6b8
Subj : Re: This Train Just Went Splat!
To   : alt.tv.er
From : Dropping The Helicopter
Date : Tue Sep 27 2005 07:13:27

From Newsgroup: alt.tv.er

Ellen K Hursh wrote:
> Dropping The Helicopter wrote:
> 
>> DawnK wrote:
>>> "Sharon" <askformyaddy@nospamhotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:11jgabn3t4n07ea@corp.supernews.com...
>>>>> Family bed was not a choice for us either but if I fell asleep while
>>>>> nursing, no big deal.
>>>> Same here. The only time it was a big deal was when I fell asleep while
>>>> baby was nursing on the first side. I'd wake up hours later with baby
>>>> munching away on the same breast while the other was terribly engorged! I
>>>> did that once with all three babies.
> 
>>> Oh no!  I can't remember anymore if Sarah had only gotten one boob, or if we
>>> fell asleep on the second one.  Too many details and too long ago!
>> This rather gruesome tale begs the obvious question: Why two boobs?  Why
>> not just one?  Problem solved, no?
> 
> Because the form of nearly all life on Earth above a certain level of
> sophistication is based on bilateral symmetry - cats, dogs, frogs,
> turtles, bats, Tasmanian devils, people, manta rays, et cetera... like
> cut-out paper snowflakes. (And then there's the appearance of fractals
> in nature, but that's an entirely different subject.) Thus, two breasts
> on a primate, barring injury or congenital defect.
> 

One pee-pee.

>> The design of the human body is in desperate need of a rethink if'n you
>> ask me.
> 
> Considering that it's designed so that the sewer system runs right
> through the recreational area, I'd say so.
> 

Indeed.  The problem is, where the heck do ya start!?!

.

0