76d Subj : Re: Why do Romulans have ridges? To : rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.startrek.current,alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise,alt.tv.star-trek.next-gen,alt.tv.star-trek.ds9 From : ANIM8Rfsk Date : Tue Oct 04 2005 06:52:55 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise in article Lvp0f.6766$U51.5796@news-server.bigpond.net.au, Fozzi at efor6920@bigpond.net.au wrote on 10/3/05 11:42 PM: > > "ANIM8Rfsk" wrote in message > news:BF67324E.552D4%ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net... >> in article rkV%e.5289$U51.3545@news-server.bigpond.net.au, Fozzi at >> efor6920@bigpond.net.au wrote on 10/2/05 11:06 AM: >> >>> >>> "Gerald Meazell" wrote in message >>> news:gQS%e.4468$oO2.3855@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net... >>>> electrictroy@gmail.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> So why the ridges? 2000 years is NOT a long enough time to evolve a >>>>> whole new species. >>>> >>>> This whole discussion is quite interesting but I suppose a more >>>> practical >>>> and believable explanation would be that when the separatist Vulcans >>>> arrived on Romulus, there was another species there and they bred with >>>> them. Over time, the other species was fully absorbed and the result is >>>> neither Vulcan nor the other, but Romulan. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Gerald >>> >>> Also a very good rationalisation, IMO >>> >>> cheers >>> Fozzi >>> >>> >> Except for the whole 'doesn't match any of the facts shown' part, sure. >> > > Doesnt match the facts as shown in a way that satisfies you, guess what we > are not obligated to satisfy you, you are of course fully within your rights > to be as narrowminded and petty as you wish, doesnt mean we have to follow > suit just because a self appointed gate keeper of canon says so > > fozzi > > yawn enjoy your fanwanks just remember that's all they are -- You Can't Stop the Signal . 0