e32 Subj : static member variable To : comp.programming.threads From : nin234 Date : Wed Feb 23 2005 08:17 am I tried searching the newgroups for an answer to this question. I found many related topics, but didn't find the exact answer I am looking for. I am implementing a class to aid in the logging for our product as follows. Code snippet is as follows. //Header file srvLog.h starts here enum eErrLvl { eLOG_DEBUG_5 = 1, eLOG_DEBUG_4, eLOG_DEBUG_3, eLOG_DEBUG_2, eLOG_DEBUG_1, eLOG_INFO, eLOG_WARNING, eLOG_ERROR, eLOG_FATAL }; std::ostream& operator << (std::ostream&, eErrLvl&); class srvLog { static int nLglvl; eErrLvl nSeverity; public: srvLog () {} static void setlvl (int lvl) { nLglvl = lvl; } const srvLog& operator () (eErrLvl nSvrty) { nSeverity = nSvrty; return *this;} friend std::ostream& operator << (std::ostream& , const srvLog&); }; //Source file srvLog.C starts here int srvLog::nLglvl = eLOG_ERROR; std::ostream& operator << (std::ostream& os, eErrLvl& eLvl) { switch (eLvl) { case eLOG_DEBUG_5: case eLOG_DEBUG_4: case eLOG_DEBUG_3: case eLOG_DEBUG_2: case eLOG_DEBUG_1: os << "Debug\t: "; break; case eLOG_INFO: os << "Info\t: "; break; case eLOG_WARNING: os << "Warn\t: "; break; case eLOG_ERROR: os << "Error\t: "; break; case eLOG_FATAL: os << "Fatal\t: "; break; } return os; } std::ostream& operator << (std::ostream& os, const srvLog& oLog) { if (oLog.nSeverity >= oLog::nLglvl) os.clear(); else { os.clear (std::ios::failbit); return os; } char msg[100]; //memset (msg, '\0', 100); struct timeval now; gettimeofday (&now, NULL); struct tm *pTm = localtime (&now.tv_sec); strftime (msg, 100, "%c ", pTm); os << msg << oLog.nSeverity; return os; } //Sample use case int main () { srvLog lgstrt; //Class A A ainst; std::cerr << lgstrt(eLOG_FATAL) << "more to log " << ainst << std::endl; pthread_create (, threadA, ... , ...); pthread_create (, threadB, ... , ...); } //ThreadA in a different file and shared library void threadA () { srvLog lgstrt; //Class A A ainst; std::cerr << lgstrt(eLOG_FATAL) << "more to log " << ainst << std::end; } //ThreadB in a different file and shared library void threadB () { srvLog lgstrt; //Class A A ainst; std::cerr << lgstrt(eLOG_FATAL) << "more to log " << ainst << std::endl; } Logging is controlled by the nLglvl static variable. This is part of a daemon. So the logging is to a file and the value of nLglvl will be set by a command line tool. My questions are the following 1) Is the value of nLglvl shared by threadA, threadB and main() thread. 2)Where should I call setlvl()? 3) If the answer to 1) is yes. Is it really required to use locking in this scenario. Because the change to the value of nLglvl will be infrequent and I can live with some bad reads. I am using POSIX threads. Linux and solaris are the current environments. It must be portable to all unix flavors. Ninan . 0