263
Subj : Re: Non-strictly-conforming and unspecified versus undefined behavior
To   : comp.programming.threads,comp.std.c
From : Alexander Terekhov
Date : Wed Feb 23 2005 11:15 am


David Schwartz wrote:
[...]
>     This assumes threads don't share all their memory. I thought your entire
> purpose in this thread was to keep things so that they do.

Again, implementation details are irrelevant. It's about __thread 
lvalues, distinct addresses of __thread designated objects, and 
sharing of objects with thread storage duration within a 
process/"program"/enclave. 

regards,
alexander.

.

0