17f
Subj : Re: Memory visibility and MS Interlocked instructions
To   : comp.programming.threads
From : Sean Kelly
Date : Fri Sep 02 2005 09:34 am

Sean Kelly wrote:
>
> Oops, you're right.  It allows for a load to occur while a store is
> processing.  My mistake.

And it imposes no global ordeing of stores.  Though I gather LOCK fills
this role on the x86.


Sean

.

0