2a0
Subj : Re: Proper behavior of uneval(-0.0) ?
To   : Brendan Eich <brendan@meer.net>
From : Igor Bukanov <igor@fastmail.fm>
Date : Wed Nov 12 2003 10:38 pm

Brendan Eich wrote:
> Igor Bukanov wrote:
> 
>>
>> Currently in SM uneval(-0.0) gives "0". Should it be "-0.0" instead? 
> 
> 
> 
> Whatever we do with the sign, I see no reason to preserve the .0 after 
> the 0, or any other spelling (-0.0000, e.g.).

-0 would be fine of cause as all numbers in JS are double values but 
after programming in typed languages where -0 would just mean integer 
zero while -0.0 gives that negative double zero it is hard to write 
simply -0.

Regards, Igor

.

0