectively
and successfully mitigating the adverse impacts of the project
on aquatic resources and fish and wildlife.
``(6) Completion of mitigation before construction of new
projects.--The Secretary shall complete all planned mitigation
in a particular watershed before constructing any new water
resources project in that watershed.''.
SEC. 202. CONCURRENT MITIGATION.
Section 906(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986
(33 U.S.C. 2283(a)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``To ensure concurrent mitigation, the Secretary shall complete 50
percent of required mitigation before beginning project construction
and shall complete the remainder of required mitigation as
expeditiously as practicable and in no case later than the last day of
project construction.''.
SEC. 203. MITIGATION TRACKING SYSTEM.
(a) In General.--Not later than 6 months after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish a record-keeping
system to track the following information:
(1) The amount and type of wetlands and other habitat types
impacted by the operation and maintenance of each water
resources project carried out by the Secretary.
(2) The amount and type of mitigation required for the
operation and maintenance of each water resources project
carried out by the Secretary.
(3) The amount and type of mitigation that has been
completed for the operation and maintenance of each water
resources project carried out by the Secretary.
(4) Wetland losses permitted under section 404 of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) and
required mitigation for such losses.
(b) Required Information and Organization.--The record-keeping
system shall include information on impacts and mitigation described in
subsection (a) occurring after 1969 and shall be organized by
watershed, project, permit application, and zip code.
(c) Availability of Information.--The Secretary shall make
information contained in the record-keeping system available to the
public on the Internet.
<all>
0