16fc COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 70962 ALICE S. HARRIS, ET AL. : : Plaintiffs-Appellants : : JOURNAL ENTRY -vs- : AND : OPINION MT. SINAI MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL. : : Defendants-Appellees : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT APRIL 10, 1997 OF DECISION CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING Civil appeal from Court of Common Pleas Case No. 273729 JUDGMENT Appeal dismissed. DATE OF JOURNALIZATION APPEARANCES: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: For Defendants-Appellees Mt. Sinai Medical Center, K. Rao, KOJO O. AGYEMAN, ESQ. M.D. and J. Evans, R.N.: Agyeman & Agyeman 350 Park Plaza STEVEN W. ALBERT, ESQ. 1111 Chester Avenue ANDREW S. POLLIS, ESQ. Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3516 SHARON A. RIEGEL, ESQ. Hahn Loeser & Parks, L.L.P. 3300 BP America Building 200 Public Square Cleveland, Ohio 44114-2301 [continued on next page] For Defendants-Appellees Deborah Clark, M.D., Hough Norwood Managed Care and Cleveland Neighborhood Health Services, Inc.: MARK W. GROEDEL, ESQ. BRIAN D. SULLIVAN, ESQ. Reminger & Reminger Co., L.P.A. 113 St. Clair Building Cleveland, Ohio 44114 - 3 - JAMES M. PORTER, J., Plaintiffs-appellants Alice S. Harris, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Johnny Lee Harris Stoudmire, Deceased, and Johnny Lee Stoudmire, father of the deceased, appeal from the jury verdict and rulings in favor of defendants- appellants Mt. Sinai Medical Center, its resident physician, Dr. Kenny Rao and J. Evans, R.N. Plaintiffs also appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of defendants-appellees Deborah Clark, M.D. and Hough Norwood Managed Care and Cleveland Neighborhood Health Services, Inc. Since the record does not contain a final appealable order, we are compelled to dismiss the appeal. After plaintiffs' opening statement, the parties agreed to dismiss defendant Dr. Carol Gilles without prejudice. The following statement appears on the record: Mr. Albert: *** At the sidebar and during the afternoon recess, the defense moved for a directed verdict on behalf of Dr. Gilles. In subsequent discussions with Plaintiff's counsel, Plaintiff's counsel agreed to involuntary dismissal, without prejudice, of Dr. Gilles. Is that correct? Ms. Agyekum: Without prejudice; that's correct. This is all that appears on the record regarding the dismissal of Dr. Gilles. Pursuant to Civ.R. 41(A)(1), a dismissal by agreement of the parties can only be done without order of the court "at any time before the commencement of trial." The dismissal in the case herein occurred after the commencement of trial and therefore must - 4 - be dismissed by order of the court pursuant to Civ.R. 41(A)(2). Lilly v. Lilly (1985), 26 Ohio App.3d 192, 193; Douthitt v. Garrison (1981), 3 Ohio App.3d 254, 256. Without a journalized order dismissing Dr. Gilles the claim against her is still outstanding. Until Dr. Gilles is dismissed by court order or an entry specifying "no just reason for delay," pursuant to Civ.R. 54(B), this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiffs' appeal. Watt v. Ford Motor Co. (June 2, 1994), Cuyahoga App. No. 64848, 64849, 65053, 65053 and 65055, unreported. Appeal dismissed for lack of a final appealable order. Case to be reinstated at earliest feasible time. - 5 - It is ordered that appellees recover of appellants its costs herein taxed. It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this Court directing the Court of Common Pleas to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. JAMES D. SWEENEY, C.J., and PATTON, J., CONCUR. JAMES M. PORTER JUDGE N.B. This entry is an announcement of the court's decision. See App.R. 22(B), 22(D) and 26(A); Loc.App.R. 27. This decision will be journalized and will become the judgment and order of the court pursuant to App.R. 22(E) unless a motion for reconsideration with supporting brief, per App.R. 26(A), is filed within ten (10) days of the announcement of the court's decision. The time period for review by the Supreme Court of Ohio shall begin to run upon the journalization of this court's announcement of decision by the . 0