485
Subj : Re: Can you mimic atexit() for class functions?
To   : borland.public.cpp.borlandcpp
From : "Benjamin Pratt" <benjamin.pratt.getridofthis@verizon.net>
Date : Thu Oct 09 2003 02:05 pm

You should read the posts before replying.

> You asked for help and I gave it.
No I didn't, that was 'gary'.

> You then argue and decide that the
> standard doesn't tell of these things.
First, 'Jeff Kish' pointed out that the order of creation/destruction of
static/global objects is not defined. (that's not arguing, and that not me
either)

Second, you reply to Jeff detailing destruction of automatics and objects
created with new. Obviously, you didn't read Jeff's post since his comment
related to globals and statics.

To clarify your hasty post, I asserted that Jeff is indeed correct. The
destruction ORDER of GLOBALS and STATIC is NOT defined by the standard. I
respectfully asked you to point to where in the standard this is refuted.

Again, you missed the fact that we a discussing the ORDER of globals and
statics being destructed.

> You then argue
No, you are the only one to take a argumentative tone, until now.

.

0