824 Subj : Re: TNG vs TOS - anybody still think Next Generation sucks? To : alt.tv.star-trek.tos From : George Peatty Date : Thu Sep 29 2005 12:00:51 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos In article , Chris Basken says... [snip] >Interesting. I found TNG's first season to be about equal to TOS at its >best. Hokey but earnest. > >The second season was much like the first, just a bit more polished (and >while I like Diana Muldur, I chafed at the writers' obvious ploy to >create TNG's version of Dr. McCoy). > >The third season was the shining point in TNG, IMHO. Almost flawless, >even the worst episodes were better than much of seasons 1 and 2. > >The fourth was good, but it felt like they were struggling to maintain >the quality of season 3. Still, some very good S4 episodes. > >The fifth season couldn't maintain it and began degenerating into really >obvious formula. In many respects this season reminded me of season 2. > >The sixth season continued the downward spiral as the creators' >attention was split between TNG and DS9. That DS9 managed to >(eventually, anyway) break from the Trek mold only made TNG seem more >stale. How many times can we see Data drone on about how Soong >programmed him and how it made him different (yet similar) to humans? >("He kept talking and talking in one long incredibly unbroken sentence >jumping from topic to topic so that no one could interrupt him...") > >The seventh season was the season that shouldn't have been (literally; >Roddenberry only wanted to go to six). It seemed every other story was >about Worf having trouble with Alexander or the Cardassians twirling >their mustaches or the holodeck not performing up to spec. _All Good >Things_ was the bright exception. I disagree about seasons five and six .. I think TNG didn't start to slip until well into season six, and even by season seven was still better than season one. However, I have favorite episodes from every season, including one and seven. . 0