62a
Subj : Re: This Train Just Went Splat!
To   : alt.tv.er
From : Ellen K Hursh
Date : Mon Sep 26 2005 22:55:52

From Newsgroup: alt.tv.er

Dropping The Helicopter wrote:

> DawnK wrote:
> > "Sharon" <askformyaddy@nospamhotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:11jgabn3t4n07ea@corp.supernews.com...
> >>> Family bed was not a choice for us either but if I fell asleep while
> >>> nursing, no big deal.
> >> Same here. The only time it was a big deal was when I fell asleep while
> >> baby was nursing on the first side. I'd wake up hours later with baby
> >> munching away on the same breast while the other was terribly engorged! I
> >> did that once with all three babies.

> > Oh no!  I can't remember anymore if Sarah had only gotten one boob, or if we
> > fell asleep on the second one.  Too many details and too long ago!
>
> This rather gruesome tale begs the obvious question: Why two boobs?  Why
> not just one?  Problem solved, no?

Because the form of nearly all life on Earth above a certain level of
sophistication is based on bilateral symmetry - cats, dogs, frogs,
turtles, bats, Tasmanian devils, people, manta rays, et cetera... like
cut-out paper snowflakes. (And then there's the appearance of fractals
in nature, but that's an entirely different subject.) Thus, two breasts
on a primate, barring injury or congenital defect.

> The design of the human body is in desperate need of a rethink if'n you
> ask me.

Considering that it's designed so that the sewer system runs right
through the recreational area, I'd say so.

.

0