2000
[DOCID: f:hc178enr.txt]
H.Con. Res.178
Agreed to June 13, 1996
One Hundred Fourth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six
Concurrent Resolution
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government
for fiscal year 1997 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for
fiscal years 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997.
The Congress determines and declares that the concurrent resolution
on the budget for fiscal year 1997 is hereby established and that the
appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 1998 through 2002 are
hereby set forth.
SEC. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS.
The table of contents for this concurrent resolution is as follows:
Sec. 1. Concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1997.
Sec. 2. Table of contents.
TITLE I--LEVELS AND AMOUNTS
Sec. 101. Recommended levels and amounts.
Sec. 102. Debt increase.
Sec. 103. Social security.
Sec. 104. Major functional categories.
TITLE II--RECONCILIATION DIRECTIONS
Sec. 201. Reconciliation in the House of Representatives.
Sec. 202. Reconciliation in the Senate.
TITLE III--BUDGET ENFORCEMENT
Sec. 301. Discretionary spending limits.
Sec. 302. Budgetary treatment of the sale of Government assets.
Sec. 303. Budgetary treatment of direct student loans.
Sec. 304. Superfund reserve fund.
Sec. 305. Tax reserve fund in the Senate.
Sec. 306. Exercise of rulemaking powers.
Sec. 307. Government shutdown prevention allowance.
TITLE IV--SENSE OF CONGRESS, HOUSE, AND SENATE PROVISIONS
Sec. 401. Sense of Congress on baselines.
Sec. 402. Sense of Congress on loan sales.
Sec. 403. Sense of Congress on changes in medicaid.
Sec. 404. Sense of Congress on impact of legislation on children.
Sec. 405. Sense of Congress on debt repayment.
Sec. 406. Sense of Congress on commitment to a balanced budget by fiscal
year 2002.
Sec. 407. Sense of Congress that tax reductions should benefit working
families.
Sec. 408. Sense of Congress on a bipartisan commission on the solvency
of medicare.
Sec. 409. Sense of Congress on medicare transfers.
Sec. 410. Sense of Congress regarding changes in the medicare program.
Sec. 411. Sense of Congress regarding revenue assumptions.
Sec. 412. Sense of Congress regarding domestic violence.
Sec. 413. Sense of Congress regarding student loans.
Sec. 414. Sense of Congress regarding additional charges under the
medicare program.
Sec. 415. Sense of Congress regarding requirements that welfare
recipients be drug-free.
Sec. 416. Sense of Congress on an accurate index for inflation.
Sec. 417. Sense of Congress that the 1993 income tax increase on social
security benefits should be repealed.
Sec. 418. Sense of Congress regarding the Administration's practice
regarding the prosecution of drug smugglers.
Sec. 419. Sense of Congress on corporate subsidies.
Sec. 420. Sense of Congress regarding welfare reform.
Sec. 421. Sense of Congress on FCC spectrum auctions.
Sec. 422. Sense of the House on emergencies.
Sec. 423. Sense of the Senate on funding to assist youth at risk.
Sec. 424. Sense of the Senate on long-term trends in budget estimates.
Sec. 425. Sense of the Senate on repeal of the gas tax.
Sec. 426. Sense of the Senate regarding the use of budgetary savings.
Sec. 427. Sense of the Senate regarding the transfer of excess
Government computers to public schools.
Sec. 428. Sense of the Senate on Federal retreats.
Sec. 429. Sense of the Senate regarding the essential air service
program of the Department of Transportation.
Sec. 430. Sense of the Senate regarding equal retirement savings for
homemakers.
Sec. 431. Sense of the Senate on the National Institutes of Health
funding for anti-addiction drugs.
Sec. 432. Sense of the Senate regarding the extension of the employer
education assistance exclusion under section 127 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Sec. 433. Sense of the Senate regarding the Economic Development
Administration placing high priority on maintaining field-
based economic development representatives.
Sec. 434. Sense of the Senate on LIHEAP.
Sec. 435. Sense of the Senate on Davis-Bacon.
Sec. 436. Sense of the Senate on reimbursement of the United States for
operations Southern Watch and Provide Comfort.
Sec. 437. Sense of the Senate on solvency of the Medicare Trust Fund.
Sec. 438. Sense of the Senate on the Presidential Election Campaign
Fund.
Sec. 439. Sense of the Senate regarding the funding of Amtrak.
TITLE I--LEVELS AND AMOUNTS
SEC. 101. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.
The following budgetary levels are appropriate for the fiscal years
1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002:
(1) Federal revenues.--For purposes of the enforcement of this
resolution:
(A) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as
follows:
Fiscal year 1997: $1,083,728,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $1,130,269,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $1,177,467,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $1,231,178,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $1,290,661,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,359,046,000,000.
(B) The amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal
revenues should be changed are as follows:
Fiscal year 1997: -$16,627,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: -$18,280,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: -$20,890,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: -$20,620,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: -$20,436,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: -$14,849,000,000.
(C) The amounts for Federal Insurance Contributions Act
revenues for hospital insurance within the recommended levels
of Federal revenues are as follows:
Fiscal year 1997: $108,053,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $113,226,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $119,361,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $125,737,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $131,641,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $138,131,000,000.
(2) New budget authority.--For purposes of the enforcement of
this resolution, the appropriate levels of total new budget
authority are as follows:
Fiscal year 1997: $1,314,760,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $1,362,075,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $1,392,403,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $1,433,371,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $1,453,873,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,496,063,000,000.
(3) Budget outlays.--For purposes of the enforcement of this
resolution, the appropriate levels of total budget outlays are as
follows:
Fiscal year 1997: $1,311,011,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $1,354,668,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $1,383,872,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $1,416,493,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $1,432,423,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $1,462,900,000,000.
(4) Deficits.--For purposes of the enforcement of this
resolution, the amounts of the deficits are as follows:
Fiscal year 1997: $227,283,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $224,399,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $206,405,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $185,315,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $141,762,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $103,854,000,000.
(5) Public debt.--The appropriate levels of the public d
2000
ebt are
as follows:
Fiscal year 1997: $5,435,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $5,702,200,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $5,945,300,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $6,165,000,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $6,338,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $6,468,400,000,000.
(6) Direct loan obligations.--The appropriate levels of total
new direct loan obligations are as follows:
Fiscal year 1997: $41,353,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $36,358,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $36,455,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $36,535,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $36,600,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $36,624,000,000.
(7) Primary loan guarantee commitments.--The appropriate levels
of new primary loan guarantee commitments are as follows:
Fiscal year 1997: $267,284,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $269,467,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $268,601,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $268,489,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $270,244,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $270,948,000,000.
SEC. 102. DEBT INCREASE.
The amounts of the increase in the public debt subject to
limitation are as follows:
Fiscal year 1997: $279,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $266,500,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $243,100,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $219,700,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $173,400,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $130,000,000,000.
SEC. 103. SOCIAL SECURITY.
(a) Social Security Revenues.--For purposes of Senate enforcement
under sections 302, 602, and 311 of the Congressional Budget Act of
1974, the amounts of revenues of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors
Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund
are as follows:
Fiscal year 1997: $385,010,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $402,282,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $423,420,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $445,102,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $465,155,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $487,344,000,000.
(b) Social Security Outlays.--For purposes of Senate enforcement
under sections 302, 602, and 311 of the Congressional Budget Act of
1974, the amounts of outlays of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors
Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund
are as follows:
Fiscal year 1997: $357,596,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998: $374,931,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999: $393,137,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000: $412,438,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001: $433,311,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002: $455,165,000,000.
SEC. 104. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.
The Congress determines and declares that the appropriate levels of
new budget authority, budget outlays, new direct loan obligations, and
new primary loan guarantee commitments for fiscal years 1997 through
2002 for each major functional category are:
(1) National Defense (050):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $265,583,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $264,146,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$800,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $268,198,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $263,018,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$200,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $270,797,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $266,289,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$192,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $273,337,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $269,961,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$187,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $275,961,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $269,025,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$185,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $278,821,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $268,962,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$183,000,000.
(2) International Affairs (150):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $14,308,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $15,201,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $4,333,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$18,110,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $12,120,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,519,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $4,342,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$18,262,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $11,095,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,520,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $4,358,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$18,311,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $11,556,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,235,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $4,346,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$18,311,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $11,664,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,022,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $4,395,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$18,409,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $11,864,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,896,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $4,387,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$18,409,000,000.
(3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $16,788,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,865,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $16,249,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,421,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $16,012,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $16,053,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $15,775,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $15,805,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $15,700,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $15,717,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $15,573,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $15,611,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
(4) Energy (270):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $3,728,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $3,080,000,000.
2000
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,033,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $2,830,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $2,328,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,039,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $2,512,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $1,758,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,045,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $2,272,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $1,351,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,036,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $2,385,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $1,329,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,000,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $2,069,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $874,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,031,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
(5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $20,879,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $21,707,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $37,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $18,862,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $19,698,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $41,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $19,787,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $20,515,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $38,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $18,604,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $19,125,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $38,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $19,170,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $19,418,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $38,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $19,098,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $19,169,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $38,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
(6) Agriculture (350):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $12,811,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,985,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $7,794,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$5,870,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $12,122,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,220,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $9,346,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$6,637,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $11,799,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,898,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $10,743,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$6,586,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $11,146,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $9,268,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $10,736,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$6,652,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $10,015,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $8,229,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $10,595,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$6,641,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $9,627,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $7,822,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $10,570,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$6,709,000,000.
(7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $8,186,000,000.
(B) Outlays, -$2,307,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,856,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$197,340,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $9,561,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $5,746,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,787,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$196,750,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $10,575,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $6,109,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,763,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$196,253,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $12,543,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $7,414,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,759,000,000
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$195,883,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $11,363,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $7,377,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,745,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$195,375,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $11,695,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $7,312,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,740,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$194,875,000,000.
(8) Transportation (400):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $42,635,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $39,311,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $15,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $43,427,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $37,306,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $15,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $43,904,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $35,886,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $15,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $43,798,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $34,678,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $15,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $44,104,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $34,121,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $15,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $44,518,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $33,624,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $15,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $
2000
0.
(9) Community and Regional Development (450):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $8,218,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $10,321,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,231,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$2,133,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $6,651,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $8,982,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,257,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$2,133,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $6,611,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $8,111,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,287,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$1,171,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $6,656,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $7,267,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,365,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$1,171,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $6,466,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $6,819,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,404,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$2,202,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $6,367,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $6,334,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,430,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$2,202,000,000.
(10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services
(500):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $48,983,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $49,964,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $16,219,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$17,469,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $47,428,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $47,758,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $16,219,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$19,760,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $48,197,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $47,761,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $16,219,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$20,854,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $48,931,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $48,319,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $16,219,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$21,589,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $49,686,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $48,953,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $16,219,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$23,319,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $50,409,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $49,629,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $16,219,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$25,085,000,000.
(11) Health (550):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $133,228,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $133,172,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$187,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $140,343,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $140,728,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$94,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $146,103,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $146,246,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $152,405,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $152,317,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $158,848,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $158,509,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $164,380,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $163,912,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
(12) Medicare (570):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $192,835,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $191,151,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $207,412,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $205,687,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $218,091,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $215,819,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $230,596,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $228,847,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $243,192,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $241,458,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $253,649,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $251,248,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
(13) Income Security (600):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $230,233,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $239,737,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $241,766,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $244,694,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $246,842,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $253,422,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $265,119,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $265,209,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $264,868,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $268,404,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $283,450,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $280,388,000,0
2000
00.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
(14) Social Security (650):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $7,813,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,001,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $8,476,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,213,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $9,219,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $11,922,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $9,979,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,662,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $10,775,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,458,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $11,607,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $14,290,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
(15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $38,463,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $39,561,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $935,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$26,362,000,000.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $38,552,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $39,313,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $962,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$25,925,000,000.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $38,179,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $38,644,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $987,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$25,426,000,000.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $38,186,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $39,886,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,021,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$24,883,000,000.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $38,382,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $37,265,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,189,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$24,298,000,000.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $39,318,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $39,602,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,194,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments,
$23,668,000,000.
(16) Administration of Justice (750):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $20,924,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $19,540,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $22,320,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $21,397,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $23,264,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $22,331,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $23,278,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $22,966,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $20,330,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $20,281,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $20,315,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $20,267,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
(17) General Government (800):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $12,353,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,186,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $14,097,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $14,275,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $13,288,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,461,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $13,609,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,675,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $13,262,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $13,185,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $13,209,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $12,831,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
(18) Net Interest (900):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, $282,591,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $282,591,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, $289,121,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $289,121,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, $292,939,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $292,939,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, $294,426,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $294,426,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, $298,531,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $298,531,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, $302,932,000,000.
(B) Outlays, $302,932,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
(19) Allowances (920):
Fiscal year 1997:
2000
(A) New budget authority, -$465,000,000.
(B) Outlays, -$1,867,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, -$1,921,000,000.
(B) Outlays, -$1,217,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, -$2,084,000,000.
(B) Outlays, -$1,085,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, -$2,340,000,000.
(B) Outlays, -$1,413,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, -$2,552,000,000.
(B) Outlays, -$2,401,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, -$2,898,000,000.
(B) Outlays, -$2,863,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
(20) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
Fiscal year 1997:
(A) New budget authority, -$45,334,000,000.
(B) Outlays, -$45,334,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $7,900,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1998:
(A) New budget authority, -$35,539,000,000.
(B) Outlays, -$35,539,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $1,350,000,000.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 1999:
(A) New budget authority, -$34,727,000,000.
(B) Outlays, -$34,727,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2000:
(A) New budget authority, -$36,505,000,000.
(B) Outlays, -$36,505,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2001:
(A) New budget authority, -$38,277,000,000.
(B) Outlays, -$38,277,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
Fiscal year 2002:
(A) New budget authority, -$39,940,000,000.
(B) Outlays, -$39,940,000,000.
(C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
TITLE II--RECONCILIATION DIRECTIONS
SEC. 201. RECONCILIATION IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
(a) Submissions.--
(1) Welfare and medicaid reform and tax relief.--Not later than
June 13, 1996, the House committees named in subsection (b) shall
submit their recommendations to provide direct spending and
revenues to the Committee on the Budget of the House of
Representatives. After receiving those recommendations, the
Committee on the Budget shall report to the House a reconciliation
bill carrying out all such recommendations without any substantive
revision.
(2) Medicare preservation.--Not later than July 18, 1996, the
House committees named in subsection (c) shall submit their
recommendations to provide direct spending to the Committee on the
Budget of the House of Representatives. After receiving those
recommendations, the Committee on the Budget shall report to the
House a reconciliation bill carrying out all such recommendations
without any substantive revision.
(3) Tax and miscellaneous direct spending reforms.--Not later
than September 6, 1996, the House committees named in subsection
(d) shall submit their recommendations to provide direct spending,
deficit reduction, and revenues to the Committee on the Budget of
the House of Representatives. After receiving those
recommendations, the Committee on the Budget shall report to the
House a reconciliation bill carrying out all such recommendations
without any substantive revision.
(b) Instructions for Welfare and Medicaid Reform and Tax Relief.--
(1) Committee on agriculture.--The House Committee on
Agriculture shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction
that provide direct spending such that the total level of direct
spending for that committee does not exceed: $35,609,000,000 in
outlays for fiscal year 1997, $36,625,000,000 in outlays for fiscal
year 2002, and $216,316,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997
through 2002.
(2) Committee on commerce.--The House Committee on Commerce
shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide
direct spending such that the total level of direct spending for
that committee does not exceed: $326,354,000,000 in outlays for
fiscal year 1997, $473,718,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 2002,
and $2,395,231,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through
2002.
(3) Committee on economic and educational opportunities.--The
House Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities shall
report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct
spending such that the total level of direct spending for that
committee does not exceed: $15,808,000,000 in outlays for fiscal
year 1997, $19,670,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 2002, and
$105,331,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
(4) Committee on ways and means.--(A) The House Committee on
Ways and Means shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction
that provide direct spending such that the total level of direct
spending for that committee does not exceed: $381,199,000,000 in
outlays for fiscal year 1997, $563,607,000,000 in outlays for
fiscal year 2002, and $2,810,569,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years
1997 through 2002.
(B) The House Committee on Ways and Means shall report changes
in laws within its jurisdiction sufficient to reduce revenues by
not more than $122,400,000,000 for fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
(c) Instructions for Medicare Preservation.--
(1) Committee on commerce.--The House Committee on Commerce
shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide
direct spending such that the total level of direct spending for
that committee does not exceed: $319,554,000,000 in outlays for
fiscal year 1997, $420,915,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 2002,
and $2,237,231,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through
2002.
(2) Committee on ways and means.--The House Committee on Ways
and Means shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that
provide direct spending such that the total level of direct
spending for that committee does not exceed: $374,399,000,000 in
outlays for fiscal year 1997, $510,804,000,000 in outlays for
fiscal year 2002, and $2,652,569,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years
1997 through 2002.
(d) Instructions for Tax and Miscellaneous Direct Spending
Reforms.--
(1) Committee on agriculture.--The House Committee on
Agriculture shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction
that provide direct spending such that the total level of direct
spending for that committee does not exceed: $35,599,000,000 in
outlays for fiscal year 1997, $36,614,000,000 in outlays for fiscal
year 2002, and $216,251,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997
through 2002.
(2) C
2000
ommittee on banking and financial services.--(A) The House
Committee on Banking and Financial Services shall report changes in
laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending such that
the total level of direct spending for that committee does not
exceed: -$12,645,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997,
-$5,775,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 2002, and
-$41,639,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
(B) The House Committee on Banking and Financial Services shall
report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that would reduce
the deficit by: $0 in fiscal year 1997, $115,000,000 for fiscal
year 2002, and $305,000,000 in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
(3) Committee on commerce.--The House Committee on Commerce
shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide
direct spending such that the total level of direct spending for
that committee does not exceed: $318,054,000,000 in outlays for
fiscal year 1997, $415,290,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 2002,
and $2,216,885,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through
2002.
(4) Committee on economic and educational opportunities.--The
House Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities shall
report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct
spending such that the total level of direct spending for that
committee does not exceed: $15,025,000,000 in outlays for fiscal
year 1997, $18,963,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 2002, and
$101,660,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
(5) Committee on government reform and oversight.--(A) The
House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight shall report
changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct
spending such that the total level of direct spending for that
committee does not exceed: $65,164,000,000 in outlays for fiscal
year 1997, $82,594,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 2002, and
$442,230,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
(B) The House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight
shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that would
reduce the deficit by: $201,000,000 in fiscal year 1997,
$590,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, and $2,837,000,000 in fiscal
years 1997 through 2002.
(6) Committee on international relations.--The House Committee
on International Relations shall report changes in laws within its
jurisdiction that provide direct spending such that the total level
of direct spending for that committee does not exceed:
$13,025,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, $10,311,000,000 in
outlays for fiscal year 2002, and $67,953,000,000 in outlays in
fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
(7) Committee on the judiciary.--The House Committee on the
Judiciary shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that
provide direct spending such that the total level of direct
spending for that committee does not exceed: $2,784,000,000 in
outlays for fiscal year 1997, $4,586,000,000 in outlays for fiscal
year 2002, and $26,482,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997
through 2002.
(8) Committee on national security.--The House Committee on
National Security shall report changes in laws within its
jurisdiction that provide direct spending such that the total level
of direct spending for that committee does not exceed:
$39,787,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, $49,774,000,000 in
outlays for fiscal year 2002, and $271,815,000,000 in outlays in
fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
(9) Committee on resources.--The House Committee on Resources
shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide
direct spending such that the total level of direct spending for
that committee does not exceed: $2,115,000,000 in outlays for
fiscal year 1997, $2,048,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 2002,
and $11,652,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
(10) Committee on science.--The House Committee on Science
shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide
direct spending such that the total level of direct spending for
that committee does not exceed: $40,000,000 in outlays for fiscal
year 1997, $46,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 2002, and
$242,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
(11) Committee on transportation and infrastructure.--The House
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure shall report changes
in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending such
that the total level of direct spending for that committee does not
exceed: $18,315,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997,
$18,001,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 2002, and
$107,328,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
(12) Committee on veterans' affairs.--The House Committee on
Veterans' Affairs shall report changes in laws within its
jurisdiction that provide direct spending such that the total level
of direct spending for that committee does not exceed:
$21,375,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, $22,217,000,000 in
outlays for fiscal year 2002, and $130,468,000,000 in outlays in
fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
(13) Committee on ways and means.--(A) The House Committee on
Ways and Means shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction
that provide direct spending such that the total level of direct
spending for that committee does not exceed: $372,342,000,000 in
outlays for fiscal year 1997, $508,107,000,000 in outlays for
fiscal year 2002, and $2,638,057,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years
1997 through 2002.
(B)(i) The House Committee on Ways and Means shall report
changes in laws within its jurisdiction sufficient to reduce
revenues by not more than $113,838,000,000 in fiscal years 1997
through 2002.
(ii) If a reconciliation bill referred to in subsection (a)(1)
is enacted into law, then the revenue amount set forth in clause
(i) shall be adjusted to reflect the revenue provisions of that
Act.
(e) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``direct
spending'' has the meaning given to such term in section 250(c)(8) of
the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.
SEC. 202. RECONCILIATION IN THE SENATE.
(a) First Reconciliation Instructions.--Not later than June 21,
1996, the committees named in this subsection shall submit their
recommendations to the Committee on the Budget of the Senate. After
receiving those recommendations, the Committee on the Budget shall
report to the Senate a reconciliation bill carrying out all such
recommendations without any substantive revision.
(1) Committee on agriculture, nutrition, and forestry.--The
Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry shall
report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct
spending (as defined in section 250(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget
and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985) to reduce outlays
$1,974,000,000 in fiscal year 1997, $26,169,000,000 for the period
of fiscal years 1997 through 2002, and $5,967,000,000 in fiscal
year 2002.
(2) Committee on finance.--(A) The Senate Committee on Finance
shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide
direct spending (as defined in section 250(c)(8) of the Balanced
Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985) to reduce outlays
$260,000,000 in fiscal year 1997, $98,321,000,000 for the period of
fiscal years 1997 through 2002, and $36,578,000,000 in fiscal year
2002.
(B) The Committee on Finance shall report changes in laws
within its jurisdiction necessary to reduce revenues by not more
than $122,400,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1997 through
2002.
2000
(b) Second Reconciliation Instructions.--No later than July 24,
1996, the Committee on Finance shall report to the Senate a
reconciliation bill proposing changes in laws within its jurisdiction
that provide direct spending (as defined in section 250(c)(8) of the
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985) to reduce
outlays $6,800,000,000 in fiscal year 1997, $158,000,000,000 for the
period of fiscal years 1997 through 2002, and $52,803,000,000 in fiscal
year 2002.
(c) Third Reconciliation Instructions.--No later than September 18,
1996, the committees named in this subsection shall submit their
recommendations to the Committee on the Budget of the Senate. After
receiving those recommendations, the Committee on the Budget shall
report to the Senate a reconciliation bill carrying out all such
recommendations without any substantive revision.
(1) Committee on agriculture, nutrition, and forestry.--The
Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry shall
report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct
spending (as defined in section 250(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget
and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985) to reduce outlays
$10,000,000 in fiscal year 1997, $65,000,000 for the period of
fiscal years 1997 through 2002, and $11,000,000 in fiscal year
2002.
(2) Committee on armed services.--The Senate Committee on Armed
Services shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that
provide direct spending (as defined in section 250(c)(8) of the
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985) to
reduce outlays $79,000,000 in fiscal year 1997, $649,000,000 for
the period of fiscal years 1997 through 2002, and $166,000,000 in
fiscal year 2002.
(3) Committee on banking, housing, and urban affairs.--The
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs shall
report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that reduce the
deficit by $3,628,000,000 in fiscal year 1997, $3,605,000,000 for
the period of fiscal years 1997 through 2002, and $462,000,000 in
fiscal year 2002.
(4) Committee on commerce, science, and transportation.--The
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation shall
report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct
spending (as defined in section 250(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget
and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985) to reduce outlays
$19,396,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1997 through 2002,
and $5,649,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
(5) Committee on energy and natural resources.--The Senate
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources shall report changes in
laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending (as
defined in section 250(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency
Deficit Control Act of 1985) to reduce outlays $90,000,000 in
fiscal year 1997, $1,512,000,000 for the period of fiscal years
1997 through 2002, and $72,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
(6) Committee on environment and public works.--The Senate
Committee on Environment and Public Works shall report changes in
laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending (as
defined in section 250(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency
Deficit Control Act of 1985) to reduce outlays $87,000,000 in
fiscal year 1997, $2,184,000,000 for the period of fiscal years
1997 through 2002, and $392,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
(7) Committee on finance.--(A) The Senate Committee on Finance
shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that reduce
the deficit by $3,639,000,000 in fiscal year 1997, $23,184,000,000
for the period of fiscal years 1997 through 2002, and
$4,121,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
(B) The Committee on Finance shall report changes in laws
within its jurisdiction to reduce revenues for the period of fiscal
years 1997 through 2002 by not more than the amount specified in
subsection (a)(2)(B) reduced by the amount that legislation enacted
pursuant to subsection (a) reduced revenues for that period of
fiscal years.
(8) Committee on governmental affairs.--The Senate Committee on
Governmental Affairs shall report changes in laws within its
jurisdiction that reduce the deficit $1,101,000,000 in fiscal year
1997, $8,801,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1997 through
2002, and $1,492,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
(9) Committee on the judiciary.--The Senate Committee on the
Judiciary shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that
provide direct spending (as defined in section 250(c)(8) of the
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985) to
reduce outlays $476,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1997
through 2002 and $119,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
(10) Committee on labor and human resources.--The Senate
Committee on Labor and Human Resources shall report changes in laws
within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending (as defined in
section 250(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit
Control Act of 1985) to reduce outlays $783,000,000 in fiscal year
1997, $3,671,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1997 through
2002, and $707,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
(11) Committee on veterans' affairs.--The Senate Committee on
Veterans' Affairs shall report changes in laws within its
jurisdiction that provide direct spending (as defined in section
250(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act
of 1985) to reduce outlays $126,000,000 in fiscal year 1997,
$5,271,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1997 through 2002,
and $1,418,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.
(d) Treatment of Reconciliation Bills for Prior Surplus.--For
purposes of section 202 of House Concurrent Resolution 67 (104th
Congress), legislation which reduces revenues pursuant to a
reconciliation instruction contained in subsection (c) shall be taken
together with all other legislation enacted pursuant to the
reconciliation instructions contained in this resolution when
determining the deficit effect of such legislation.
TITLE III--BUDGET ENFORCEMENT
SEC. 301. DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS.
(a) Definition.--As used in this section and for the purposes of
allocations made pursuant to section 302(a) or 602(a) of the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, for the discretionary category, the
term ``discretionary spending limit'' means--
(1) with respect to fiscal year 1997--
(A) for the defense category $266,362,000,000 in new budget
authority and $264,968,000,000 in outlays; and
(B) for the nondefense category $230,988,000,000 in new
budget authority and $273,644,000,000 in outlays;
(2) with respect to fiscal year 1998--
(A) for the defense category $268,971,000,000 in new budget
authority and $263,862,000,000 in outlays; and
(B) for the nondefense category $224,746,000,000 in new
budget authority and $263,093,000,000 in outlays;
(3) with respect to fiscal year 1999, for the discretionary
category $491,268,000,000 in new budget authority and
$525,485,000,000 in outlays;
(4) with respect to fiscal year 2000, for the discretionary
category $498,589,000,000 in new budget authority and
$525,251,000,000 in outlays;
(5) with respect to fiscal year 2001, for the discretionary
category $491,117,000,000 in new budget authority and
$516,223,000,000 in outlays; and
(6) with respect to fiscal year 2002, for the discretionary
category $500,592,000,000 in new budget authority and
$514,219,000,000 in outlays;
as adjusted for changes in concepts and definitions and emergency
appropriations.
(b) Point of Order in the Senate.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall
not be in orde
2000
r in the Senate to consider--
(A) a revision of this resolution or any concurrent
resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1998 (or amendment,
motion, or conference report on such a resolution) that
provides discretionary spending in excess of the sum of the
defense and nondefense discretionary spending limits for such
fiscal year;
(B) any concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year
1999, 2000, 2001, or 2002 (or amendment, motion, or conference
report on such a resolution) that provides discretionary
spending in excess of the discretionary spending limit for such
fiscal year; or
(C) any appropriation bill or resolution (or amendment,
motion, or conference report on such appropriation bill or
resolution) for fiscal year 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, or
2002 that would exceed any of the discretionary spending limits
in this section or suballocations of those limits made pursuant
to section 602(b) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.
(2) Exception.--
(A) In general.--This section shall not apply if a
declaration of war by the Congress is in effect or if a joint
resolution pursuant to section 258 of the Balanced Budget and
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 has been enacted.
(B) Enforcement of discretionary limits in fy 1997.--Until
the enactment of reconciliation legislation pursuant to
subsections (a), (b), and (c) of section 202 of this resolution
and for purposes of the application of paragraph (1), only
subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) shall apply, and it shall
apply only for fiscal year 1997.
(c) Waiver.--This section may be waived or suspended in the Senate
only by the affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly
chosen and sworn.
(d) Appeals.--Appeals in the Senate from the decisions of the Chair
relating to any provision of this section shall be limited to 1 hour,
to be equally divided between, and controlled by, the appellant and the
manager of the concurrent resolution, bill, or joint resolution, as the
case may be. An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members of the
Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate to
sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised
under this section.
(e) Determination of Budget Levels.--For purposes of subsection
(b), the levels of new budget authority and outlays for a fiscal year
shall be determined on the basis of estimates made by the Committee on
the Budget of the Senate.
SEC. 302. BUDGETARY TREATMENT OF THE SALE OF GOVERNMENT ASSETS.
(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the prohibition on scoring asset sales has discouraged the
sale of assets that can be better managed by the private sector and
generate receipts to reduce the Federal budget deficit;
(2) the President's fiscal year 1997 budget included
$3,900,000,000 in receipts from asset sales and proposed a change
in the asset sale scoring rule to allow the proceeds from these
sales to be scored;
(3) assets should not be sold if such sale would increase the
budget deficit over the long run; and
(4) the asset sale scoring prohibition should be repealed and
consideration should be given to replacing it with a methodology
that takes into account the long-term budgetary impact of asset
sales.
(b) Budgetary Treatment.--(1) For the purposes of any concurrent
resolution on the budget and the Congressional Budget Act of 1974,
amounts realized from sales of assets shall be scored with respect to
the level of budget authority, outlays, or revenues.
(2) For purposes of this section, the term ``sale of an asset''
shall have the same meaning as under section 250(c)(21) of the Balanced
Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.
(3) For purposes of this section, the sale of loan assets or the
prepayment of a loan shall be governed by the terms of the Federal
Credit Reform Act of 1990.
SEC. 303. BUDGETARY TREATMENT OF DIRECT STUDENT LOANS.
For the purposes of any concurrent resolution on the budget and the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the cost of a direct loan under the
Federal direct student loan program shall be the net present value, at
the time when the direct loan is disbursed, of the following cash flows
for the estimated life of the loan--
(1) loan disbursements;
(2) repayments of principal;
(3) payments of interest and other payments by or to the
Government over the life of the loan after adjusting for estimated
defaults, prepayments, fees, penalties, and other recoveries; and
(4) direct expenses, including--
(A) activities related to credit extension, loan
origination, loan servicing, management of contractors, and
payments to contractors, other government entities, and program
participants;
(B) collection of delinquent loans; and
(C) writeoff and closeout of loans.
SEC. 304. SUPERFUND RESERVE FUND.
(a) Deficit Neutral Adjustments in the House.--
(1) Committee allocations.--In the House of Representatives--
(A) after the enactment of a superfund bill that reforms
the Superfund program to facilitate the clean up of hazardous
waste sites and extends Superfund taxes; and
(B) upon the reporting of an appropriation measure (or
submission of a conference report thereon) that appropriates
funds for the Superfund program in excess of $1,302,000,000;
the chairman of the Committee on the Budget of that House may
submit revised allocations, functional levels, budget aggregates,
and discretionary spending limits to carry out this section by an
amount not to exceed the excess subject to the limitation. These
revisions shall be considered for the purposes of the Congressional
Budget Act of 1974 as the allocations, levels, aggregates, and
limits contained in this resolution.
(2) Committee suballocations.--The Committee on Appropriations
of the House of Representatives may report appropriately revised
suballocations pursuant to sections 302(b)(1) and 602(b)(1) of the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 following the revision of
allocations to that committee pursuant to paragraph (1).
(3) Limitations.--The adjustments under this subsection shall
not exceed the lesser of--
(A) the net revenue increase for a fiscal year resulting
from the enactment of legislation that extends Superfund taxes;
or
(B) $898,000,000 in budget authority for a fiscal year and
the outlays flowing from such budget authority in all fiscal
years.
(3) Readjustments.--In the House of Representatives, any
adjustments made under this subsection for any appropriations
measure or any conference report thereon may be readjusted if that
measure is not enacted into law.
(b) Deficit Neutral Adjustments in the Senate.--
(1) In general.--In the Senate, after the enactment of
legislation that reforms the Superfund program and extends
Superfund taxes, budget authority and outlays allocated to the
Committee on Appropriations under sections 302(a) and 602(a) of the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the appropriate functional
levels, the appropriate budget aggregates, and the discretionary
spending limits in section 201 of this resolution may be revised to
provide additional budget authority and the outlays flowing from
that budget authority for the Superfund program, pursuant to this
subsection.
(2) Deficit neutral adjustments.--
(A) Allocations.--
(i) Committee allocations.--In the Senate, upon
reporting of an appropriations measure, or when a
conference commi
2000
ttee submits a conference report thereon,
that appropriates funds for the Superfund program in excess
of $1,302,000,000, the chairman of the Committee on the
Budget of the Senate may submit revised allocations,
functional levels, budget aggregates, and discretionary
spending limits to carry out this section that adds to such
allocations, levels, aggregates, and limits an amount that
is equal to such excess. These revised allocations, levels,
aggregates, and limits shall be considered for the purposes
of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 as the allocations,
levels, aggregates, and limits contained in this
resolution.
(ii) Committee suballocations.--The Committee on
Appropriations of the Senate may report appropriately
revised suballocations pursuant to sections 302(b)(1) and
602(b)(1) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 following
the revision of the allocations pursuant to clause (i).
(B) Limitations.--The adjustments under this subsection
shall not exceed--
(i) the net revenue increase for a fiscal year
resulting from the enactment of legislation that extends
Superfund taxes; and
(ii) $898,000,000 in budget authority for a fiscal year
and the outlays flowing from such budget authority in all
fiscal years.
SEC. 305. TAX RESERVE FUND IN THE SENATE.
(a) In General.--In the Senate, revenue and spending aggregates may
be reduced and allocations may be revised for legislation that reduces
revenues by providing family tax relief, fuel tax relief, and
incentives to stimulate savings, investment, job creation, and economic
growth if such legislation will not increase the deficit for--
(1) fiscal year 1997;
(2) the period of fiscal years 1997 through 2001; or
(3) the period of fiscal years 2002 through 2006.
(b) Revised Allocations.--Upon the consideration of legislation
pursuant to subsection (a), the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget
of the Senate may file with the Senate appropriately revised
allocations under sections 302(a) and 602(a) of the Congressional
Budget Act of 1974 and revised functional levels and aggregates to
carry out this section. These revised allocations, functional levels,
and aggregates shall be considered for the purposes of the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 as allocations, functional levels, and
aggregates contained in this resolution.
(c) Reporting Revised Allocations.--The appropriate committee may
report appropriately revised allocations pursuant to sections 302(b)
and 602(b) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to carry out this
section.
SEC. 306. EXERCISE OF RULEMAKING POWERS.
Congress adopts the provisions of this title--
(1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate and
the House of Representatives, respectively, and as such they shall
be considered as part of the rules of each House, or of that House
to which they specifically apply, and such rules shall supersede
other rules only to the extent that they are inconsistent
therewith; and
(2) with full recognition of the constitutional right of either
House to change those rules (so far as they relate to that House)
at any time, in the same manner, and to the same extent as in the
case of any other rule of that House.
SEC. 307. GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN PREVENTION ALLOWANCE.
(a) In General.--In the House of Representatives for consideration
of a conference report, or in the Senate, the fiscal year 1997 outlay
allocation made pursuant to sections 302(a) and 602(a) of the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to the Committees on Appropriations,
the fiscal year 1997 outlay aggregate, the fiscal year 1997
discretionary limit on nondefense outlays and other appropriate
aggregates may be increased for a resolution making continuing
appropriations for fiscal year 1997. These revised allocations,
aggregates, and limits shall be considered for all purposes of the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 as allocations, aggregates, and limits
contained in this resolution and shall remain in effect for the
consideration of any fiscal year 1997 appropriations measure.
(b) Revised Allocations.--In the Senate, upon the consideration of
a motion to proceed or an agreement to proceed to a resolution making
continuing appropriations for fiscal year 1997, or in the House of
Representatives, upon the filing of a conference report thereon, that
complies with the fiscal year 1997 discretionary limit on nondefense
budget authority, the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the
appropriate House may submit a revised outlay allocation for such
committee and appropriately revised aggregates and limits to carry out
this section.
(c) Committee Suballocations.--The Committee on Appropriations of
the appropriate House may report appropriately revised suballocations
pursuant to sections 302(b)(1) and 602(b)(1) of the Congressional
Budget Act of 1974 following the revision of allocations pursuant to
this section.
(d) Limitations.--The adjustments made under this section shall not
exceed $1,337,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997.
TITLE IV--SENSE OF CONGRESS, HOUSE, AND SENATE PROVISIONS
SEC. 401. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON BASELINES.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds that:
(1) Baselines are projections of future spending if existing
policies remain unchanged.
(2) Under baseline assumptions, spending automatically rises
with inflation even if such increases are not mandated under
existing law.
(3) Baseline budgeting is inherently biased against policies
that would reduce the projected growth in spending because such
policies are depicted as spending reductions from an increasing
baseline.
(4) The baseline concept has encouraged Congress to abdicate
its constitutional obligation to control the public purse for those
programs which are automatically funded.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that baseline
budgeting should be replaced with a budgetary model that requires
justification of aggregate funding levels and maximizes congressional
accountability for Federal spending.
SEC. 402. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON LOAN SALES.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds that:
(1) The House and Senate Appropriations Subcommittees on
Treasury, Postal Service, and General Government have stated that
``more consideration should be given to the sale of nonperforming
loans held not only by HUD, but by all Federal agencies that
provide credit programs'' and directed the Office of Management and
Budget to direct Federal agencies to evaluate the value of their
credit programs and develop a plan for the privatization of such
credit programs.
(2) The Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce,
Justice, State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies has directed
that the Small Business Administration should study and report to
Congress on the feasibility of private servicing of SBA loan
activities.
(3) The House Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural
Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies
previously directed the Farmers Home Administration to ``explore
the potential savings that might occur from contract centralized
servicing''.
(4) The Committee on Agriculture of the House has consistently
urged the Secretary of Agriculture to explore contracting out loan
servicing operations.
(5) The General Accounting Office has found that ``Allowing the
public and private sectors to compete for the centralized servicing
(of loans) could mean reaping the benefits of the competitive
marketplace--greater efficiency, increased focus on customer needs,
increased innovation, and improved
2000
morale.''.
(6) The House Committee on Small Business has recommended
``that 40 percent of the loan servicing portfolio (for Disaster
Loans) be privatized''.
(7) The President's Budget for Fiscal Year 1997 proposes to
review options for improving the quality of loan portfolio
management including contracting to the private sector.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the
appropriate committees of the House and the Senate should report
legislation authorizing the sale of such loan assets as they deem
appropriate in order to contribute to Government downsizing,
administrative cost savings, and improved services to borrowers.
SEC. 403. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON CHANGES IN MEDICAID.
It is the sense of Congress that any legislation changing the
medicaid program pursuant to this resolution should--
(1) guarantee coverage for low-income children, pregnant women,
the elderly, and the disabled as described in the National
Governors' Association February 6, 1996, policy on reforming
medicaid, which was endorsed unanimously by our Nation's Governors;
(2) maintain the medicaid program as a matching program while
providing a fairer and more equitable formula for calculating the
matching rate;
(3) reject any illusory financing schemes;
(4) continue existing law for Federal minimum quality standards
for nursing homes and the enforcement of those standards;
(5) continue Federal rules that prevent wives or husbands from
being required to impoverish themselves in order to obtain and keep
medicaid benefits for their spouse requiring nursing home care and
continue existing prohibitions against the States requiring the
adult children of institutionalized patients from having to
contribute to the cost of nursing facility services; and
(6) provide coverage of medicare premiums and cost-sharing
payments for low-income seniors consistent with the unanimous
National Governors' Association medicaid policy.
SEC. 404. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON IMPACT OF LEGISLATION ON CHILDREN.
(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that Congress
should not adopt or enact any legislation that will increase the number
of children who are hungry, homeless, poor, or medically uninsured.
(b) Legislative Accountability for Impact on Children.--In the
event legislation enacted to comply with this resolution results in an
increase in the number of hungry, homeless, poor, or medically
uninsured by the end of fiscal year 1997, Congress shall revisit the
provisions of such legislation which caused such increase and shall, as
soon as practicable thereafter, adopt legislation which would halt any
continuation of such increase.
SEC. 405. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DEBT REPAYMENT.
It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) Congress has a basic moral and ethical responsibility to
future generations to repay the Federal debt;
(2) Congress should enact a plan that balances the budget and
also develop a regimen for paying off the Federal debt;
(3) after the budget is balanced, a surplus should be created
which can be used to begin paying off the debt; and
(4) such a plan should be formulated and implemented so that
this generation can save future generations from the crushing
burdens of the Federal debt.
SEC. 406. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COMMITMENT TO A BALANCED BUDGET BY
FISCAL YEAR 2002.
It is the sense of Congress that the President and Congress should
continue to adhere to the statutory commitment made by both parties on
November 20, 1995, to enact legislation to achieve a balanced budget
not later than fiscal year 2002 as estimated by the Congressional
Budget Office.
SEC. 407. SENSE OF CONGRESS THAT TAX REDUCTIONS SHOULD BENEFIT WORKING
FAMILIES.
It is the sense of Congress that this concurrent resolution on the
budget assumes any reductions in taxes should be structured to benefit
working families by providing family tax relief and incentives to
stimulate savings, investment, job creation, and economic growth.
SEC. 408. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON A BIPARTISAN COMMISSION ON THE SOLVENCY
OF MEDICARE.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) the Trustees of Medicare have concluded that ``the Medicare
program is clearly unsustainable in its present form'';
(2) the Trustees of Medicare concluded in 1995 that ``the
Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, which pays inpatient hospital
expenses, will be able to pay benefits for only about 7 years and
is severely out of financial balance in the long range'';
(3) preliminary data made available to Congress indicate that
the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund will go bankrupt in the year
2001, rather than the year 2002, as predicted last year;
(4) the Public Trustees of Medicare have concluded that ``the
Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund shows a rate of growth
of costs which is clearly unsustainable'';
(5) the Bipartisan Commission on Entitlement and Tax Reform
concluded that, absent long-term changes in Medicare, projected
Medicare outlays will increase from about 4 percent of the payroll
tax base today to over 15 percent of the payroll tax base by the
year 2030;
(6) the Bipartisan Commission on Entitlement and Tax Reform
recommended, by a vote of 30 to 1, that spending and revenues
available for Medicare must be brought into long-term balance; and
(7) in the most recent Trustees' report, the Public Trustees of
Medicare ``strongly recommend that the crisis presented by the
financial condition of the Medicare trust funds be urgently
addressed on a comprehensive basis, including a review of the
program's financing methods, benefit provisions, and delivery
mechanisms''.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that in order
to meet the aggregates and levels in this budget resolution--
(1) a special bipartisan commission should be established
immediately to make recommendations concerning the most appropriate
response to the short-term solvency and long-term sustainability
issues facing the Medicare program which do not include tax
increases in any form, including transfers of spending from the
Medicare Part A program to the Part B program; and
(2) the commission should report to Congress its
recommendations prior to the adoption of a concurrent budget
resolution for fiscal year 1998 in order that the committees of
jurisdiction may consider these recommendations in fashioning an
appropriate congressional response.
SEC. 409. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MEDICARE TRANSFERS.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) home health care provides a broad spectrum of health and
social services to approximately 3,500,000 Medicare beneficiaries
in the comfort of their homes;
(2) the President has proposed reimbursing the first 100 home
health care visits after a hospital stay through Medicare Part A
and reimbursing all other visits through Medicare Part B, shifting
responsibility for $55,000,000,000 of spending from the Hospital
Insurance Trust Fund to the general revenues that pay for Medicare
Part B;
(3) such a transfer does nothing to control Medicare spending,
and is merely a bookkeeping change which artificially extends the
solvency of the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund;
(4) this transfer of funds camouflages the need to make changes
in the Medicare program to ensure the long-term solvency of the
Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, which the Congressional Budget
Office now states will become bankrupt in the year 2001, a year
earlier than projected in the 1995 report by the Trustees of the
Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds;
(5) Congress will be breaking a commitment to the American
people if it does not act to ensure the s
2000
olvency of the entire
Medicare program in both the short- and long-term;
(6) the President's proposal would force those in need of
chronic care services to rely upon the availability of general
revenues to provide financing for these services, making them more
vulnerable to benefits changes than under current law; and
(7) according to the National Association of Home Care,
shifting Medicare home care payments from Part A to Part B would
deemphasize the importance of home care by eliminating its status
as part of the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, thereby undermining
access to the less costly form of care.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that in meeting
the spending targets specified in the budget resolution, Congress
should not accept the President's proposal to transfer spending from
one part of Medicare to another in its efforts to preserve, protect,
and improve the Medicare program.
SEC. 410. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING CHANGES IN THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds that, in achieving the spending
levels specified in this resolution--
(1) the Public Trustees of Medicare have concluded that ``the
Medicare program is clearly unsustainable in its present form'';
(2) the President has said his goal is to keep the Medicare
Hospital Insurance Trust Fund solvent for more than a decade, but
his budget transfers $55,000,000,000 of home health spending from
Medicare Part A to Medicare Part B;
(3) the transfer of home health spending threatens the delivery
of home health services to 3.5 million Medicare beneficiaries;
(4) such a transfer increases the burden on general revenues,
including income taxes paid by working Americans, by
$55,000,000,000;
(5) such a transfer artificially inflates the solvency of the
Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, misleading Congress,
Medicare beneficiaries, and working taxpayers;
(6) the Director of the Congressional Budget Office has
certified that, without such a transfer, the President's budget
extends the solvency of the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund for only
one additional year; and
(7) without misleading transfers, the President's budget
therefore fails to achieve his own stated goal for the Medicare
Hospital Insurance Trust Fund.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that, in
achieving the spending levels specified in this resolution, Congress
assumes that Congress would--
(1) keep the Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund solvent for
more than a decade, as recommended by the President; and
(2) accept the President's proposed level of Medicare Part B
savings over the period 1997 through 2002; but would
(3) reject the President's proposal to transfer home health
spending from one part of Medicare to another, which threatens the
delivery of home health care services to 3.5 million Medicare
beneficiaries, artificially inflates the solvency of the Medicare
Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, and increases the burden on general
revenues, including income taxes paid by working Americans, by
$55,000,000,000.
SEC. 411. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) Corporations and individuals have clear responsibility to
adhere to environmental laws. When they do not, and environmental
damage results, the Federal and State governments may impose fines
and penalties, and assess polluters for the cost of remediation.
(2) Assessment of these costs is important in the enforcement
process. They appropriately penalize wrongdoing. They discourage
future environmental damage. They ensure that taxpayers do not bear
the financial brunt of cleaning up after damages done by polluters.
(3) In the case of the Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster in
Prince William Sound, Alaska, for example, the corporate settlement
with the Federal Government totaled $900,000,000.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that
assumptions in this resolution assume an appropriate amount of revenues
per year through legislation that will not allow deductions for fines
and penalties arising from a failure to comply with Federal or State
environmental or health protection laws.
SEC. 412. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
The assumptions underlying functional totals in this budget
resolution include:
(1) Findings.--The Senate finds that:
(A) Violence against women is the leading cause of physical
injury to women. The Department of Justice estimates that over
1 million violent crimes against women are committed by
domestic partners annually.
(B) Domestic violence dramatically affects the victim's
ability to participate in the workforce. A University of
Minnesota survey reported that one-quarter of battered women
surveyed had lost a job partly because of being abused and that
over half of these women had been harassed by their abuser at
work.
(C) Domestic violence is often intensified as women seek to
gain economic independence through attending school or job
training programs. Batterers have been reported to prevent
women from attending such programs or sabotage their efforts at
self-improvement.
(D) Nationwide surveys of service providers prepared by the
Taylor Institute of Chicago, document, for the first time, the
interrelationship between domestic violence and welfare by
showing that between 50 percent and 80 percent of women in
welfare-to-work programs are current or past victims of
domestic violence.
(E) The American Psychological Association has reported
that violence against women is usually witnessed by their
children, who as a result can suffer severe psychological,
cognitive and physical damage and some studies have found that
children who witness violence in their homes have a greater
propensity to commit violent acts in their homes and
communities when they become adults.
(F) Over half of the women surveyed by the Taylor Institute
stayed with their batterers because they lacked the resources
to support themselves and their children. The surveys also
found that the availability of economic support is a critical
factor in women's ability to leave abusive situations that
threaten themselves and their children.
(G) Proposals to restructure the welfare programs may
impact the availability of the economic support and the safety
net necessary to enable poor women to flee abuse without
risking homelessness and starvation for their families.
(2) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that:
(A) No welfare reform provision should be enacted by
Congress unless and until Congress considers whether such
welfare reform provisions would exacerbate violence against
women and their children, further endanger women's lives, make
it more difficult for women to escape domestic violence, or
further punish women victimized by violence.
(B) Any welfare reform measure enacted by Congress should
require that any welfare-to-work, education, or job placement
programs implemented by the States address the impact of
domestic violence on welfare recipients.
SEC. 413. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING STUDENT LOANS.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) over the last 60 years, education and advancements in
knowledge have accounted for 37 percent of our Nation's economic
growth;
(2) a college degree significantly increases job stability,
resulting in an unemployment rate among college graduates less
2000
than
half that of those with high school diplomas;
(3) a person with a bachelor's degree will average 50-55
percent more in lifetime earnings than a person with a high school
diploma;
(4) education is a key to providing alternatives to crime and
violence, and is a cost-effective strategy for breaking cycles of
poverty and moving welfare recipients to work;
(5) a highly educated populace is necessary to the effective
functioning of democracy and to a growing economy, and the
opportunity to gain a college education helps advance the American
ideals of progress and social equality;
(6) a highly educated and flexible work force is an essential
component of economic growth and competitiveness;
(7) for many families, Federal Student Aid programs make the
difference in the ability of students to attend college;
(8) in 1994, nearly 6 million postsecondary students received
some kind of financial assistance to help them pay for the costs of
schooling;
(9) since 1988, college costs have risen by 54 percent, and
student borrowing has increased by 219 percent;
(10) in fiscal year 1996, the Balanced Budget Act achieved
savings without reducing student loan limits or increasing fees to
students or parents; and
(11) under this budget resolution student loans will increase
from $26.6 billion today to $37.4 billion in 2002; the
Congressional Budget Office projects that these are the exact same
levels that would occur under President Clinton's student loan
policies.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the
aggregates and functional levels included in this budget resolution
assume that savings in student loans can be achieved without any
program change that would increase costs to students and parents or
decrease accessibility to student loans.
SEC. 414. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING ADDITIONAL CHARGES UNDER THE
MEDICARE PROGRAM.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) senior citizens must spend more than 1 dollar in 5 of their
limited incomes to purchase the health care they need;
(2) \2/3\ of spending under the Medicare program under title
XVIII of the Social Security Act is for senior citizens with annual
incomes of less than $15,000;
(3) fee-for-service cost increases have forced higher out-of-
pocket costs for seniors; and
(4) the current Medicare managed care experience has
demonstrated that Medicare HMO enrollees face lower out-of-pocket
costs when they join HMO's in competitive markets; also, over one
half of these enrollees pay no Medicare premiums and receive extra
benefits free of charge, such as prescription drugs and eye
glasses, due to competitive market forces.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that any
reconciliation bill considered during the second session of the 104th
Congress should maintain Medicare beneficiaries right to remain in the
current Medicare fee-for-service program and also should maintain the
existing prohibitions against additional charges by providers under the
Medicare fee-for-service program under title XVIII of the Social
Security Act (``balance billing''), and that Medicare beneficiaries
should be offered the greatest opportunity possible to choose private
plans that will offer lower out-of-pocket costs than what they
currently pay in the Medicare fee-for-service program, and to choose a
health care delivery option that best meets their needs.
SEC. 415. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING REQUIREMENTS THAT WELFARE
RECIPIENTS BE DRUG-FREE.
In recognition of the fact that American workers are required to be
drug-free in the workplace, it is the sense of Congress that this
concurrent resolution on the budget assumes that the States may require
welfare recipients to be drug-free as a condition for receiving such
benefits and that random drug testing may be used to enforce such
requirements.
SEC. 416. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON AN ACCURATE INDEX FOR INFLATION.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) a significant portion of Federal expenditures and revenues
are indexed to measurements of inflation;
(2) a variety of inflation indices exist which vary according
to the accuracy with which such indices measure increases in the
cost of living; and
(3) Federal Government usage of inflation indices which
overstate true inflation has the demonstrated effect of
accelerating Federal spending, increasing the Federal budget
deficit, increasing Federal borrowing, and thereby enlarging the
projected burden on future American taxpayers.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the
assumptions underlying this budget resolution include that all Federal
spending and revenues which are indexed for inflation should be
calibrated by the most accurate inflation indices which are available
to the Federal Government.
SEC. 417. SENSE OF CONGRESS THAT THE 1993 INCOME TAX INCREASE ON SOCIAL
SECURITY BENEFITS SHOULD BE REPEALED.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) the fiscal year 1994 budget proposal of President Clinton
to raise Federal income taxes on the Social Security benefits of
senior citizens with income as low as $25,000, and those provisions
of the fiscal year 1994 recommendations of the Budget Resolution
and the 1993 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act in which the One
Hundred Third Congress voted to raise Federal income taxes on the
Social Security benefits of senior citizens with income as low as
$34,000 should be repealed;
(2) President Clinton has stated that he believes he raised
Federal taxes too much in 1993; and
(3) the budget resolution should react to President Clinton's
fiscal year 1997 budget which documents the fact that in the
history of the United States, the total tax burden has never been
greater than it is today.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the
assumptions underlying this resolution include--
(1) that raising Federal income taxes in 1993 on the Social
Security benefits of middle-class individuals with income as low as
$34,000 was a mistake;
(2) that the Federal income tax hike on Social Security
benefits imposed in 1993 by the One Hundred Third Congress and
signed into law by President Clinton should be repealed; and
(3) President Clinton should work with Congress to repeal the
1993 Federal income tax hike on Social Security benefits in a
manner that would not adversely affect the Social Security Trust
Fund or the Medicare Part A Trust Fund, and should ensure that such
repeal is coupled with offsetting reductions in Federal spending.
SEC. 418. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION'S PRACTICE
REGARDING THE PROSECUTION OF DRUG SMUGGLERS.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) drug use is devastating to the Nation, particularly among
juveniles, and has led juveniles to become involved in interstate
gangs and to participate in violent crime;
(2) drug use has experienced a dramatic resurgence among our
youth;
(3) the number of youths aged 12-17 using marijuana has
increased from 1.6 million in 1992 to 2.9 million in 1994, and the
category of ``recent marijuana use'' increased a staggering 200
percent among 14- to 15-year-olds over the same period;
(4) since 1992, there has been a 52 percent jump in the number
of high school seniors using drugs on a monthly basis, even as
worrisome declines are noted in peer disapproval of drug use;
(5) 1 in 3 high school students uses marijuana;
(6) 12- to 17-year-olds who use marijuana are 85 percent more
likely to graduate to cocaine than those who abstain from
marijuana;
(7) juveniles who reach 21 without ever having used drugs
almost
2000
never try them later in life;
(8) the latest results from the Drug Abuse Warning Network show
that marijuana-related episodes jumped 39 percent and are running
at 155 percent above the 1990 level, and that methamphetamine cases
have risen 256 percent over the 1991 level;
(9) between February 1993 and February 1995 the retail price of
a gram of cocaine fell from $172 to $137, and that of a gram of
heroin also fell from $2,032 to $1,278;
(10) it has been reported that the Department of Justice,
through the United States Attorney for the Southern District of
California, has adopted a policy of allowing certain foreign drug
smugglers to avoid prosecution altogether by being released to
Mexico;
(11) it has been reported that in the past year approximately
2,300 suspected narcotics traffickers were taken into custody for
bringing illegal drugs across the border, but approximately one in
four were returned to their country of origin without being
prosecuted;
(12) it has been reported that the United States Customs
Service is operating under guidelines limiting any prosecution in
marijuana cases to cases involving 125 pounds of marijuana or more;
(13) it has been reported that suspects possessing as much as
32 pounds of methamphetamine and 37,000 Quaalude tablets were not
prosecuted but were, instead, allowed to return to their countries
of origin after their drugs and vehicles were confiscated;
(14) it has been reported that after a seizure of 158 pounds of
cocaine, one defendant was cited and released because there was no
room at the Federal jail and charges against her were dropped;
(15) it has been reported that some smugglers have been caught
two or more times--even in the same week--yet still were not
prosecuted;
(16) the number of defendants prosecuted for violations of the
Federal drug laws has dropped from 25,033 in 1992 to 22,926 in
1995;
(17) this Congress has increased the funding of the Federal
Bureau of Prisons by 11.7 percent over the 1995 appropriations
level; and
(18) this Congress has increased the funding of the Immigration
and Naturalization Service by 23.5 percent over the 1995
appropriations level.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the function totals and aggregates underlying this
resolution assume that the Attorney General should promptly
investigate this matter and report, within 30 days, to the Chair of
the Senate and House Committees on the Judiciary; and
(2) the Attorney General should ensure that cases involving the
smuggling of drugs into the United States are vigorously
prosecuted.
SEC. 419. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON CORPORATE SUBSIDIES.
It is the sense of Congress that the functional levels and
aggregates in this budget resolution assume that--
(1) the Federal budget contains tens of billions of dollars in
payments, benefits, and programs that primarily assist profit-
making enterprises and industries rather than provide a clear and
compelling public interest;
(2) corporate subsidies can provide unfair competitive
advantages to certain industries and industry segments;
(3) at a time when millions of Americans are being asked to
sacrifice in order to balance the budget, the corporate sector
should bear its share of the burden; and
(4) Federal payments, benefits, and programs which
predominantly benefit a particular industry or segment of an
industry, rather than provide a clear and compelling public
benefit, should be reformed or terminated in order to provide
additional tax relief, deficit reduction, or to achieve the savings
necessary to meet this resolution's instructions and levels.
SEC. 420. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING WELFARE REFORM.
(a) Congress finds that--
(1) this resolution assumes substantial savings from welfare
reform;
(2) children born out of wedlock are five times more likely to
be poor and about ten times more likely to be extremely poor and
therefore are more likely to receive welfare benefits than children
from two-parent families; and
(3) high rates of out-of-wedlock births are associated with a
host of other social pathologies; for example, children of single
mothers are twice as likely to drop out of high school; boys whose
fathers are absent are more likely to engage in criminal
activities; and girls in single-parent families are three times
more likely to have children out of wedlock themselves.
(b) It is the sense of Congress that any comprehensive legislation
sent to the President that balances the budget by a certain date and
that includes welfare reform provisions and that is agreed to by
Congress and the President shall also contain to the maximum extent
possible a strategy for reducing the rate of out-of-wedlock births and
encouraging family formation.
SEC. 421. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON FCC SPECTRUM AUCTIONS.
It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the Congressional Budget Office has scored revenue expected
to be raised from the auction of Federal Communications Commission
licenses for various services;
(2) for budget scoring purposes, Congress has assumed that such
auctions would occur in a prompt and expeditious manner and that
revenue raised by such auctions would flow to the Federal treasury;
(3) this resolution assumes that the revenue to be raised from
auctions totals billions of dollars;
(4) this resolution makes assumptions that services would be
auctioned where the Federal Communications Commission has not yet
conducted auctions for such services, such as Local Multipoint
Distribution Service (LMDS), licenses for paging services, final
broadband PCS licenses, narrow band PCS licenses, licenses for
unserved cellular, and Digital Audio Radio (DARS), and other
subscription services, revenue from which has been assumed in
Congressional budgetary calculations and in determining the level
of the deficit; and
(5) the Commission's service rules can dramatically affect
license values and auction revenues and therefore the Commission
should act expeditiously and without further delay to conduct
auctions of licenses in a manner that maximizes revenue, increases
efficiency, and enhances competition.
SEC. 422. SENSE OF THE HOUSE ON EMERGENCIES.
(a) Findings.--The House of Representatives finds that:
(1) The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 exempted from the
discretionary spending limits and the Pay-As-You-Go requirements
for entitlement and tax legislation funding requirements that are
designated by Congress and the President as an emergency.
(2) Congress and the President have increasingly misused the
emergency designation by--
(A) designating as emergencies funding requirements that
are predictable and do not pose a threat to life, property, or
national security,
(B) designating emergencies with the sole purpose of
circumventing statutory and congressional spending limitations,
and
(C) adding to emergency legislation controversial items
that would not otherwise withstand public scrutiny.
(b) Sense of the House.--It is the sense of the House of
Representatives that in order to balance the Federal budget Congress
should consider alternative approaches to budgeting for emergencies,
including codifying the definition of an emergency, establishing
contingency funds to pay for emergencies, and fully offsetting the
costs of emergencies with rescissions of spending authority that would
have been obligated but for the rescission.
SEC. 423. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON FUNDING TO ASSIST YOUTH AT RISK.
(a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
(1) there is an increasing preva
2000
lence of violence and drug use
among this country's youth;
(2) in recognizing the magnitude of this problem, the Federal
Government must continue to maximize efforts in addressing the
increasing prevalence of violence and drug use among this country's
youth, with necessary adherence to budget guidelines and proven
program effectiveness;
(3) the Federal Bureau of Investigation reports that between
1985 and 1994, juvenile arrests for violent crime increased by 75
percent nationwide;
(4) the United States Attorney General reports that 20 years
ago, fewer than half our cities reported gang activity and now, a
generation later, reasonable estimates indicate that there are more
than 500,000 gang members in more than 16,000 gangs on the streets
of our cities resulting in more than 580,000 gang-related crimes in
1993;
(5) the Justice Department's Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention reports that in 1994, law enforcement
agencies made over 2,700,000 arrests of persons under age 18, with
juveniles accounting for 19 percent of all violent crime arrests
across the country;
(6) the Congressional Task Force on National Drug Policy
recently set forth a series of recommendations for strengthening
the criminal justice and law enforcement effort, including domestic
prevention efforts reinforcing the idea that prevention begins at
home;
(7) the Office of National Drug Control Policy reports that
between 1991 and 1995, marijuana use among 8th, 10th, and 12th
graders has increased and is continuing to spiral upward; and
(8) the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention reports that in
1993, substance abuse played a role in over 70 percent of rapes,
over 60 percent of incidents of child abuse, and almost 60 percent
of murders nationwide.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the
function totals and aggregates underlying this concurrent resolution on
the budget assume that--
(1) sufficient funding should be provided to programs of proven
program effectiveness which assist youth at risk to reduce illegal
drug use and the incidence of youth crime and violence;
(2) priority should be given to determine ``what works''
through scientifically recognized, independent evaluations of
existing programs to maximize the Federal investment and efforts
should be made to reform those programs of no proven benefit;
(3) efforts should be made to ensure coordination and eliminate
duplication among federally supported at-risk youth programs; and
(4) special efforts should be made to increase successful
interdiction of the flow of illegal drugs into the United States
and into communities nationwide.
SEC. 424. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON LONG-TERM TRENDS IN BUDGET ESTIMATES.
It is the sense of the Senate that--
(1) the report accompanying a concurrent resolution on the
budget should include an analysis, prepared after consultation with
the Director of the Congressional Budget Office, of the concurrent
resolution's impact on likely budgetary trends during the next 30
fiscal years; and
(2) the President should include in his budget each year, an
analysis of the budget's impact on revenues and outlays for
entitlements for the period of 30 fiscal years, and that the
President should also include likely budgetary trends during the
next 30 fiscal years, and that the President should also include
generational accounting information each year in the President's
budget.
SEC. 425. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON REPEAL OF THE GAS TAX.
(a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
(1) the President originally proposed a $72,000,000,000 energy
excise tax (the so-called BTU tax) as part of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1993 (OBRA 93) which included a new tax on
transportation fuels;
(2) in response to opposition in the Senate to the BTU tax, the
President and Congress adopted instead a new 4.3 cents per gallon
transportation fuels tax as part of OBRA 93, which represented a 30
percent increase in the existing motor fuels tax;
(3) the OBRA 93 transportation fuels tax has cost American
motorists an estimated $14,000,000,000 to $15,000,000,000 since it
went into effect on October 1, 1993;
(4) the OBRA 93 transportation fuels tax is regressive,
creating a larger financial impact on lower and middle income
motorists than on upper income motorists;
(5) the OBRA 93 transportation fuels tax imposes a
disproportionate burden on rural citizens who do not have access to
public transportation services, and who must rely on their
automobiles and drive long distances, to work, to shop, and to
receive medical care;
(6) the average American faces a substantial tax burden, and
the increase of this tax burden through the OBRA 93 transportation
fuels tax represented and continues to represent an inappropriate
and unwarranted means of reducing the Nation's budget deficit;
(7) retail gasoline prices in the United States have increased
an average of 19 cents per gallon since the beginning of the year
to the highest level since the Persian Gulf War, and the OBRA 93
transportation fuels tax exacerbates the impact of this price
increase on consumers;
(8) continuation of the OBRA 93 transportation fuels tax will
exacerbate the impact on consumers of any future gasoline price
spikes that result from market conditions; and
(9) the fiscal year 1997 budget resolution will assume a net
tax cut totaling $122,000,000,000 over six years, which exceeds the
revenue impact of a repeal of the OBRA 93 transportation fuels tax,
and will establish a reserve fund which may be used to provide
other forms of tax relief, including relief from the OBRA 93
transportation fuels tax, on a deficit neutral basis.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the
revenue levels and procedures in this resolution provide that--
(1) Congress and the President should immediately approve
legislation to repeal the 4.3 cents per gallon transportation fuels
tax contained in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993
through the end of 1996;
(2) Congress and the President should approve, through the
fiscal year 1997 budget process, legislation to permanently repeal
the 4.3 cents per gallon transportation fuels tax contained in the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993; and
(3) the savings generated by the repeal of the 4.3 cents per
gallon transportation fuels tax contained in OBRA 93 should be
fully passed on to consumers.
SEC. 426. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING THE USE OF BUDGETARY SAVINGS.
(a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
(1) in August of 1994, the Bipartisan Commission on Entitlement
and Tax Reform issued an Interim Report to the President, which
found that, ``To ensure that today's debt and spending commitments
do not unfairly burden America's children, the Government must act
now. A bipartisan coalition of Congress, led by the President, must
resolve the long-term imbalance between the Government's
entitlement promises and the funds it will have available to pay
for them'';
(2) unless Congress and the President act together in a
bipartisan way, overall Federal spending is projected by the
Commission to rise from the current level of slightly over 22
percent of the Gross Domestic Product of the United States
(hereafter in this section referred as ``GDP'') to over 37 percent
of GDP by the year 2030;
(3) the source of that growth is not domestic discretionary
spending, which is approximately the same portion of GDP now as it
was in 1969, the last time at which the Federal budget was in
b
2000
alance;
(4) mandatory spending was only 29.6 percent of the Federal
budget in 1963, but is estimated to account for 72 percent of the
Federal budget in the year 2003;
(5) Social Security, Medicare and medicaid, together with
interest on the national debt, are the largest sources of the
growth of mandatory spending;
(6) ensuring the long-term future of the Social Security system
is essential to protecting the retirement security of the American
people;
(7) the Social Security Trust Fund is projected to begin
spending more than it takes in by approximately the year 2013, with
Federal budget deficits rising rapidly thereafter unless
appropriate policy changes are made;
(8) ensuring the future of Medicare and medicaid is essential
to protecting access to high-quality health care for senior
citizens and poor women and children;
(9) Federal health care expenses have been rising at double
digit rates, and are projected to triple to 11 percent of GDP by
the year 2030 unless appropriate policy changes are made; and
(10) due to demographic factors, Federal health care expenses
are projected to double by the year 2030, even if health care cost
inflation is restrained after 1999, so that costs for each person
of a given age grow no faster than the economy.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that budget
savings in the mandatory spending area should be used--
(1) to protect and enhance the retirement security of the
American people by ensuring the long-term future of the Social
Security system;
(2) to protect and enhance the health care security of senior
citizens and poor Americans by ensuring the long-term future of
Medicare and medicaid; and
(3) to restore and maintain Federal budget discipline, to
ensure that the level of private investment necessary for long-term
economic growth and prosperity is available.
SEC. 427. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING THE TRANSFER OF EXCESS
GOVERNMENT COMPUTERS TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
(a) Assumptions.--The figures contained in this resolution are
based on the following assumptions:
(1) America's children must obtain the necessary skills and
tools needed to succeed in the technologically advanced 21st
century;
(2) Executive Order 12999 outlines the need to make modern
computer technology an integral part of every classroom, provide
teachers with the professional development they need to use new
technologies effectively, connect classrooms to the National
Information Infrastructure, and encourage the creation of excellent
education software;
(3) many private corporations have donated educational software
to schools, which are lacking the necessary computer hardware to
utilize this equipment;
(4) current inventories of excess Federal Government computers
are being conducted in each Federal agency; and
(5) there is no current communication being made between
Federal agencies with this excess equipment and the schools in need
of these computers.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the
functional totals and aggregates in this budget resolution assume that
the General Services Administration should place a high priority on
facilitating direct transfer of excess Federal Government computers to
public schools and community-based educational organizations.
SEC. 428. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON FEDERAL RETREATS.
It is the sense of the Senate that the assumptions underlying the
function totals and aggregates in this resolution assume that all
Federal agencies will refrain from using Federal funds for expenses
incurred during training sessions or retreats off Federal property,
unless Federal property is not available.
SEC. 429. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING THE ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE
PROGRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
(a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
(1) the essential air service program of the Department of
Transportation under subchapter II of chapter 417 of title 49,
United States Code--
(A) provides essential airline access to isolated rural
communities across the United States;
(B) is necessary for the economic growth and development of
rural communities;
(C) connects small rural communities to the national air
transportation system of the United States;
(D) is a critical component of the national transportation
system of the United States; and
(E) provides air service to 108 communities in 30 States;
and
(2) the National Commission to Ensure a Strong Competitive
Airline Industry established under section 204 of the Airport and
Airway Safety, Capacity, Noise Improvement, and Intermodal
Transportation Act of 1992 recommended maintaining the essential
air service program with a sufficient level of funding to continue
to provide air service to small communities.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the
essential air service program of the Department of Transportation under
subchapter II of chapter 417 of title 49, United States Code, should
receive a sufficient level of funding to continue to provide air
service to small rural communities that qualify for assistance under
the program.
SEC. 430. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING EQUAL RETIREMENT SAVINGS FOR
HOMEMAKERS.
(a) Findings.--The Senate finds that the assumptions of this budget
resolution take into account that--
(1) by teaching and feeding our children and caring for our
elderly, American homemakers are an important, vital part of our
society;
(2) homemakers retirement needs are the same as all Americans,
and thus they need every opportunity to save and invest for
retirement;
(3) because they are living on a single income, homemakers and
their spouses often have less income for savings;
(4) individual retirement accounts are provided by Congress in
the Internal Revenue Code to assist Americans for retirement
savings;
(5) currently, individual retirement accounts permit workers
other than homemakers to make deductible contributions of $2,000 a
year, but limit homemakers to deductible contributions of $250 a
year; and
(6) limiting homemakers individual retirement account
contributions to an amount less than the contributions of other
workers discriminates against homemakers.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the
revenue level assumed in this budget resolution provides for
legislation to make individual retirement account deductible
contribution limits for homemakers equal to the individual retirement
account deductible contribution limits for all other American workers,
and that Congress and the President should immediately approve such
legislation in the appropriate reconciliation vehicle.
SEC. 431. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
FUNDING FOR ANTI-ADDICTION DRUGS.
It is the sense of the Senate that amounts appropriated for the
National Institutes of Health should provide funding for additional
research on an anti-addiction drug to block the craving for illicit
addictive substances.
SEC. 432. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF THE EMPLOYER
EDUCATION ASSISTANCE EXCLUSION UNDER SECTION 127 OF THE
INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986.
(a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
(1) since 1978, over 7,000,000 American workers have benefited
from the employer education assistance exclusion under section 127
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by being able to improve their
education and acquire new skills without having to pay taxes on the
benefit;
(2) American companies have benefited by improving the
educa
2000
tion and skills of their employees who in turn can contribute
more to their company;
(3) the American economy becomes more globally competitive
because an educated workforce is able to produce more and to adapt
more rapidly to changing technologies;
(4) American companies are experiencing unprecedented global
competition and the value and necessity of life-long education for
their employees has increased;
(5) the employer education assistance exclusion was first
enacted in 1978;
(6) the exclusion has been extended 7 previous times;
(7) the last extension expired December 31, 1994; and
(8) the exclusion has received broad bipartisan support.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the
revenue level assumed in the budget resolution accommodate an extension
of the employer education assistance exclusion under section 127 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 from January 1, 1995, through December
31, 1996.
SEC. 433. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ADMINISTRATION PLACING HIGH PRIORITY ON MAINTAINING
FIELD-BASED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTATIVES.
(a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings:
(1) The Economic Development Administration plays a crucial
role in helping economically disadvantaged regions of the United
States develop infrastructure that supports and promotes greater
economic activity and growth, particularly in nonurban regions.
(2) The Economic Development Administration helps to promote
industrial park development, business incubators, water and sewer
system improvements, vocational and technical training facilities,
tourism development strategies, technical assistance and capacity
building for local governments, economic adjustment strategies,
revolving loan funds, and other projects which the private sector
has not generated or will not generate without some assistance from
the Government through the Economic Development Administration.
(3) The Economic Development Administration maintains 6
regional offices which oversee staff that are designated field-
based representatives of the Economic Development Administration,
and these field-based representatives provide valuable expertise
and counseling on economic planning and development to nonurban
communities.
(4) The Economic Development Administration Regional Centers
are located in the urban areas of Austin, Seattle, Denver, Atlanta,
Philadelphia, and Chicago.
(5) Because of a 37-percent reduction in approved funding for
salaries and expenses from fiscal year 1995, the Economic
Development Administration has initiated staff reductions requiring
the elimination of 8 field-based positions. The field-based
economic development representative positions that are either being
eliminated or not replaced after voluntary retirement and which
currently interact with nonurban communities on economic
development efforts cover the States of New Mexico, Arizona,
Nevada, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Illinois, Indiana, Maine,
Connecticut, Rhode Island, and North Carolina.
(6) These staff cutbacks will adversely affect States with very
low per-capita personal income, including New Mexico which ranks
47th in the Nation in per-capita personal income, Oklahoma ranking
46th, North Dakota ranking 42nd, Arizona ranking 35th, Maine
ranking 34th, and North Carolina ranking 33rd.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the
functional totals and aggregates underlying this budget resolution
assume that--
(1) it is regrettable that the Economic Development
Administration has elected to reduce field-based economic
development representatives who are fulfilling the Economic
Development Administration's mission of interacting with and
counseling nonurban communities in economically disadvantaged
regions of the United States;
(2) the Economic Development Administration should take all
necessary and appropriate actions to ensure that field-based
economic development representation receives high priority; and
(3) the Economic Development Administration should reconsider
the planned termination of field-based economic development
representatives responsible for States that are economically
disadvantaged, and that this reconsideration take place without
delay.
SEC. 434. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON LIHEAP.
(a) Findings.--The Senate finds that:
(1) home energy assistance for working and low-income families
with children, the elderly on fixed incomes, the disabled, and
others who need such aid is a critical part of the social safety
net in cold-weather areas during the winter, and a source of
necessary cooling aid during the summer;
(2) LIHEAP is a highly targeted, cost-effective way to help
millions of low-income Americans pay their home energy bills. More
than two-thirds of LIHEAP-eligible households have annual incomes
of less than $8,000, more than one half have annual incomes below
$6,000; and
(3) LIHEAP funding has been substantially reduced in recent
years, and cannot sustain further spending cuts if the program is
to remain a viable means of meeting the home heating and other
energy-related needs of low-income families, especially those in
cold-weather States.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--The assumptions underlying this budget
resolution assume that it is the sense of the Senate that the funds
made available for LIHEAP for fiscal year 1997 will be not less than
the actual expenditures made for LIHEAP in fiscal year 1996.
SEC. 435. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON DAVIS-BACON.
Notwithstanding any provision of this resolution, it is the sense
of the Senate that the provisions in this resolution do not assume the
repeal but rather reform of the Davis-Bacon Act.
SEC. 436. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON REIMBURSEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR
OPERATIONS SOUTHERN WATCH AND PROVIDE COMFORT.
(a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
(1) as of May 1996, the United States has spent $2,937,000,000
of United States taxpayer funds since the conclusion of the Gulf
War in 1991 for the singular purpose of protecting the Kurdish and
Shiite population from Iraqi aggression;
(2) the President's defense budget request for 1997 includes an
additional $590,100,000 for Operations Southern Watch and Provide
Comfort, both of which are designed to restrict Iraqi military
aggression against the Kurdish and Shiite people of Iraq;
(3) costs for these military operations constitute part of the
continued budget deficit of the United States; and
(4) United Nations Security Council Resolution 986 (1995)
(referred to as ``SCR 986'') would allow Iraq to sell up to
$1,000,000,000 in petroleum and petroleum products every 90 days,
for an initial period of 180 days.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the
assumptions underlying the function totals and aggregates in this
resolution assume that--
(1) the President should instruct the United States Permanent
Representative to the United Nations to ensure any subsequent
extension of authority beyond the 180 days originally provided by
SCR 986 specifically mandates and authorizes the reimbursement of
the United States for costs associated with Operations Southern
Watch and Provide Comfort out of revenues generated by any sale of
petroleum or petroleum-related products originating from Iraq;
(2) in the event that the United States Permanent
Representative to the United Nations fails to modify the terms of
any subsequent resolution extending the authority granted by SCR
986 as called for in paragraph (1), the President should reject any
United Nations' action or r
eaa
esolution seeking to extend the terms of
the oil sale beyond the 180 days authorized by SCR 986;
(3) the President should take the necessary steps to ensure
that--
(A) any effort by the United Nations to temporarily lift
the trade embargo for humanitarian purposes, specifically the
sale of petroleum or petroleum products, restricts all revenues
from such sale from being diverted to benefit the Iraqi
military; and
(B) the temporary lifting of the trade embargo does not
encourage other countries to take steps to begin promoting
commercial relations with the Iraqi military in expectation
that sanctions will be permanently lifted; and
(4) revenues reimbursed to the United States from the oil sale
authorized by SCR 986, or any subsequent action or resolution,
should be used to reduce the Federal budget deficit.
SEC. 437. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON SOLVENCY OF THE MEDICARE TRUST FUND.
(a) Findings.--The Senate finds that repeal of certain provisions
from the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 would move the
insolvency date of the HI (Medicare) Trust Fund forward by a full year.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that no
provisions in this budget resolution should worsen the solvency of the
Medicare Trust Fund.
SEC. 438. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN
FUND.
It is the sense of the Senate that the assumptions underlying the
functional totals in this resolution assume that when the Finance
Committee meets its outlay and revenue obligations under this
resolution the committee should not make any changes in the
Presidential Election Campaign Fund or its funding mechanism and should
meet its revenue and outlay targets through other programs within its
jurisdiction.
SEC. 439. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING THE FUNDING OF AMTRAK.
(a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
(1) a capital funding stream is essential to the ability of the
National Rail Passenger Corporation (``Amtrak'') to reduce its
dependence on Federal operating support; and
(2) Amtrak needs a secure source of financing, no less
favorable than provided to other modes of transportation, for
capital improvements.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that--
(1) revenues attributable to one-half cent per gallon of the
excise taxes imposed on gasoline, special motor fuel, and diesel
fuel from the Mass Transit Account should be dedicated to a new
Intercity Passenger Rail Trust Fund during the period January 1,
1997, through September 30, 2001;
(2) revenues would not be deposited in the Intercity Passenger
Rail Trust Fund during any fiscal year to the extent that the
deposit is estimated to result in available revenues in the Mass
Transit Account being insufficient to satisfy that year's estimated
appropriation levels;
(3) monies in the Intercity Passenger Rail Trust Fund should be
generally available to fund, on a reimbursement basis, capital
expenditures incurred by Amtrak;
(4) amounts to fund capital expenditures related to rail
operations should be set aside for each State that has not had
Amtrak service in such State for the preceding year; and
(5) funding provided by the Intercity Passenger Rail Trust Fund
shall be made available subject to appropriations and shall not
increase mandatory spending.
Attest:
Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Attest:
Secretary of the Senate.
0